Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )

Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [   ]      

CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX:
Check the appropriate box:
[   ] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[   ] Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
Definitive Proxy Statement
Definitive Additional Materials
Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12
[   ]Confidential, For Use of the
Commission Only (as permitted
by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[X]Definitive Proxy Statement
[   ]Definitive Additional Materials

Norfolk Southern Corporation

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)PAYMENT OF FILING FEE (CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX):
[X] No fee required.
[   ]Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4)(1) and 0-11.
1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
5)Total fee paid:
[   ]Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:
[   ]Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.
1)Amount previously paid:
2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
3)Filing Party:
4)Date Filed:
4) Date Filed:


Table of Contents




Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

NoticeCertain statements in this proxy statement are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the 2015 Annual Meeting
safe harbor provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended, including but not limited to statements included in the section titled “Business Highlights.” In some cases, forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of words like “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plan,” “consider,” “project,” and 2015 Proxy Statement


Thursday, May 14, 2015,similar references to the future. Forward-looking statements are made as of the date they were first issued and reflect the good-faith evaluation of Norfolk Southern Corporation’s (“Norfolk Southern” or the “Corporation”) management of information currently available. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Corporation’s control. These and other important factors, including those discussed under “Risk Factors” in the Corporation’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, as well as the Corporation’s other public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), may cause our actual results, performance or achievement to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are not, and should not be relied upon as, a guarantee of future performance or results, nor will they necessarily prove to be accurate indications of the times at 8:30 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time
Conference Center, Williamsburg Lodge, South England Street, Williamsburg, Virginiaor by which any such performance or results will be achieved. As a result, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, the occurrence of certain events or otherwise, unless otherwise required by applicable securities law.





Table of Contents


NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATIONNORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
Three Commercial Place, Norfolk, Virginia 23510

Thursday, May 14, 2015
8:30 A.M., Eastern Daylight Time
Conference Center, Williamsburg Lodge, South England Street, Williamsburg, Virginia

Agenda
Three Commercial Place, Norfolk, Virginia 23510

NOTICE OF 2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

DATE AND TIME
We will hold ourThursday, May 10, 2018, 8:30 A.M., Eastern Daylight Time

LOCATION
Hilton Norfolk The Main
100 East Main Street
Norfolk, Virginia 23510

AGENDA
At the Annual Meeting, of Stockholders forshareholders will vote on the following purposes:items:

1.     Election of thirteen12 directors for one year terms ending in 2016.
a one-year term.
2.Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, as our independent auditors for 2015.
2018.
3.Approval by non-binding vote, of advisory resolution on executive compensation.
4.Approval ofShareholder proposal regarding the Norfolk Southern Corporation Executive Management Incentive Plan, as amended.
5.Approval of the Norfolk Southern Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended.right to act by written consent.

Transaction of suchSuch other business as properly may come before the meeting and any adjournments or postponements of the meeting.postponements.

Record DateRECORD DATE
Only stockholdersshareholders of record as of the close of business on March 5, 2015,1, 2018, will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting.Annual Meeting.

AdmissionVOTING
Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote on each of the items to be voted on at the Annual Meeting.

ADMISSION
Only stockholdersshareholders or their legal proxies may attend the Annual Meeting. To be admitted, you must bring an admission ticket and a valid, government-issued photo identification and – if you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name – proof of stock ownership. Referidentification. Please refer to page 282 for more information about attending the Annual Meeting.

By order of the Board of Directors,

DENISE W. HUTSON
Corporate Secretary

Dated: March 21, 2018

YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT
If you do not expect to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote by telephone or Internet as described below, or, if you received your materials by mail, by completing, dating, and signing the proxy card/voting instruction form, and returning it in the accompanying envelope. You may revoke your proxy or instructions at any time before your shares are voted by following the procedures described in “Voting and Proxies” beginning on page 80.

By orderPROXY VOTING METHODS
Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, please vote right away by using one of the Boardfollowing advance voting methods (see “Voting and Proxies” beginning on page 80 for additional details). Make sure to have the proxy card/voting instruction form or Notice of Directors,
DENISE W. HUTSON
Corporate SecretaryInternet Availability in hand, and follow the instructions. You can vote in advance in one of three ways:

Visit the website listed on the proxy card/voting
instruction form or Notice of Internet Availability to vote
VIA THE INTERNET

Call the telephone number on the proxy card/voting
instruction form or Notice of Internet Availability to vote
BY TELEPHONE

Complete, sign, and date, and then return the
proxy card/voting instruction form in the
enclosed envelope to vote
BY MAIL




 
Dated: March 25, 2015

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
FOR THE STOCKHOLDERSHAREHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 14, 201510, 2018

Pursuant to rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), we have elected to provide access to our proxy materials overby notifying you of the availability of our proxy materials on the Internet. Accordingly,On March 21, 2018, we are sending aan Important Notice ofRegarding the Availability of Proxy Materials or Notice,(the “Notice of Internet Availability”) to certain of our stockholdersshareholders of record, and we are sending a paper copy of the proxy materials to employee plan participants and proxy card to other stockholdersthose shareholders of record who we believe would prefer receiving such materials inhave requested a paper form.copy. Brokers and other nominees who hold shares on behalf of beneficial owners may be sending their own similar Notice.notice.

In accordance with SEC rules, you may access our noticeNotice and proxy statement andProxy Statement, our Annual Report, and our form of proxy at www.voteproxy.com,http://www.proxyvote.com, which does not have “cookies” that identify visitors to the site. The Notice of Internet Availability also includes instructions for requestingshareholders to request, at no charge, a printed copy of thethese materials. The notice and proxy statement are also available at that web site. In addition, this proxy statementour Notice and ourProxy Statement and Annual Report are available on our web sitewebsite at www.norfolksouthern.com.www.nscorp.com.


2015 Proxy Statement     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION



Table of Contents

If you do not expect to attend the meeting, we urge you to provide your proxy by marking, dating and signing the proxy card and returning it in the accompanying envelope, or by submitting your proxy over the telephone or the Internet as more particularly described on the proxy card. You may revoke your proxy at any time before your shares are voted by following the procedures described in the proxy statement.



Advance Voting Methods

Even if you plan to attend the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in person, please vote right away using one of the following advance voting methods (see page 1 for additional details). Make sure to have your proxy card or voting instruction form in hand and follow the instructions. You can vote in advance in one of four ways:



Visit the website listed on your proxy card/voting instruction form to vote VIA THE INTERNET

Call the telephone number on your proxy card/voting instruction form to vote BY TELEPHONE

Sign, date and return your proxy card/voting instruction form in the enclosed envelope to vote BY MAIL

Scan the QR code found at the end of this statement to vote VIA MOBILE DEVICE



2015 Proxy Statement     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION



Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

GENERAL INFORMATION1
2015 PROXY SUMMARY4
DIRECTOR NOMINEES5
BOARD OF DIRECTOR PROPOSALS6
BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS7
TOTAL STOCKHOLDER RETURNS8
COMPENSATION ALIGNMENT8
PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE10
ITEM 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS10
ITEM 2: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM15
ITEM 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION16
ITEM 4: APPROVAL OF NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE
PLAN, AS AMENDED17
ITEM 5: APPROVAL OF NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN,
AS AMENDED21
OTHER MATTERS27
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF STOCK28
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE30
BOARD OF DIRECTORS31
COMPOSITION AND ATTENDANCE31
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE31
QUALIFICATIONS OF DIRECTORS AND NOMINEES33
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE34
RETIREMENT POLICY35
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS36
NARRATIVE TO NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE37
RISK OVERSIGHT39
COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD39
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT44
RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS44
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION45
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION45
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS45
KEY CHANGES45
COMPENSATION TABLES62
RETIREMENT BENEFITS70
DEFERRED COMPENSATION71
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON A CHANGE IN CONTROL OR OTHER TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT72
COMPENSATION POLICY RISK ASSESSMENT81
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT82
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL DEADLINES82
APPENDICES

2015 Proxy Statement     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION



Table of Contents

Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

GENERAL INFORMATION  

March 21, 2018

Fellow Shareholder,

On behalf of your Board of Directors, I invite you to join us at our 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on Thursday, May 10, 2018, in Norfolk, Virginia. Details of the meeting’s location and time are provided in the Notice of Meeting. I encourage you to review the proxy materials and vote as soon as possible even if you are planning to join us at the Annual Meeting. Youmay vote by telephone or over the Internet, or, if you receive these materials by mail, by completing, signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card/voting instruction form. Your vote is important to us.

GENERAL INFORMATIONOver the past year, the Board has remained focused on overseeing the successful implementation of Norfolk Southern’s strategic plan. That plan - which we launched in early 2016 - focuses on four core principles: safety, service, productivity, and growth. The Board strongly supports Norfolk Southern’s senior management team and is confident that this team provides the right leadership to achieve our strategic plan goals and continue to drive shareholder value. I am pleased to report that the management team continues to achieve record results through the successful execution of the strategic plan.

VotingIn 2017, Norfolk Southern achieved an all-time record full-year operating ratio and Proxiesdouble-digit earnings per share growth. Balancing our capital deployment remained a key focus. Your Board approved $703 million in total cash dividend payments and $1 billion in share repurchases, while continuing to ensure proper investment in our rail network.

The following questionsBoard has maintained its commitment to effective corporate governance practices, including soliciting and answers provide guidancetaking action on howinput from you, our shareholders. Our shareholder engagements this past year provided us with valuable feedback on issues of importance to voteyou, including board diversity, risk oversight, and executive compensation alignment. We also remained focused on executive succession planning, ensuring the Company has a pipeline of highly qualified executives that encourage innovation to ensure we continue to reduce costs, drive profitability, and accelerate growth.

Thank you for your shares.

WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU – VOTE TODAY.

Who can vote?
Stockholders who are record ownerscontinued confidence and investment in Norfolk Southern Corporation. I remain proud to serve as your Lead Independent Director and look forward to the continued achievement of our common stock as of the close of business on March 5, 2015, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the 2015 Annual Meeting.

As of the close of business on the March 5, 2015, record date, 326,645,000 shares of our common stock were issued and outstanding. Of those shares, 306,324,223 shares were owned by stockholders entitled to one vote per share. The remaining 20,320,777 shares were held by our wholly owned subsidiaries, which are not entitled to vote those shares under Virginia law.

Whatstrategic plan goals that will I be voting on?
Stockholders will be voting (i) to elect directors of Norfolk Southern, (ii) to appoint KPMG as auditors of Norfolk Southern, (iii) in an advisory, non-binding capacity, on the approach to executive compensation disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in this Proxy Statement, (iv) to approve the Norfolk Southern Corporation Executive Management Incentive Plan, as amended, and (v) to approve the Norfolk Southern Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended. Our Board of Directors is recommending that stockholders vote FOR items (i) through (v).drive long-term shareholder value.

How many shares are needed at the Annual Meeting to constitute a quorum?
The presence, either in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote at the 2015 Annual Meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum. Abstentions are counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum.

How will these matters be decided at the meeting?
A majority of votes cast in favor of each proposal, in person or by proxy, will constitute approval of these matters at the Annual Meeting. More information on the voting requirement for each item is included in the description of the matter in the proxy statement.

Who is soliciting my proxy?
The Board of Directors is soliciting your proxy to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. If you give the Board of Directors your proxy, your shares will be voted in accordance with the selections you indicate on the proxy card.

Who is paying for this solicitation?
Norfolk Southern pays the cost of preparing proxy materials and soliciting proxies, including the reimbursement, upon request, of trustees, brokerage firms, banks and other nominee record holders for the reasonable expenses they incur to forward proxy materials to beneficial owners. Our officers and other employees may solicit proxies by telephone, facsimile, electronic mail or personal interview; they receive no additional compensation for doing so. We have retained Innisfree M&A Incorporated to assist in the solicitation of proxies at an anticipated approximate cost of $15,000 plus reasonable out-of-pocket expenses.

What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial stockholder?
If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, you are considered a stockholder of record with respect to those shares. If your shares are held in a brokerage account or bank, broker or other nominee, you are considered the “beneficial owner” of such shares.

How do I vote if I am a stockholder of record?
If you are the record owner of any shares of our common stock (the shares are registered in your name), you may vote your shares by submitting your proxy card or by voting in person at the 2015 Annual Meeting.

You also may vote by telephone or the Internet in the manner described on the proxy card, or you may vote by marking, dating and signing the proxy card and mailing it to American Stock Transfer and Trust Company Shareholder Services.




1          
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     2015 Proxy Statement

Sincerely,

Steven F. Leer
Lead Director



YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT TO US



Table of Contents

  GENERAL INFORMATIONNotice of 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

How do I vote in person at the Annual Meeting?
To obtain directions to attend the meeting and vote in person, you may contact:

Denise W. Hutson, Corporate Secretary
Norfolk Southern Corporation
Three Commercial Place, 13th Floor
Norfolk, Virginia 23510-9219
Telephone: 757-823-5567

If you are not a record stockholder, you can only vote in person at the Annual Meeting if you bring a proxy from the record holder (the broker, bank or other nominee who holds your shares).

How do I gain admission to the Annual Meeting?
Only stockholders or their legal proxies may attend the Annual Meeting. If you are a record owner of shares held in your name, you must bring a valid, government-issued photo identification. If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name by a broker, bank, or other nominee, you must bring a valid, government-issued photo identification and proof of beneficial ownership, such as: 1) a copy of the voting information form from your bank or broker with your name on it; 2) a letter from your bank or broker stating that you owned shares of our common stock as of the Record Date; or 3) an original brokerage account statement indicating that you owned shares of our common stock as of the Record Date.

How do I vote if I am a beneficial stockholder?
If you are the beneficial owner of any shares held in street name by a broker, bank or other nominee, you may vote your shares by submitting your voting instructions to that entity. Please refer to the voting instruction form that your broker, bank or other nominee record holder included with these materials.

Your shares may be voted on certain matters if they are held in street name by a broker, even if you do not provide the record holder with voting instructions; brokers have the authority under New York Stock Exchange rules to vote shares for which their customers do not provide voting instructions on certain “routine” matters. The ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm (Item 2) is considered a routine matter for which brokers may vote shares they hold in street name, even in the absence of voting instructions from the beneficial owner. The election of directors (Item 1), advisory vote on executive

compensation (Item 3), approval of Amended EMIP (Item 4), and approval of Amended LTIP (Item 5) are not considered routine matters, and a broker cannot vote shares it holds in street name on these proposals if it has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares with respect to the proposals.

How do I vote if I own common stock through an employee plan?
If shares are credited to your account in the Norfolk Southern Corporation Thoroughbred Retirement Investment Plan or the Thrift and Investment Plan, you will receive an instruction form from the trustee of that plan. Your instruction form submitted by mail, over the telephone or Internet serves as voting instructions for the trustee of the plans, Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company. If your proxy is not received by 5P.M. Eastern Time on May 11, 2015, the trustee of these plans will vote your shares for each item on the proxy card in the same proportion as the shares that are voted for that item by the other participants in the respective plan.

What if I change my mind after I vote?
Any stockholder of record may revoke a previously submitted proxy at any time before the shares are voted by: (a) giving written notice of revocation to our Corporate Secretary; (b) submitting subsequent voting instructions over the telephone or the Internet; (c) delivering a validly completed proxy card bearing a later date; or (d) attending the 2015 Annual Meeting and voting in person. For shares you hold beneficially in street name, you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee, or, if you have obtained a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee giving you the right to vote your shares, by attending the 2015 Annual Meeting and voting in person.

What is householding?
As permitted by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we may deliver a single copy of the Annual Report and proxy statement, or the Notice of Internet Availability, to multiple record stockholders sharing an address. This is known as householding. Upon request, we will promptly deliver a separate copy of the Annual Report or proxy statement to a stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the document was delivered. If you would like a separate copy of this proxy statement or the 2014 Annual Report now or in the future, or if you are receiving multiple copies and would like to receive only one copy for your household, you may contact: Denise W. Hutson, Corporate Secretary, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Three Commercial Place, 13th Floor, Norfolk, Virginia 23510-9219 (telephone 757-823-5567).



2TABLE OF CONTENTS
2018 PROXY SUMMARY4
Voting Matters4
Director Nominees4
2015 BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS5
Delivering on Our Strategic Plan5
2017 Business Highlights6
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND THE BOARD7
ITEM 1:Election of Directors7
Nominees—For Terms Expiring in 20197
Qualifications of Directors and Nominees11
Director Independence13
Governance Framework and Practices14
Board Leadership Structure14
Lead Independent Director14
Board Self-Evaluation Process15
Board Refreshment and Succession
Planning Policy
15
Retirement Policy15
Director Elections Majority Voting Policy and
Resignation Requirement
15
Proxy StatementAccess16
Special Meetings16
Shareholder Engagement16
Corporate Sustainability and Responsibility16
Risk Oversight18
Related Persons Transactions18
The Thoroughbred Code of Ethics19
Board Composition and Attendance19
Committees of the Board19
Compensation Committee Interlocks
and Insider Participation
21
Compensation of Directors24
AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS

27
ITEM 2:Ratification of Appointment of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm
27
Audit Committee Report28
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION29
ITEM 3:Approval of Advisory Resolution on
Executive Compensation
  NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     29
Compensation Committee Report31
Compensation Discussion and Analysis32
Executive Summary32
Our 2017 Named Executive Officers35
Objectives of Compensation Program35
Compensation Governance35
Compensation Policies37
Compensation Components38
Impact of the Tax Treatment of Awards on Norfolk
Southern’s Compensation Policies
47
Change-In-Control Agreements47
Share Ownership Guidelines for Officers48
Policies and Decisions Regarding the Adjustment
or Recovery of Awards
48
Executive Compensation Tables49
Summary Compensation Table49
2017 Grants of Plan-Based Awards52
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal
Year-End 2017
56
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 201758
Retirement Benefits59
Deferred Compensation60
Potential Payments Upon a Change in Control or
Other Termination of Employment
62
Compensation Policy Risk Assessment71
Pay Ratio Disclosure71
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS72
ITEM 4:Shareholder Proposal Regarding Right to
Act by Written Consent
72
Shareholder Proposal Deadlines74
Shareholder Recommendations and Nominations74
Other Matters75
STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATION76
Beneficial Ownership of Stock76
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance
79
VOTING AND PROXIES80
Q&A80




Table of Contents

GENERAL INFORMATION  

Are votes confidential? Who counts the votes?
We have policies in place to safeguard the confidentiality of proxies and ballots. American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, Brooklyn, N.Y., which we have retained to tabulate all proxies and ballots cast at the 2015 Annual Meeting, is bound contractually to maintain the confidentiality of the voting process. In addition, each Inspector of Election will have taken the oath required by Virginia law to execute duties faithfully and impartially.

None of our employees or members of our Board of Directors have access to completed proxies or ballots and, therefore, do not know how individual stockholders vote on any matter. However, when a stockholder writes a question or comment on a proxy or ballot, or when there is a need to determine the validity of a proxy or ballot, our management and/or their representatives may be involved in providing the answer to the question or in determining such validity.

Who can I call with questions?
You may contact:

Denise W. Hutson, Corporate Secretary
Norfolk Southern Corporation
Three Commercial Place, 13th Floor
Norfolk, Virginia 23510-9219
Telephone: 757-823-5567

How may I contact the transfer agent?
You may contact American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, LLC (“AST”) at 877-864-4750.



3          
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     20152018 Proxy Summary| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

  2015 PROXY SUMMARY

20152018 PROXY SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. This summary does not contain all of the information you should consider, and you should read the entire proxy statement before voting.

VOTING MATTERS

Item     Description     Board Recommendation     Page
1Election of directorsFOR EACH NOMINEE7
2Ratification of the appointment of our independent auditorsFOR27
3Approval of advisory resolution on executive compensationFOR29
4Shareholder proposal regarding right to act by written consentAGAINST72

Annual Meeting of StockholdersDIRECTOR NOMINEES

Time and DateThursday, May 14, 2015, at 8:30 A.M., Eastern Daylight Time11 of 12 director nominees are independent

Place

Conference Center, Williamsburg Lodge
South England Street, Williamsburg, Virginia

Highly-qualified directors with diversity of skills, background and experience

Record Date

March 5, 2015

Voting

Stockholders as of the record date are entitled to vote. Each share of common stockAverage director tenure is entitled to one vote for each director nominee and one vote for each of the other proposals to be voted on at this meeting.

6.5 years

Business of the Meeting

Name  Age  Director
Since
  Principal Occupation  Independent  Committee Memberships
Thomas D. Bell, Jr.682010Chairman
Mesa Capital Partners, LLC
Compensation
Executive
Finance and Risk Management
(Chair)
Wesley G. Bush562012Chairman and CEO
Northrop Grumman Corp.
Compensation
Finance and Risk Management
Daniel A. Carp692006Former Chairman and CEO
Eastman Kodak Company
Compensation (Chair)
Executive
Governance and Nominating
Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr.682016President
Purdue University
Compensation
Governance and Nominating
Marcela E. Donadio632016Former Partner and Americas
Oil & Gas Sector Leader
Ernst & Young LLP
Audit
Finance and Risk Management
Steven F. Leer
(Lead Director)
651999Former CEO and Chairman
Arch Coal, Inc.
Compensation
Executive
Governance and Nominating
(Chair)
Michael D. Lockhart682008Former Chairman, President
and CEO
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
Audit
Finance and Risk Management
Amy E. Miles512014Former Chair and CEO
Regal Entertainment Group, Inc.
Audit (Chair)
Executive
Governance and Nominating
Martin H. Nesbitt552013Co-Founder
The Vistria Group
Audit
Finance and Risk Management
Jennifer F. Scanlon512018President and CEO
USG Corporation
Compensation
Finance and Risk Management
James A. Squires562014Chairman, President and CEO
Norfolk Southern Corp.
Executive (Chair)
John R. Thompson662013Former Senior Vice President
and General Manager
BestBuy.com LLC
Audit
Governance and Nominating
       Board Vote RecommendationNorfolk Southern Corporation       Page
(for additional information)
Election of 13 Directors 4FOR EACH NOMINEEwww.norfolksouthern.com10
  
Other Board Proposals:

Ratification of KPMG as
Auditor for 2015

FOR

15

Advisory Resolution to Approve
Executive Compensation

FOR

16

Approval of Norfolk Southern
Corporation Executive Management
Incentive Plan, as amended

FOR

17

Approval of Norfolk Southern
Corporation Long-Term
Incentive Plan, as amended

FOR

21


Transact other business that properly comes before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

4
2015 Proxy Statement

     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

2015 PROXY SUMMARY  Business Highlights|

DIRECTOR NOMINEES

  Name     Age     Director Since     Principal Occupation     Independent     Committee Memberships
 
  Thomas D. Bell, Jr.652010ChairmanCompensation
Mesa Capital Partners, LLCExecutive
Finance
  Erskine B. Bowles692011Senior Advisor andCompensation
Non-Executive Vice ChairmanFinance
BDT Capital Partners, LLC
  Robert A. Bradway522011Chairman and CEOAudit
Amgen, Inc.Governance & Nominating
  Wesley G. Bush532012Chairman, CEO andCompensation
PresidentFinance
Northrup Grumman Corp.
  Daniel A. Carp662006Non-ExecutiveCompensation
Delta Air Lines, Inc.Governance & Nominating
Executive
  Karen N. Horn712008PartnerAudit
Brock Capital GroupGovernance & Nominating
Executive
  Steven F. Leer621999Senior Advisor to theCompensation
President/CEO of Governance & Nominating
Arch Coal, Inc.Executive
  Michael D. Lockhart662008Former Chairman, PresidentAudit
and CEO Armstrong WorldFinance
Industries, Inc.
  Amy E. Miles482014CEO Regal EntertainmentAudit
Group, Inc.Finance
  Charles W. Moorman, IV632005Chairman and CEOExecutive
Norfolk Southern Corp.
  Martin H. Nesbitt522013Co-FounderAudit
The Vistria GroupFinance
  James A. Squires532014President 
Norfolk Southern Corp.
  John R. Thompson632013Former Senior Vice PresidentAudit
Best Buy.comGovernance & Nominating           

5          
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     2015 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

  2015 PROXY SUMMARY


BOARD OF DIRECTOR PROPOSALS

Ratification of KPMG as Auditor for 2015. As a matter of good governance, we are asking stockholders to ratify the selection of KPMG as our independent auditors for 2015.

Advisory Resolution to Approve Executive Compensation. We are asking our stockholders to approve, on an advisory basis, our named executive officer compensation. The Board recommends a FOR vote because it believes that our compensation policies and practices are effective in achieving the company’s goals of aligning executives’ compensation with overall business strategies, attracting and retaining highly qualified executives, and providing incentives that drive stockholder value.

Approval of the Norfolk Southern Corporation Executive Management Incentive Plan, as amended (“Amended EMIP”) and the Norfolk Southern Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended (“Amended LTIP”). We are asking our stockholders to approve the material terms of the Amended EMIP and the Amended LTIP. The Board recommends a vote FOR both proposals so as to continue to allow Norfolk Southern the opportunity to make performance-based awards under both plans that are deductible under current tax laws. The Board further recommends a vote FOR the Amended LTIP to allow Norfolk Southern to continue to align the interests of directors and employees with the interests of stockholders, by allowing directors and employees to acquire an ownership interest in Norfolk Southern through equity awards. The Board determined that there was a need for additional shares to be made available for long-term incentives that may be awarded under the plan and, as a result, the Board approved, subject to stockholder approval, an additional 8 million shares. The Amended LTIP and Amended EMIP allow Norfolk Southern to award a significant portion of the compensation paid to the Named Executive Officers as performance-based and at-risk compensation, as shown in the charts on pages 51-52 of the Compensation Discussion & Analysis.

6
2015 Proxy Statement

     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

2015 PROXY SUMMARY  

BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS


This summary provides highlights from our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014,2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on February 5, 2018 (the “2017 Form 10-K”), and from our Fourth-Quarter Earnings Presentation, filed with the SEC on February 11, 2015,Form 8-K on January 24, 2018, to assist you in reviewing Norfolk Southern’s 20142017 performance. The information contained below is only a summary, and you should refer to the more comprehensive discussions contained in our 20142017 Form 10-K, as supplemented by our Form 8-Ks filed during 2018, for additional information about these highlights.

DELIVERING ON OUR STRATEGIC PLAN

Our strong 2014 financial results reflect higher volumesachievements in 2017 show that our strategic plan to reduce costs, drive profitability and an all-time low operating ratio, demonstratingaccelerate growth is driving increased shareholder value. Our plan is built on disciplined cost control and asset utilization, while balancing revenue growth through volume growth and pricing.

STRATEGIC PLAN TO INCREASE SHAREHOLDER VALUE

Key Focus AreasKey Financial Targets
(as conveyed December 4, 2015)
Progress Through 2017
Optimize revenue – both
pricing and volume
Disciplined pricing increases above rail inflationContinued pricing gains
over rail inflation
Improve productivity to
deliver efficient and
superior service
Operating Ratio < 658 consecutive quarters of
year-over-year Operating
Ratio improvement
Increase asset utilizationDouble-digit compound
annual EPS growth
Double-digit EPS growth in 2016 and 2017
Focus capital investment
to support long-term
value creation
CapEx ~19% of revenue
through 2018
CapEx ~17% of revenue
thereafter
Total CapEx since 2015
~18% of revenues
Reward shareholders with
significant return of capital
Dividend payout target of ~33%
over the longer term and
continuation of dividend
growth and significant
share repurchases
Achieved dividend payout of
>33% in 2016 & 2017;
Over $1.8 billion in share
repurchases for 2016-2017

We are on track to achieve our ability2020 goals and expect to leverage existingachieve $650 million in annual productivity savings by the end of the five-year period.

We are focused on our core principles of safety, service, productivity and new marketsgrowth, and we believe we have the resources in place necessary to continue driving both growth and productivity. We remain steadfast in our commitment to controlling costs and improving productivity. Demand for our transportation services exceeded our expectations. The surge of volumemeet customer expectations, support long-term growth, and severe winter weather ledincrease shareholder value.

Our Board and management team are confident that this strategic plan will continue to resource shortages and network delays during the year, but we have improveddrive long-term, sustainable value for all of our operations by employing additional resources, and we expect improvement to continue through 2015.

Our 2014 railway operating revenues were a record high at $11.6 billion, income from railway operations were a record high at $3.6 billion, and our highest ever net income of $2.0 billion created a record $6.39 earnings per diluted share. During 2014:shareholders.

Our financial results were driven by a 7% increase in intermodal revenue and a 6% increase in general merchandise revenue, which offset a 6% decline in coal revenues.

Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 5www.norfolksouthern.com

Our operating expenses increased only 1% for the year while handling 5% more volume than 2013. Our operating efficiency was reflected in our operating ratio, which set a record at 69.2%.

We generated $2.9 billion in cash from operations, from which we were able to invest $2.1 billion in capital spending and distribute $687 million in dividends. We raised our dividends per share from $2.04 in 2013 to $2.22 for 2014, an increase of approximately 9%, and declared another $0.02 per share increase for the first quarter of 2015. The remainder of our cash from operations, combined with borrowing proceeds, supported $318 million of share repurchases and retirement of 3.1 million shares of stock. In 2015, we anticipate $2.4 billion in capital spending and approximately $1 billion in share repurchases, both significantly higher levels than 2014.

We continued to invest in our network through our capital spending program. We added capacity and operating flexibility to our network with a major expansion of our yard at Bellevue, Ohio, and with completion of a bridge in Chicago known as the Englewood flyover, and we anticipate completing several additional projects early in 2015 to further improve the fluidity of our operations.


7          
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     2015 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

  2015 PROXY SUMMARYBusiness Highlights| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

2017 BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

Norfolk Southern achieved record results in 2017, including record earnings per share and operating ratio:

earnings per share of $18.61; and
full-year operating ratio of 66.0 percent.

These results include impact of the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Tax Act”), which increased diluted earnings per share by $12.00 for the year and provided a 140 basis point improvement to the 2017 operating ratio.

Excluding the impact of the Tax Act, we achieved record results in 2017 for these same financial measures:

earnings per share of $6.61*, an 18 percent improvement over 2016; and
full-year operating ratio of 67.4* percent, a 150 basis point improvement over the prior year’s record.

These strong financial results were achieved through the successful execution of our strategic plan. Railway operating revenues increased 7 percent compared to 2016 while railway operating expenses increased 2 percent, resulting in a 12 percent increase in income from railway operations for 2017 as compared to 2016. We achieved pricing gains over rail inflation and double-digit earnings per share growth during the year.

We achieved $150 million in productivity savings in 2017. These productivity achievements included:

improved employee productivity, handling 5% more volume with 3% lower average headcount;
record locomotive productivity;
record fuel efficiency; and
record average train length.

We remained committed in 2017 to a balanced deployment of capital, investing over $1.7 billion in our business in capital expenditures and also returning over $1.7 billion to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases. We repurchased $1 billion of Norfolk Southern stock to retire 8.2 million shares, and we paid $703 million in dividends during the year. We recently announced an 18% increase in our quarterly dividend, and have delivered a 10% compound annual growth in dividends per share over the last 10 calendar years.

*     

Reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure is provided on page 83 of this Proxy Statement under “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”

Total Shareholder Returns*



*

Assumes that the value of the investment in Norfolk Southern Corporation common stock and each index was $100 on Dec. 31, 2009,2012, and that all dividends were reinvested. Data furnished by Bloomberg Financial Markets.



COMPENSATION ALIGNMENT

The compensation earned in 2014 by our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), President and Executive Vice Presidents (“EVPs”) who are named executive officers, as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement, reflect our policy of having a significant portion of executive income tied to corporate performance and shareholder returns.

Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 6www.norfolksouthern.com

79% of our CEO’s compensation and 70% of the other named executive officers’ compensation awarded for 2014 was at risk, and the earnout of 53% of the CEO’s compensation and 49% of the other named executive officers’ compensation was based on the achievement of established corporate performance goals.

75% of our CEO’s compensation and 60% of the other named executive officers’ compensation for 2014 were equity-based long-term incentive awards that ultimately will be paid in Norfolk Southern stock.

Our CEO and other named executive officers earned approximately 81% of their annual incentive opportunity based on achieving above-target performance levels for operating income and operating ratio, but a below-target performance level for the composite service measure. Although our operating income and operating ratio improved compared to 2013, the composite service measure declined from 83% to 70% reflecting network congestion and therefore nothing was earned for that goal.


8
2015 Proxy Statement

     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

2015 PROXY SUMMARY  

ForCorporate Governance and the performance-based portion of the long-term equity award, our CEOBoard| 2018 Annual Meeting and other named executive officers earned approximately 51% of performance share units for the three-year cycle ending in 2014, based on goals for total shareholder return (TSR), return on average invested capital and operating ratio. The goals were equally weighted, and we achieved an 81% payout for return on average invested capital and 71% for operating ratio. TSR did not meet our established goals, so nothing was earned for that goal.

To further align our TSR with performance share earnouts, the Compensation Committee eliminated operating ratio as a performance goal for performance share units awarded in 2014 and based half (rather than one-third) of the earnout on relative TSR. These performance share units will be earned at the end of 2016, so the impact of this change will be reflected at that time.

The Compensation Committee re-examined our peer group, which consists of the six other North American Class I railroads, and examined peer groups utilized by proxy advisory firms in 2013. In consultation with its compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee determined that our current peer group is the most relevant comparator for our compensation program because they are more likely to compete with Norfolk Southern for key management talent than smaller railroads and other non-railroad transportation and industrial companies.


In 2015, the Compensation Committee made the following changes to better align compensation with performance:

Changed the performance targets and resulting payouts for the 2015 annual incentive award to increase the operating income and operating ratio performance goals for threshold, target and maximum payouts.

After considering Norfolk Southern’s relative TSR performance for 2012-2014, continued the 50% weighting for the TSR goal in performance share units and capped the earnout for the TSR goal at target payout when three-year TSR is negative.




9          
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     2015 Proxy Statement



Table of ContentsCORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND THE BOARD

  PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTEITEM     ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
1

PROXY STATEMENT

This proxy statement and the accompanying proxy card relate to the Board of Directors’ solicitation of your proxy for use at our Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 14, 2015. We began mailing to stockholders this proxy statement and the accompanying proxy card, or where applicable the Notice of Availability of Proxy Materials, on approximately March 25, 2015, in order to furnish information relating to the business to be transacted at the 2015 Annual Meeting. We also included a copy of our 2014 Annual Report and its Form 10-K (referred to together herein as the “Annual Report”) in the mailing for informational purposes; the Annual Report is not a part of the proxy solicitation materials.


PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE

ITEM 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Our directors are elected annually and their terms will expire at the 2015 Annual Meeting. The following individuals arehave been nominated for election as directors:directors for a one-year term expiring at the 2019 Annual Meeting: Thomas D. Bell, Jr., Erskine B. Bowles, Robert A. Bradway, Wesley G. Bush, Daniel A. Carp, Karen N. Horn,Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr., Marcela E. Donadio, Steven F. Leer, Michael D. Lockhart, Amy E. Miles, Charles W. Moorman, IV, Martin H. Nesbitt, Jennifer F. Scanlon, James A. Squires, and John R. Thompson.

Unless you instruct otherwise when you give us your proxy, it Erskine B. Bowles will be voted in favorretire from the Board of Directors effective the electiondate of Mr. Bell, Mr. Bowles, Mr. Bradway, Mr. Bush, Mr. Carp, Dr. Horn, Mr. Leer, Mr. Lockhart, Ms. Miles, Mr. Moorman, Mr. Nesbitt, Mr. Squires and Mr. Thompson as directors for one-year terms that begin at the 2015this Annual Meeting of Stockholders and continue untilin accordance with the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until the election and qualification of their respective successors or their earlier removal or resignation.director retirement policy in Norfolk Southern’s Corporate Governance Guidelines.

If any nominee becomes unable to serve, your proxy will be voted for a substitute nominee to be designated by the Board of Directors, or the Board of Directors will reduce the numbersize of directors.the Board.

So that you have information concerning the independence of the process by which our Board of Directors selected the nominees, we confirm, as required by the SEC, that (1) there are no family relationships among any of the nominees or among any of the nominees and any officer, and (2) there is no arrangement or understanding between any nominee or director and any other person pursuant to which the nominee or director was selected. Additional information on the experience and expertise of the director nominees can be found on the following pages.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that the stockholdersshareholders vote FOR each of the nominees for election as directors.

Vote Required to Elect a Director: Pursuant to our Bylaws, in uncontested elections of directors such as this election, directors are elected at a meeting, so long as a quorum for the meeting exists, by a majority of votes cast by the shares entitled to be voted in the election. Abstentions or shares that are not voted are not counted as cast for this purpose. Any nominee for director who is not elected pursuant to this Bylaw provision must promptly tender his or her resignation to the Board of Directors for consideration by our Governance and Nominating Committee. Brokers do not have the authority to vote their customers’ shares on this matter if they do not receive instructions as to how to vote on this item.

Additional information on the “Areas of Expertise” for directors and nominees can be found on page 34 of this proxy statement under “Qualifications of Directors and Nominees.”


10
2015 Proxy Statement

     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of ContentsNOMINEES

Director since:2010
Committees:
Compensation
Executive
Finance and Risk
Management
(Chair)
PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE  THOMAS D. BELL, JR.
Independent

NOMINEES—FOR TERMS EXPIRING IN 2016


Thomas D. Bell, Jr.

Independent: Director since 2010
Areas of Expertise: CEO/Senior Officer; Governance/Board; Governmental Relations; Human Resources/Compensation; Marketing; Strategic Planning

Mr. Bell, 65,68, is the Chairman of Mesa Capital Partners, a real estate investment company. Mr. Bell also served as non-executive Chairman of SecurAmerica LLC, a provider of contract security services, from 2010 through 2012. Mr. Bell previously served as Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerCEO of Cousins Properties, Inc.a publicly-traded real estate investment trust that invests in office buildings throughout the South, from 2002 to 2009. He is also a director of Southern Company Gas (formerly AGL Resources) and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Young and Rubicam Inc. He iswas a director of Regal Entertainment Group, Inc. until its acquisition in March 2018.

Areas of Expertise:CEO/Senior Officer; Environmental and AGLSafety; Governance/Board; Governmental and Stakeholder Relations; Human Resources and has also previously served as a director of Cousins Properties, Inc.Compensation; Marketing; Strategic Planning


Erskine B. Bowles

Independent: Director since 2011
Areas of Expertise: CEO/Senior Officer; Finance/Accounting; Governance/Board; Governmental Relations; Human Resources/Compensation; Strategic Planning

Mr. Bowles, 69, has been a Senior Advisor and non-executive Vice Chairman of BDT Capital Partners, LLC, since January 2012 and a Senior Advisor to Carousel Capital since 2001. He was Co-Chairman of the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform. Mr. Bowles was President of the University of North Carolina from 2006 to 2010, and previously served as White House Chief of Staff under President Clinton. He is currently a director of Morgan Stanley, Facebook, Inc. and Belk, Inc. Mr. Bowles was formerly a director of General Motors Company, Cousins Properties, Inc., and North Carolina Mutual Life Insurance Company.


Robert A. Bradway

Independent: Director since 2011
Areas of Expertise: CEO/Senior Officer; Finance/Accounting; Governance/Board; Governmental Relations; Information Technology; Strategic Planning

Mr. Bradway, 52, has been the Chief Executive Officer of Amgen, Inc., a biotechnology company, since May 2012. Mr. Bradway previously served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Amgen from 2010 through 2012 and as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2007 to 2010. Mr. Bradway is a director of Amgen and was elected as chairman of its Board of Directors in 2013.


Director since:2012
Committees:
Compensation
Finance and Risk
Management
11          
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     2015 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

  PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE

WESLEY G. BUSH
Wesley G. BushIndependent

Independent: Director since 2012
Areas of Expertise: CEO/Senior Officer; Finance/Accounting; Governance/Board; Governmental Relations; Strategic Planning; Transportation

Mr. Bush, 53,56, has been Chief Executive Officer and President of Northrop Grumman Corporation, a global aerospace and defense technology company, since 2010, having2010. He was elected to Northrop Grumman’s board in 2009 and named Chairman in 2011. Mr. Bush previously served previously as Northrop Grumman’s President and Chief Operating Officer from 20072006 to 2009, and President2017, and Chief Financial Officer from 20062005 to 2007. Mr. Bush is a director of Northrop Grumman and was elected as Chairman of its Board of Directors in 2011.2006.


Daniel A. Carp

Independent: Director since 2006
Areas of Expertise:CEO/Senior Officer; Environmental and Safety; Finance and Accounting; Governance/Board; Governmental and Stakeholder Relations; Human Resources/Resources and Compensation; Information Technology; Strategic Planning; Transportation

Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 7www.norfolksouthern.com

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and the Board| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

Director since:2006
Committees:
Compensation (Chair)
Executive
Governance and
Nominating
DANIEL A. CARP
Independent

Mr. Carp, 66,69, served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Eastman Kodak Company from 2000 until his retirement in 2005. HeMr. Carp is non-executive Chairman of the Boarda director of Delta Air Lines, Inc. and, having been non-executive Chairman of its board from 2007 until May 2016. Mr. Carp is also a director of Texas Instruments Incorporated.

Areas of Expertise:CEO/Senior Officer; Governance/Board; Human Resources and Compensation; Information Technology; Strategic Planning; Transportation


Director since:2016
Committees:
Compensation
Governance and
Nominating
MITCHELL E. DANIELS, JR.
Independent

Mr. Daniels, 68, has been President of Purdue University since 2013 and served as Governor of Indiana from 2005 to 2013. From 1990 to 2000, Mr. Daniels worked for Eli Lilly and Company, holding the executive positions of President of North American Pharmaceutical Operations and Senior Vice President of Corporate Strategy and Policy. Mr. Daniels is also a director of Cerner Corp.

Areas of Expertise:CEO/Senior Officer; Finance and Accounting; Governance/Board; Governmental and Stakeholder Relations; Strategic Planning


Karen N. Horn

Independent:Director since 2008since:2016
Committees:
Audit
Finance and Risk
Management
MARCELA E. DONADIO
Independent

Ms. Donadio, 63, retired as a partner of Ernst & Young LLP, a multinational professional services firm, in 2014. From 2007 until her retirement, Ms. Donadio was Americas Oil & Gas Sector Leader, with responsibility for one of Ernst & Young’s significant industry groups helping set firm strategy for oil and gas industry clients in the United States and throughout the Americas. Ms. Donadio is also a director of Marathon Oil Corp. and National Oilwell Varco Inc.

Areas of Expertise:CEO/Senior Officer; Finance/Finance and Accounting; Governance/Board; Human Resources/Resources and Compensation; Strategic Planning

Dr. Horn, 71, has been a partner with Brock Capital Group since 2003. Dr. Horn served as president of Private Client Services and managing director of Marsh, Inc., a subsidiary of MMC, from 1999 until her retirement in 2003. Dr. Horn previously served as President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. Dr. Horn serves as director of T. Rowe Price Mutual Funds, Simon Property Group, Inc., and Eli Lilly and Company. She is Vice Chairman of the U.S. Russia Foundation, Vice Chairman of the National Bureau of Economic Research and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

Director since:1999
Committees:
Compensation
Executive
Governance and
Nominating (Chair)
STEVEN F. LEER
Steven F. LeerIndependent

Independent: Director since 1999
Areas of Expertise: CEO/Senior Officer; Environmental/Safety; Governance/Board; Human Resources/Compensation; Marketing; Strategic Planning; Transportation

Mr. Leer, 62,65, served as the Chief Executive Officer of Arch Coal, Inc., a company engaged in coal mining and related businesses, from 1992 through 2012, as2012. He was Chairman of its Board of Directorsboard from 2006 through 2012 and as its Executive Chairman from 2012 through 2014. Mr. Leer currently servesHe then served as Senior Advisor to the President and CEO of Arch Coal. HeCoal from 2014 through May 2015. Mr. Leer is also a director of Cenovus Energy Inc. and the non-executive Chairman of USG Corporation.

Areas of Expertise:CEO/Senior Officer; Environmental and Safety; Governance/Board; Governmental and Stakeholder Relations; Human Resources and Compensation; Marketing; Strategic Planning; Transportation


Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 8www.norfolksouthern.com
  

12
2015 Proxy Statement

     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE  Corporate Governance and the Board| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

Director since:2008
Committees:
Audit
Finance and Risk
Management

MICHAEL D. LOCKHART
Michael D. LockhartIndependent

Independent: Director since 2008
Areas of Expertise: CEO/Senior Officer; Finance/Accounting; Governance/Board; Marketing; Strategic Planning; Transportation

Mr. Lockhart, 66,68, served as Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of Armstrong World Industries, Inc., and its predecessor, Armstrong Holdings, Inc., a leading global producer of flooring products and ceiling systems, from 2000 until his retirement in February 2010. Mr. Lockhart previously served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of General Signal Corporation, a diversified manufacturer, from September 1995 until it was acquired in 1998. Mr. Lockhart has previously served as a director of Armstrong World Industries, Inc.


Amy E. Miles

Independent: Director since 2014
Areas of Expertise:CEO/Senior Officer; Finance/Environmental and Safety; Finance and Accounting; Governance/Board; Marketing; Strategic PlanningPlanning; Transportation


Director since:2014
Committees:
Audit (Chair)
Executive
Governance and
Nominating

AMY E. MILES
Independent

Ms. Miles, 48, has51, served as Chief Executive Officer of Regal Entertainment Group, Inc., the largest movie theater companya leading motion picture exhibitor, from June 2009 until its acquisition in the U. S., since 2009. Prior toMarch 2018. During that time, she served as a director of Regal and was named Chair of its board in March 2015. Ms. Miles previously served as Regal Entertainment’s Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Regal Entertainment Group, Inc. Miles joined Regal Cinemas Inc. as Senior Vice President Finance in 1999, after working with Deloitte & Touche LLP and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Ms. Miles also serves as a director of Regal Entertainment Group, Inc., National CineMedia, Inc., and Townsquare Media, Inc.from March 2002 through June 2009.


Charles W. Moorman, IV

Director since 2005
Areas of Expertise:CEO/Senior Officer; Environmental/Safety; Governance/Board; Governmental Relations; Information Technology; Strategic Planning; Transportation

Mr. Moorman, 63, has been Chairman of Norfolk Southern Corporation since February 2006Finance and Chief Executive Officer since November 2005. Prior thereto he served as President, Senior Vice President Corporate Planning and Services, President Thoroughbred Technology and Telecommunications, Inc., Vice President Information Technology and Vice President Personnel and Labor Relations. He is also a director of Chevron Corporation. Effective June 1, 2015, he will step down as Chief Executive Officer and serve as Executive Chairman.


Martin H. Nesbitt

Independent: Director since 2013
Areas of Expertise: CEO/Senior Officer; Finance/Accounting; Governance/Board; Governmental Relations;Information Technology; Marketing; Strategic Planning


Director since:2013
Committees:
Audit
Finance and Risk
Management

MARTIN H. NESBITT
Independent

Mr. Nesbitt, 52,55, is the Co-Founder of The Vistria Group, a private equity firm. Mr. Nesbitt previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of PRG Parking Management, LLC, an off-airport parking management company, and Managing Director of Green Courte Partners, LLC, a real estate investment firm, until 2012. Mr. Nesbitt is also a director of Jones Lang LaSalle IncorporatedInc. and Pebblebrook Hotel Trust.American Airlines Group Inc.

Areas of Expertise:CEO/Senior Officer; Finance and Accounting; Governance/Board; Governmental and Stakeholder Relations; Marketing; Strategic Planning


Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 9www.norfolksouthern.com
  

13          
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     2015 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

  PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTECorporate Governance and the Board| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

Director since:2018
Committees:
Compensation
Finance and Risk
Management


James A. Squires

DirectorJENNIFER F. SCANLON
Independent

Ms. Scanlon, 51, has been President and Chief Executive Officer of USG Corporation, an industry-leading manufacturer of building products and innovative solutions, since 2014
November 2016. Previously, she was President of the company’s international business, President of its L&W Supply Corporation, and Chief Information Officer and Chairman of the board for USG Boral Building Products. Ms. Scanlon is also a director of USG.

Areas of Expertise:CEO/Senior Officer; Finance/Accounting;Environmental and Safety; Governance/Board; Human Resources and Compensation;Information Technology; Marketing; Strategic Planning; Transportation


Director since:2014
Committees:
Executive (Chair)

JAMES A. SQUIRES

Mr. Squires, 53,56, has been President of Norfolk Southern since 2013. Prior thereto he2013 and Chief Executive Officer since June 2015. Mr. Squires was named Chairman of the Board of Norfolk Southern in October 2015. Mr. Squires previously served as Norfolk Southern’s Executive Vice President-Administration, Executive Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President Finance, Senior Vice President Law, and Vice President Law of Norfolk Southern Corporation. Effective June 1, 2015, he will assume the role of Chief Executive Officer and President.Law.


John R. Thompson

Independent: Director since 2013
Areas of Expertise:CEO/Senior Officer; Finance/Finance and Accounting; Governance/Board; Governmental and Stakeholder Relations; Information Technology;Human Resources and Compensation; Marketing; Strategic PlanningPlanning; Transportation


Director since:2013
Committees:
Audit
Governance and
Nominating

JOHN R. THOMPSON
Independent

Mr. Thompson, 63, has been66, served as a government relations consultant for Best Buy Co., Inc., a multinational consumer electronics corporation, sincefrom October 2012. Mr. Thompson served2012 to April 2016, and as Senior Vice President and General Manager of BestBuy. comBestBuy.com LLC, a subsidiary of Best Buy Co., Inc., from 2002 through 2012. Mr. Thompson iswas formerly a director of Belk, Inc. and Wendy’s International, Inc.

Areas of Expertise:CEO/Senior Officer; Finance and Accounting; Governance/Board; Governmental and Stakeholder Relations; Information Technology; Marketing; Strategic Planning


Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 10www.norfolksouthern.com
  

14
2015 Proxy Statement

     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE  Corporate Governance and the Board| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

ITEM 2: RATIFICATIONQUALIFICATIONS OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMDIRECTORS AND NOMINEES

At a meeting held on January 22, 2015, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors appointed the firm of KPMG LLP (“KPMG”), independent registered public accounting firm, to perform for 2015 the integrated audit of our consolidated financial statementsOur directors have diverse backgrounds and internal control over financial reporting. KPMGprovide critical experience and its predecessors have been retained as Norfolk Southern’s external auditor since 1983 (and priorexpertise to that for one of our predecessor companies, Norfolk and Western Railway Company, since 1969).

Pursuant to its charter, the Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of Norfolk Southern’s independent registered public accounting firm. In connection with this oversight, the Audit Committee is involved in the selection of the lead audit partner for the engagement. In addition, the Audit Committee is responsible for negotiating and approving the fees paid to KPMG. In determining whether to reappoint KPMG this year, the Audit Committee reviewed the performance and independence of the firm and considered a number of factors, including the quality of its interactions and discussion with KPMG, the performance of the firm in the audit engagement, the qualifications of the audit team, and the length of time the firm has been engaged and whether rotation of the independent auditor would be in the best interest of Norfolk Southern. The AuditGovernance and Nominating Committee carefully considers the experience and qualifications of each director standing for re-election and potential nominee for election, to ensure that the Board can effectively carry out its oversight role on behalf of Directors believeour shareholders.

The Governance and Nominating Committee has identified ten areas of expertise that the continued engagementare of KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests ofparticular importance to Norfolk Southern given the nature of our business and its stockholders.

For the years ended December 31, 2014, and December 31, 2013, KPMG billed usour expectations for the following services:

     2014     2013
Audit Fees1$2,414,800 $2,439,700
Audit-Related Fees2$128,400$127,800
Tax Fees3 $121,770$40,890
All Other Fees$0$0
Total Fees$2,664,970$2,608,390

1Audit Fees include fees for professional services performed by KPMG for the auditfuture of our consolidated financial statementscompany. The categories identified by the Governance and internal control over financial reporting (integrated audit), the review of our consolidated financial statements included in our 10-Q filings, and services thatNominating Committee are normally provided inconnection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

2Audit-Related Fees principally include fees for audit-related tax services, employee benefit plan audits and audits of subsidiaries and affiliates, and other attestation services.

3Tax Fees consist of tax advice, planning, and consulting services.

The Audit Committee requires that management obtain prior approval from the Committee for all audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided. The Audit Committee considers and approves at each January meeting anticipated services to be provided during the year, as well as the projected fees for those services. The Audit Committee considers and pre-approves additional services and projected fees as needed at each meeting. The Audit Committee has delegated authority to its Chair to pre-approve services between meetings, provided that the Chair reports any such pre-approval to the Audit Committee at its next meeting. The Audit Committee will not approve non-audit engagements that would violate SEC rules or impair the independence of our independent registered public accounting firm. All services rendered to us by KPMG in 2014 and 2013 were pre-approved in accordance with these procedures.follows:

Representatives of KPMG are expected to be present at the 2015 Annual Meeting, with the opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and available to respond to appropriate questions.

The Audit Committee recommends, and the Board of Directors concurs, that stockholders vote FOR the proposal to ratify the selection of KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2015.

Vote Required to Ratify Appointment: Under Virginia law and under our Restated Articles of Incorporation, actions such as the ratification of the appointment of auditors are approved, so long as a quorum for the meeting exists, if the number of votes cast favoring the action exceeds the number of votes cast opposing the action. Abstentions or shares that are not voted are not counted as cast for this purpose. Brokers have the authority to vote their customers’ shares on the ratification of the appointment of KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm even if they do not receive instructions as to how to vote on the matter.


CEO/Senior Officer

Experience working as a CEO or senior executive of a major public, private or non-profit entity.

Environmental and Safety

A thorough understanding of safety and environmental issues and transportation industry regulations.

Finance and Accounting

Senior executive level experience in financial accounting and reporting, auditing, corporate finance and/or internal controls.

Governance/Board

Prior or current experience as a board member of a major public, private or non-profit entity.

Governmental and Stakeholder Relations

Experience in or a strong understanding of the workings of government and public policy on a local, state, and national level and stakeholder strategy and engagement.

Human Resources and Compensation

Senior executive level experience or membership on a board compensation committee with an extensive understanding of compensation programs, particularly compensation programs for executive level employees and incentive based compensation programs.

Information Technology

Senior executive level or board experience with information technology issues for a major public, private or non-profit entity.

Marketing

Senior executive level experience in marketing combined with a strong working knowledge of Norfolk Southern’s markets, customers and strategy.

Strategic Planning

Senior executive level experience in strategic planning for a major public, private or non-profit entity.

Transportation

Extensive knowledge and experience in the transportation industry, either as a senior executive of a transportation or logistics company or as a senior executive of a customer of a transportation company.


15          Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 11www.norfolksouthern.com
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION 2015 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

  PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTECorporate Governance and the Board| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

ITEM 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

We are requestingThe table and chart below summarize the areas of expertise that our stockholders approve, by advisory vote,Governance and Nominating Committee has identified as being represented on our Board, both from an individual and collective standpoint. In addition to these areas of expertise, the compensationGovernance and Nominating Committee also considers ethical integrity, board dynamics, reputation of potential nominees, recommendations of director search firms, and diversity of the Board.

Norfolk Southern defines diversity as the collective mixture of similarities and differences that impact our Named Executive Officers, as such compensation is reflected in our “Compensation Discussionworkforce, workplace, and Analysis” beginning on page 45marketplace. Our Governance and our Executive Compensation Tables beginning on page 62. This “Say-on-Pay” vote is required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street ReformNominating Committee views diversity broadly, seeking to nominate individuals from varied backgrounds, perspectives, and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. While the Say-on-Pay vote is advisory,experiences. The Governance and thereforeNominating Committee does not bindinghave a specific written policy on the Board, the Compensation Committee will consider the resultsdiversity of any significant vote against the compensation of the Named Executive Officers and determine whether any actions are necessary or advisable to address the concerns expressed by stockholders. In accordance with the recommendation of our stockholders at the 2011 Annual Meeting, the Board of Directors has determined to seek a stockholder advisory voteat this time. However, more information on executive compensation annually until the next required voteNorfolk Southern’s diversity principles and philosophy can be found on our website on the frequency of such advisory votes. We are required to hold such frequency votes“Work at least every six years.

Our Compensation Committee designed our executive compensation program with advice from its compensation consultant. The executive compensation program is designed to align executives’ compensation with our overall business strategies, attract and retain highly qualified executives, and provide incentives that drive stockholder value. The Compensation Committee approved a mix of salary, annual cash incentive and equity incentive compensation that it believes best serves the interests of Norfolk Southern and its stockholders in achieving those objectives.

The compensation of our Named Executive Officers in 2014 consisted primarily of the following components, all as describedNS” page under “Learn more fully in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 45:about NS.”

Base Salary.

Annual Incentive:The annual incentive paid under the Executive Management Incentive Plan is based on performance against financial, operational and service metrics.

Long-Term Incentive Awards: Norfolk Southern’s long-term equity incentive awards under the Long-Term Incentive Plan target longer-term achievement of corporate objectives and are designed to create an ownership culture among the executives of Norfolk Southern. Grants under the Long-Term Incentive Plan

include stock options, time-based restricted stock units and performance shares that are earned out based on achievement of corporate objectives over a three-year performance cycle, all as more fully described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

Bell
BushCarpDanielsDonadioLeerLockhartMilesNesbittScanlonSquiresThompson
CEO/Senior Officer

Retirement Plans

Environmental and Programs:Norfolk Southern’sRetirement Plan and Supplemental Benefit Plan, both as more fully described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, provide retirement benefits to our Named Executive Officers and provide Norfolk Southern with the ability to retain key executives over a longer period.

Safety

The Board of Directors and its Compensation Committee believe the program for compensation of the Named Executive Officers is appropriately designed to support Norfolk Southern’s goals and has an appropriate mix of cash and equity and an appropriate balance between short-term and long-term compensation. Accordingly, the Board of Directors recommends that stockholders approve the program by approving the following advisory resolution:

RESOLVED, that the stockholders of Norfolk Southern Corporation approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the individuals identified in the Summary Compensation Table, as disclosed in the Proxy Statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the 2014 Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and disclosures.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the resolution approving the compensation of our Named Executive Officers.

Vote Required: Under Virginia law and under our Restated Articles of Incorporation, actions such as the resolution on executive compensation are approved, so long as a quorum for the meeting exists, if the number of votes cast favoring the action exceeds the number of votes cast opposing the action. Abstentions or shares that are not voted are not “cast” for this purpose. Brokers do not have the authority to vote their customers’ shares on this matter if they do not receive instructions as to how to vote on this item.


16
2015 Proxy StatementFinance and Accounting

Governance/Board
Governmental and Stakeholder Relations
Human Resources and Compensation
Information Technology
Marketing
Strategic Planning
Transportation

More information on director qualifications and nomination is contained in Norfolk Southern’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, posted on the “Invest in NS” page under “Governance Documents” on our website.

       NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATIONNorfolk Southern CorporationPage 12www.norfolksouthern.com 



Table of Contents

PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE  Corporate Governance and the Board| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

ITEM 4: APPROVAL OF NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN, AS AMENDED (“AMENDED EMIP”)DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Subject to stockholder approval at this meeting, theThe Board of Directors at its meeting on December 2, 2014, adopted certain amendments tohas considered whether the members of our Board of Directors are independent. A director is considered “independent” if the Board determines that the director has no material relationship with Norfolk Southern Corporation Executive Management Incentive Plan (“Amended EMIP”),(directly or as more fully described herein.

A copya partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with Norfolk Southern). The Board makes these determinations after full deliberation, considering all relevant facts and circumstances. To aid in its evaluation of director independence, the Board has adopted categorical independence standards. Under the standards, an individual director is “independent,” unless the Board determines otherwise, if none of the Amended EMIPfollowing relationships exists between Norfolk Southern and the director:

the director is, or has been within the last three years, an employee, or an immediate family member of the director is, or has been within the last three years, an Executive Officer, of Norfolk Southern or any of our consolidated subsidiaries;

the director or an immediate family member of the director has received during any twelve-month period within the last three years more than $120,000 in direct compensation from Norfolk Southern or any of our consolidated subsidiaries, other than director and committee fees and deferred compensation for prior service (provided such deferred compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service);

(a) the director is a current partner or employee of a present or former internal or external auditor of Norfolk Southern or any of our consolidated subsidiaries, (b) the director has an immediate family member who is a current partner of such a firm, (c) the director has an immediate family member who is a current employee of such a firm and personally works on Norfolk Southern’s audit, or (d) the director or an immediate family member was within the last three years a partner or employee of such a firm and personally worked on Norfolk Southern’s audit within that time;

the director or an immediate family member is, or has been within the last three years, employed as an executive officer of another company where one of our Executive Officers serves as a director and sits on that company’s compensation committee;

the director is an executive officer or employee, or an immediate family member of the director is an executive officer, of a company that makes payments to, or receives payments from, Norfolk Southern or any of our consolidated subsidiaries for property or services in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of $1 million or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues; and

the director is an executive officer or compensated employee, or an immediate family member of the director is an executive officer, of a charitable organization that receives donations from Norfolk Southern, any of our consolidated subsidiaries or the Norfolk Southern Foundation in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of $1 million or 2% of such charitable organization’s donations.

For purposes of these categorical standards, “immediate family member” has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as Appendix A to this proxy statement. The filing can be accessed atwww.sec.gov or on Norfolk Southern’s web site,www.nscorp.comdefinition used in the “Investors Relations” section,New York Stock Exchange’s Listing Standards. These categorical independence standards are available on our website at www.norfolksouthern.com on the “Invest in NS” page under “Governance Documents.”

The Board has determined that all the “Financial Reportsdirector nominees other than Mr. Squires satisfy the above categorical standards and Proxy Statements” subsection.qualify as independent directors of Norfolk Southern. Mr. Squires serves as our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and, therefore, is not an independent director. In making these independence determinations, our Board of Directors considered the following transactions:

The Norfolk Southern Foundation made charitable grants to Purdue University during the past three years, pursuant to Norfolk Southern’s College Partnership program. From time-to-time, the Norfolk Southern Foundation may make charitable contributions to Purdue University pursuant to the Foundation’s employee-directed matching gift program. Mr. Daniels has been President of Purdue University since January 2013.

Norfolk Southern provided transportation services to and received lease payments from USG Corporation during the past three years and paid USG Corporation freight damage claims during the past two years. Ms. Scanlon has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of USG Corporation since November 2016.

These transactions did not exceed our categorical independence standards and were not sufficiently material as to require disclosure as a Related Persons Transaction under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K. In addition, stockholders who wish to request a paper copy of the Amended EMIP may contact: Denise W. Hutson, Corporate Secretary, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Three Commercial Place, Norfolk, Virginia 23510-9219 (telephone 757-823-5567).

The summary of the Amended EMIP set forth below describes only the material features of the plan. The Amended EMIP is available to stockholders, as noted above, and stockholders should reference the plan document as needed for other plan provisions and to clarify any part of this summary.

Purpose of EMIP and Certain Recent Amendments Thereto

The Norfolk Southern Corporation Executive Management Incentive Plan (“EMIP”) helps Norfolk Southern remain competitiveBoard considered these relationships in its ability to attractnomination of Mr. Daniels and retain qualified personnel by providing an annual cash incentive opportunity to Board-appointed officers with the rankMs. Scanlon and determined that their independence as directors of Vice President and above. See the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section that begins on page 45 of this proxy statement for information regarding our executive compensation strategy, including additional information about the annual cash incentive provided under EMIP. The amendment we are asking you to approve will allow Norfolk Southern the opportunity to make performance-based EMIP awards that are deductible under current tax laws.

On December 2, 2014, the Board approved the Amended EMIP, subject to stockholder approval at this meeting, primarily to qualify the annual incentive payments under the plan as performance-based compensation for purposes of Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m). Section 162(m) places a limit on the amount that a public company may deduct in a year for compensation

paid to the company’s chief executive officer or any of the company’s three other most highly compensated executive officers (other than its principal executive officer and principal financial officer) who are employed as of the end of the year. These individuals are defined as “covered employees” in Section 162(m).

However, performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) that is paid to a covered employee is not subject to the limitation on tax deductibility. One of the requirements to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) is that stockholders have approved the plan under which the awards are granted and the material terms of the performance goals pursuant to which compensation is paid within the previous five years. Norfolk Southern’s stockholders last approved the EMIP in May 2010 with 94.9% of the vote for approval, excluding abstentions and shares that were not voted. Norfolk Southern is seeking stockholder approval of the Amended EMIP to assure that the plan can continue to provide participants with performance-based compensation that is deductible under current tax laws and regulations. However, Norfolk Southern reserves the right to pay compensation under the Amended EMIP that does not qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) as circumstances may warrant, as described inImpact of the Tax Treatment of Awards on Norfolk Southern’s Compensation Policies on page 60 of this proxy statement. Approval of this Item 4 will constitute approval of the Amended EMIP, including the material terms of the performance standards in the plan.

Since EMIP was last approved by stockholders in May 2010, the Board has made the following changes in the Amended EMIP, each as further described below:impaired.

(1)       Maximum Amount of Award –In April 2012, the Board amended EMIP to provide that bonuses paid to any executive under the plan will not exceed the lesser of three tenths of one percent of Norfolk Southern’s income from railway operations for the incentive year or ten million dollars. The Committee and the Board adopted this limit in response to concerns expressed by its stockholders, and incentives paid under EMIP have not exceeded this cap.
Southern Corporation
Page 13www.norfolksouthern.com
(2)Performance Standards– In addition to reapproving the previously established performance standards, the Amended EMIP


17          
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     2015 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

  PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE

clarifies thatCorporate Governance and the performance standards may be measured on an absolute or relative basisBoard| 2018 Annual Meeting and may include service measures and network performance.

(3)Adjustment of Earnout– The Amended EMIP provides the Committee with additional flexibility to adjust the corporate performance factor for litigation, changes in tax law or accounting principles, or accruals of amounts for payment under the plan.
(4)Authority for Plan Amendments– The Amended EMIP provides the chief executive officer with the authority to adopt amendments that are ministerial, substantively administrative, or necessary to comply with statutory or other legally mandated requirements, and which do not have a material cost to Norfolk Southern.Proxy Statement

Summary of Important Features of the Amended EMIP

The following paragraphs summarize the material terms of the Amended EMIP, including the Amended EMIP’s provisions regarding administration, eligibility, establishment and payment of annual incentive awards, individual performance adjustments, amendment and termination of the Amended EMIP, and the benefits under the Amended EMIP. The summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Amended EMIP.

Administration

The Amended EMIP can be administered by the Compensation Committee or any other committee of Norfolk Southern’s Board of Directors authorized to grant awards under the plan (the “Committee”). It is intended that each member of the Committee qualify as an outside director (as defined under Section 162(m)) and as an independent director under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange. The Committee has the sole discretion, subject to certain limitations, to interpret the Amended EMIP; to select eligible officers for participation; to determine the bonus levels under the Amended EMIP; to select performance criteria from the list specified in the plan and assign weights to the selected performance criteria; to set performance goals; and to adopt, amend and rescind rules relating to the Amended EMIP.

Eligibility

Board-elected officers at the level of Vice President and above are eligible to be selected by the Committee for participation in the plan. As of February 1, 2015,

there were 29 Board-elected officers at the level of Vice President and above eligible to participate in the plan.

Establishment of Incentive Groups, Bonus Levels, and Performance Standards

Not later than the first ninety days of an incentive year, the Committee establishes incentive groups and sets the bonus level for each incentive group. The bonus level is set as a percentage of a participant’s incentive-year salary. Each incentive year, the Committee selects one or more performance criteria and establishes performance goals for the selected criteria.

The Committee selects from among the following performance criteria or any combination thereof:

Earnings measures (including net income, earnings per share, income from continuing operations, income before income taxes, income from railway operations); return measures (including net income divided by total assets, return on shareholder equity, return on average invested capital); service measures (including connection performance, train performance, plan adherence); cash flow measures (including operating cash flow, free cash flow); productivity measures (including total operating expense per thousand gross ton miles or revenue ton miles, total operating revenue per employee, total operating expense per employee, gross ton miles or revenue ton miles per employee, carloads per employee, revenue ton miles per mile of road operated, total operating expense per carload, revenue ton miles per carload, gross ton miles or revenue ton miles per train hour, percent of loaded-to-total car miles, network performance); fair market value of shares of Norfolk Southern’s common stock; revenue measures; expense measures; operating ratio measures; customer satisfaction measures; working capital measures; cost control measures; economic value added measures; and safety measures.

The Committee has discretion to apply performance criteria on a corporate, division or department level and to assign weights to each selected performance criterion or any combination thereof. The Committee may establish performance goals for the performance criteria it selects either solely with respect to Norfolk Southern’s performance or by comparison to a published market or industry index.



18
2015 Proxy Statement

     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE  

Payment of Annual Incentive Awards

A participant’s annual incentive award is equal to the product of the corporate performance factor for the incentive year times the applicable bonus level times the participant’s salary for the incentive year.

At the end of each incentive year, the Committee determines the extent to which the established performance goals have been achieved for the incentive year and the corporate performance factor based upon Norfolk Southern’s performance with respect to that incentive year’s goals. In determining the corporate performance factor, special charges and restructuring charges, unusual or infrequent accounting adjustments which are significant, and restatements or reclassifications, all as determined in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, will be excluded if they would have the effect of reducing the corporate performance factor, and will be included if they would have the effect of increasing the corporate performance factor, unless the Committee determines otherwise. The Committee also has discretion to include or exclude any of the following events in determining whether the corporate performance factor has been achieved: (a) litigation, claims, judgments, settlements or loss contingencies, (b) the effect of changes in tax law, accounting principles, or other such laws or provisions affecting reported results, or (c) accruals of any amounts for payment under the Plan or any of our other compensation arrangements.

Participants may elect to defer all or a portion of awards under the Amended EMIP to Norfolk Southern’s Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan.

Individual Adjustments

The Amended EMIP provides that the Committee may review the performance of any of the covered employees and reduce the payment. For all other participants, the Amended EMIP provides that the chief executive officer may review the participant’s performance and increase or decrease the award of any such participant, provided that the amount of any increase will not exceed 25 percent of the award otherwise payable.

Clawback Provision

The Board of Directors may require reimbursement of all or any portion of an excess bonus that was paid to a participant under the plan if financial results are restated due to Norfolk Southern’s material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws and if the excess bonus was distributed within three

years of the date that the restatement was disclosed. The excess bonus is the difference between the bonus paid to the individual and the bonus that would have been paid if calculated using the restated financial statements. Norfolk Southern is not required to award an additional annual incentive to participants if restated financial earnings would result in a higher payment. A bonus may also be recouped as necessary to comply with the law.

Amendment or Termination

The Amended EMIP will be effective the date the plan is approved by stockholders. The chief executive officer may make any amendments to the plan that are, in his or her discretion, ministerial, substantively administrative, or necessary to comply with statutory or other legally mandated requirements, where the implementation of such amendment does not result in a material cost to Norfolk Southern. All other amendments to the plan and any termination of the plan must be made by the Board of Directors, provided that no amendment or termination may deprive a participant of any rights previously accrued. A termination may not be effective for the same incentive year in which the Board took the necessary action to terminate the Amended EMIP.

Benefits Under the Plan

While the Amended EMIP will be effective the date the plan is approved by stockholders, the selection of performance criteria must be made within ninety days of the beginning of an incentive year and, as a result, the Amended EMIP will not be used by the Committee until the 2016 incentive year. Since the Board will not set the Executive Officers’ 2016 base salaries and bonus levels until late 2015, and the Committee will not establish 2016 performance criteria and performance goals until early 2016, it is not possible to determine the dollar value of the incentive opportunity or the actual amount of incentive pay that will be available for the 2016 incentive year (the first full incentive year in which Amended EMIP is effective). In addition, the benefits that may be paid under the Amended EMIP are not determinable for the 2015 fiscal year because Norfolk Southern cannot determine the extent to which the performance goals will be achieved in 2015.

Because the benefits that may be paid under the Amended EMIP are not determinable, the following chart shows the annual incentives that were paid under the existing EMIP for the 2014 fiscal year. A discussion of the performance criteria selected for the EMIP awards for 2014 and the results based on Norfolk Southern’s performance for that year, is found under the headingAnnual Incentive beginning on page 54 of this proxy statement.



19          
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     2015 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

  PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE

NEW PLAN BENEFITS1 TABLE

Norfolk Southern Corporation
Executive Management Incentive Plan
(indicates benefits that were earned
in 2014 under the existing EMIP)

Name and PositionDollar
Amount
C. W. Moorman, Chairman and CEO$1,813,500
J. A. Squires, President$906,750
M. R. Stewart, Executive VP and CFO$544,050
D. H. Butler, Executive VP—Planning and Chief Information
       Officer$652,860
M. D. Manion, Executive VP—Operations$652,860
All Current Executive Officers as a Group2$6,562,654
All Current Directors Who Are Not Executive Officers as a
       Group3$0
All Current Officers Who Are Not Executive Officers, as a
       Group$4,424,135
____________________

1The benefits included in this table are not new benefits; rather they are the benefits that were paid to officers under the existing EMIP for fiscal year 2014. Such awards were not contingent in any way upon results of the stockholder vote on this Amended EMIP.

2Includes officers, other than the officers listed individually in the table, who have been designated by the Board of Directors as Executive Officers for purposes of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

3Directors who are not officers are not eligible for Amended EMIP but are listed in the table to comply with SEC guidance.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR approval of the Norfolk Southern Corporation Executive Management Incentive Plan, as amended.

Vote Required: Under Virginia law, and under our Restated Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, this proposal is approved, so long as a quorum for the meeting exists, if the votes cast favoring the action exceed the votes opposing the action. Abstentions or shares that are not voted are not counted as cast for this purpose. Brokers do not have the authority to vote their customers’ shares on this matter if they do not receive instructions as to how to vote on this item.


20
2015 Proxy Statement

     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE  

ITEM 5: APPROVAL OF NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN, AS AMENDED (“AMENDED LTIP”)

Subject to stockholder approval at this meeting, the Board of Directors at its meeting on January 23, 2015, adopted certain amendments to the Norfolk Southern Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan (“Amended LTIP”), as more fully described herein.

A copy of the Amended LTIP has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as Appendix B to this proxy statement. The filing can be accessed atwww.sec.gov or on Norfolk Southern’s web site,www.nscorp.com in the “Investor Relations” section, under the “Financial Reports and Proxy Statements” subsection. In addition, stockholders who wish to request a paper copy of the Amended LTIP may contact: Denise W. Hutson, Corporate Secretary, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Three Commercial Place, Norfolk, Virginia 23510-9219 (telephone 757-823-5567).

The summary of the Amended LTIP set forth below describes only the material features of the plan. The Amended LTIP is available to stockholders, as noted above, and stockholders should reference the plan document as needed for other plan provisions and to clarify any part of this summary.

Purpose of the Amended LTIP

The Norfolk Southern Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) helps drive the success of Norfolk Southern by providing an opportunity for non-employee directors, officers and other employees to acquire an ownership interest in Norfolk Southern and provide alignment of interest with its stockholders. We believe that this ownership interest provides participants with an additional incentive to devote their maximum efforts and skills to the advancement of Norfolk Southern. The LTIP also helps Norfolk Southern remain competitive in its ability to attract and retain qualified personnel. See the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section contained in this proxy statement for information regarding our executive compensation strategy, including additional information about the LTIP provided under the heading Long-Term Incentive Awards on page 56 of this proxy statement. LTIP was last approved by our stockholders at their Annual Meeting on May 13, 2010.

The Amended LTIP permits the grant of non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights (settled in cash or in shares of stock as exercise gain shares), restricted shares, restricted stock units (settled in

cash or in shares of stock as restricted stock unit shares), and performance share units (settled in cash or in shares of stock as performance shares).

The following paragraphs summarize the material terms of the Amended LTIP, including the proposed material changes made in the Amended LTIP. The summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Amended LTIP.

Summary of Proposed Material Changes

Our Board of Directors approved the Amended LTIP on January 23, 2015, subject to stockholder approval at this meeting. The proposed material changes to the Amended LTIP are:

(1)Shares Available—Under LTIP, last approved by stockholders at their 2010 Annual Meeting, a total of 3.9 million shares of Norfolk Southern’s authorized but unissued Common Stock remained available for future grants to participants as of February 1, 2015. Under the Amended LTIP, an additional 8 million shares of Norfolk Southern’s stock are approved for issuance as of May 14, 2015.

(2)Maximum Award—The Amended LTIP provides that the maximum award of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares, restricted stock units and performance shares that can be made to a participant in one year is 1 million shares of stock underlying the awards and limits the annual aggregate grant date fair value of awards that can be made to a non-employee director to $500,000.

(3)Vesting Period—The LTIP previously required that the Committee impose a minimum restriction period of three years and a maximum restriction period of five years for grants of restricted shares and restricted stock units. The Amended LTIP eliminates the maximum restriction period and lowers the minimum restriction period for grants to non-employee directors from three years to one year. The Amended LTIP revises the definition of retirement for non-employee directors to eliminate the requirement to serve for two consecutive years to retain an award granted under the plan.

(4)Eliminate Potential Tax Gross-Up Payments—The Amended LTIP eliminates tax gross-up payments following a change in control of Norfolk Southern on awards that are subject to a retention agreement.



21          
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     2015 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

  PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE

(5)Payment of Dividends—The Amended LTIP clarifies that if dividends are authorized on restricted shares subject to performance goals, then the dividends may be paid only to the extent that the performance goals are achieved.

(6)Accelerated Distribution on Death—The Amended LTIP accelerates the distribution of restricted shares and restricted stock units to the beneficiary following a participant’s death if the award was not subject to performance goals.

(7)Eliminate Adjustments for Individual Performance—The Amended LTIP eliminates Committee discretion to adjust the payout of restricted shares, restricted stock units and performance shares based on individual performance.

(8)Performance Standards—In addition to reapproving the previously established performance standards, the Amended LTIP clarifies that performance standards may be measured on an absolute or relative basis and may include network performance and economic value added measures.

(9)Compliance With Code Section 162(m)—Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code places a limit on the amount that a public company may deduct in any one taxable year for compensation paid to the company’s chief executive officer or any of the company’s three other most highly compensated executive officers (other than its principal executive officer and principal financial officer) who are employed as of the end of the year. These individuals are defined as “covered employees” in Section 162(m). However, performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) that is paid to a covered employee is not subject to the limitation on tax deductibility. One of the requirements to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) is that stockholders have approved the plan under which the awards are granted and the material terms of the performance goals pursuant to which compensation is paid within the previous five years. Norfolk Southern’s stockholders last approved the LTIP in May 2010 with 93.0% of shareholders approving, excluding abstentions and shares that were not voted. Norfolk Southern is seeking stockholder approval of the Amended LTIP to assure that the plan can continue to provide participants with performance-based compensation that is deductible under current tax laws and regulations. However, Norfolk Southern reserves the right to pay compensation under the Amended LTIP that does not qualify as

performance-based compensation as circumstances may warrant, as described inImpact of the Tax Treatment of Awards on Norfolk Southern’s Compensation Policies on page 60 of this proxy statement.

(10)Automatic Prorated Award for Certain Non-Employee Directors. The Amended LTIP provides an automatic award for new non-employee directors under the same terms as granted to other non-employee directors that year (if any grant was made), prorated based on the number of days remaining in the calendar year of the individual’s becoming a director.

Summary of the Important Features of the Amended LTIP

Administration

The Amended LTIP can be administered by the Compensation Committee or any other committee of Norfolk Southern’s Board of Directors authorized to grant awards under the Amended LTIP (the “Committee”). It is intended that each member of the Committee qualify as an outside director (under Section 162(m)), as a non-employee director under Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and as an independent director under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange. The Committee has the sole discretion, except as may be delegated to the chief executive officer, to interpret the Amended LTIP; to select participants; to determine the type, size, terms and conditions of awards; to authorize the grant of awards; and to adopt, amend and rescind rules relating to the Amended LTIP. The Committee may delegate authority to the chief executive officer to select the officers and employees who participate in the Amended LTIP (provided, however, that only the Committee may grant awards to the chief executive officer and Executive Officers); to determine the type, size, terms and conditions of awards under the Amended LTIP; and to authorize the grant of awards.

The Amended LTIP permits the Committee to authorize the exchange of a new award for one that currently is outstanding only in the event of a merger or consolidation of Norfolk Southern and only to the extent such exchange is permissible under Internal Revenue Code Section 409A.

Eligibility

To be eligible to be a participant in the Amended LTIP, an individual on the date an award is made must be a full-time nonagreement officer or employee who is a participant in Norfolk Southern’s Executive Management Incentive



22
2015 Proxy Statement

     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE  

Plan or Management Incentive Plan, or be designated as a full-time nonagreement employee of Norfolk Southern or its subsidiaries who can make an appreciable contribution to the attainment of Norfolk Southern’s overall business objectives, as determined by the Committee, and reside in the United States or Canada. Non-employee directors of Norfolk Southern are also eligible for selection by the Committee to participate in the Amended LTIP. As of February 1, 2015, there were 11 non-employee directors, 9 officers designated as executive officers (“Executive Officers”) by Norfolk Southern’s Board of Directors, and 20 participants (other than Executive Officers) in the Executive Management Incentive Plan or Management Incentive Plan who were eligible for selection by the Committee to participate in the Amended LTIP.

Fungible Share Ratio

The Amended LTIP maintains a fungible share reserve ratio so that, for awards granted after the date of the stockholders’ 2010 Annual Meeting, the number of shares remaining available for issuance under the Amended LTIP will be reduced by 1 for each award granted as an option or stock-settled stock appreciation right, or by 1.61 for each full value award (i.e., restricted shares, restricted stock units, or performance share units).

Under the Amended LTIP, shares that are forfeited, cancelled, exchanged, surrendered, terminated or expired again are available for awards under the plan, using the same fungible share ratios as applied to the shares that were forfeited. Thus, if a stock-based award other than an option or a stock appreciation right is forfeited, then 1.61 shares will again be available for awards under the plan for every one share or unit forfeited. However, the following shares will not be available again for awards under the plan: (1) shares not issued or delivered as a result of the net settlement of an outstanding stock appreciation right or option, (2) shares used to pay the exercise price or withholding taxes related to an outstanding award, or (3) shares repurchased on the open market with proceeds of an option exercise.

Incentive Stock Options

The Committee may grant incentive stock options, as defined under Internal Revenue Code Section 422, which are subject to the following terms and conditions: (1) the option price per share will be determined by the Committee but will not, in any event, be less than 100% of the fair market value of the stock on the award date; (2) the term of the option will be fixed by the Committee but will not, in any event, exceed ten years from the

date the option is granted; (3) options may be exercised during the lifetime of the participant, and following his death only by the beneficiary (or, if the beneficiary dies after the participant, but before the option is exercised and before such rights expire, by the beneficiary’s estate) but otherwise options may not be assigned or alienated; (4) options will not be exercisable before one year after the date of grant, or such longer period as the Committee may determine; (5) the purchase price of stock upon exercise of an option will be paid to Norfolk Southern at the time of the exercise of the option in cash, or at the discretion of the Committee, by surrender of shares of previously acquired Norfolk Southern stock which have been held by a participant for at least six months next preceding the date of exercise and which will be valued at fair market value on the date of the option exercise; and (6) an option will expire upon the earliest of (i) the expiration of its term, (ii) for a participant whose employment is terminated due to retirement, disability or death, the expiration of its term (except as otherwise provided by the Committee), (iii) the last day of active service of a participant whose employment is terminated for any reason other than retirement, disability or death, (iv) the last day of employment of a participant who is granted a leave of absence if the participant’s employment terminates at any time during or at the end of the leave of absence, or (v) in connection with the merger or consolidation of Norfolk Southern, the date of grant of a new award to replace the option.

Non-Qualified Stock Options

The Committee may authorize the grant of non-qualified stock options subject to the same terms, conditions and restrictions previously set forth for incentive stock options.

Stock Appreciation Rights

The Committee may grant a stock appreciation right (“SAR”) in tandem with an option or on a stand alone basis. If granted in connection with an option, the SAR can be exercised on the same basis as the option to which it relates. If granted on a stand alone basis, the SAR can be exercised at a price not less than 100% of the fair market value of Norfolk Southern’s stock on the award date and during a term not exceeding 10 years from the award date. The Committee may provide that the SAR will be settled in cash (“cash-settled SAR”) or in shares of Norfolk Southern stock (“stock-settled SAR”).



23          
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     2015 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

  PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE

Upon exercise, tandem and stand alone SARs entitle a participant to receive shares of common stock equal to the number of shares of stock that have an aggregate fair market value on the exercise date equal to the amount by which the fair market value of one share of stock exceeds the option price per share of the related option, multiplied by the number of shares covered by the related option. If granted in tandem with an option, a participant must surrender to Norfolk Southern the related unexercised option in order to exercise the SAR.

Upon exercise of a cash-settled SAR, a participant receives cash equal to the amount by which the fair market value of a share of stock on the date of exercise exceeds the option price per share of the related option, multiplied by the number of shares covered by the related option.

Restricted Shares and Restricted Stock Units

The Committee may grant restricted shares or restricted stock units subject to a restriction period of not less than 36 months, or for non-employee directors not less than 12 months.

Restricted shares are subject to any restrictions the Committee establishes (including any limitation on the right to vote restricted shares or the right to receive dividends), and the restrictions may lapse separately or in combination. Until the restriction period lapses, the participant may not sell, transfer, assign, pledge or otherwise dispose of the shares.

The Committee may authorize that restricted stock units be payable in cash or in shares of stock following the later of the end of the restriction period or any applicable retention agreement. During the restriction period, a participant will not have beneficial ownership interest in the stock underlying the units and will not have the right to vote the shares or receive dividends.

The Committee determines at the time an award is granted whether restricted shares or restricted stock units are subject to achievement of specified performance goal(s) and whether the restriction period is subject to early termination upon achievement of the goals. Restricted shares, including any dividends, and restricted stock units will be forfeited to the extent any performance goals are not achieved.

Restricted shares and restricted stock units will be forfeited upon termination of employment before the end of the restriction period, unless a participant’s employment is terminated by retirement, disability or death. The Committee may waive any or all restrictions

on restricted shares and restricted stock units awarded under the Amended LTIP. If the restrictions are waived, restricted stock units will be settled on the same date as would have applied absent a waiver of restrictions if no performance goals were imposed, or within two and one half months after the end of the year in which all restrictions are either waived or satisfied if performance goals were imposed.

Performance Share Units

The Committee may grant performance share units (“PSUs”) which entitle the participant to receive shares of stock or cash (or a combination thereof) as determined by the Committee, upon achievement of performance goals over a specified performance cycle. The Committee selects performance criteria, establishes the performance goals and determines the performance cycle over which the selected goals will apply. The Committee determines whether the goals have been met and authorizes the issuance of performance shares to participants. PSUs are forfeited to the extent performance goals are not achieved.

If a participant’s employment terminates before the end of the performance cycle for any reason other than retirement, disability or death, the participant forfeits all PSUs.

Performance Criteria

For performance share units and for any restricted shares or restricted stock units that are subject to performance goals, the Committee selects one or more of the following performance criteria:

Earnings measures (including net income, earnings per share, income from continuing operations, income before income taxes, income from railway operations); return measures (including net income divided by total assets, return on shareholder equity, return on average invested capital); cash flow measures (including operating cash flow, free cash flow); productivity measures (including total operating expense per thousand gross ton miles or revenue ton miles, total operating revenue per employee, total operating expense per employee, gross ton miles or revenue ton miles per employee, carloads per employee, revenue ton miles per mile of road operated, total operating expense per carload, revenue ton miles per carload, gross ton miles or revenue ton miles per train hour, percent of loaded-to-total car miles, network performance); fair market value of shares of Norfolk Southern’s Common Stock;



24
2015 Proxy Statement

     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE  

revenue measures; expense measures; operating ratio measures; customer satisfaction measures; working capital measures; cost control measures; total shareholder return measures; economic value added measures; and safety measures.

The Committee sets the performance goals and weighting percentages for the criteria and determines the length of the performance period and/or restriction period, if applicable, over which the selected performance goals apply.

After the end of the performance cycle, the Committee determines the extent to which the Performance Goals were achieved. Special charges and restructuring charges, unusual or infrequent accounting adjustments which are significant, and restatements or reclassifications, all as determined in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, are excluded if they would have the effect of reducing the percentage of performance goals achieved, and are included if they would have the effect of increasing the percentage of performance goals achieved, unless the Committee determines otherwise.

Retention Agreements

The Committee may require as a condition of restricted stock units that the participant enter into a retention agreement with Norfolk Southern providing that shares or cash to be earned at the end of the restriction period are subject to retention for a specified period of time.

In addition, the Committee may require that exercise gain shares, performance shares, restricted shares, or restricted stock unit shares are subject to retention. In that case, the shares of stock underlying the awards will be held by Norfolk Southern until expiration of the retention period (or waiver of the retention period by the Committee). Shares subject to retention cannot be sold, transferred, assigned, pledged, conveyed or otherwise disposed of by the participant.

Retention periods cease upon a Change in Control. Generally, a Change in Control occurs if: (1) any person becomes the beneficial owner of 20% or more of the stock, (2) any consolidation or merger occurs in which Norfolk Southern is not the surviving corporation or any sale or lease of substantially all Norfolk Southern’s assets occurs, or (3) within any period of two consecutive years the composition of the Board of Directors of Norfolk Southern changes such that the directors in office at the beginning of the period (along with any new directors elected by at least two thirds of the incumbent directors) no longer constitute a majority of the Board.

Dividend Equivalent Payments

The Committee may authorize the immediate payment of dividend equivalents on stock covered by an option or stock appreciation right in an amount equal to, and commensurate with, dividends paid on Norfolk Southern’s stock. Dividend equivalents on options or SARs may be paid in cash or stock.

The Committee may authorize the immediate or deferred payment of dividend equivalents on stock underlying restricted stock units that are not subject to performance goals, payable in cash or stock. The Committee also may authorize the deferred payment of dividend equivalents on stock underlying performance share units or restricted share units subject to performance goals. Deferred dividend equivalents for awards subject to performance goals may be paid only to the extent that performance goals on the underlying award are achieved are payable in cash or converted to additional performance shares or restricted stock unit shares (as applicable).

Dividend equivalents are not paid or accrued during a participant’s leave of absence.

Non-Compete Covenants

The Committee may require as a condition of any award that the participant enter into a non-compete, non-solicitation and confidentiality agreement, and/or that the award is subject to immediate forfeiture if the participant engages in competing employment for a specified period of time following termination of employment.

Amendment or Termination

The Board of Directors may at any time further amend the Amended LTIP, provided that no change in any awards previously granted to a participant can be made which would impair the rights of a participant without that participant’s consent. In addition, the Board may not, without stockholder approval, make any amendment that materially increases the benefits accruing to participants under the plan, materially increases the number of securities that may be issued under the plan, or materially modifies the requirements for participation in the plan or where such approval otherwise is necessary to comply with listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange, the requirements of any rule(s) under Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or other Federal or state laws or regulations as may be applicable.



25          
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     2015 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

  PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE

Tax Status

Under current Federal income tax laws, the principal Federal tax consequences to participants and Norfolk Southern of the grant and exercise of incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options are summarized below:

Incentive Stock Options.No income results to a participant upon the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option, provided that (1) there is no disqualifying disposition of option stock within one year after the transfer of option stock to the participant; and (2) the participant is an employee of Norfolk Southern at all times during the period beginning on the date of grant and ending on the date three months (or twelve months in the case of a participant who is totally and permanently disabled) prior to the date of exercise. In the event of a disposition of option stock following the expiration of one year after the transfer of the stock to the participant, any gain or loss, equal to the difference between the amount realized upon the disposition and the option price, generally will be taxable as long-term capital gain or loss. In the event of a disqualifying disposition of option stock prior to the expiration of the one-year holding period, the participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the excess of the fair market value of the option stock at the time of exercise (or the amount realized upon such disposition, if less) over the option price. If the amount realized upon the disqualifying disposition exceeds the fair market value of the option stock at the time of exercise, the excess will be taxable as short-term capital gain. If the amount realized upon the disqualifying disposition is less than the

option price, the participant will recognize a short-term capital loss equal to the excess of the option price over the amount realized.

No deduction is allowable to Norfolk Southern upon the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option. In the event that a participant recognizes ordinary income as a result of a disqualifying disposition of the option stock, Norfolk Southern generally will be entitled to a deduction in an amount equal to the ordinary income recognized by the participant.

Non-Qualified Stock Options.No income is recognized upon the grant of a non-qualified stock option. The participant recognizes ordinary income upon exercise of the non-qualified stock option equal to the excess of the fair market value of the option stock on the date of exercise over the option price.

Norfolk Southern generally will be entitled to a deduction equal to the ordinary income recognized by the participant in the same taxable year in which the participant recognizes ordinary income with respect to non-qualified stock options.

Awards

Grants under the plan are made solely in the discretion of the Committee, and, if properly delegated, the chief executive officer. For this reason, it is not possible to determine the grants that will be made to our directors, officers or other employee participants if stockholder approval is obtained.



Outstanding Awards as of February 1, 2015

As of February 1, 2015, there were:

2,054,025performance share unit and restricted stock unit awards outstanding, which represent the full-value awards outstanding under the LTIP;

6,451,004stock options outstanding under all of Norfolk Southern’s equity compensation plans, with a weighted average exercise price of $66.31 and weighted average remaining term of 6.87 years;

3,902,309 shares remaining available for grant under the LTIP;

817,576 shares available for grant under the Norfolk Southern Corporation Thoroughbred Stock Option Plan1;

9,000 shares available for grant under the Norfolk Southern Corporation Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan (effective January 23, 2015, the Board amended that plan to provide that no additional awards will be made under the plan after that date); and

328,068,144 shares of Norfolk Southern’s Common Stock outstanding.

____________________

1The Thoroughbred Stock Option Plan permits the grant of options, with an option price of not less than 100% of the fair market value on the grant date and for a term that may not exceed 10 years from the grant date.

26
2015 Proxy Statement

     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE  

Equity Compensation Plan Information as of December 31, 2014

Plan Category

          

Number of
securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options,
warrants and rights
(a)

          

Weighted
average
exercise price
of outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
(b)

          

Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuance
under equity
compensation plans
(excluding
securities reflected
in column (a))
(1)
(c)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 7,241,162 (2)$60.28 (3)              4,899,428           
Equity compensation plans not approved by security
       holders
1,084,904 $67.24  1,007,896 (4) 
       Total              8,326,0665,907,324
____________________

1Excludes securities reflected in column (a).

2Includes options, restricted stock units and performance share units granted under the Long-Term Incentive Plan that will be settled in shares of stock.

3Calculated without regard to 2,495,249 outstanding restricted stock units and performance share units at December 31, 2014.

4Of the shares remaining available for grant under plans not approved by stockholders, 9,000 are available for grant as restricted stock under the Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR approval of the Norfolk Southern Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended.

Vote Required: Under Virginia law, and under our Restated Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, this proposal is approved, so long as a quorum for the meeting exists, if the votes cast favoring the action exceed the votes opposing the action. Abstentions or shares that are not voted are not counted as cast for this purpose. Brokers do not have the authority to vote their customers’ shares on this matter if they do not receive instructions as to how to vote on this item.

OTHER MATTERS

The Board of Directors does not know of any other matters to be presented at the 2015 Annual Meeting, other than as noted elsewhere in this proxy statement. If other matters are properly brought for a vote before the 2015 Annual Meeting or at any postponement or adjournment thereof, your proxy gives authority to the persons named as proxies on the proxy card or voting instruction form to vote on these matters in accordance with their best judgment. The Chairman may refuse to allow the presentation of a proposal or a nomination for the Board at the Annual Meeting if it is not properly submitted.



27          
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     2015 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

  BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF STOCK


SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Applicable SEC rules require that we furnish you the following information relating to the oversight and management of Norfolk Southern and to certain matters concerning our Board of Directors and officers who are designated by our Board of Directors as executive officers for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Executive Officers”).

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF STOCK

Based solely on our records and our review of the most recent Schedule 13G filings with the SEC, the following tables show information concerning the persons or groups known to Norfolk Southern to be beneficial owners of more than five percent of our common stock, our only class of voting securities:

Title of ClassName and Address of Beneficial OwnerAmount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership
Percent
of
Class
Common StockThe Vanguard Group1
100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355
18,925,16716.1%1
Common StockBlackrock, Inc.2
55 East 52ndStreet, New York, NY 10022
18,114,03925.9%2
____________________

1The Vanguard Group reported in its Schedule 13G filing that it beneficially owned 6.1% of our common stock as of December 31, 2014, and that as of that date it had sole voting power with respect to 553,571 of such shares, shared voting power with respect to none of such shares, sole investment power with respect to 18,420,414 of such shares, and shared investment power with respect to 504,753 of such shares.

2Blackrock, Inc. reported in its Schedule 13G filing that it beneficially owned 5.9% of our common stock as of December 31, 2014, and that as of that date, it had sole voting power with respect to 15,338,528 of such shares, shared voting power with respect to none of such shares, and sole investment power with respect to all of such shares.

The following table shows, as of January 30, 2015, the beneficial ownership of our common stock for:

(1)each director and each nominee;
(2)our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer, and each of the other three most highly compensated Executive Officers, based on total compensation for 2014 (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”); and
(3)all directors and Executive Officers as a group.

Unless otherwise indicated by footnote to the data in the table, all such shares are held with sole voting and investment power, and no director or Executive Officer beneficially owns any Norfolk Southern equity securities other than our common stock. No one director or Executive Officer owns as much as 1% of the total outstanding shares of our common stock. All directors and Executive Officers as a group own approximately 0.66% of the total outstanding shares of our common stock.

28
2015 Proxy Statement

     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF STOCK  

NameShares of
Common Stock
NameShares of
Common Stock
    Thomas D. Bell, Jr.16,8541Amy E. Miles3,0001
    Erskine B. Bowles11,0971Charles W. Moorman, IV806,5962
    Robert A. Bradway10,8001Martin H. Nesbitt6,0651
    Wesley G. Bush8,7971James A. Squires197,2863
    Daniel A. Carp33,2021John R. Thompson6,0651
    Karen N. Horn21,5431Marta R. Stewart49,6774
    Steven F. Leer65,3421Deborah H. Butler137,9835
    Michael D. Lockhart22,0831Mark D. Manion148,2306
20 directors and Executive Officers as a group (including the persons named above)2,159,6497
____________________

1Includes a one-time grant of 3,000 restricted shares to each non-employee director when that director was first elected to the Board. These grants were made pursuant to the Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan; the director may vote these shares, but has no investment power over them until they are distributed (see information under the “Narrative to Non-Employee Director Compensation Table” caption on page 37). The amounts reported include 1,440 restricted stock units awarded pursuant to the Long-Term Incentive Plan to directors who were serving on the Board on January 27, 2015, and who have served on the Board for at least two years, qualifying them to receive the shares immediately upon leaving the Board. The amounts do not include 3,065 restricted stock units awarded to Ms. Miles, who has not served as a director for two years and would forfeit the shares if she left the Board. The amounts reported also include restricted stock units previously held, and which are vested or which will vest within 60 days, as follows: Mr. Bell, 12,414; Mr. Bowles, 6,360; Mr. Bradway, 6,360; Mr. Bush, 4,142; Mr. Carp, 28,074; Dr. Horn, 17,103; Mr. Leer, 60,902; Mr. Lockhart, 17,103; Ms. Miles, 0; Mr. Nesbitt, 1,625; and Mr. Thompson, 1,625. These restricted stock units will be settled in stock. While the directors have neither voting power nor investment power over the shares underlying these restricted stock units, the directors are entitled to receive the shares immediately upon leaving the Board. See below under “Narrative to Non-Employee Director Compensation Table—Long-Term Incentive Plan” for more information regarding these restricted stock units. The amounts reported also include shares credited to certain directors’ accounts in our Dividend Reinvestment Plan.

2Includes 2,659 shares credited to Mr. Moorman’s account in our Thrift and Investment Plan; and 456,030 shares subject to stock options granted pursuant to our Long-Term Incentive Plan with respect to which Mr. Moorman has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days.

3Includes 142 shares credited to Mr. Squires’ account in our Thrift and Investment Plan; 82,500 shares subject to stock options granted pursuant to our Long-Term Incentive Plan with respect to which Mr. Squires has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days; and 48,978 shares owned by an immediate family member and attributable to Mr. Squires.

4Includes 2,623 shares credited to Ms. Stewart’s account in our Thrift and Investment Plan; and 13,753 shares subject to stock options granted pursuant to our Long-Term Incentive Plan with respect to which Ms. Stewart has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days.

5Includes 1,376 shares credited to Ms. Butler’s account in our Thrift and Investment Plan; and 72,500 shares subject to stock options granted pursuant to our Long-Term Incentive Plan with respect to which Ms. Butler has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days.

6Includes 6,186 shares credited to Mr. Manion’s account in our Thrift and Investment Plan; 84,470 shares subject to stock options granted pursuant to our Long-Term Incentive Plan with respect to which Mr. Manion has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days.

7Includes 21,448 shares credited to Executive Officers’ individual accounts under our Thrift and Investment Plan. Also includes: 904,111 shares subject to stock options granted to Executive Officers pursuant to our Long-Term Incentive Plan with respect to which the participant has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days; and 48,978 shares owned by a family member whose ownership is attributed to an Executive Officer. For officers, this amount does not include restricted stock units which will ultimately be settled in shares of common stock upon the satisfaction of applicable vesting requirements but which do not vest within 60 days.

29          
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     2015 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

  BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF STOCK

The following table shows, as of January 30, 2015, the number of NS stock units credited to those non-employee directors who have made elections under the Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan to defer all or a portion of compensation and have elected to invest such amounts in phantom units of our common stock, as well as the shares of common stock (and units to be settled in shares of common stock) beneficially owned. A more detailed discussion of director compensation can be found beginning on page 37. A stock unit represents the economic equivalent of a share of our common stock and serves to align the directors’ individual financial interests with the interests of our stockholders because the value of the directors’ holdings fluctuates with the price of our common stock. These stock units ultimately are settled in cash.

Name

           

Number of
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
1

           

Number of
NS Stock
Units
2

           

Total Number
of Shares Beneficially
Owned and NS Stock Units

       
    Thomas D. Bell, Jr.16,854016,854
    Erskine B. Bowles11,0974,91016,007
    Robert A. Bradway10,800010,800
    Wesley G. Bush8,7973,124 11,921 
    Daniel A. Carp33,202 6,19939,401
    Karen N. Horn21,5430 21,543
    Steven F. Leer 65,342 31,43896,780
    Michael D. Lockhart22,0839,40231,485 
    Amy E. Miles3,00003,000
    Martin H. Nesbitt6,0650 6,065
    John R. Thompson 6,06506,065
____________________

1Figures in this column are based on the beneficial ownership that appears on page 29.

2Represents NS stock units credited to the accounts of non-employee directors who have elected under the Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan to defer all or a portion of compensation and have elected to invest such amounts in “phantom” units whose value is measured by the market value of shares of our common stock, but which ultimately will be settled in cash, not in shares of common stock. NS stock units have been available under the Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan as a hypothetical investment option since January 1, 2001.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors and Executive Officers and any persons beneficially owning more than 10 percent of a class of our stock to file reports of beneficial ownership and changes in beneficial ownership (Forms 3, 4 and 5) with the SEC. Based solely on our review of copies of Forms 3, 4 and 5 available to us, or written representations that no Forms 5 were required, we believe that all required Forms concerning 2014 beneficial ownership were filed on time by all directors and Executive Officers.



30
2015 Proxy Statement

     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

BOARD OF DIRECTORS  

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

COMPOSITIONGOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK AND ATTENDANCEPRACTICES

Our Board of Directors consists of thirteen members as of the date of this Proxy Statement. Norfolk Southern’s stockholders approved an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation to declassify the Board of Directors in 2010, so each director stands for election annually.

On January 21, 2014, the Board of Directors amended our Bylaws to increase the number of directors from twelve to fourteen and elected Amy E. Miles and James A. Squires to fill the resulting vacancies. Burton M. Joyce retired from the Board of Directors effective the date of the 2014 Annual Meeting, in accordance with the director retirement policy in our Governance Guidelines. The Board reduced the number of directors from fourteen to thirteen, effective the date of the 2014 Annual Meeting, in light of this retirement.

The Board met six times in 2014. Each director attended not less than 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board and meetings of all committees on which such director served.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


The Board of Directors has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that, among other matters, describe procedures for stockholdersshareholders and other interested parties who wish to contactcommunicate with the non-employee members of the Board (the “outside” directors). Communications will be forwarded to the Lead Independent Director after review by the Corporate Secretary, as appropriate. Communications that are unrelated to the duties and responsibilities of the Board may not be forwarded. These include matters involving individual grievances or that are otherwise not of general concern to all shareholders, and items that are business solicitations or advertisements, resumes or other job-related inquiries, spam, and hostile, threatening or similarly unsuitable communications, each of which will be handled by management, as appropriate. However, all shareholder and interested parties communications are made available to the Board of Directors upon the Board’s request. The Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on our website atwww.nscorp.com www.norfolksouthern.com on the “Invest in the “Investor Relations” sectionNS” page under “Corporate Governance.“Governance Documents.

Since February 2006, BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE
Mr. MoormanSquires has held the positions ofserved as Chief Executive Officer since June 1, 2015 and as Chairman ofsince October 1, 2015. While the Board and Chief Executive Officer. The Board of Directors believes that thiscombining the CEO and Chairman positions provides a leadership structure that is in the best interests of Norfolk Southern and our stockholders. This structure allowsshareholders, the Board of Directors recognizes the importance of strong independent board leadership and has provided for such leadership by designating a Lead Independent Director, as discussed in detail below under “Lead Independent Director.”

Combining the CEO and Chairman positions provides for consistency inof leadership of the Board and of management and reflects the depthmaintains clear lines of knowledgeauthority. Given that Mr. Moorman has regarding the business of Norfolk Southern.

Effective June 1, 2015, Mr. Moorman will step down as Chief Executive Officer of Norfolk Southern and Mr. Squires will assume this position. As part of Norfolk Southern’s normal succession planning process, the Board of Directors has determined that it is in the best interests of Norfolk Southern and our stockholders

for Mr. Moorman to remain Executive ChairmanSquires’ knowledge of the Board for a periodCorporation is more extensive than that of time to facilitate the transition. By separating the positions of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman at this time, Mr. Squires will be able to focus on managing the business of the corporation while Mr. Moorman will provide continuity in the leadership of the corporation. Mr. Moorman and Mr. Squires have worked closely together for several years, including when Mr. Squires succeeded Mr. Moorman as President in June 2013. The Board of Directors believes that their ongoing partnership in their new respective positions will ensure an efficient transition in senior management that will benefit Norfolk Southern and our stockholders.

As Executive Chairman, Mr. Moorman will continue to leverage his extensive leadership experience with Norfolk Southern and his unique insights regarding its customers, operations, markets, and the railroad industry. Mr. Moorman will advise and support Mr. Squires asany other director, he transitions into his new position as Chief Executive Officer and assumes all executive responsibilities for the daily management of Norfolk Southern. Mr. Moorman will continue to provide input into the business strategy of the corporation in order to maximize stockholder value during the transition period. Mr. Moorman will also remain involved in Norfolk Southern’s government relations efforts; corporate citizenship initiatives such as sustainability programs, charitable activities, and community engagement with railway historical societies and preservation organizations; and certain operational activities including employee outreach, field visits, and railroad inspection trips.

As Executive Chairman, Mr. Moorman also will continueis particularly well equipped to lead the Board and set the Board’s agenda in collaboration with our Lead Independent Director. Further, Mr. Squires’ experience gives him a depth of Directors in its oversight and governance responsibilities. Given his thorough understanding ofknowledge about the issues, challenges, and opportunities facing Norfolk Southern, Mr. Moorman will be positioned to identify and prioritize critical matters for Board review and deliberation. In order to assure an informed Board decision-making process, Mr. Moorman will remain a liaison and facilitate communications betweenbroader industry that the Board of Directors and management. Finally, Mr. Moorman will continue to preside at meetings ofbelieves is a highly valuable feature for the Board, serve as Chair of the Executive Committee, and perform such other duties as prescribed by the Board or set forth in the Bylaws.Chairman.

LEAD INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR
In order to provide strong independent Board leadership, the Board’s leadership structure is enhanced by the role of our Lead Independent Director, who:

is selected from the independent directors of the Board by the independent directors;
presides at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present, including all meetings of the outside directors;
calls additional meetings of the outside directors as necessary;
serves as a liaison between the Chairman and CEO and the independent directors, conferring with the Chairman and CEO on a number of topics, including the effectiveness of Board meetings;
develops and approves, together with the Chairman and CEO, Board and committee meeting agendas, meeting schedules, and other materials to be distributed to the Board in order to ensure sufficient time for informed discussions of complex issues;
monitors the flow of information from the committee chairs to the directors, reviews shareholder communications, meets with significant shareholders as appropriate, and interviews potential director candidates; and
presides over our annual board self-evaluation process.

Mr. Moorman will continueLeer was selected by the independent directors to work collaborativelybe our Lead Independent Director in 2013. Mr. Leer is an experienced director with the leadextensive knowledge of Norfolk Southern’s business, drawing from his perspectives both as a board member and as a former customer. While Mr. Leer has extensive experience as a public company CEO and chairman, because he is not currently a standing executive he is able to devote extensive time and focus to his role as Lead Independent Director. Mr. Leer has served as a director of Norfolk Southern through two leadership transitions and has been instrumental in providing continuity in the oversightleadership of the Board, and governance of Norfolk Southern. Thein facilitating communication amongst board members.

More information on the position of lead director hasLead Independent Director is contained in Norfolk Southern’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, posted on the “Invest in NS” page under “Governance Documents” on our website.



31          Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 14www.norfolksouthern.com
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION 2015 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

  BOARD OF DIRECTORSCorporate Governance and the Board| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

BOARD SELF-EVALUATION PROCESS

been structured to serve as an effective balance to the position of Executive Chairman. The lead director is selected from the independent directors of the Board by the independent directors at the Board’s organizational meeting following the Annual Meeting of Stockholders or at such other time as they deem appropriate. The lead director presides at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present and presides at all meetings of the outside directors. The Corporate Governance Guidelines require that the outside directors meet at least twice a year without members of management present, and the lead director is empowered to call additional meetings of the outside directors as necessary. In 2014, the outside directors met without members of management present at every Board meeting. The lead director also serves as a liaison between the executive directors and the outside directors, and in this capacity confers with the Chairman and CEO on the effectiveness of Board meetings. Together with the Chairman, the lead director develops and approves Board and committee meeting agendas, meeting schedules, and such other materials to be distributed to the Board in order to assure sufficient time for informed discussions of complex issues. Finally, the lead director monitors the flow of information from the committee chairs to the directors, reviews stockholder communications, meets with significant stockholders as required, and interviews potential director candidates. Further information regarding the position of lead director is set forth in Norfolk Southern’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. Mr. Leer has served as our lead director since the date of the 2013 Annual Meeting.

The lead director alsoOur Lead Independent Director presides over anour annual Boardboard self-evaluation process. For the 20142017 evaluation, the Board retained a third-party firm to facilitate the evaluation, with evaluation results sent directly to the directors without input or interpretation by management. The evaluation included an assessment of the effectiveness of the Board believes these changes have allowedand its committees, director performance, board dynamics, the effectiveness of our Lead Independent Director and committee chairs, and the level of independence between the Lead Independent Director and our Chairman and CEO. The individual assessments were organized and summarized for discussion by our Lead Independent Director with the Board. In addition, our Lead Independent Director supplemented the evaluation process to be morewith one-on-one reviews with individual directors following the evaluation as he deemed appropriate. The Board believes utilizing a third-party firm and reviewing and updating the questionnaire each year as appropriate ensures the evaluation process remains robust and ensure that the process is free from any conflicts of interest and is truly an independent review.

The CorporateBOARD REFRESHMENT AND SUCCESSION PLANNING POLICY
Our Governance Guidelines also describe the Board’sand Nominating Committee adopted a policy with respect to director attendance at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is that, to the extent possible, each director is expected to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. All of our then-current directors attended the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

The Board has approved and adopted The Thoroughbred Code of Ethics which applies to all directors, officers and employees of Norfolk Southern, and a Code of Ethical Conduct for Senior Financial Officers that applies to specified financial officers. These documents andunder our Corporate Governance Guidelines are available onrequiring that it discuss succession planning for directors, including the committee chair and lead director positions, at least annually. The Committee considers any upcoming retirements under its retirement policy for directors, desired skills and expertise for the Board, and tenure of current directors. In evaluating tenure, the Committee reviews average tenure and distribution of individual tenures for the Board (that is, the number of directors having less than five years of service, five to ten years of service and over ten years of service), with the goal of maintaining an appropriate balance of new perspectives and longer-term expertise.

RETIREMENT POLICY
Under our website atwww.nscorp.com in the “Investor Relations” section under “Corporate Governance.” Any stockholder may request printed copies of the Corporate Governance Guidelines, The Thoroughbred Codea director must retire effective as of Ethicsthe date of the annual meeting that falls on or Codenext follows the date of Ethical Conduct for Senior Financial Officers by contacting: Denise W. Hutson, Corporate Secretary, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Three Commercial Place, 13th Floor, Norfolk, Virginia 23510-9219 (telephone 757-823-5567).that director’s 72nd birthday.

DIRECTOR ELECTIONS MAJORITY VOTING POLICY AND RESIGNATION REQUIREMENT
Norfolk Southern’s Bylaws require that in an uncontested election of directors, a director shallwill be elected by a majority of votes cast. Any incumbent director who is not re-elected shallwill promptly tender his or her resignation to the Board of Directors for consideration by our Governance and Nominating Committee. The Governance and Nominating Committee will promptly consider the resignation and recommend to the Board of Directors whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation. The Board of Directors will act on the Committee’s recommendation within 90 days following certification of the election results. Any director who tenders his or her resignation pursuant to this provision will not participate in the Governance and Nominating Committee’s recommendation or Board of Directors’ consideration regarding whether or not to accept the tendered resignation. If the resignation is accepted, the Governance and Nominating Committee will recommend to the Board whether to fill the vacancy or reduce the size of the Board. We will publicly disclose the Board of Directors’ decision within four business days, including a full explanation of the process by which the decision was reached and, if applicable, the reasons why the Board rejected the director’s resignation.



32Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 15www.norfolksouthern.com
2015 Proxy Statement

 NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

BOARD OF DIRECTORS  Corporate Governance and the Board| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

PROXY ACCESS

Stockholder EngagementOur Board of Directors adopted a proxy access bylaw amendment in 2016 that permits a group of shareholders holding 3% of our outstanding shares for at least 3 years, and who otherwise comply with the Corporation’s Bylaws, to nominate up to 20% of the Board of Directors (with a minimum of 2 nominees), with up to 20 shareholders permitted to aggregate their holdings to reach the 3% threshold. Our Bylaws are posted on our website on the “Invest in NS” page under “Governance Documents.”

SPECIAL MEETINGS
A special meeting will be called by the Corporate Secretary of the Corporation upon written request by one or more shareholders who in the aggregate represent at least 20% of the Corporation’s voting shares and who otherwise comply with the Corporation’s Bylaws, which are posted on our website on the “Invest in NS” page under “Governance Documents.”

SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
Norfolk Southern regularly engages with its stockholdersshareholders on our strategic plan, governance, issues, executive compensation, issuessustainability, and other matters of interest to stockholders.shareholders. During 2014,2017, we engaged in a stockholdercontinued our shareholder outreach program and met with many of our largest institutional investors. TheOur outreach program included one-on-one meetings with members of our governance team, as well as our Corporate Secretary and Director of Investor Relations. Feedback we received from shareholders was presented to our Board of Directors and to our Governance and Nominating Committee or Compensation Committee, as appropriate, for that committee’s consideration. Our Governance and Nominating Committee, headed by our Lead Independent Director, discussed both the process for conducting this outreach program and the results of these shareholder meetings. As a resultmeetings with our Board of its stockholder engagement:Directors. In response to these engagements, we have included additional disclosure on our Corporate Sustainability and Responsibility in this Proxy Statement.

The Board of Directors amended the Corporate Governance Guidelines to reduce the number of outside boards on which a director may serve. The amended Corporate Governance Guidelines permit directors to serve on no more than three outside boards, and permit the CEO to serve on only one outside board. The Corporate Governance Guidelines previously allowed directors to serve on four outside boards.

The Compensation Committee eliminated an overlap in performance goals under EMIP and LTIP, as more fully described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

We enhanced a number of areas of disclosure in this proxy statement in response to shareholder requests, including disclosures related to compensation matters, auditor independence and the Board self-evaluation process.

QUALIFICATIONS OF DIRECTORSCORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY AND NOMINEESRESPONSIBILITY
Moving freight by rail is more fuel- and carbon-efficient than moving freight by truck: on average four times more efficient. In addition, Norfolk Southern strives to continuously reduce our fuel consumption and lower our carbon emissions. Recently, we updated our goals: to reduce locomotive fuel consumption by $80 million by 2020 through greater efficiency; and to reduce carbon emission intensity by 10% (both versus 2015 levels). In support of these goals, we continue to implement technology-driven initiatives that benefit both the environment and our bottom line.

Norfolk Southern’s directors have diverse backgrounds and provide experience and expertise in a number of critical areas to the company. The Governance and Nominating Committee considers the particular experience, attributes and qualifications of directors standing for re-election and potential nominees for election as well as the needs of theOur Board of Directors has appointed a corporate sustainability officer, who leads the company’s efforts to embed sustainable practices into corporate strategy. We have entwined sustainability into daily operations in ways that advance our business goals and honor our environmental and social commitments as a wholeresponsible corporate citizen. We strive to satisfy these commitments while driving business forward, to ensure success for all stakeholders: investors, customers, employees, communities, and its individual committees.industry partners.

The GovernanceOur Sustainability Report is published annually and Nominating Committee has identified ten areas of expertise that are particularly relevant to Norfolk Southern and has identified the directors whose key areas of expertise qualify them for each of the listed categories. The categories identifiedinformed by the Governance and Nominating Committee are:

CEO/Senior Officer—Experience working as a CEOGlobal Reporting Initiative’s G4 Core Level guidelines. The report is available on our website on the “Get to Know NS” page under “Environment.” (Please note that information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference in this Proxy Statement or Senior Officerconsidered to be part of a major public or private company or non-profit entity.this document.)

Environmental and Safety—A thorough understanding of safety and environmental issues and transportation industry regulations.

Finance and Accounting—Senior executive level experience in financial accounting and reporting, auditing, corporate finance and/or internal controls.

Governance/Board—Prior or current experience as a board member of a major organization (private, public or nonprofit).

Governmental Relations—Experience in or a strong understanding of the workings of government and public policy on a local, state and national level.

Human Resources and Compensation—Senior executive level experience or membership on a board compensation committee with an extensive understanding of compensation programs, particularly compensation programs for executive level employees and incentive based compensation programs.

Information Technology—Senior executive level or board experience with information technology issues for a major public, private or non-profit entity.


33          Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 16www.norfolksouthern.com
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION 2015 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

  BOARD OF DIRECTORSCorporate Governance and the Board| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

Highlights from our 2016-2017 sustainability cycle include:

Integrating Sustainable Business Practices
into Daily Operations
Safety is a Core Value and Pillar of
our Strategy
Achieved record locomotive fuel efficiency, improving fuel economy by nearly 1.6%
Adopted a carbon-mitigation strategy, Trees and Trains, that turns our carbon footprint into a corporate opportunity
Reducing fuel consumption:
Our locomotive fuel-management systems reduce locomotive fuel consumption;
Our Horsepower Per Ton operating tool advises engineers how many locomotives to use for each segment of a trip
Upgrading locomotives to more fuel-efficient and lower emission models at an accelerated rate over the next five years
Reducing engine idling through training and use of plug-in “Sleeper” engine heating system at rail yards to reduce locomotive idling in cold weather
Training operations employees on how to identify and reduce workplace risks through “Pause, Process, and Proceed” — assess risks, choose a safe course and proceed in the safest possible way
“I am Coming Home” and “Tell Me” campaigns make safety personal and support our behavior-based safety program
Trained 3,241 local emergency responders across 14 states in safe response to potential rail incidents
 

Marketing—Senior executive level experience in marketing combined with a strong working knowledge of Norfolk Southern’s markets, customers and strategy.

Strategic Planning—Senior executive level experience in strategic planning for a major public, private or non-profit entity.

Transportation—Extensive knowledge and experience in the transportation industry, either as a senior executive of a transportation or logistics company or as a senior executive of a customer of a transportation company.

Each director’s biography includes a listing of the areas of expertise where each director or nominee is most skilled. In addition, the table below summarizes the particular attributes that led the Governance and Nominating Committee to nominate each individual as a director of Norfolk Southern.

BellGenerating Economic Benefits for Businesses
and Communities
BowlesBradwayBushCarpHornLeerLockhartMilesMoormanNesbittSquiresThompson
   CEO/Senior Officer XIncreasing the Diversity of Our Workforce and
Improving our Communities
Financed an employee payroll of more than $2 billion and disbursed a combined $5.4 billion in taxes, purchases, and other payments through 22 states and the District of Columbia
Realized new business from 75 industries NS assisted in locating or expanding along its lines - representing a customer investment of over $1 billion
Invested $1.72 billion, or 16 cents of every $1 in operating revenue, in capital projects, generating economic benefits across the NS supply chain
83% of employees represented by 13 trade unions
Stepping up recruitment of women for operations jobs to increase talent pool and the diversity of experience in the workplace
New hires included 19% women and 32% minorities
Thoroughbred Volunteers contributed more than 1,600 hours of service to our communities

SUSTAINABILITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE RISK MANAGEMENT

Norfolk Southern, through its Enterprise Risk Management Program and disclosure procedures, reviews and monitors sustainability and climate change risks relating to volatility in energy prices, business interruptions from severe weather, and legislative and regulatory efforts to limit greenhouse gas emissions. Our Board receives updates on these risks, and our management works with employees to identify, assess, and mitigate these risks and any potential emerging risks associated with sustainability and climate change. For more information on these risks, please see our annual and quarterly reports filed with the SEC.

       XNorfolk Southern Corporation       XPage 17       Xwww.norfolksouthern.com       XXXXXXXXX 
 Environmental and SafetyXX
   Finance and AccountingXXXXXXXXX
   Governance/BoardXXXXXXXXXXXXX
   Governmental RelationsXXXXXXX
   Human Resources andXXXXXX
          Compensation
   Information TechnologyXXXX
   MarketingXXXXXX 
   Strategic PlanningXXXXXXXXXXXXX
   TransportationXXXXXX

In addition to these specific categories, the Governance and Nominating Committee considers a number of other factors in considering director candidates, including board dynamics, reputation of potential nominees, recommendations of director search firms, and how the nominee will contribute to the diversity of the Board. More information on qualifications for potential directors is contained in Norfolk Southern’s Corporate Governance Guidelines posted under the “Investor Relations” tab on our website. Norfolk Southern Corporation defines diversity as the collective mixture of similarities and differences that impact our workforce, workplace and marketplace. The Governance and Nominating Committee also views diversity broadly, seeking to nominate individuals from varied backgrounds, perspectives and experiences. The Governance and Nominating Committee does not have a specific written policy on the diversity of the Board of Directors at this time. More information on Norfolk Southern’s diversity principles and philosophy can be found on our website in the “Employees” section under “Diversity” atwww.nscorp.com.

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

As required by the New York Stock Exchange, the Board of Directors has considered whether individual directors are independent. A director is considered “independent” if the Board determines that the director has no material relationship with Norfolk Southern (directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with Norfolk Southern). The Board makes these determinations after full deliberation, considering all relevant facts and circumstances. To aid in its evaluation of director independence, the Board has adopted categorical independence standards. Under the standards, an individual director is “independent,” unless the Board determines otherwise, if none of the following relationships exists between Norfolk Southern and the director:

the director is, or has been within the last three years, an employee, or an immediate family member of the director is, or has been within the last three years, an Executive Officer of Norfolk Southern or any of our consolidated subsidiaries;

the director or an immediate family member of the director has received during any twelve-month period within the last three years more than $120,000 in direct compensation from Norfolk Southern or any of our consolidated subsidiaries, other than director and committee fees and deferred compensation for prior service (provided such deferred compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service);


34
2015 Proxy Statement

     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

BOARD OF DIRECTORS  Corporate Governance and the Board| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

RISK OVERSIGHT
Norfolk Southern considers and manages opportunities, threats, and uncertainties that may impact the Corporation’s business objectives by employing a robust Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) program. The ERM program supports the Corporation’s achievement of business objectives by enabling a collaborative risk management environment to proactively identify, assess, monitor, and mitigate business risk.

While the Board of Directors is ultimately responsible for oversight of the ERM program, the Finance and Risk Management Committee has been delegated oversight of the ERM program. The Finance and Risk Management Committee:

(a)recommends ERM program procedures and processes to the director is a current partner or employee of a present or former internal or external auditor of Norfolk Southern or any of our consolidated subsidiaries, (b) the director has an immediate family member who is a current partner of such a firm, (c) the director has an immediate family member who is a current employee of such a firm and personally works on Norfolk Southern’s audit, or (d) the director or an immediate family member was within the last three years a partner or employee of such a firm and personally worked on Norfolk Southern’s audit within that time;

Board;

oversees the director or an immediate family member is, or has been within the last three years, employed as an executive officerERM program and requests reports from management on its monitoring and mitigation of another company where one of our Executive Officers serves as a director and sits on that company’s compensation committee;

risks;

discusses with management the director is an executive officer or employee, or an immediate family member of the director is an executive officer, of a company that makes payments to, or receives payments from,relationship between Norfolk Southern or any of our consolidated subsidiaries for property or services in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of $1 million or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues;Southern’s risk appetite and

business strategies; and

collaborates with the director is an executive officer or compensated employee, or an immediate family memberAudit Committee to assist it in its review of major financial risk exposures and its oversight of the director is an executive officer, of a charitable organization that receives donations from Norfolk Southern, any of our consolidated subsidiaries orguidelines and policies used to govern the Norfolk Southern Foundation in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of $1 million or 2% of such charitable organization’s donations.

ERM program.

For purposes of these categorical standards, “immediate family member” has the definition set forthOther Board committees also play a role in the New York Stock Exchange’s Listing Standards. These categorical independence standards are available on our website atwww.nscorp.com in the “Investor Relations” section under “Corporate Governance.”

The Board has determined that all the director nominees other than Mr. Moorman and Mr. Squires satisfy the above categorical standards and qualify as independent directors of Norfolk Southern. Mr. Moorman serves as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Squires serves as our President and, therefore, neither is an independent director. In making these independence determinations, our Board of Directors considered the following transaction:risk oversight:

We provided transportation services to, received coal royaltiesThe Audit Committee is responsible for oversight of ERM program guidelines and rental payments from,policies, and paid freight claimsconsiders Norfolk Southern’s major financial risk exposures, as well as risks associated with financial reporting and contract refunds to Arch Coal, Inc. in the ordinary course of business during 2014. Mr. Leer served as Chairman of the Board of Arch Coal until April 24, 2014,fraud.

The Compensation Committee considers major compensation-related risks when reviewing our compensation strategy, plans and currently serves as Senior Advisor to the President/CEO. Mr. Leer is no longer an executive officer or director of Arch Coal.

programs.

This transaction did not exceed our categorical independence standardManagement implements the ERM program through its Enterprise Risk Council. The Council is comprised of executive leadership and was not sufficiently material asthe chief risk officer, who coordinate with business leaders across Norfolk Southern to require disclosure as a Related Person Transaction under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K.assess and mitigate enterprise risks. Management provides regular presentations and updates on risk management efforts to the Finance and Risk Management Committee. In addition, the Board considered this relationshipor the Finance and Risk Management Committee may conduct additional risk assessments at any time, and the Board - and each of its committees - is empowered to engage outside advisors to assist in performing its nomination of Mr. Leer and determined both that his independence as a director ofrisk oversight duties.

RELATED PERSONS TRANSACTIONS
During 2017, Norfolk Southern did not have any related persons transactions.

We may occasionally participate in transactions with certain “related persons.” Related persons include our Executive Officers, directors, beneficial owners of 5% or more of our common stock, immediate family members of these persons, and entities in which one of these persons has a direct or indirect material interest. We refer to transactions with these related persons as “related persons transactions.” We have adopted a written policy to prohibit related persons transactions unless they are determined to be in Norfolk Southern’s best interests. Under this policy, the Audit Committee of our Board is responsible for the review and approval of each related persons transaction exceeding $120,000. In instances where it is not impairedpracticable or desirable to wait until the next meeting of the Audit Committee for review of a related persons transaction, the Chair of the Audit Committee has been delegated authority to act between Audit Committee meetings. The Audit Committee, or its Chair, considers all relevant factors when determining whether to approve a related persons transaction, including whether the proposed transaction is on terms and made under circumstances that Mr. Leer’s extensive experience with a coal company, an important revenue group forare at least as favorable to Norfolk Southern is particularly valuable expertise for the Board of Directors.

RETIREMENT POLICY

Under our Governance Guidelines, a director must retire effective as of the date of the Annual Meeting that falls onwould be available in comparable transactions with or next follows the date of that director’s 72nd birthday.involving unaffiliated third parties. Among other relevant factors, they consider:

35          the size of the transaction and the amount of consideration payable to the related person(s);
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     the nature of the interest of the applicable director, director nominee, Executive Officer, or 5% shareholder, in the transaction; and
2015 Proxy Statementwhether we have developed an appropriate plan to monitor or otherwise manage the potential conflict of interest.

Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 18www.norfolksouthern.com


Table of Contents

  BOARD OF DIRECTORSCorporate Governance and the Board| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

The Chair must report any action taken pursuant to this delegated authority to the Audit Committee at its next meeting. In addition, at the Audit Committee’s first meeting of each fiscal year, it reviews all previously approved related persons transactions that remain ongoing and have a remaining term or remaining amounts payable to or receivable from us of more than $120,000. Based on all relevant facts and circumstances, taking into consideration our contractual obligations, the Audit Committee determines whether it is in our and our shareholders’ best interest to continue, modify or terminate the related persons transaction.

COMPENSATIONTHE THOROUGHBRED CODE OF DIRECTORSETHICS

2014 Non-Employee Director Compensation Table1

Name (a)     Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash2
($)
(b)
     Stock
Awards3
($)
(c)
     Option
Awards
($)
(d)
     Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
(e)
     Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings4
($)
(f)
     All Other
Compensation
($)5
(g)
     Total
($)
(h)
     
Thomas D. Bell, Jr.  110,000  149,730 00        0               39,383        299,113 
Erskine B. Bowles90,000149,73000039,094278,824
Robert A. Bradway90,000149,7300009,094248,824
Wesley G. Bush90,000149,73000024,094263,824
Daniel A. Carp110,000149,73000014,094273,824
Karen N. Horn105,000149,7300009,744264,474
Burton M. Joyce655,000149,73000017,890222,620
Steven F. Leer140,000149,730009,14726,694325,571
Michael D. Lockhart90,000149,73000044,094283,824
Amy E. Miles790,000421,1620000511,162
Martin H. Nesbitt90,000149,73000039,094278,824
John R. Thompson90,000149,7300009,094248,824
____________________

1Mr. MoormanThe Board has approved and Mr. Squires received no compensationadopted The Thoroughbred Code of Ethics, which applies to all directors, officers and employees of Norfolk Southern, and a Code of Ethical Conduct for BoardSenior Financial Officers that applies to specified financial officers. These documents and our Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on our website at www.norfolksouthern.com on the “Invest in NS” page under “Governance Documents.” Any shareholder may request printed copies of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, The Thoroughbred Code of Ethics, or committee service in 2014 and will not receive compensationCode of Ethical Conduct for Board or committee service in 2015. Therefore, neither this table nor the narrative which follows contain compensation information for Mr. Moorman or Mr. Squires. For compensation information for Mr. Moorman and Mr. Squires, see “Executive Compensation” on page 45 of this proxy statement.Senior Financial Officers by contacting: Denise W. Hutson, Corporate Secretary, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Three Commercial Place, 13th Floor, Norfolk, Virginia 23510-9219 (telephone 757-823-5567).

2Includes amounts elected to be received on a deferred basis pursuant to the Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan. For a discussion of this plan, as well as our other director compensation plans, see the narrative discussion below.BOARD COMPOSITION AND ATTENDANCE

3For all directors, represents the full grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of the 1,590 restricted stock units granted onOn January 23, 2014 pursuant to our Long-Term Incentive Plan. For Ms. Miles, this amount also represents the full grant date fair value of the 3,000 restricted shares granted to her upon joining22, 2018, the Board of Directors amended our Bylaws to increase the size of the Board from twelve to thirteen directors upon the election of Ms. Scanlon to the Board. Ms. Scanlon was recommended by a third-party search firm. The Board met six times in 2017. Each director attended not less than 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board and meetings of all committees on January 21, 2014. Aswhich such director served.

The Corporate Governance Guidelines also describe the Board’s policy with respect to director attendance at the Annual Meeting of December 31, 2014,Shareholders, which provides that, to the extent possible, each director other than Mr. Joyce held 3,000 restricted sharesis expected to attend the Annual Meeting. We work hard to coordinate schedules so that all of our directors can attend, but occasionally events arise that we are unable to schedule around. All but one director attended our 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and the directors held restricted stock units in the following amounts: Mr. Bell, 12,414; Mr. Bowles, 6,360; Mr. Bradway, 6,360; Mr. Bush, 4,142; Mr. Carp, 28,074; Dr. Horn, 17,103; Mr. Joyce, 6,361; Mr. Leer, 60,902; Mr. Lockhart, 17,103; Ms. Miles, 1,625; Mr. Nesbitt, 1,625;this was due to an unavoidable conflict.

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD
Our Board committees and Mr. Thompson, 1,625. See belowtheir responsibilities are described below. Each committee operates under “Narrative to Non-Employee Director Compensation Table—Long-Term Incentive Plan” for more information regarding these restricted stock units.

4Represents the amountsa charter approved by which 2014 interest accrued on fees deferred prior to 2001 by the non-employee directors under the Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan exceeded 120% of the applicable Federal long-term rate provided in Section 1274(d) of the Internal Revenue Code.

5Includes (i) the dollar amounts we contributed to charitable organizations on behalf of directors pursuant to our matching gifts programs as follows: Mr. Bell, $30,000; Mr. Bowles, $35,000; Mr. Bradway, $5,000; Mr. Bush, $20,000; Mr. Carp, $10,000; Dr. Horn, $5,650; Mr. Joyce, $5,000; Mr. Leer, $22,600; Mr. Lockhart, $40,000; Mr. Nesbitt, $35,000; and Mr. Thompson, $5,000, and (ii) each director’s proportional cost of NS-owned life insurance policies used to fund the Directors’ Charitable Award Program. Because a director must serve on our Board for one year prior to becoming eligible for the Directors’ Charitable Award Program, no portion of this cost was allocated to Ms. Miles. For further discussion of the Directors’ Charitable Award Program, see the narrative discussion below.

6Mr. Joyce retired from the Board of Directors effectivethat requires the datecommittee to evaluate its performance at least annually. The committee’s evaluation includes effectiveness, size and composition, the quality of information and presentations given to the committee by management, the suitability of the 2014 Annual Meeting.

7Ms. Miles joinedcommittee’s duties and other issues that the Boardcommittee deems appropriate. Copies of Directorsthe committee charters are available on January 21, 2014.our website on the “Invest in NS” page under “Governance Documents.” Any shareholder may request a printed copy of one or more of the committee charters by contacting: Denise W. Hutson, Corporate Secretary, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Three Commercial Place, 13th Floor, Norfolk, Virginia 23510-9219 (telephone 757-823-5567).

36Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 19www.norfolksouthern.com
2015 Proxy Statement

 NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

BOARD OF DIRECTORS  Corporate Governance and the Board| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

AUDIT COMMITTEE

Current members:Amy E. Miles (Chair)
Marcela E. Donadio
Michael D. Lockhart
Martin H. Nesbitt
John R. Thompson

Meetings in 2017:Nine

All members of the Audit Committee are independent (see information under “Director Independence” on page 13), satisfy all additional requirements for service on an Audit Committee, as defined by the applicable New York Stock Exchange Listing Standards and SEC rules, and qualify as “audit committee financial experts,” as that term is defined by SEC rules. No member of the Committee serves on more than three public company audit committees.

During 2017 the Audit Committee:

assisted board oversight of the accuracy and integrity of our financial statements, financial reporting process and internal control systems;
engaged an independent registered public accounting firm (subject to shareholder ratification) based on an assessment of their qualifications and independence, and pre-approved all services associated with their engagement;
evaluated the efforts and effectiveness of our independent registered public accounting firm and Audit and Compliance Department, including their independence and professionalism;
facilitated communication among the Board, the independent registered public accounting firm, our financial and senior management and our Audit and Compliance Department;
assisted board oversight of our compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements;
reviewed procedures established for the receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints received, including confidential, anonymous submissions by employees, or others, of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters, and significant cases of alleged employee conflict of interest, ethical violations, misconduct, or fraud, the volume and nature of calls to the “Ethics and Compliance Hotline” and other matters similar in nature;
discussed the Corporation’s guidelines and policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, including the Corporation’s major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures; and
prepared the “Audit Committee Report” that SEC rules require be included in our annual proxy statement.
Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 20www.norfolksouthern.com

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and the Board| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Current members:Daniel A. Carp (Chair)
Thomas D. Bell, Jr.
Erskine B. Bowles
Wesley G. Bush
Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr.
Steven F. Leer
Jennifer F. Scanlon

Meetings in 2017:Four

All members of the Compensation Committee are independent (see information under “Director Independence” on page 13) and satisfy all additional requirements for service on a Compensation Committee, as defined by the applicable New York Stock Exchange Listing Standards and the SEC rules.

During 2017 the Compensation Committee:

considered and made recommendations to the Board concerning the compensation levels, plans and programs for the directors, chief executive officer and executive officers;
reviewed and approved corporate goals and objectives relevant to the chief executive officer’s compensation and considered and recommended to the independent members of the Board the compensation of the chief executive officer based on an evaluation of his performance relative to those corporate goals and objectives;
considered the results of the shareholder advisory vote on executive compensation in connection with its review of Norfolk Southern’s executive compensation strategy, plans and programs;
provided oversight of each management annual incentive plan, deferred compensation plan, long-term incentive plan and other executive compensation plan that the Board has adopted and granted, recommended or approved awards under the plans;
provided oversight of the design of our employee retirement plans;
made any other compensation decisions for which it is desirable to achieve the protections afforded by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, Rule 16b-3, or by other laws or regulations that may be or become relevant in this area and in which only disinterested directors may participate; and
oversaw disclosures included in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) and produced a Compensation Committee Report indicating that it has reviewed and discussed the CD&A with management and approved its inclusion in the annual proxy statement.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
The members of the Compensation Committee during 2017 were Daniel A. Carp, Chair, Thomas D. Bell, Jr., Erskine B. Bowles, Wesley G. Bush, Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr., and Steven F. Leer. None of these members have ever been employed by Norfolk Southern, and no members had any relationship with us during 2017 requiring disclosure as a transaction with a related person, promoter, or control person under Item 404 of Regulation S-K or under the Compensation Committee Interlocks disclosure requirements of Item 407(e)(4) of Regulation S-K.

Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 21www.norfolksouthern.com

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and the Board| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

Current members:James A. Squires (Chair)
Thomas D. Bell, Jr.
Daniel A. Carp
Steven F. Leer
Amy E. Miles

Meetings in 2017:Two

When the Board is not in session, and except as otherwise provided by law, the Executive Committee has and may exercise all the authority of the Board, including the authority to declare a quarterly dividend on our common stock at the rate of the quarterly dividend most recently declared by the Board. All actions taken by the Executive Committee are reported to the Board at its next meeting and are subject to revision or alteration by the Board.

FINANCE AND RISK MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE

Current members:Thomas D. Bell, Jr. (Chair)
Erskine B. Bowles
Wesley G. Bush
Marcela E. Donadio
Michael D. Lockhart
Martin H. Nesbitt
Jennifer F. Scanlon

Meetings in 2017:Five

All members of the Finance and Risk Management Committee are independent (see information under “Director Independence” on page 13).

During 2017 the Finance and Risk Management Committee:

oversaw implementation of policies concerning our capital structure, including evaluating the appropriate structure of our long-term debt, mix of long-term debt and equity, and strategies to manage our interest burden, and recommended to the Board the declaration of dividends, share repurchases and the issuance of debt and equity securities;
reviewed and evaluated tax and treasury matters and financial returns of our transactions, including management of cash flows, tax planning activities and evaluating financial returns of proposed mergers, acquisitions and divestitures; and
provided oversight of our Enterprise Risk Management program, including recommending Enterprise Risk Management procedures and processes to the Board, requesting reports from management on its monitoring and mitigation of risks, and discussing with management the relationship between Norfolk Southern’s risk appetite and business strategies.
Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 22www.norfolksouthern.com

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and the Board| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

GOVERNANCE AND NOMINATING COMMITTEE

Current members:Steven F. Leer (Chair)
Daniel A. Carp
Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr.
Amy E. Miles
John R. Thompson

Meetings in 2017:Five

All members of the Governance and Nominating Committee are independent (see information under “Director Independence” on page 13).

During 2017 the Governance and Nominating Committee:

recommended to the Board qualified individuals to be nominated as members of the Board;
recommended to the Board qualified individuals to be elected as our officers;
evaluated and considered whether to recommend the adoption of any amendments to our Corporate Governance Guidelines;
monitored legislative developments relevant to us and oversaw efforts to affect legislation and other public policy;
provided oversight of our political contributions and charitable giving;
oversaw our relations with shareholders; and
monitored corporate governance trends and practices and made recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning corporate governance issues.
Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 23www.norfolksouthern.com

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and the Board| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

2017 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE1
Name     Fees
Earned
or
Paid in
Cash3
($)
     Stock
Awards4
($)
     Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings5
($)
     All Other
Compensation6
($)
     Total
($)
Thomas D. Bell, Jr.110,000150,313022,090282,403
Erskine B. Bowles90,000150,31302,090242,403
Robert A. Bradway245,000150,313038,785234,098
Wesley G. Bush90,000150,313037,090277,403
Daniel A. Carp110,000150,313019,590279,903
Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr.90,000150,31302,090242,403
Marcela E. Donadio90,000150,31309,290249,603
Steven F. Leer140,000150,31312,1757,290309,778
Michael D. Lockhart90,000150,31302,090242,403
Amy E. Miles110,000150,313021,740282,053
Martin H. Nesbitt90,000150,313022,090262,403
John R. Thompson90,000150,313010,090250,403
1

Mr. Squires received no compensation for Board or committee service in 2017, and Mr. Squires will not receive compensation for Board or committee service in 2018. Therefore, neither this table nor the narrative that follows contains compensation information for Mr. Squires. For compensation information for Mr. Squires, see the Summary Compensation Table on page 49 of this proxy statement. Ms. Scanlon was not a director in 2017, and she is therefore not included in this table because she received no compensation for Board or Committee service in 2017.

2

Mr. Bradway served as a director of the Corporation from January 1 through May 11, 2017.

3

Includes amounts elected to be received on a deferred basis pursuant to the Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan. For a discussion of this plan, as well as our other director compensation plans, see the narrative discussion below.

4

For all directors, represents the full grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of the restricted stock units granted pursuant to our Long-Term Incentive Plan. Each director serving on January 26, 2017 received 1,250 restricted stock units. As of December 31, 2017, each director other than Mr. Daniels, Ms. Donadio, and Mr. Bradway also held 3,000 restricted shares granted pursuant to the Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan to each non-employee director upon election to the Board before 2015; and as of December 31, 2017, the directors held restricted stock units in the following amounts: Mr. Bell, 18,391; Mr. Bowles, 11,886; Mr. Bradway, 11,886; Mr. Bush, 9,502; Mr. Carp, 35,219; Mr. Daniels, 1,407; Ms. Donadio, 1,407; Mr. Leer, 70,496; Mr. Lockhart, 23,430; Ms. Miles, 6,798; Mr. Nesbitt, 6,798; and Mr. Thompson, 6,798. See below under “Non-Employee Director Compensation - Long-Term Incentive Plan” for more information regarding these restricted stock units.

5

Represents the amounts by which 2017 interest accrued on fees deferred prior to 2001 by Mr. Leer under the Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan exceeded 120% of the applicable Federal long-term rate provided in Section 1274(d) of the Internal Revenue Code.

6

Includes (i) the dollar amounts we contributed to charitable organizations on behalf of directors pursuant to our matching gifts programs as follows: Mr. Bell, $20,000; Mr. Bowles, $0; Mr. Bradway, $36,500; Mr. Bush, $35,000; Mr. Carp, $17,500; Mr. Daniels, $0; Ms. Donadio, $7,200; Mr. Leer, $5,200; Mr. Lockhart, $0; Ms. Miles, $19,650; Mr. Nesbitt, $20,000; and Mr. Thompson, $8,000, and (ii) each director’s proportional cost of NS-owned life insurance policies used to partially fund the Directors’ Charitable Award Program. We do not regard these contributions as compensation; however, this disclosure is required by SEC rules. For further discussion of the Directors’ Charitable Award Program, see the narrative discussion below.

Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 24www.norfolksouthern.com

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and the Board| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

NARRATIVE TO NON-EMPLOYEE
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE

Below is a discussion of the material factors necessary to an understanding of the compensation disclosed in the above table.

How We Set Director Compensation.The Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors determine the annual compensation of non-employee directors each year. The Committee consults with its compensation consultant on the director compensation program and reviews survey information to determine whether changes are advisable. The Committee reviews both a comparison to the market amount of compensation paid to directors serving on boards of similar companies and reviews the allocation of this compensation between cash retainer and equity grants. In general, the Compensation Committee and the Board seek to make any changes to non-employee director compensation in a gradual and incremental fashion.

Retainer and Fees.In 2014,2017, each member of the Board of Directors received a quarterly retainer for services of $12,500 and a quarterly fee of $10,000$22,500 for servingservice on at least two committees, plus expenses incurred in connection with attendance atthe Board meetings.and its standing committees. Directors who served as committee chairpersons received an additional quarterly fee of $5,000 for such service, and the lead directorwhile our Lead Independent Director received an additional quarterly fee of $12,500.

Long-Term Incentive Plan.Each of our then current non-employee directors was granted 1,250 restricted stock units effective January 2017. Each restricted stock unit represents the economic equivalent of one share of our common stock, and will be settled in shares of our stock rather than cash. Stock units are credited with dividend equivalents as dividends are paid on our common stock, and the amount credited is converted into additional restricted stock units based on the fair market value of our stock on the dividend payment date. Upon leaving the Board, a director will receive the value of the restricted stock units in shares of our stock either in a lump sum distribution or in ten annual distributions, in accordance with an election made by each director.

Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan.A director may elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of the director’s compensation. Amounts deferred are credited to a separate memorandum account maintained in the name of each participating director. Six directors elected to defer compensation that would have been payable in 2017 into the Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan.

Amounts deferred on or after January 1, 2001, are credited with variable earnings and/or losses based on the performance of hypothetical investment options selected by the director. The hypothetical investment options include NS stock units and various mutual funds as crediting indices. NS stock units are phantom units whose value is measured by the market value of shares of our common stock, but the units will be settled in cash, not in shares of stock. Amounts deferred on or after January 1, 2001, will be distributed in accordance with the director’s elected distribution option in one lump sum or a stream of annual cash payments over 5, 10 or 15 years.

Amounts deferred before January 1, 2001, earn a fixed rate of interest, which is credited to the account at the beginning of each quarter. In general, the fixed interest rate is determined on the basis of the director’s age at the time of the deferral: under age 45, 7%; age 45-54, 10%; age 55-60, 11%; and over age 60, 12%. Amounts set forth in the table above represent the extent to which these rates exceed 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate. The total amount so credited for amounts deferred before January 1, 2001 (including interest earned thereon) is distributed in ten annual installments beginning in the year following the year in which the participant ceases to be a director.

Amounts deferred on or after January 1, 2001, are credited with variable earnings and/or losses based on the performance of hypothetical investment options selected by the director. The hypothetical investment options include NS stock units and various mutual funds as crediting indices. NS stock units are phantom units whose

value is measured by the market value of shares of our common stock, but the units will be settled in cash, not in shares of stock. Amounts deferred on or after January 1, 2001, will be distributed in accordance with the director’s elected distribution option in one lump sum or a stream of annual cash payments over 5, 10 or 15 years.

Four directors elected to defer compensation that would have been payable in 2014 into the Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan.

Our commitment to accrue and pay interest and/or earnings on amounts deferred is facilitated by the purchase of corporate-owned life insurance with the directors as insureds under the policies. If the Board of Directors determines at any time that changes in the law affect our ability to recover the cost of providing the benefits payable under the Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan, the Board may reduce the interest and/or earnings on deferrals to a rate not less than one half the rate otherwise provided for in the Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan.

Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan.Through 2014, each non-employee director received a grant of 3,000 shares of restricted stock upon election to the Board. Restricted stock is registered in the name of the director, who has the right to vote the shares and receive dividends, but restricted stock may not be sold, pledged or otherwise encumbered during the restriction period. The restriction period begins when the restricted stock is granted and ends on the earlier of death or the director ceasing to be a director because of disability or retirement. These shares will be forfeited if a non-employee director does not retire in accordance with the terms of the plan. Effective January 23, 2015, the Board of Directors amended the Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan to provide that no additional awards will be made under the plan, and alternate awards will be made to new directors under the Long-Term Incentive Plan.

Long-Term Incentive Plan.Each of our then current non-employee directors was granted 1,590 restricted stock units effective January 23, 2014. Each restricted stock unit represents the economic equivalent of one share of our common stock, and will be settled in shares of our stock rather than cash. Stock units are credited with dividend equivalents as dividends are paid on our common stock, and the amount credited is converted into additional restricted stock units based on the fair market value of our stock on the dividend payment date.



37          Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 25www.norfolksouthern.com
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION 2015 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

  BOARD OF DIRECTORSCorporate Governance and the Board| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

Upon leaving the Board, a director will receive the value of the restricted stock units in shares of our stock either in a lump sum distribution or in ten annual distributions, in accordance with an election made by each director. Restricted stock unit awards made after 2010 are subject to retention until the director ceases to serve as a director, with a minimum three-year retention period measured from the award date. If a director leaves while restricted stock unit awards are still subject to the retention period, the restricted stock units will be distributed in accordance with the director’s prior distribution election as each retention period expires.

Directors’ Charitable Award Program.Each director who has served for one year is entitled to nominate up to five tax-exempt institutions to receive, in the aggregate, up to $500,000 from Norfolk Southern following the director’s death. Directors are entitled to designate up to $100,000 per year of service until the $500,000 cap is reached. Following the director’s death, we will distribute the donations in five equal annual installments.

The Directors’ Charitable Award Program supports our long-standing commitment to contribute to educational, cultural and other appropriate charitable institutions and to encourage others to do the same. We fund some of the charitable contributions made under the program out of general corporate assets, and some of the charitable contributions with proceeds from life insurance policies we have purchased on some of the directors’ lives. We are the owner and beneficiary of these policies, and the directors have no rights to any policy benefits. Upon directors’ deaths, we receive these life insurance death benefits free of income tax, which provide a source from which we can be reimbursed for donations made under the program. Our cost of the life insurance premiums under the program is partially offset by tax deductions we take from making the charitable contributions. We allocate a proportional share of the cost of maintaining these policies during 20142017 to each director eligible for the Directors’ Charitable Award Program in the above table under “All Other Compensation,” regardless of whether we purchased a life insurance policy with respect to each particular director.

Because we make the charitable contributions (and are entitled to the related deduction) and are the owner and the beneficiary of the life insurance policies, directors receive no direct financial benefit from this program. In the event the proceeds from any of these policies exceed the donations we are required to make under the program, we contribute the excess proceeds to the Norfolk Southern Foundation. Amounts the Norfolk Southern Foundation receives under this program may reduce what we otherwise would contribute from general corporate resources to support the Foundation’s activities.

Directors’ Physical Examinations.Restricted Stock Plan.EachBefore 2015, each non-employee director received a grant of 3,000 shares of restricted stock upon election to the Board. Restricted stock is entitled to reimbursement for a physical examination, up to $10,000 per calendar year. The CEO,registered in the President and the Executive Vice Presidents also are eligible for such reimbursement. See pages 60 and 64name of the “Executive Compensation” sectiondirector, who has the right to vote the shares and receive dividends, but restricted stock may not be sold, pledged or otherwise encumbered during the restriction period. The restriction period begins when the restricted stock is granted and ends on the earlier of this proxy statement. Somedeath or the director ceasing to serve on the Board because of disability or retirement. Effective January 2015, the Board of Directors amended the Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan to provide that no additional awards will be made under the plan, and alternate awards will be made to new directors under the Long-Term Incentive Plan.

SHARE OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES FOR DIRECTORS
Our Board of Directors has established as part of our Corporate Governance Guidelines that each non-employee director should own shares of Norfolk Southern stock equal to at least five times the annual amount of quarterly fees paid for service on the Board and its standing committees. The Board of Directors believes this stock ownership guideline is reasonable and aligns director and shareholder interests. Norfolk Southern common stock, restricted stock, and deferred and restricted stock units held in Norfolk Southern’s Long-Term Incentive Plan or under the Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan count toward this guideline. Directors may acquire such holdings over a five-year period. All directors were reimbursed for physical examinations during 2014 and these amountscurrently meet this guideline or are included in “All Other Compensation” inexpected to meet the 2014 Non-Employee Director Compensation Table.guideline within the five-year period.



38Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 26www.norfolksouthern.com
2015 Proxy Statement

 NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

BOARD OF DIRECTORS  Audit Committee Matters| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

RISK OVERSIGHTAUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS


ITEMRATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
2

The BoardAudit Committee of Directors is responsible for the oversight of Norfolk Southern’s risk management efforts. The Board works with management to set the corporate objectives around which risk management is shaped, and management implements a risk management program based on these objectives. The Governance and Nominating Committee has been delegated authority to recommend procedures for the Board’s risk oversight function. The Governance and Nominating Committee assigns oversight responsibilities for specific risks to the Board of Directors has appointed KPMG LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, to perform the integrated audit of our consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting for 2018. KPMG and its predecessors have been the committeesCorporation’s external auditor since 1982.

Selection of KPMG.The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of the Board.Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm and consequently is involved in the selection of the lead audit partner for the engagement. In addition, in accordance with applicable regulations and its charter, the Audit Committee periodically considers major financial risksis responsible for negotiating and approving the fees paid to KPMG. In determining whether to reappoint KPMG this year, the Committee reviewed KPMG’s performance and independence and considered a number of Norfolk Southern, risks associated with Norfolk Southern’s financial reportingfactors, including:

the quality of its interactions and discussion with KPMG;

KPMG’s performance in the audit engagement;

the qualifications of the lead audit partner and audit team;

KPMG’s independence program and processes for maintaining independence;

KPMG’s expertise and global reach;

the length of time KPMG has been engaged; and

the potential impact of changing our independent registered public accounting firm.

Due to KPMG’s high quality performance and the risk of fraud impacting Norfolk Southern. Finally, the Compensation Committee considers major compensation related risks of Norfolk Southern. Management provides presentations, information and updates on risk management efforts on a regular basis and as requested by the Board or Board committees. In addition, the Board or its committees may conduct additional risk assessments at any time, and each committee is empowered to engage outside advisors as needed to assist in performing its risk management duties.


COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD

After the election of directors at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the Board of Directors appoints members to its committees. In May 2014, the Board appointed members to the Executive Committee, the Governance and Nominating Committee, the Finance Committee,strong independence, the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee. The charter of each of the committees is approved by the Board of Directors and requiresbelieve that each committee evaluate its performance at least annually. The committee’s evaluation includes effectiveness, size and composition, the qualitycontinued engagement of information and presentations given toKPMG as the committee by management,Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm is in the suitabilitybest interests of the committee’s dutiesCorporation and other issues thatits shareholders.

KPMG Fees.For the committee deems appropriate. Copies ofyears ended December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, KPMG billed us for the committee charters are available on our website in the “Investor Relations” section under “Corporate Governance” atwww.nscorp.com. Any stockholder may request printed copies of one or more of the committee charters by contacting: Denise W. Hutson, Corporate Secretary, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Three Commercial Place, 13th Floor, Norfolk, Virginia 23510-9219 (telephone 757-823-5567).following services:

TheEXECUTIVE COMMITTEE’Scurrent members are Charles W. Moorman, Chair, Thomas D. Bell, Daniel A. Carp, Karen N. Horn (who joined the Committee on May 8, 2014), and Steven F. Leer. Mr. Joyce served on the Committee until his retirement from the Board on the date of the 2014 Annual Meeting. When the Board is not in session, and except as otherwise provided by law, the Executive Committee has and may exercise all the authority of the Board, including the authority to declare a quarterly dividend on our common stock at the rate of the quarterly dividend most recently declared by the Board. All actions taken by the Executive Committee are reported to the Board at its next meeting and are subject to revision or alteration by the Board. The Executive Committee met two times in 2014 and is governed by a written charter adopted by the Board.

TheGOVERNANCE AND NOMINATING COMMITTEE’Scurrent members are Steven F. Leer, Chair, Robert A. Bradway, Daniel A. Carp, Karen N. Horn, and John R. Thompson. All members of the Governance and Nominating Committee are independent (see information under “Director Independence” on page 34). The Governance and Nominating Committee met five times in 2014 and is governed by a written charter adopted by the Board.

The Governance and Nominating Committee’s duties include:

     2017     2016
Audit Fees1$2,969,000$2,616,000
Audit-Related Fees2$173,100$144,100
Tax Fees3$29,381$1,000
All Other Fees$0$0
Total Fees$3,171,481$2,761,100
1

recommending to

Audit Fees include fees for the Board qualified individuals to be nominated to fill any vacancy onaudit of our consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting (integrated audit), the Boardreview of our consolidated financial statements included in our 10-Q filings, and services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or as additional members of the Board;

engagements.
2

recommending to the Board qualified individuals to be elected as our officers;

Audit-Related Fees principally include fees for employee benefit plan audits and other attestation services.

recommending the adoption of and any amendments to our Corporate Governance Guidelines;


3Tax Fees consist of tax advice, tax planning, and tax compliance services.
39          Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 27www.norfolksouthern.com
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION 2015 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

  BOARD OF DIRECTORSAudit Committee Matters| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

Pre-Approval Policy. The Audit Committee requires that management obtain the Committee’s prior approval for all audit and permissible non-audit services. The Committee considers and approves at each January meeting anticipated services to be provided during the year, as well as the projected fees for those services. The Committee considers and pre-approves additional services and projected fees as needed at each meeting. The Audit Committee has delegated authority to its Chair to pre-approve services between meetings, provided that the Chair reports any such pre-approval to the Audit Committee at its next meeting. The Audit Committee will not approve non-audit engagements that would violate SEC rules or impair the independence of our independent registered public accounting firm. All services rendered to us by KPMG in 2017 and 2016 were pre-approved in accordance with these procedures.

Representatives of KPMG are expected to attend the 2018 Annual Meeting. They will have the opportunity to make a statement, if they so desire, and be available to respond to appropriate questions.

monitoring legislative developments relevant to usThe Audit Committee unanimously recommends, and overseeing efforts to affect legislation and other public policy;

overseeing our political contributions and charitable giving;

overseeing our risk oversight;

monitoring our relations with stockholders;

monitoring corporate governance trends and practices and making recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning corporate governance issues; and

recommendingconcurs, that shareholders vote FOR the proposal to ratify the Boardappointment of Directors procedures and processes for the Board’s oversight of the Corporation’s risk management program.

As described in the Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Governance and Nominating Committee considers potential candidates to be nominated for electionKPMG as directors, whether recommended by a stockholder, director, member of management or consultant retained for that purpose, and recommends nominees to the Board. The Governance and Nominating Committee reviews the current biography of the potential candidate and additional information provided by the individual or group that recommended the candidate for consideration. The Governance and Nominating Committee fully considers the qualifications of all candidates and recommends the nomination of individuals who, in the Governance and Nominating Committee’s judgment, will best serve the long-term interests of all stockholders. In the judgment of the Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board, all director nominees recommended by the Governance and Nominating Committee should, at a minimum:

be of high ethical character and have personal and professional reputations consistent with our image and reputation;

have experience as senior executives of public companies or leaders of large organizations, including charitable and governmental organizations, or have other experience at a strategy or policy setting level that would be beneficial to us;

be able to represent all of our stockholders in an objective and impartial manner; and

have time available to devote to Board activities.

It is the intent of the Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board that at least one director on the Board will qualify as an “audit committee financial expert,” as that term is defined in regulations of the SEC.

The Governance and Nominating Committee will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders. Any such recommendation should include:

biographical information on the candidate, including all positions held as an employee, officer, partner, director or ten percent owner of all organizations, whether for profit or not-for-profit, and other relevant experience;

a description of any relationship between the candidate and the recommending stockholder;

a statement requesting that the Board consider nominating the individual for election as a director;

written consent of the proposed candidate to being named as a nominee; and

proof of the recommending stockholder’s stock ownership.


40
2015 Proxy Statement

     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

BOARD OF DIRECTORS  

Recommendations by stockholders must be in writing and addressed to the Chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee, c/o Corporate Secretary, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Three Commercial Place, 13th Floor, Norfolk, Virginia 23510-9219. To ensure that the Governance and Nominating Committee will have adequate time to consider all candidates,stockholder recommendations must be received no later than November 26, 2015, in order to be considered for nomination for election at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

A stockholder may directly nominate an individual for election as director instead of (or in addition to) recommending a candidate for the Governance and Nominating Committee’s consideration. Unless required by SEC regulations, stockholder nominees will not appear in our proxy statement or on the proxy card for the annual meeting.Stockholders wishing to nominate an individual for election as a director at an annual meeting must comply with specific Bylaw provisions, which are available on our website,www.nscorp.com, in the “Investor Relations” section under “Corporate Governance.” To be eligible to be included in the ballot at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, director nominations must comply with these Bylaw provisions and must be received during the period that begins December 6, 2015, and ends February 14, 2016.

TheFINANCE COMMITTEE’Scurrent members are Thomas D. Bell, Jr., Chair, Erskine B. Bowles, Wesley G. Bush, Michael D. Lockhart, Amy E. Miles (who joined the Committee on January 21, 2014) and Martin H. Nesbitt. Mr. Joyce served on the Committee until his retirement from the Board on the date of the 2014 Annual Meeting. The Finance Committee met five times in 2014 and is governed by a written charter adopted by the Board.

The Finance Committee’s duties include:

overseeing implementation of policies concerning our capital structure, including evaluating the appropriate structure of our long-term debt, mix of long-term debt and equity, strategies to manage our interest burden, and recommending to the Board the declaration of dividends, share repurchases and the issuance of debt and equity securities; and

reviewing and evaluating tax and treasury matters and financial returns of our transactions, including management of cash flows, tax planning activities and evaluating financial returns of proposed mergers, acquisitions and divestitures.

TheCOMPENSATION COMMITTEE’Scurrent members are Daniel A. Carp, Chair, Thomas D. Bell, Jr., Erskine B. Bowles, Wesley G. Bush, and Steven F. Leer. All members of the Compensation Committee are independent (see information under “Director Independence” on page 34) and satisfy all additional requirements for service on a Compensation Committee, as defined by the applicable rules of the New York Stock Exchange and the SEC. The Compensation Committee met three times in 2014 and is governed by a written charter adopted by the Board.

The Compensation Committee’s duties include:

considering and making recommendations to the Board concerning the compensation levels, plans and programs for the directors, chief executive officer and executive officers;

reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to the chief executive officer’s compensation and considering and recommending to the independent members of the Board the compensation of the chief executive officer based on an evaluation of his performance relative to those corporate goals and objectives;

considering the results of any shareholder advisory vote on executive compensation in connection with its review of Norfolk Southern’s executive compensation strategy, plans and programs;

oversee any management incentive bonus plan, deferred compensation plan, long-term incentive plan or other executive compensation plan that the Board may adopt and grant, recommend or approve awards under the plans;


41          
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     2015 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

  BOARD OF DIRECTORS

overseeing the design of our employee retirement plans;

making any other compensation decisions for which it is desirable to achieve the protections afforded by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, Rule 16b-3, or by other laws or regulations that may be or become relevant in this area and in which only disinterested directors may participate; and

overseeing disclosures included in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) and producing a Compensation Committee Report indicating that it has reviewed and discussed the CD&A with management and approved its inclusion in the annual proxy statement.

The Compensation Committee makes all salary recommendations to the independent members of the Board of Directors for the chief executive officer and, based on his individual performance evaluations, to the Board of Directors for all other executive officers. The Compensation Committee also makes long-term incentive compensation awards to directors and makes recommendations to the full Board of Directors on all other elements of director compensation. In setting such compensation for the directors and the chief executive officer, the Compensation Committee considers the recommendations of the compensation consultant.

The Compensation Committee has engaged Pay Governance to assist it in making compensation recommendations and decisions and otherwise fulfilling its duties under its charter. The Committee annually requests that Pay Governance assess our compensation and employee benefit arrangements, particularly those relevant to our directors and Executive Officers, and advise whether Pay Governance recommends any changes to ensure that our compensation arrangements are appropriate. During the Compensation Committee’s 2014 review of the directors’, the chief executive officer’s and management’s compensation levels, the Committee considered the advice they received from Pay Governance; however, the Committee was responsible for deciding or for making final recommendations to the Board as to the form and amount of our compensation programs.

In January 2015 the Compensation Committee considered whether Pay Governance had any conflicts of interest in its service as the Committee’s compensation consultant. Based on information presented by Pay Governance and information provided by management, the Committee determined that Pay Governance has no such conflict of interest.

TheAUDIT COMMITTEE’Scurrent members are Karen N. Horn, Chair, Robert A. Bradway, Michael D. Lockhart, Amy E. Miles (who joined the Committee on January 21, 2014), Martin H. Nesbitt, and John R. Thompson. Mr. Joyce served as Chair of the Committee until his retirement from the Board on the date of the 2014 Annual Meeting. The Board has determined that all current members of the Audit Committee are independent (see information under “Director Independence” on page 34) and satisfy all additional requirements for service on an audit committee, as defined by the applicable rules of the New York Stock Exchange and the SEC, and no member of the Audit Committee serves on more than three public company audit committees. While other members of the Audit Committee may also qualify, the Board has determined that Karen N. Horn, Robert A. Bradway, Michael D. Lockhart, Amy E. Miles and Martin H. Nesbitt, who are members of the Audit Committee, qualify as “audit committee financial experts,” as that term is defined by SEC rules. The Audit Committee met eight times in 2014 and is governed by a written charter adopted by the Board.

The Audit Committee’s duties include:

assisting Board oversight of the accuracy and integrity of our financial statements, financial reporting process and internal control systems;

engaging an independent registered public accounting firm (subject to stockholder ratification) based on an assessment of their qualifications and independence, and pre-approving all services and estimated fees associated with their engagement;

evaluating the efforts and effectiveness of our independent registered public accounting firm and Audit and Compliance Department, including their independence and professionalism;


42
2015 Proxy Statement

     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     




Table of Contents

BOARD OF DIRECTORS  

facilitating communication among the Board, the independent registered public accounting firm, our financial and senior management and our Audit and Compliance Department;

assisting Board oversight of our compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements;

reviewing procedures established for the receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints received, including confidential, anonymous submissions by employees, or others, of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters, and significant cases of alleged employee conflict of interest, ethical violations, misconduct, or fraud, the volume and nature of calls to the "Ethics and Compliance Hotline" and other matters similar in nature; and

preparing the “Audit Committee Report” included in our annual proxy statement.


43          
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     2015 Proxy Statementyear ending December 31, 2018.



Table of Contents

  AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

Before our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014,2017, was filed with the SEC, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors reviewed and discussed with management our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014.2017.

The Audit Committee has discussed with KPMG LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, the matters required to be discussed by PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 16,1301, “Communications with Audit Committees.”

The Audit Committee also has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from KPMG LLP required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding KPMG LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with KPMG LLP their independence.

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the financial statements referred to above be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014,2017, filed with the SEC.

2014 Members of the Audit Committee

Karen N. Horn,Chair
Robert A. Bradway,Member
Michael D. Lockhart,Member
Amy E. Miles,Member
Martin H. Nesbitt,Member
John R. Thompson,Member

RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS

During 2014, Norfolk Southern did not have any related persons transactions.

We may occasionally participate in transactions with certain “related persons.” Related persons include our Executive Officers, directors, beneficial owners of 5% or more of our common stock, immediate family members of these persons, and entities in which one of these persons has a direct or indirect material interest. We refer to transactions with these related persons as “related person transactions.” We have adopted a written policy to prohibit related person transactions unless they are determined to be in Norfolk Southern’s best interests. Under this policy, the Audit Committee is responsible for the review and approval of each related person transaction exceeding $120,000. In instances where it is not practicable or desirable to wait until the next meeting of the Audit Committee for review of a related person transaction, the Chair of the Audit Committee has been delegated authority to act between Audit Committee meetings. The Audit Committee, or the Chair, considers all relevant factors when determining whether to approve a related person transaction, including whether the proposed transaction is on terms and made under circumstances that are at least as favorable to Norfolk Southern as would be available in comparable transactions with or involving unaffiliated third parties. Among other relevant factors, they consider:

the sizeMembers of the transaction and the amount of consideration payable to the related person(s);

Audit Committee

the nature of the interest of the applicable director, director nominee, Executive Officer, or 5% stockholder, in the transaction; and

whether we have developed an appropriate plan to monitor or otherwise manage the potential for a conflict of interest.

The Chair must report any action taken pursuant to this delegated authority to the Audit Committee at its next meeting. In addition, at the Audit Committee’s first meeting of each fiscal year, it reviews all previously approved related person transactions that remain ongoing and have a remaining term or remaining amounts payable to or receivable from us of more than $120,000. Based on all relevant facts and circumstances, taking into consideration our contractual obligations, the Audit Committee determines whether it is in our and our stockholders’ best interest to continue, modify or terminate the related person transaction.

44Amy E. Miles,Chair
2015 Proxy Statement

Marcela E. Donadio
Michael D. Lockhart
Martin H. Nesbitt
John R. Thompson
       NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATIONNorfolk Southern CorporationPage 28www.norfolksouthern.com 



Table of Contents

Executive Compensation| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

ITEMAPPROVAL OF ADVISORY RESOLUTION ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
3

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

The membersWe are asking our shareholders to vote to support the compensation of Norfolk Southern’s Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement. Our executive compensation program is described in detail in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 32 and our “Executive Compensation Tables” beginning on page 49. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of Norfolk Southern’s Named Executive Officers and the philosophy, policies, and practices described in this proxy statement. While this “Say-on-Pay” vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on the Board, the Compensation Committee during 2014 were Daniel A. Carp, Chair, Thomas D. Bell, Jr., Erskine B. Bowles, Wesley G. Bush, and Steven F. Leer. Nonewill consider the results of the these members have ever been employed by Norfolk Southern, and no members had any relationship with us during 2014 requiring disclosure as a transaction with a related person, promoter, or control person under Item 404 of Regulation S-K or under the Compensation Committee Interlocks disclosure requirements of Item 407(e)(4) of Regulation S-K.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

KEY CHANGES

What were the key changesvote in theevaluating our executive compensation program for 2014?in the future.

The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors took the following key actions with respect to executive compensation for 2014, asAs more fully described in thisour Compensation Discussion and Analysis:Analysis, Norfolk Southern’s executive compensation program is designed to align executives’ compensation with the Corporation’s overall business strategies, to attract and retain highly qualified executives, and to provide incentives that drive shareholder value. Accordingly, the compensation program consists of a mix of the following compensation components that the Committee believes best serves to achieve those objectives:


Long-Term Incentive AwardsAnnual IncentiveSalary
Target longer-term achievement of corporate objectives by aligning interest of executives with shareholders
Include performance shares that are earned over a 3-year performance cycle, stock options, and time-based restricted stock units
See page 43 for further details
Compensate executives based on achievement of annual corporate goals
Earn based on performance against financial, operating, and network performance metrics
See page 40 for further details
Help attract and retain executives
Provide a fixed level of compensation
See page 40 for further details
1

Average for Ms. Earhart, Mr. Galanko, Mr. Shaw, and Mr. Wheeler. Omitted from this table is Ms. Stewart because she retired during 2017, and Mr. Hurlbut because he served as the interim chief financial officer following Ms. Stewart’s retirement on August 1 until Ms. Earhart’s appointment on August 15.

Under the direction of our Compensation Committee, our executive compensation program emphasizes performance-based compensation, including compensation that is contingent upon performance conditions or subsequent stock price appreciation. The Committee considers the annual cash incentive, long-term performance share units, and stock options to be performance-based awards. The annual cash incentive and performance share units are at risk of having no value unless threshold goals are achieved, and the stock options are at risk of having no value unless our stock price appreciates.

Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 29www.norfolksouthern.com

Table of Contents

Executive Compensation| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

The Committee believes such performance-based compensation creates a strong alignment between the interests of our executive officers and our shareholders. In 2017, our Chief Executive Officer’s target compensation was 78% performance-based, and the other Named Executive Officers’ target compensation was on average 66% performance-based.

The Committee establishes financial, operating, and railroad network performance measures for the annual cash incentive, and financial and stock performance criteria for our performance share unit (PSU) long-term stock incentive, and establishes challenging goals that must be met for threshold, target, or maximum payouts to be awarded. For the annual and long-term incentives that ended in 2017, the results were as follows:

Considered total direct compensation paid by a peer group of companies consisting of other North American Class I railroads and, following that analysis, did not make any changes to salary levels or annual incentive opportunities for the2017 Annual Incentive: Our Named Executive Officers.

Set financial and operating targets which, if met, would produce a 67%Officers earned 115.7% of their annual cash incentive payout. Norfolk Southern achieved the maximumopportunity based on achieving above-target performance goal for the operating ratio measure and exceeded its targeted performance goallevels for the operating income measure, resulting in an annual incentive payout of 80.6%. However, the thresholdand operating ratio measures, and below-target performance goal for the composite service measure.

2015-2017 PSU Performance Cycle: A 37.5% payout was achieved for the 3-year cycle, based on performance against goals that were established in January 2015 for two equally weighted metrics, return on average invested capital and relative total shareholder return (TSR). We achieved a 75% payout for TSR for the 3-year cycle but did not meet the threshold measure was not met, sofor return on average invested capital and, as a result, no award was earned for the portion of the annual incentiveperformance share unit corresponding to this performance metric.

The Committee grants stock options with a ten-year term, providing incentives to our executives to promote long-term shareholder interests. The value of stock options is inextricably linked to the creation of shareholder value, since options generate value for executives when Norfolk Southern creates value for shareholders through price appreciation.

Shareholders have repeatedly expressed strong support for Norfolk Southern’s executive compensation program. We regularly engage in a shareholder outreach program to solicit feedback concerning our executive compensation program. This process allows shareholders to provide input to the Compensation Committee on our executive compensation program and disclosure beyond the annual advisory vote on compensation. In the meetings held during 2017, shareholders expressed satisfaction with Norfolk Southern’s compensation program and with our disclosures related to the program in the proxy statement.

As a result of our shareholder engagements, the Committee has taken several actions over the past years to enhance the design of our executive compensation program. For 2018, the Committee made the following changes to the long-term incentive awards granted to our Named Executive Officers which it believes will provide better alignment with shareholders:

revise the mix of the long-term incentive awards to decrease the percentage granted as stock options and increase the percentage granted as performance share units and restricted stock units, while adjusting the vesting of the restricted stock units to a 4-year ratable period rather than a 5-year cliff;

Continued to grant, as in past years, long-term incentive awards consisting of options,provide that performance share unit and restricted stock units awards will be forfeited if the recipient terminates employment with the Corporation before October 1 of the year of grant, except in the case of death or disability; and

for performance share units, all of whose ultimate value is based on stockholder return. The value oftotal shareholder return serves as a modifier rather than as a performance share units is tied to achievement of disclosed goals for total stockholder returnmetric, and return on average invested capital.
capital serves as the sole metric.

SHAREHOLDER SUPPORT FOR NORFOLK SOUTHERN’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

The Board of Directors and its Compensation Committee believe the compensation program for the Named Executive Officers is appropriately designed to support Norfolk Southern’s goals. Since this advisory vote was first held in 2011, shareholders have agreed, as they have strongly supported our executive compensation program with 94% or more of the votes cast each year, and 96% in 2017, in favor of our executive compensation program.

Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 30www.norfolksouthern.com

To better align performance share earnout with total shareholder return, eliminated operating ratio as a performance goal and tied one-half (rather than one-third) of the performance share units awarded for the 2014-2016 cycle to three-year total stockholder return.

Awarded CEO compensation that is 79% at-risk and 53% of which is tied to established corporate performance goals.

Awarded CEO compensation that is 75% equity-based awards that are aligned with stockholder returns.

Continued to engage with stockholders on matters concerning executive compensation and make changes to our compensation programs and disclosure as a result of such engagement.

The Committee believes that our compensation program provides competitive pay, promotes retention, and provides incentive for our Executive Officers to maximize long-term stockholder value.


45          
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     2015 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONExecutive Compensation| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

Historical “Say-on-Pay” Voting Results (For)

What wereWe therefore ask that you express your support by voting FOR the key changes to CEO totalfollowing advisory resolution:

RESOLVED, that the shareholders of Norfolk Southern Corporation approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation for 2014?

The Committee awarded CEO compensation atof the 46th percentile of total direct compensation as compared to peer group companies, which fell at a lower percentile than the 56th percentile for 2013. While at the time the Committee made its compensation decisions the total direct compensation relative to the peer group was a reduction from 2013, the CEO’s total compensation as reportedindividuals identified in the Summary Compensation Table, increased approximately $3.9 million. This increase consistsas disclosed in the proxy statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the following components (shown in approximate amounts):

$3.1 million of the increase is due to the increased actuarial present value of the pension plan benefits for Mr. Moorman as compared to the increase for 2013, consisting of $2.6 million from changes in the mortality assumptions and discount rates in 2014 (accounting and actuarial assumptions) and $0.5 million from changes in Mr. Moorman’s final average compensation.

$0.7 million of the increase is due to higher valued equity awards, and $0.1 million is due to a higher annual incentive earnout for above-target operating income and operating ratio results. The Committee increased the equity awards to maintain competitive compensation at approximately the 50th percentile of our peer group.


What key decisions didSecurities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the 2017 Summary Compensation Table, and the other related tables and disclosures.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that shareholders vote FOR the advisory resolution approving the compensation of our Named Executive Officers.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The Compensation Committee make for CEO total compensation awarded in 2015?

The Committee reviewedof our Board of Directors oversees the 2014 executive compensation program in lighton behalf of the Corporation’s resultsBoard. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, we reviewed and discussed with management the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” set forth in this proxy statement.*

The Compensation Discussion and Analysis discloses the material elements of Norfolk Southern’s executive compensation program. We are committed to a compensation program that is designed to align executives’ compensation with Norfolk Southern’s overall business strategies, attract and retain highly qualified executives, and provide incentives that drive shareholder value. The Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes how our decisions regarding Norfolk Southern’s executive compensation program for 20142017 implemented these design elements.

In reliance on the review and madediscussions with management referred to above, we recommended to the following key decisionsBoard that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in Norfolk Southern’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for Mr. Moorman’s 2015 compensation (which will be reflected in the 2016fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, and this proxy statement):statement.

Members of the Compensation Committee

Daniel A. Carp,Chair
Thomas D. Bell, Jr.
Erskine B. Bowles
Wesley G. Bush
Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr.
Steven F. Leer

*     

TheMs. Scanlon was appointed to the Compensation Committee on January 22, 2018, upon her election to the Board, and did not increase Mr. Moorman’s salary level orparticipate in the annual cash incentive plan opportunity for 2015.
Committee’s deliberations regarding the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 31www.norfolksouthern.com

The Committee did not increase the targeted value of long-term equity incentive awards for Mr. Moorman in 2015.

For Mr. Moorman and all executive officers, the Committee continued the 50% weighting for the TSR goal in performance share units and capped the earnout for the TSR goal at target payout when three-year TSR is negative.

For Mr. Moorman and all executive officers, the Committee changed the performance targets and resulting payouts for the 2015 annual incentive award to increase the operating income and operating ratio performance goals for threshold, target and maximum payouts.



46
2015 Proxy Statement

     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

Executive Compensation| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the objectives, governance, and policies that guide our executive compensation program, the compensation components that made up that program during 2017, and the performance goals and results.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

OUR 2017 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

The following chart summarizes the key characteristics and performance metrics that apply to the compensation program for our Named Executive Officers for 2017:

ElementFormKey Characteristics & Performance Metrics
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  Base
Salary
Fixed Cash
Reviewed annually and periodically adjusted based on market data, individual performance and experience, changes in position or duties, or other circumstances
Annual
Incentive
Performance
Based Cash
Designed to compensate executives based on achievement of annual corporate performance goals
Performance metrics chosen to encourage employees to do all they can individually and as a team to increase revenue, reduce expenses, and improve operating performance
Performance metrics for 2017:
Operating income
Operating ratio
Composite service measure(weighted average of adherence to operating plan (30%), connection performance (30%), and train performance (40%))
Long-Term
Incentive
Awards

Performance
Share Units
(50%)
Performance metrics chosen to promote enhancement of shareholder value and efficient utilization of corporate assets
Performance metrics for 2017:
After-tax return on average invested capital
Total shareholder return measure(relative to publicly-traded North American Class I railroads and a secondary measure relative to S&P 500)
Vests at the end of a 3-year period if 3-year performance goals are achieved
Stock Options
(35%)
Provides ability to retain key employees and at the same time increase shareholder value
Vests on the 4th anniversary of the date of grant
Restricted Stock
Units (15%)
Serves as a key retention tool for valued members of management
Vests on the 5th anniversary of the date of grant

2017 COMPENSATION ALIGNMENT

At Norfolk Southern, our Compensation Committee aligns compensation to performance by emphasizing performance-based compensation components. These components include an annual cash incentive, long-term performance share units with a 3-year cycle, and stock options.

In December 2015, Norfolk Southern announced its five-year strategic plan to streamline the Corporation’s operations and drive profitability and growth. Under the strategic plan, Norfolk Southern’s goal is to achieve an operating ratio less than 65 by 2020 and double-digit compound annual earnings per share growth over the plan period, along with focused capital investment to support long-term value creation and significant return of capital to shareholders. Norfolk Southern is intensely focused on executing these initiatives to drive long-term shareholder value.

As described in the “Business Highlights” beginning on page 5, Norfolk Southern’s five-year strategic plan goals continued to produce results in 2017, including a record operating ratio of 66.0 percent for the year and record diluted earnings per share of $18.61. Excluding the impact of the Tax Act, which provided a 140 basis point improvement to

Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 32www.norfolksouthern.com

Table of Contents

Executive Compensation| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

the operating ratio and added $12.00 to earnings per share for the year, the operating ratio was 67.4* percent, which was a 150 basis point improvement over the prior year’s record, and earnings per share was $6.61*, an 18 percent improvement over 2016.

In 2017, we reinvested $1.7 billion in the Corporation through our capital spending and replacement program, while paying $703 million in dividends and repurchasing $1 billion of company stock. Annual revenues grew 7% in 2017, including a 5% increase in total carload volume and revenue per-unit gains across all major market segments. These strong operating results, together with a focus on productivity and cost control, led to a 15% increase in net income over 2016 (excluding the impact of the Tax Act).

The Committee is committed to tying executives’ annual and long-term incentive compensation to Norfolk Southern’s performance and strategic plan goals.

Annual Incentive.Norfolk Southern exceeded the 2017 target goals for operating income and operating ratio reflecting strong financial performance and operational efficiency, but did not meet the target goal for the composite service measure, resulting in a payout of 115.7% of the annual incentive opportunity for the Named Executive Officers.

Performance Share Units.Our Named Executive Officers earned 37.5% of performance share units for the 3-year cycle ending in 2017, based on equally weighted goals for total shareholder return (TSR) and after-tax return on average invested capital. We achieved a 75% payout for TSR for the three-year cycle, but did not achieve any payout for the after-tax return on average invested capital portion of the award.

*     

Reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure is provided on page 83 of this Proxy Statement under “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”

LEADING COMPENSATION GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

Embedded in our overall executive compensation program are features that reflect leading governance principles and demonstrate our commitment to best practices in executive compensation:

We DoWe Do Not Do
Stock Ownership Guidelines, for CEO – 5 times annual salary; for EVPs – 3 times annual salary
Pledging or hedging of Norfolk Southern securities
Clawback provisions in both annual and long-term incentives
Stock option repricing, reloads or exchanges without shareholder approval
Directly link the Corporation’s performance, including the Corporation’s stock-price performance, to pay outcomes
Stock options granted below fair market value, as all stock options are priced during an open window period after the release of earnings
Disclose metrics for annual and long-term incentives earned
Excise tax gross-ups on change-in-control benefits
Independent compensation consultant that is hired by and reports directly to the Compensation Committee
Tax gross-ups on perquisites for Executive Vice Presidents and above
Annual Say-on-Pay vote
Individual employment agreements or individual supplemental retirement plans
Single trigger change-in-control agreements
Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 33www.norfolksouthern.com

Table of Contents

Executive Compensation| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

KEY 2017 COMPENSATION DECISIONS

As the Compensation Committee continues its focus on aligning executives’ compensation with Norfolk Southern’s strategic plan goals and overall business strategies, attracting and retaining highly qualified executives, and providing incentives that drive shareholder value, the Committee made the following key decisions with respect to executive compensation for 2017:

Established Challenging 2017 Annual Incentive Performance Targets Aligned to Our Strategic Plan Goals. In January 2017, the Committee set challenging financial, operating, and service targets which, if met, would have produced a 67% annual incentive payout. In establishing performance targets for 2017, the Committee considered:
Norfolk Southern’s forecasted business environment;
the continuing change in Norfolk Southern’s traffic mix;
continued economic uncertainty;
overall economic factors in the rail industry; and
goals of the five-year strategic plan.

Given the high bar the Committee established in 2016, and in consideration of ongoing economic uncertainty and the goals of the strategic plan, the Committee:

decreased the performance necessary to achieve a payout at the threshold and target levels for operating income, but established a target level that was higher than 2016 performance;
increased the performance necessary to achieve the targeted and maximum payout for the operating ratio;
increased the maximum payout for operating income and operating ratio from 100% to 150% for the portion attributable to each of these factors if Norfolk Southern accelerates achievement of its strategic plan goals.

Against these challenging performance measures, Norfolk Southern achieved a 115.7% payout of its 2017 annual incentive reflecting its strong financial results for operating income and operating ratio.

Established Compensation for CEO that is 78% Performance-Based. The Committee established Mr. Squires’ 2017 compensation for his second full year in the Chief Executive Officer position. The Committee’s 2017 compensation award for Mr. Squires provided 72% of his targeted compensation in the form of equity-based awards that are aligned with shareholder interests, and 78% as performance-based compensation.
Granted Long-Term Incentive Awards that are Performance-Based. The Committee continued to grant annual long-term incentive awards, the majority of which consist of options and performance share units, whose ultimate value is based on shareholder return and which may not have any value at the end of the performance or vesting period.
Excluded the Impact of Tax Reform on Executive Pay. The Committee took action before the end of 2017 to exclude the impact of the Tax Act from the determination of the payout for the 2017 annual incentive and for the performance share units for the 3-year cycle ending in 2017. If the Committee had not taken this action, the payouts would have been higher.
Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 34www.norfolksouthern.com

Table of Contents

Executive Compensation| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

OUR 2017 NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
NamePosition
James A. SquiresChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Cynthia C. EarhartExecutive Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Alan H. ShawExecutive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer
Michael J. WheelerExecutive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Thomas E. Hurlbut1Interim Chief Financial Officer, Vice President and Controller
William A. Galanko2Former Executive Vice President Law and Administration
Marta R. Stewart3Former Executive Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer
1Mr. Hurlbut served as the interim chief financial officer following Ms. Stewart’s retirement effective August 1, 2017, until Ms. Earhart’s appointment on August 15, 2017.
2Mr. Galanko retired effective March 1, 2018.
3Ms. Stewart retired effective August 1, 2017.

Objectives of Compensation ProgramOBJECTIVES OF COMPENSATION PROGRAM

Norfolk Southern’s executive compensation program is primarily designed to:

Align executives’ compensation with overall business strategies.

Attract and retain highly qualified executives.

Provide incentives for executives tothat drive stockholdershareholder value.

COMPENSATION GOVERNANCE
The Compensation Committee is responsible for developingworks closely with its independent compensation consultant throughout the year to develop the executive compensation program and maintainingto align pay with performance and with pay at comparable companies. While the Compensation Committee discusses current and proposed compensation structures with management, the Committee acts independently of management and has the full authority to retain any advisors it deems appropriate compensation programs for our Executive Officers, including our Named Executive Officers.to assist it in making these decisions.

In order to enhance the Committee’s ability to carry out these responsibilities effectively, as well as ensure that Norfolk Southern maintains strong links between executive pay and performance, the Committee:

Has retained Pay Governance LLC as an independent compensation consultant.

Reviews management recommendations with respect to the compensation program.

Annually reviews individual performance of the Executive Officers with the Chief Executive Officer and recommends any compensation adjustments.

Use of Compensation ConsultantUSE OF INDEPENDENT COMPENSATION CONSULTANT

The Committee engaged an independent compensation consultant, Pay Governance LLC, to provide executive compensation consulting services during 2014.2017. Pay Governance does not provide services to Norfolk Southern other than those provided at the request of the Committee.

At the Committee’s request, Pay Governance providescompiled compensation data for the peer group selected by the Committee. Pay Governance also provided requested reports and information to the Committee and attendsCommittee. Pay Governance attended Committee meetings at the Committee’s request. For 2014, the Committee engaged Pay Governance to (1) conduct a market pay assessment of Norfolk Southern’s compensation levels relative to both the competitive market and Norfolk Southern’s compensation philosophy, including identifying and reviewing market benchmark positions and pay data, (2) assist Norfolk Southern with the development of long-term incentive grant guidelines for the officer and management groups, based on Pay Governance’s competitive pay assessment, (3) conduct an assessment of Norfolk Southern’s non-employee directors’ compensation package relative to competitive

market practices, (4) review emerging trends and issues in executive compensation with the Committee and discuss the implications for Norfolk Southern, and (5) provide certain additional executive compensation consulting services as may be requested by the Committee. In conducting the market pay assessment, Pay Governance reviews with the Committee parameters for the selection of peer group companies and compiles compensation data for the peer group. The Committee uses thisused the information provided by Pay Governance as a starting point for its compensation decisions.

More specifically, in 2017, Pay Governance:

conducted a market pay assessment of Norfolk Southern’s compensation levels relative to both the competitive market and Norfolk Southern’s compensation philosophy, including identifying and reviewing available market benchmark positions and pay data;
assisted Norfolk Southern with the development of long-term incentive grant guidelines for the officer and management groups, based on Pay Governance’s competitive pay assessment;
reviewed emerging trends and issues in executive compensation with the Committee and discussed the implications for Norfolk Southern; and
provided an analysis of the difficulty of achieving the threshold, target, and maximum performance goals for the annual incentive and the performance share units, and of the current plans’ effectiveness in driving achievement of threshold, target, and maximum payouts.
Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 35www.norfolksouthern.com

Table of Contents

Executive Compensation | 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

For 2017 and 2018, following a review of its records and policies, Pay Governance provided the Compensation Committee with a report regarding its conformance with independence factors under applicable SEC rules and the listing standards of the NYSE. The Committee considered the independence factors and determined that Pay Governance is independent and free from potential conflicts of interest.

PERFORMANCE REVIEWS

The Committee annually reviews the performance of the Chief Executive Officer and considers this performance when establishing his compensation package. The Committee also reviews the performance of the other Named Executive Officers with the assistance of the Chief Executive Officer, and considers both its own assessment of the executives’ performance and the assessment of the CEO in establishing a compensation package for the other Named Executive Officers.

COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION OF MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS

Management Recommendations

does not make recommendations on the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer. Pay Governance makes recommendations to the Committee on any adjustments to compensation for the Chief Executive Officer, and the Chief Executive Officer is not present when the Committee makes decisions on his compensation package.

The Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President-Administration providePresident Administration and Chief Information Officer (for the period from January 1, 2017, to August 14, 2017) and the Executive Vice President Law and Administration (for the period from August 15, 2017, to December 31, 2017) provided recommendations to the Compensation Committee on any adjustments to compensation for the Named Executive Officers, other than the Chief Executive Officer. Such adjustments are based on each individual’s performance, level of responsibility, and time in position.position, and internal pay equity.

In addition to individual adjustments, the Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President-Administration providePresident Administration and Chief Information Officer (for the period from January 1, 2017, to August 14, 2017) and the Executive Vice President Law and Administration (for the period from August 15, 2017, to December 31, 2017) provided recommendations to the Committee on adjustments to compensation to address retention needs, performance goals, internal and market pay equity, overall corporate performance, and general economic conditions. While the Committee considers the recommendations of management in these areas, it makes compensation decisions independently after considering Pay Governance’s recommendations.

CONSIDERATION OF SHAREHOLDER ADVISORY VOTE ON COMPENSATION AND SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

At Norfolk Southern’s 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, approximately 96% of the votes cast supported the advisory resolution on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. The Committee compared the results of the advisory vote to its peer group average results and the average results amongst the S&P 500 companies. The Committee viewed the results of the advisory vote as demonstrating broad shareholder support for our current executive compensation program. Given the results of the shareholder advisory vote and the Committee’s ongoing review of Norfolk Southern’s compensation programs, the Committee believes that our existing compensation program effectively aligns the interests of the Named Executive Officers with Norfolk Southern’s long-term goals. While the shareholder vote on compensation is advisory in nature, the Board and Compensation PoliciesCommittee carefully considers the results of any such vote in future compensation decisions.

Norfolk Southern engages in a shareholder outreach program with our institutional investors to solicit feedback concerning our executive compensation program, and this shareholder feedback is reported to the Committee and the Board for consideration. This process allows shareholders to provide input to the Compensation Committee on our executive compensation program and disclosure beyond the annual advisory vote on compensation. In response to
Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 36www.norfolksouthern.com

Table of Contents

Executive Compensation | 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

specific concerns expressed by shareholders during these discussions, the Committee has taken several actions over the past years to enhance the design of our executive compensation program. For 2018, the Committee made the following changes:

revise the mix of the long-term incentive awards to decrease the percentage granted as stock options and increase the percentage granted as performance share units and restricted stock units, while adjusting the vesting of the restricted stock units to a 4-year ratable period rather than a 5-year cliff;
provide that performance share unit and restricted stock units awards will be forfeited if the recipient terminates employment with the Corporation before October 1 of the year of grant, except in the case of death or disability; and
for performance share units, total shareholder return serves as a modifier rather than as a performance metric, and return on average invested capital serves as the sole metric.

COMPENSATION POLICIES
In setting compensation for the Named Executive Officers, the Committee:our Compensation Committee considers:

Considers each officer’s performance, experience, qualifications, responsibilities, and tenure;

current and historical salary levels, targeted annual incentive opportunities, and long-term incentive awards;
expected corporate performance and general economic conditions; and
comparative market data, provided by the independent compensation consultant, fromfor other North American Class I railroads, as a guideline. In aggregate, theThe Committee targetsconsiders total direct compensation (i.e., salary(salary plus target annual incentive plus the expected value of long-term incentive awards) atrelative to the 50th percentile for the Chief Executive Officer and at a range from the 50th to the 65th percentile for the other Named Executive Officers as compared to the peer group.



47          
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     2015 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Considers current salary levels, targeted annual incentive opportunities and the value of long-term incentive awards at the time the awards are made.

Considers expected corporate performance and general economic conditions.

The Committee does not consider amounts realized from prior performance-based or stock-based compensation awards when setting the current year’s target total direct compensation, regardless of whether such realized amounts realized may have resulted in a higher or a lower payout than targeted in prior years. Since the nature and purpose of performance-based and stock-based compensation is to tie executives’ compensation to future performance, the Committee believes that considering amounts realized from prior compensation awards in making current compensation decisions is inconsistent with this purpose.

Compensation GovernancePEER GROUP

TheOur Compensation Committee works closely with its compensation consultant and management to develop the executive compensation program through the year and to align pay with performance and with pay at comparable companies. Embedded in our overall executive compensation program are certain best-practices features:

WE DOWE DO NOT DO

Stock Ownership Guidelines, for CEO and President – 5 times annual salary; for EVPs – 3 times annual salary

χ

Tax gross ups on perquisites

Clawback provisions in both annual and long-term incentives

χ

Stock option repricing, reloads or exchanges without stockholder approval

79% of CEO’s pay is at-risk

χ

Stock options granted below fair market value, as all stock options are priced during an open window period after the release of earnings

53% of CEO’s pay is performance-based

χ

Pledging of Norfolk Southern securities

Disclose metrics for annual and long-term incentives

χ

Hedging of Norfolk Southern securities

Compensation Committee comprised entirely of outside independent directors

χ

Individual employment agreements or individual supplemental retirement plans

Independent compensation consultant that is hired by and reports directly to the Compensation Committee

χ

Single trigger change in control agreements

Annual Say on Pay vote

χ

Excise tax gross ups on change in control benefits



48
2015 Proxy Statement

     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

Peer Group

The Committee monitors the continuing appropriateness of its selection of the peer group.group companies. The Committee narrowedbelieves its focus should be on ensuring the peer group for the Named Executive Officers beginning in 2011 to focus onincludes the other North American Class I railroads because Norfolk Southern is primarily in competition with those companies for key executive talent. As a result, the Committee determined that reference to the pay levels at the other North American Class I railroads was the most relevant comparator for the Named Executive Officers. Therefore, theThe North American Class I railroads that make up the peer group companies for 20142017 (“Peer Group Companies”) are:

BNSF Railway,
Canadian National Railway,
Canadian Pacific Railway,

CSX,
Kansas City Southern,
and Union Pacific
Pacific.

The

Our Committee applies its executive compensation policies consistently to all Named Executive Officers, and the application of these policies produces differing amounts of compensation for the Chief Executive Officer, the President and the Executive Vice Presidentseach officer based on his or her responsibilities and tenure and responsibilities.as compared to the compensation set for comparable positions by the Peer Group Companies. In setting the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, the Committee strives to balance comparative market data for chief executive officers of Peer Group Companies with its goal to provide meaningfulincentive opportunities that are significantly performance-based incentive opportunitiesand thus designed to drive stockholder returns. In addition, the Committee looks at executives at the President and Executive Vice President levels and considers the appropriate compensation differential between the Chief Executive Officer, the President and the remaining executive officers.shareholder value. Because the Chief Executive Officer’s job carries the highest level of responsibility and has the greatest ability to drive stockholdershareholder value, his total compensation contains a higher variable or at-riskperformance-based component than that of other executives.

Consideration of Stockholder Advisory Vote on Compensation

At Norfolk Southern’s 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our stockholders voted on a non-binding advisory resolution on the compensation provided to theother Named Executive Officers, as reported in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and executive compensation tables in the Corporation’s 2014 proxy

Officers.

statement. Approximately 96% of voting stockholders approved that resolution, excluding abstentions and shares that were not voted. The Committee viewed the results of the advisory vote as demonstrating broad stockholder support for our current executive compensation program. Given the results of the stockholder advisory vote and the Committee’s ongoing review of Norfolk Southern’s compensation programs, the Committee believes that our existing compensation programs effectively align the interests of the Named Executive Officers with Norfolk Southern’s long-term goals. While the stockholder vote on compensation is advisory in nature, the Board and Compensation Committee will carefully consider the results of any such vote in future compensation decisions.



49          Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 37www.norfolksouthern.com
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION 2015 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONExecutive Compensation | 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

COMPENSATION COMPONENTS

Stockholder EngagementOVERVIEW

Norfolk Southern regularly engages with its stockholders on executive compensation and governance matters. During 2014, we engaged inOur Compensation Committee has designed a stockholder outreach program with our largest institutional investors to solicit feedback concerning Norfolk Southern’s executive compensation program, and the Committee was provided with a report on the results of that outreach, as described more fully on page 33. This process provided an opportunity for stockholders to provide input on our executive compensation program and policies in addition to the annual advisory vote on compensation and to comment on our disclosure of compensation matters in the proxy statement. As a result of our stockholder engagement, Norfolk Southern made the change described below in 2014 to the executive compensation program.

EMIP and LTIP Performance Goal Overlap

In prior years, operating ratio served as a performance goal for both the Executive Management Incentive Plan, which is the annual cash incentive program, and for the performance share units under the Long-Term Incentive Plan, which is the long-term equity incentive program. Stockholders expressed concern that the overlap rewarded executives twice for the same performance, and overemphasized one performance criteria. In response to stockholder concerns, the Committee eliminated operating ratio as a performance goal for performance share unit grants during 2014.

Compensation Components

Overview

The Committee strives to create abalanced compensation program that provides our Named Executive Officers with a balanced compensation package that includes an appropriate base salary along with competitive annual and long-term incentive compensation, so as tocompensation. The program directly linklinks executives’ compensation to Norfolk Southern’s strategic goals and financial performance, and thus alignaligns their interests with those of our stockholders.shareholders. Norfolk Southern’s total compensation for its Named Executive Officers is weighted heavily toward performance-based incentive compensation, rather than base salary, with the resultso that a substantial portion of 2014 targettargeted executive compensation aligns with stockholder interests and is at-risk.shareholder interests.

2014 Named Executive Officers2017 CEO Target Total Compensation Mix

2017 Average Target Total Compensation Mix for Continuing NEOs*

*NamePosition
Charles W. Moorman, IVChairmanReflects the average percentage of target compensation for Ms. Earhart, Mr. Galanko, Mr. Shaw and Chief Executive Officer
James A. SquiresPresident
Marta R. StewartMr. Wheeler. PSU component does not include accelerated turnaround incentive award granted to Mr. Galanko upon his promotion to Executive Vice President – FinanceLaw and Chief Financial OfficerAdministration, as no value is assigned to those awards as assessed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Omitted from this table is Ms. Stewart because she retired during 2017, and Mr. Hurlbut because he served as the interim chief financial officer following Ms. Stewart’s retirement on August 1 until Ms. Earhart’s appointment on August 15.
Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 38www.norfolksouthern.com
Deborah H. ButlerExecutive Vice President – Planning and Chief Information Officer
Mark D. ManionExecutive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

50
2015 Proxy Statement

     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  Executive Compensation | 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

2014 CEO Target Total Compensation Mix
In setting executives’ total direct compensation and the compensation component mix, the Committee considers the advice of its independent compensation consultant and then makes its own judgments to determine appropriate compensation levels and mix. The Committee considers each executive’s performance, role, time in position, and internal pay equity. In addition, the Committee uses market data of the Peer Group Companies when available as a reference point for determining the appropriate compensation, considering where the expected total direct compensation for the upcoming year falls relative to the 50th percentile for the Chief Executive Officer and the other Named Executive Officers. In making its final determinations, the Committee generally gives greater consideration to comparable market data and performance for seasoned incumbents, and to factors such as tenure and internal pay equity for those newer in their role.

2014 President Target Total Compensation Mix

After considering the available market data and other considerations, at the beginning of 2017, the Committee:

51          increased the total direct compensation targets for Mr. Squires, Mr. Shaw, Mr. Wheeler, and Mr. Hurlbut, to position their compensation at a competitive range around the median compensation as compared with comparable positions at the Peer Group Companies;
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     determined that the total direct compensation targets for Ms. Earhart was appropriate, and therefore did not change any components of her total direct compensation for 2017;
2015 Proxy Statementestablished the total direct compensation target for Mr. Galanko as a result of his promotion to the Senior Vice President level; and
increased the total direct compensation target for Ms. Stewart as a result of providing her with a long-term incentive award to incent her retention until October 1, 2018, which award was forfeited when Ms. Stewart chose to retire effective August 1, 2017.

The Committee subsequently increased the total direct compensation target for Mr. Galanko in recognition of his promotion to Executive Vice President in October 2017.

Effective December 2017, the Committee recommended, and the Board approved, a one-time adjustment to Mr. Hurlbut’s salary, paid as a lump sum, resulting from his service as Interim Chief Financial Officer following Ms. Stewart’s retirement on August 1 and until Ms. Earhart’s appointment on August 15.

For 2017, the portion of total direct compensation awarded as total cash compensation versus long-term incentive compensation was approximately*:

*

The long-term incentive grants shown in the table were made in January 2017, when Ms. Earhart held the position Executive Vice President Administration and Chief Information Officer, and Mr. Galanko held the position Senior Vice President Law and Corporate Communications. Ms. Stewart is omitted from this table because she retired during 2017. Mr. Hurlbut is omitted from the table because he served as the interim chief financial officer following Ms. Stewart’s retirement and until Ms. Earhart’s appointment. No value is assigned to accelerated turnaround incentive awards granted as PSUs to Mr. Galanko upon his promotion to Executive Vice President Law and Administration, as assessed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 39www.norfolksouthern.com


Table of Contents

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONExecutive Compensation | 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

2014 Average Target Total Compensation Mix for Remaining NEOs*

*Reflects the average percentage of target compensation for Ms. Stewart, Ms. Butler and Mr. Manion. Actual target percentages are as follows: for Ms. Stewart, 21% salary, 19% annual incentive, 30% PSUs, 21% options and 92% RSUs; for Ms. Butler, 24% salary, 21% annual incentive, 28% PSUs, 19% options and 8% RSUs; and for Mr. Manion, 20% salary, 18% annual incentive, 31% PSUs, 22% options and 9% RSUs.


2014 Target Mix of Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards for Executive Officers

52
2015 Proxy Statement

     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

In establishing compensation for the different executive levels, the Committee historically attempted to provide internal pay equity across each level so that executives occupying positions having a similar level of responsibility, such as Executive Vice President, received similar total direct compensation. Given recent changes in our executive officers and resulting differences in relative responsibilities and tenure, the Compensation Committee now considers internal pay equity across each level as only one of many factors to consider and is transitioning to a greater focus on market based-pay differentiation for executives within each level.

The Committee considers what proportion of total direct compensation should be paid annually as base salary, as total cash compensation (salary plus annual incentive) and as long-term compensation. This allocation is based in part on comparison to the compensation mix of the Peer Group Companies. The Committee benchmarks Executive Officers’ total direct compensation as the best measure of our competitiveness with Peer Group Companies. While the Committee will consider benchmarked base salary, total cash compensation and long-term compensation for the Peer Group Companies as a whole or for individual Peer Group Companies, the Committee does not establish targeted percentiles for each component of total direct compensation. The Committee believes this approach targets a competitive level of total direct compensation, while also allowing the Committee the flexibility to consider market practices and internal pay equity in determining the compensation component mix. This allocation is re-evaluated annually.

Periodically, the Committee reviews the mix of compensation paid to the Chief Executive Officer and other Named Executive Officers compared to the compensation mix paid to similar officers at individual Peer Group Companies. During 2012, this review resulted in an increase in the cash components of executive compensation, while keeping Total Direct Compensation targets unchanged. For 2013 and 2014, this review did not result in any change to the allocation of Total Direct Compensation, and accordingly, executive salary levels and annual incentive opportunities were not changed, other than as a result of a change in position level.

For 2014, the portion of total direct compensation awarded as cash compensation versus long-term incentive compensation was approximately:

 Total Cash
Compensation
Long-Term
Compensation
Mr. Moorman25%75%
Mr. Squires     38%     62%
Ms. Stewart40%60%
Ms. Butler45%55%
Mr. Manion38%62%

TheOur Committee further considers the portion of total direct compensation which is to be awarded as long-term compensation and how the long-term piece of compensationportion should be allocated among stock options, performance share units, and restricted stock units. This allocation is based on general market practices, compensation trends, governance practices, and business issues facing Norfolk Southern. In making this determination, the Committee takes into account the potential dilutive effect of stock-based awards, including guidance on these measures from proxy advisory services, and further considers the purpose behind each element of long-term compensation and how the allocation among these elements will support its overall compensation policies. The Committee does not target comparative market data in making this allocation decision.objectives. For 2014,2017, the Committee retained the same mixpercentage allocation of awards as werewas granted in 20122016, excluding the accelerated turnaround incentive awards granted in the form of PSUs, and 2013.

The Committee considers where the resulting total direct compensation, valued at the time of the award, falls within the targeted parameter for the Named Executive Officers. This comparison is based on salary for the upcoming year, an estimated 67% earn-out for the bonus, and the estimated grant date fair values of performance share units, stock options, anda restricted stock units awarded for the upcoming year.

Total direct compensation awarded for 2014 for Mr. Moorman was positioned at the 46th percentile as compared to the Peer Group Companies, and therefore within a reasonable range of the targeted 50th percentile. There were no directly comparable positions to Mr. Squires’ position at the Peer Group Companies, so the Committee was not able to consider where his total direct compensation was positioned as compared to other presidents at Peer Group Companies. The Committee’s intent in establishing Mr. Squires’ total direct compensation for 2014 was to position his compensation between the Chief Executive Officer and



53          
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     2015 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

the Executive Vice Presidents, resulting in targeted direct compensation that would place him above the railroad industry executives who were not at the chief executive officer level to recognize his role as President.

Total direct compensation awarded for 2014 to the Executive Vice Presidents was, on average, positioned at the 53rd percentile as compared to the Peer Group Companies, within a reasonable range of the 50th to 65th percentile target. Total direct compensation awarded for 2014unit award granted to Ms. Stewart in January 2017 to incent her retention, which award was positioned at the 41st percentile as compared to the Peer Group Companies. Ms. Stewart’s total direct compensation awardedforfeited upon her retirement effective August 2017.

2017 Target Mix of Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards for 2014 was below the targeted percentile but within a reasonable range in light of her time in the position. Total direct compensation awarded for 2014 to Mr. Manion was positioned at the 49th percentile as compared to the Peer Group Companies, which the Committee considered to be within a reasonable range of the target. For 2014, in connection with its review of target total direct compensation, the Committee increased Mr. Manion’s long-term incentive awards as compared with the other Executive Vice Presidents, which reflects a market-based premium paid to chief operating officers for the Peer Group Companies.Officers*

*

As Mr. Galanko and Mr. Hurlbut were employed at the level of Senior Vice President and Vice President, respectively, when the Long-Term Incentive Plan awards were made in January 2017, their awards were allocated 45% as performance share units, 30% as stock options, and 25% as restricted stock units.

SALARIES

The Committee may reduce the annual incentive paidBoard establishes competitive base salaries for our executive officers to anyattract and retain key executive based on performance. The Committee determined in 2015 that the individual performance of all Named Executive Officers for 2014 met or exceeded expectations and therefore did not make any reduction to annual incentive payments on the basis of individual performance.

Salaries

Thetalent. Our Compensation Committee reviews the Named Executive Officers’ base salaries annually and periodically makes adjustments from timerecommendations to timeNorfolk Southern’s Board of Directors to realignadjust salaries withbased on market levels, after taking into accountdata, individual performance and experience, changes in position or duties, or for other circumstances. As described above,

After the Committee’s annual salary review in January 2017, the Committee recommended increases in Mr. Squires’, Mr. Shaw’s and Mr. Hurlbut’s salaries for 2017, and the Board approved these changes. The Committee recommended an increase in Mr. Galanko’s salary in connection with his promotion to Executive Vice President Law and Administration, and the Board approved this increase, effective in October 2017. The Committee also recommended, and the Board approved, a one-time adjustment to Mr. Hurlbut’s salary, payable in a lump sum and impacting his 2017 salary only, in recognition of his performance as Interim Chief Financial Officer. The Committee did not recommend any adjustments to Ms. Stewart’s, Ms. Earhart’s, or Mr. Wheeler’s salaries for 2017, as the Chief Executive Officer and other Named Executive OfficersCommittee determined that those salaries were not increased in 2014. The base salary for the Chief Executive Officer and other Named Executive Officers were last increased in 2012, other than changes for Mr. Squires and Ms. Stewart in 2013 due to changes in position.appropriate.

Annual IncentiveANNUAL INCENTIVE

Each of our Named Executive Officers participates in Norfolk Southern’s Executive Management Incentive Plan (“EMIP”), which is designed to compensate executives based on achievement of annual corporate performance

goals. Each year, the Compensation Committee establishes a maximum opportunity for each Named Executive Officer at the level of Executive Vice President or above. The opportunity is determined using relevant market data and internal pay equity. This opportunityequity, and is expressed as a percentage of base salary:

Corporate
Performance
Payout
Percentage
Earned
=Individual
Payout ($)
Annual
Base
Salary ($)
XMaximum
Opportunity
Maximum
Opportunity
— 

Committee’s
Discretionary
Adjustment

X
Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 40Company
Payout
Percentage
Earnedwww.norfolksouthern.com


For 2014, the Committee established a maximum opportunity for Mr. MoormanTable of 250% of his base salary, a maximum opportunity of 165% for Mr. Squires and a maximum opportunity for each of the Executive Vice Presidents of 145% of his or her base salary. Contents

Executive Compensation | 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

The maximum annual incentive award that each Named Executive Officer is eligible to receive is not the amount expected to be paid to an executive, but is instead the highest amount that the Committee may award as performance-based compensation while preserving deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Committee has no discretion to increase the payout above the maximum opportunity under the EMIP.

For 2017, the Committee established annual incentive opportunities of 225% of base salary for the Chief Executive Officer, 135% for the Executive Vice President level, 120% for the Senior Vice President level, and 100% for the Vice President level. The Committee chose thesethen established performance levels, including at the threshold, target and maximum opportunitiesperformance levels as shown on the next page. The Committee established goals to produce an overall 67% targeted corporate performance payout which, if met, would result in annual incentive payouts equal to the following percentages of each officer’s salary:

Position    Annual
Incentive
Opportunity
          

Target
Performance
Level

          Percent of Salary Paid
as Annual Incentive at
Target Performance
Chief Executive Officer225%x67%=150%
Executive Vice President135%x67%=90%
Senior Vice President120%x67%=80%
Vice President100%x67%=67%

To permit flexibility in the event of unusual and exceptional circumstances, the Committee established a higher opportunity of 250% for the Chief Executive Officer and their145% for the Executive Vice Presidents. However, the Committee’s expectation, absent such circumstances, was to approve payouts that correspond to aat the 225% opportunityand 135% opportunities for Mr. Moorman, a 150% opportunity for Mr. Squiresthe Chief Executive Officer and a 135% opportunity for Executive Vice Presidents, respectively, to more closely align with market pay positions. As described earlier,

The Committee may reduce the Committee established performance targets which, if met, would result in bonus payments equal to 150%, 100% and 90%, respectively (which equals in each case 67% of the respective annual incentive opportunity).

After the end of the performance year 2014,paid to any executive based on performance. For 2017, the Committee did not make any adjustments to the annual incentive payout based on individual performance, and approved payouts to Mr. MoormanSquires based on a 225% opportunity, to Mr. Squires at a 150% opportunity and to the Executive Vice Presidents based on a 135% opportunity. The annual incentive amounts paid for 20142017 and reported as “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” in the Summary Compensation Table are based onapply these opportunities in the formula described below applied to these opportunities.above.



54
2015 Proxy Statement

     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

Under EMIP, each participant has an opportunity to earn an annual incentive that is determined by the company’sNorfolk Southern’s performance relative to goals established by the Committee. In 2014,2017, the Committee established goals for operating income, operating ratio, and the composite service measure, weighted 50%, 35%, and 15% respectively.

The Committee selected operating income, consisting of operating revenue less the sum of operating expenses, as a measure of the corporation’s financial profitability. Operating ratio, or operating expenses as a percentage of revenue, is a measure of operational efficiency.

The composite service measure is the weighted average of train performance, connection performance, and adherence to operating plan, connection performance, and train performance, with weights of 30%40%, 30% and 40%30% respectively. Each metricmeasure is based on objective performance targets, and the composite service measure is based on goals for each of the three individual service measures. The composite service measure is an indication of the overall performance of our railroad network. These service measures are used operationally by management as measures of service performance and are highly visible to our employees. As a result, the Committee selected these three service measures as the best available internal metricstandard to evaluate Norfolk Southern’s customer serviceoverall railroad network performance.

The portions of the annual incentive based on operating income, operating ratio and the composite service measure each vest independently, so it is possible to earn an annual incentive bonus by achieving the threshold on only one of these metrics. The Committee selected these metrics for 20142017 because it believed that use of such metrics encourages employees to do all they can individually and as a team to increase revenue, hold downreduce expenses, and improve operating performance.

The Committee sets performance levels required to achieve 100% of the maximum annual incentive opportunity so that the full bonusamount is only earned in years where our results are exceptional. Performance levels required to achieve a target payout at the 67% corporate performance level are set at levels considered challenging with a reasonable likelihood of being achieved and that represent strong levels of performance based on Norfolk Southern’s overall business outlook, and general economic conditions expected during the performance year, and long-term strategic plan. Performance levels for the
Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 41www.norfolksouthern.com

Table of Contents

Executive Compensation| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

operating ratio and operating income measures are established based on the annual financial plan established at the beginning of the year. The performance levels for the composite service measure are selected by the Committee based on management recommendations and reflect rigorous operational goals.

In anticipation of improved business conditions in 2014, the Committee increased the performance standards for operating ratio and operating income as compared with performance goals established in 2013. The Committee maintained the performance standards for the composite service measure, reflecting the Committee’s expectation

that increasing customer demand for rail service would make it difficult to improve these service metrics on a year-over-year basis.

For 2014,2017, the Committee set the following threshold, target, and maximum payouts:payouts for each of the corporate performance payout measures for the annual incentive:

if Norfolk Southern achieved only one of each threshold performance measure listed below, then a threshold payout of:

— 0.06% at an operating income of $2.251 billion, or

— 0.70% at an operating ratio of 75.9%,  

or

— 4.5% at a composite service measure of 73.0%

a targeted payout of 67% for an operating income of $3.40 billion, an operating ratio of 69.9% and a composite service measure of 80.0%, and

a maximum payout of 100% if Norfolk Southern achieved an operating income equal to or in excess of $3.63 billion, an operating ratio equal to or lower than 69.3%, and a composite service measure equal to or in excess of 82.5%.

If Norfolk Southern achieved only one of each threshold performance measure listed below, then a threshold payout of:

If Norfolk Southern achieved the target or maximum performance measures listed below, then a payout of:

Operating Income                  Threshold                                Target          Maximum       
Outcome$3.025$3.302≥ $3.591
Corporate Performance
Payout Percentage
10.0%67%150%
 orandand
Operating RatioThresholdTargetMaximum
Outcome69.9%68.4%≤ 67.2%
Corporate Performance
Payout Percentage
7.0%67%150%
 orandand
Composite Service MeasureThresholdTargetMaximum
Outcome72.5%79.0%≥ 81.8%
Corporate Performance
Payout Percentage
4.5%67%100%
 

Overall, the Committee established the following threshold, target and maximum payouts for the annual incentive which would be multiplied by the executive’s annual incentive opportunity shown on the previous page:

     

If Norfolk Southern achieved threshold performance for only the composite service measure, then a threshold payout of:

     

If Norfolk Southern achieved the target for all three performance measures listed above, then a payout of:

     

If Norfolk Southern achieved the maximum for all three performance measures listed above, then a payout of:

Overall Result          Threshold                        Target                  Maximum      
Corporate Performance
Payout Percentage
4.5%67%142.5%
 

The dollar amounts corresponding to the above-listed threshold, target, and maximum opportunities for each of the Named Executive Officers can be found in the Grantsunder “Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table.Awards” on page 52.

For each of the three performance goals,measures, the Committee sets performance levels and resulting payouts at intervals between the threshold, target, and maximum. When the Committee met in January 2017 and established the performance measures for the annual incentive, the Committee considered Norfolk Southern’s forecasted business environment, the continuing change in Norfolk Southern's traffic mix, continued economic uncertainty, overall economic factors in the rail industry, and the goals of the five-year strategic plan. The Committee determined that the performance levels that it had established for the 2016 operating income metric of the annual incentive, which had resulted in no annual incentive payout with respect to that metric, had proved unattainable in the face of economic and business conditions. The Committee further recognized that while expectations for Norfolk Southern's profitability had strengthened somewhat since the beginning of 2016, there was continuing uncertainty regarding the economic and business conditions for 2017. As a result, the Committee decreased the performance necessary to achieve the threshold

Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 42www.norfolksouthern.com

Table of Contents

Executive Compensation| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

and the target payout for the operating income metric, and correspondingly reduced the payout for achieving the threshold level as compared with 2016, but established a target level that was higher than 2016 performance. To reflect the goals of Norfolk Southern's strategic plan, the Committee maintained the performance necessary to achieve the threshold for the operating ratio metric but reduced the payout at threshold level as compared with 2016, and increased the performance necessary to achieve a target payout. The Committee maintained the same performance necessary to achieve a threshold, target, or maximum payout under the composite service metric as it had established in 2016 as they provided appropriate operational goals. Further, to provide incentive to accelerate achievement of the strategic plan goals, and aggressively control costs, the Committee increased the maximum payout for operating income and operating ratio from a 100% earnout to a 150% earnout for the portion attributable to the operating income and operating ratio performance measure if Norfolk Southern accelerated achievement of its strategic plan goals.

The final percentage for the annual incentive is calculated using a weighted average of the payouts for each performance measure as illustrated below:



55          
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     2015 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

ANNUAL INCENTIVE PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Operating Income (billions)Operating RatioComposite Service Measure
50%35%15%
OIPayoutORPayoutCSMPayout
$3.63100%69.3%100%82.5% 100% 
  $3.49                76% 69.7%                76%   80.7%                76%  
 $3.44 67%  69.9% 67%   80.0% 67% 
 $3.05 52%  71.4% 52%  77.2% 52%  
$2.5030%74.5% 30% 73.0% 30%
$2.25 0%76.0%0%<73.0%0%

Operating Income
(billions)
50%
           Operating Ratio
35%
           Composite Service
Measure
15%
OI           PayoutOR           PayoutCSM           Payout
$3.591150%67.2%150%
$3.450120%67.8%120%
$3.400100%68.0%100%81.8%100%
$3.35082%68.2%82%80.6%82%
$3.30267%68.4%67%79.0%67%
$3.17555%68.6%55%77.0%55%
$3.02520%69.9%20%72.5%30%
   <$3.0250%>69.9%0%<72.5%0%

Actual results for the year were applied to each schedule to determine the earned 20142017 award, as detailed below:

Performance MetricPerformance% of
Award
Earned
Component
Weighting
Subtotal     Performance     % of Award Earned     Component Weighting     Subtotal
Operating Income (billions)     $3.57591.2% 50%     45.6%
Operating Ratio 69.2%     100%     35%35.0%
Operating Income (billions)*$3.435114.0%50%57.0%
Operating Ratio*67.4%145.0%35%50.8%
Composite Service Measure 69.9% 0% 15% 0.0%76.5%52.9%15%7.9%
Total (rounded) 80.6%115.7%
*     The Committee excluded the impact of the Tax Act from the determination for the 2017 annual incentive; if the Committee had not taken this action, the earned award and payout would have been higher.

Under the terms of the Executive Management Incentive Plan, the annual incentive paid to any individual executive under the plan will not exceed the lesser of three-tenths of one percent of Norfolk Southern’s income from railway operations for the incentive year or ten million dollars.

Long-Term Incentive AwardsLONG-TERM INCENTIVE AWARDS

Norfolk Southern believes that the most effective means to encourageachieve long-term corporate performance byis to align the interests of our Named Executive Officers is to create an ownership culture. This philosophy is implemented through thewith shareholders. The Committee achieves this alignment by granting of equity-based awards that vestare earned based on continued employment, and other long-term awardsat least half of which vest on achievement of pre-determinedpredetermined performance goals. The Compensation Committee believes that the use of long-term incentive compensation for executives reinforces their focus on the importance of returns to stockholders,shareholders, promotes achievement of long-term performance goals, and encourages executive retention.

TheIn January 2017, the Committee allocated 2014its annual long-term incentive awards to officers then at the Executive Vice President level and above 50% as performance share units, 35% as stock options, and 15% as restricted stock units,units. In January 2017, Mr. Galanko and 50%Mr. Hurlbut were employed at the level of Senior Vice President and Vice President, respectively, and the Committee allocated their annual long-term incentive awards 45% as performance share units, 30%

Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 43www.norfolksouthern.com

Table of Contents

Executive Compensation| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

as stock options, and 25% as restricted stock units. Executives were required to enter into an agreement not to engage in competing employment as a condition of receiving the 20142017 award. Consistent with the accelerated turnaround incentive awards granted to the Executive Vice Presidents in 2016, the Committee subsequently made an award of performance share units in October 2017 to Mr. Galanko, upon his promotion to the Executive Vice President level, to incent accelerated achievement of Norfolk Southern’s five-year plan strategic goals.

Performance Share Units.Norfolk Southern uses performance share units to reward the achievement of performance goals over a 3-year period. Performance share units settle in shares of Norfolk Southern common stock after the Committee certifies the extent to which the performance goals were attained. At the time of grant, Norfolk Southern uses the estimated grant date fair values of the performance share unit awards for market comparison purposes.

For 2017, the Committee established performance goals at the time of grant for two equally weighted criteria: after-tax return on average invested capital and a total shareholder return measure. Vesting of one-half of the shares is based on after-tax return on average invested capital, which the Committee believes is an important indicator to shareholders of a capital-intensive company such as Norfolk Southern. Vesting of the other half of the shares is based on Norfolk Southern’s total shareholder return as compared with the shareholder return of the other publicly-traded North American Class I railroads and a secondary measure based on a comparison of Norfolk Southern’s shareholder return to the S&P 500, with each shareholder return measurement reflecting the return over the entire 3-year period. The Committee capped the earnout for the TSR goal at the 50% target when the 3-year TSR is negative, regardless of whether Norfolk Southern has outperformed its peer group on a relative basis, to better align payout with shareholder returns. Each half of performance share units granted vests independently of the other half and its respective performance metrics. The Committee believes that the use of the metrics described above promotes the enhancement of shareholder value and efficient utilization of corporate assets.

For the 2015-2017 performance cycle, the performance criteria are as follows:

Performance Metric          % of PSUs Earned
2015-2017
NS Three-Year Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) vs. North American1st100%
Class I Railroads#2nd75%
3rd50%
4th25%*
*Minimum 40% earnout if NS TSR > median S&P 500 TSR for 3-year period5th0%*
#Ranking excludes any Class I Railroad that is not publicly-traded6th0%*
Three-Year Average After-Tax Return on Average Invested Capital≥12.3%100%
12.05%75%
9.625%25%
<9.5%0%

The earned award for the 2015-2017 performance cycle was determined as follows:

Performance Metric     Performance     % of
Award
Earned
Three-Year Total Shareholder Return vs. North American Class I Railroads2nd75%
Three-Year Average After-Tax Return on Average Invested Capital*9.4%0%
Total(sum of % of Award Earned divided by 2 for one-half weighting of each of the components)37.5%
*     The Committee excluded the impact of the Tax Act from the determination for the three-year average after-tax return on average invested capital; if the Committee had not taken this action, the earned award and payout would have been higher.
Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 44www.norfolksouthern.com

Table of Contents

Executive Compensation| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

Stock Options.Norfolk Southern believes that use of stock options provides itus with the ability to retain key employees and at the same time increase stockholdershareholder value since the value of the options is only realized if Norfolk Southern’sour stock price increases from the date on which the options are granted. For 2014,2017, the Committee maintained the option vestinga four-year cliff-vesting period at four years to encourage retention of key employees and awarded dividend equivalent payments on options during the four-year vesting period. The value of the option awarded is adjusted to recognize the effect of the dividend equivalents.

Norfolk Southern grantsThe Committee has never issued backdated option grants. Options are priced on the effective date of the grant at the higher of (i) the closing price or (ii) the average of the high and low price on the effective date of the grant. In addition, the Long-Term Incentive Plan prohibits repricing of outstanding stock options without the approval of shareholders.

We grant nonqualified stock options annually at the regularly scheduled January meeting of the Compensation Committee. The Committee approves all option grants at the level of Vice President and above. Under the terms of the Long-Term Incentive Plan, the effective date of the grant is the first day of the trading window during which executives are permitted to trade in Norfolk Southern’s securities following the release of Norfolk Southern’s financial results for the prior year, thereby establishingyear. This establishes a prospective effective date to price the options. The Committee has never issued backdated option grants. Options are priced on the effective date of the grant at the higher of (i) the closing price or (ii) the average of the high and low price on the effective date of the grant. In addition, the Long-Term Incentive Plan prohibits repricing of outstanding stock options without the approval of stockholders.



56
2015 Proxy Statement

     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

Performance Share Units.Norfolk Southern uses performance share units to reward the achievement of performance goals over a three-year period. Performance share units settle in shares of Norfolk Southern common stock after the Committee certifies the extent to which the performance goals were attained after the end of the three-year period. For 2014, performance goals were established at the time of grant for two equally weighted criteria: after-tax return on average invested capital and a total stockholder return measure. Vesting of one-half of the shares is based on after-tax return on average invested capital, which Norfolk Southern believes is an indicator important to stockholders of a capital-intensive company such as Norfolk Southern. Return on average invested capital for this purpose is calculated by dividing Norfolk Southern’s net operating profit after-tax (defined as net income excluding interest expense, and adjusted for the effect of capitalizing Norfolk Southern’s operating lease obligations) by the average invested capital (defined as the average of the current and prior year-end stockholders’ equity and total debt balances, which is then adjusted for the effect of capitalizing Norfolk Southern’s operating

lease obligations). Vesting of the other half of the shares is based on Norfolk Southern’s total stockholder return as compared with the stockholder return of the other publicly-traded North American Class I railroads and a secondary measure based on a comparison of Norfolk Southern’s stockholder return to the S&P 500, with each stockholder return measurement reflecting the return over the entire three-year period and using a 20-day average to measure performance at the beginning and the end of the period. Each half of performance share units granted vests independently of the other half and its respective performance metrics. Prior to 2014, performance goals were established for three equally weighted criteria: return on average invested capital (a pre-tax return measure), a total stockholder return measure, and operating ratio. Norfolk Southern believes that the use of the metrics described above promotes the enhancement of stockholder value and efficient utilization of corporate assets.

For the 2012-2014 performance cycle, the performance criteria and resulting earn-out percentages are as follows:



Performance Metric% of PSUs
Earned
2012-2014
NS Three-Year Total Stockholder Return (“TSR”) vs. North American1st100%
Class I Railroads#2nd     75%
     3rd50%
4th25%*
*Minimum 40% earnout if NS TSR > median S&P 500 TSR for 3-year period5th0%*
#Ranking excludes any Class I Railroad that is not publicly traded6th0%*
 
Three-Year Average Return on Average Invested Capital≥20%100%
19%90%
18%80%
17%70%
16%60%
15%50%
14%40%
13%20%
<13%0%
 
Three-Year Average Operating Ratio≤67%100%
70%75%
74%50%
78%25%
>78%0%

57          
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     2015 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The earned award for the 2012-2014 performance cycle was determined as follows:

Performance MetricPerformance% of
Award Earned
Total Stockholder Return (“TSR”) vs. North American     6th0%
Class I Railroads     
 
40% earnout if NS TSR > median S&P 500 TSR for 3-yearNS TSR < median0%
periodS&P 500 TSR
Return on Average Invested Capital18.1%81.0%
Operating Ratio70.6%71.3%
Total(sum of % of Award Earned divided by 3 for one-third
weighting of each of the components)
50.8%

In setting the performance targets for the 2013-2015 cycle, the Committee considered the performance targets for the 2012-2014 cycle and the earn-out percentages for prior years’ performance share unit awards. For the 2013-2015 cycle, the Committee raised the performance target for operating ratio to incentivize enhanced operating performance, and the Committee maintained the performance targets for return on average invested capital and total stockholder return from the 2012-2014

cycle, because it believed these targets continued to provide appropriate incentives. Thus, for the 2013-2015 performance cycle, the performance criteria and resulting earn-out percentages for the total stockholder return and return on average invested capital measures are the same as listed in the table above, and the performance criteria and resulting earn-out percentages for the operating ratio measure are as follows:



Performance Metric% of PSUs
Earned
2013-2015
NS Three-Year Total Stockholder Return (“TSR”) vs. North American1st100%
Class I Railroads#2nd75%
3rd50%
     4th25%*
*Minimum 40% earnout if NS TSR > median S&P 500 TSR for 3-year period5th     0%*
#Ranking excludes any Class I Railroad that is not publicly traded6th0%*
 
Three-Year Average Return on Average Invested Capital≥20%100%
19%90%
18%80%
17%70%
16%60%
15%50%
14%40%
13%20%
<13%0%
 
Three-Year Average Operating Ratio≤68%100%
69%75%
71%50%
76%25%
>76%0%

58
2015 Proxy Statement

     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

In setting the performance targets for the 2014-2016 cycle, the Committee eliminated the performance goal for operating ratio, as it determined that achievement of a target operating ratio was more appropriately incentivized through annual cash incentive grants under EMIP, the Corporation’s annual cash incentive program. The Committee also adjusted the return on average

invested capital performance goal to an after-tax return measure, to more closely align the performance goal to the economic returns achieved by Norfolk Southern’s stockholders. For the 2014-2016 performance cycle, the performance criteria and resulting earn-out percentages for the total stockholder return and return on average invested capital measures are as follows:



Performance Metric                    % of PSUs
Earned
2014-2016
     
NS Three-Year Total Stockholder Return (“TSR”) vs. North American1st 100%
Class I Railroads#2nd75% 
3rd50%
4th 25%*
*Minimum 40% earnout if NS TSR > median S&P 500 TSR for 3-year period5th0%*
#Ranking excludes any Class I Railroad that is not publicly traded6th0%*
 
Three-Year Average After-Tax Return on Average Invested Capital ≥12%100%
11.8%90%
 11.7%80%
11.6%70%
 11.4%60%
 11.2%  50%  
10.0%40%
8.5% 20%
<8.5%0%

For the 2013-2015 and 2014-2016 performance share units, Norfolk Southern used a 50% earn-out assumption to value the award for market comparison purposes.

Restricted Stock Units:Units.Norfolk Southern believes that the use of time-based restricted stock units serves as a key retention tool for keeping valued members of management. For 2014, Norfolk Southern2017, the Committee granted restricted stock units whichthat vest on the fifth anniversary of the date of grant and which settle in whole shares of Norfolk Southern common stock. In January 2017, the Committee granted a restricted stock unit award to Ms. Stewart to incent her retention until October 1, 2018, which award was forfeited when Ms. Stewart chose to retire effective August 1, 2017.

Retirement PlansAccelerated Turnaround Incentives.The Committee established a special performance share unit award in February 2016, called the “Accelerated Turnaround Incentive” or “ATI.” The ATI PSU program provides an additional incentive for early achievement of the financial goals that are tied to Norfolk Southern’s five-year strategic plan. The ATI PSU will pay out only if Norfolk Southern accelerates achievement of its five-year strategic plan goals for operating ratio and Programsearnings per share. The award was granted in the form of a PSU with a three-year term and targeting the 2020 strategic plan goals of an operating ratio below 65 and double-digit compound annual growth in earnings per share before 2020.

In 2017, the Committee granted additional ATI PSUs to Mr. Galanko following his promotion to Executive Vice President Law and Administration, with this prorated award equal to the ATI PSUs granted to the other executive vice presidents in 2016. The other Named Executive Officers did not receive any additional ATI PSUs in 2017.

Norfolk Southern’s efforts to drive increased shareholder value under the five-year strategic plan include:

an operating ratio below 65 by 2020; and

double-digit compound annual growth rate in earnings per share by 2020.

The ATI PSU measure is based solely on the 2018 results for operating ratio and diluted earnings per share. The Committee established performance goals for operating ratio and diluted earnings per share as equally weighted performance criteria with earnouts as follows if the strategic plan goals are achieved in 2018:

ThresholdNo payout of the ATI PSUs will be made unless at least the target level is achieved.
TargetIf five-year strategic plan year 2019 goals forboth operating ratioanddiluted earnings per share results are achieved in 2018, then 50% of ATI PSUs will be earned.
MaximumIf five-year strategic plan year 2020 operating ratio and diluted earnings per share goals are achieved in 2018, then 100% of ATI PSUs will be earned.

The payout is interpolated between the target and maximum levels. Therefore, if at least the target goal is achieved for diluted earnings per share and for operating ratio, but the maximum performance for either is not achieved, the earnout will be based on an evenly interpolated value between 50% and 100% for the measure. ATI PSUs that are earned, if any, will settle in shares of Norfolk Southern common stock in 2019 after the Committee certifies the extent to which the performance goals were achieved.

Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 45www.norfolksouthern.com

Table of Contents

Executive Compensation| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

No value is assigned to the ATI PSUs in the Stock Awards column of the Summary Compensation Table or the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table because of the unlikelihood of achieving the threshold measure as assessed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

RETIREMENT PLANS AND PROGRAMS
Norfolk Southern believes that its Retirement Plan and Supplemental Benefit Plan provide it with the ability to retain key employees over a longer period. Norfolk Southern sponsors a qualified defined benefit pension plan that provides a benefit based on age, service, and a percentage of final average compensation. Norfolk Southern also sponsors a nonqualified supplemental benefit plan that provides a retirement benefit for salary or annual incentive that is deferred, restores the retirement

benefit for amounts in excess of the Internal Revenue Code limitations for tax-qualified retirement plans, provides a retirement benefit for salary or annual incentive that is deferred under Norfolk Southern’s deferred compensation plans, and may be used to provideallows for possible use in providing enhanced retirement benefits for certain executives. In addition to supporting the goal to retain key employees, Norfolk Southernthe Committee believes that the supplemental benefit plan also recognizes, rewards and encourages contributions by its key employees, and maintains internal equity by ensuring that pension benefit levels are based on relative compensation levels of each participant. Further information on the Retirement Plan and Supplemental Benefit Plan may be found in theNarrative “Narrative to Pension Benefits Table on page 70. Table.”

Norfolk Southern maintains the Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan (the “EDCP”) for the benefit of the Named Executive Officers and certain other employees. The purpose of the EDCP is to provide executives with the opportunity to defer compensation and earnings until retirement or another specified date or event. The type of compensation eligible for deferral includes base salary and the annual incentive. Further information on the EDCP may be found in theNarrative “Narrative to Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Tableon page 72.Table.”



59          
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     2015 Proxy Statement



Table of ContentsOTHER BENEFITS AND PERQUISITES

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Other Benefits and Perquisites

Norfolk Southern provides the Named Executive Officers with certain health and welfare benefits and a tax-qualified 401(k) plan and certainin the same manner that such benefits have been made available to other salaried employees of the company. The Named Executive Officers receive limited perquisites which Norfolk Southernthat the Compensation Committee believes are necessary to retain Executive Officers and to enhance their productivity. The value of perquisites is considered as part of the total compensation package when other elements are evaluated.

Norfolk Southern’sOur Board of Directors has directed and requires the Chief Executive Officer, and the President, and their familieshis family and guests when appropriate, to use Norfolk Southern’s aircraft whenever reasonably possible for air travel. Norfolk SouthernThe Board believes that such use of the corporate aircraft promotes itsthe best interests of Norfolk Southern by generally ensuring the immediate availability of these officersthe Chief Executive Officer and by providing a prompt, efficient means of travel and in view of the need for security in such travel. For the same reasons, Norfolk Southern’sour Board of Directors has determined that the Chief Executive Officer and the President may authorize employees and their guests to use the corporate aircraft for purposes whichthat further the Corporation’s business interests of Norfolk Southern and when the aircraft is not otherwise needed for business use.interests. Such non-business use by other employees and their guests is infrequent.

Other perquisites include executive physicals, personal use of company facilities, and certain approved spousal travel, and tax preparation services.travel. Norfolk Southern does not make tax gross-up payments on perquisites for the Named Executive Officers employed at the Executive Vice President level or provide them with company cars. The chief marketing officer receives a business expense reimbursement for club dues in cases where the membership furthers the business interests of Norfolk Southern.above.

Norfolk Southern believes that the benefits and perquisites described above are appropriate to remain competitive compared to other companies and to promote retention of these officers.

Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 46www.norfolksouthern.com

ImpactTable of the Tax Treatment of Awards on Norfolk Southern’s Compensation PoliciesContents

Executive Compensation| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

Norfolk Southern’sIMPACT OF THE TAX TREATMENT OF AWARDS ON NORFOLK SOUTHERN’S COMPENSATION POLICIES
Our executive compensation program has been carefully considered in light of the applicable tax rules. Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally provides that a publicly-heldpublicly held company may not deduct compensation paid to certain of its top executive officers to the extent such compensation exceeds $1 million per executive officer in any year. However, limited exceptions to Section 162(m) apply with respect

to “qualified performance-based compensation.compensation,” as defined in the Internal Revenue Code. In order to allow deductibility of the value of the awards for the annual incentive, stock options and certain long-term incentive awards, Norfolk Southernperformance share units, we amended, with shareholder approval, the Long-Term Incentive Plan and Executive Management Incentive Plan in 2010 with stockholder approval2015 to permit the continued grant of performance-based compensation that meets the requirements of Section 162(m) under those plans and is re-submitting both plansplans. However, the exemption from Section 162(m)’s deduction limit for qualified performance-based compensation has been repealed, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, such that compensation paid to stockholdersour covered executive officers in excess of $1 million will not be deductible unless it qualifies for approval at this meeting (see pages 17 through 27). However, Norfolk Southerntransition relief applicable to certain arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017. The Committee believes that tax-deductibility is but one factor to be considered in fashioning an appropriate compensation package for executives. Norfolk Southern reserves and will continue to exercise its discretion in this area so as to serve the best interests of Norfolk Southern and its stockholders.shareholders.

Change-in-Control AgreementsCHANGE-IN-CONTROL AGREEMENTS

Norfolk Southern has entered into change-in-control agreements during 1996 at a time of consolidation inwith the rail industry. The agreements were intendedNamed Executive Officers to provide certain economic protections to executives in the event of a termination of employment following a change-in-controlchange in control of Norfolk Southern andSouthern. The change-in-control agreements are intended to keep management intact and focused on the best interests of Norfolk Southern and its stockholders withoutshareholders in pursuing a potential change-in-control transaction, while serving to eliminate potential management distraction related to the distractionuncertainty of possible job and income loss. The Compensation Committee continues to believebelieves that the agreements are reasonable and appropriate. Benefits will not be paid under the agreements unless both a change in control occurs and the executive’s employment is terminated or constructively terminated following the change in control. We believeThe Committee believes this “double trigger” maximizes stockholdershareholder value because this structure would prevent an unintended windfall to management in the event of a change in control that does not result in the termination (or constructive termination) of employment of management. In 2002,For officers who entered into change-in-control agreements before 2008, the Board of Directors agreed to abide by a stockholder approved proposal that future severance agreements with senior executives that exceed 2.99 times the sum of the executive’s base salary plus bonus require stockholder approval. The change-in-control agreements were revised in 2008 to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code but those revisions did not enhance or increase benefits provided under the agreements as they existed prior to the revisions. Inagreements. Since January 2013, Norfolk Southern entered into amendments to its change-in-control agreements with the Named Executive OfficersMr. Squires and Ms. Earhart to eliminate tax gross-up payments provided under the agreements. Each Named Executive Officer appointed sinceMr. Galanko's and Ms. Stewart's change-in-control agreements terminated upon retirement.

The Board agreed in 2002 to abide by a shareholder-approved proposal that time has signed an



60
2015 Proxy Statement

     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Tablelimits new severance agreements with senior executives to 2.99 times the sum of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

amendment agreeing to the eliminationexecutive's base salary plus bonus. In light of thisthe recent executive leadership transition, the Committee approved a form of change-in-control agreement in 2016 which complies with the requirements of the shareholder resolution and which does not contain a tax gross-up. gross-up provision. Norfolk Southern entered into the new change-in-control agreement in 2016 with Mr. Shaw, Mr. Wheeler, and Mr. Hurlbut.

A detailed description of the benefits provided under the change-in-control agreements may be found in the “Change-in-Control Agreements” section under the sectionChange-in-Control Agreements“Potential Payments Upon a Change in Control or Other Termination of Employment” on page 78.62.

Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 47www.norfolksouthern.com

Table of Contents

Executive Compensation | 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

Share Ownership GuidelinesSHARE OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES FOR OFFICERS

Norfolk Southern’sOur Board of Directors has established as part of its Corporate Governance Guidelines the following ownership guidelines for shares of Norfolk Southern stock for its directors and officers:

PositionMinimum Value
Directors5 times annual retainer
Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer5 times annual salary
President
Executive Vice Presidents3 times annual salary
Senior Vice Presidents, Vice Presidents1 times annual salary

For directors, Norfolk Southern common stock, restricted stock, and deferred and restricted stock units held in Norfolk Southern’s Long-Term Incentive Plan or under the Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan count toward this requirement. For officers, Norfolk Southern common stock and stock equivalents held in Norfolk Southern’s 401(k) plan are counted toward these requirements,holdings, but unexercised stock options or unvested equity awards doare not count. Directors and officerscounted. Officers may acquire such holdings over a five-year period. All directors and officers currently meet this guideline or are expected to meet the guideline within the five-year grace period.

Pledging; Hedging

All of our Executive Officers are prohibited from entering into pledging or hedging transactions or positions regarding Norfolk Southern’s securities.

All Executive Officers of Norfolk Southern are required to clear any transaction involving its common stock with Norfolk Southern’s Corporate Secretary prior to engaging in the transaction.

Policiestransaction, and Decisions Regarding the Adjustmentpledging or Recovery of Awardshedging transactions will not be approved.

Anti-Pledging/Anti-Hedging Policy. All of our Executive Officers are prohibited from entering into pledging or hedging transactions or positions regarding Norfolk Southern’s securities.

POLICIES AND DECISIONS REGARDING THE ADJUSTMENT OR RECOVERY OF AWARDS

While Norfolk Southern doeswe do not anticipate there would ever be circumstances where a restatement of earnings upon which incentive plan award decisions were based would occur, should such an unlikely event take place, Norfolk Southern would havethe Committee has the discretion to take all actions necessary to protect the interests of stockholdersshareholders up to and including actions to recover such incentive awards. The performance share awards include a clawback provision to permit the recovery of performance share awards following a material restatement of Norfolk Southern’s financial results. Similarly, the Executive Management Incentive Plan includes a clawback provision to permit recovery of annual incentives as a result of any material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws. The long-term incentive award agreements further provide for forfeiture of awards, including after retirement, if the recipient engages in certain competing employment, or if it is determined that the recipient has committed fraud or theft in the course of the recipient’s employment with Norfolk Southern, or if the recipient discloses certain confidential information. Both the Long-Term Incentive Plan and the Executive Management Incentive Plan further allow for the reduction, forfeiture or recoupment of any award as may be required by law.



61          Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 48www.norfolksouthern.com
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION 2015 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONExecutive Compensation | 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Summary Compensation Table

The following table shows the total compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to each Named Executive Officer during 20142017 for service in all capacities to Norfolk Southern and our subsidiaries for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.2017. The table also sets forth information regarding fiscal 20132016 and 20122015 compensation.

Name and
Principal Position
(a)

     

Year
(b)

     

Salary
($)
(c)

     

Bonus
($)
(d)

     

Stock
Awards
($)
(e)

     

Option
Awards
($)
(f)

     

Non-
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
(g)

     

Change in
Pension Value
and Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
(h)

     

All Other
Compensation
($)
(i)

     

Total
($)
(j)

    
   Charles W. Moorman, IV20141,000,00004,879,4222,624,9761,813,5003,117,088101,03113,536,017
          Chairman and Chief
          Executive Officer
20131,000,00004,690,9002,080,8001,685,25012,727170,0739,639,750
20121,000,00005,368,3021,811,8401,343,2502,924,375217,31012,665,077
   James A. Squires12014750,00001,626,323874,892906,7501,657,155115,7095,930,829
          President2013687,50001,126,917489,600744,319109,036105,3103,262,682
2012600,00001,269,565429,120483,570952,24844,7553,779,258
   Marta R. Stewart22014500,0000910,756489,868544,0501,303,71248,0633,796,449
          Executive Vice President-
          Finance and Chief
          Financial Officer
2013333,3330225,062102,000271,512032,877964,784 
   Deborah H. Butler2014600,0000910,756489,868652,8602,362,45771,1915,087,132
          Executive Vice President-
          Planning and Chief
          Information Officer
2013600,00001,126,917489,600606,690 536,539 66,9593,426,705
2012
 
 600,000
 
0
 
1,269,565
 
429,120
 
483,570
 
1,767,170
 
64,500
 
4,613,925
 
   Mark D. Manion2014600,00001,236,397664,906 652,8601,742,13537,3614,933,659
          Executive Vice President
          and Chief Operating
          Officer
2013600,00001,126,917489,600606,69048,36935,4372,907,013
2012
 
600,000
 
0
 
1,269,565
 
429,120
 
483,570
 
1,669,726
 
26,140
 
4.478,121
 
Name and
Principal Position
(a)
Year
(b)
Salary
($)
(c)
Bonus
($)
(d)
Stock
Awards
($)
(e)
Option
Awards
($)
(f)
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
(g)

Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
(h)

All Other
Compensation
($)
(i)
Total
($)
(j)
James A. Squires20171,000,00004,225,0992,275,1192,603,2501,710,708122,96111,937,137
Chairman, President and2016900,00003,900,2092,099,966724,950678,156121,7938,425,074
Chief Executive Officer2015837,50001,625,2684,375,05001,036,596115,1517,989,565
Cynthia C. Earhart2017600,0000746,753402,579937,1701,033,92022,1033,742,525
Executive Vice President Finance2016600,0000747,159402,583289,980514,22441,7312,595,677
and Chief Financial Officer2015525,0000746,809402,4410604,11633,3612,311,727
Alan H. Shaw2017600,0000926,630498,791937,170689,47217,4613,669,524
Executive Vice President and2016500,0000747,159402,583241,650309,27624,9672,225,635
Chief Marketing Officer
Michael J. Wheeler2017600,00001,056,432568,591937,170948,44722,0364,132,676
Executive Vice President and2016581,2500780,094419,914279,240530,19437,8852,628,577
Chief Operating Officer
Thomas E. Hurlbut12017320,0000192,49682,629370,240184,28433,3981,183,047
Interim Chief Financial Officer
and Vice President and Controller
William A. Galanko22017412,5000349,905150,165598,748231,35731,2361,773,911
Former Executive Vice President
Law and Administration
Marta R. Stewart32017350,00001,290,837559,913546,6831,114,95677,4813,939,870
Former Executive Vice President2016600,00001,039,891559,951289,980650,76045,5943,186,176
Finance and Chief Financial
Officer
2015600,00001,039,944559,95801,106,17248,8023,354,876
1Thomas E. Hurlbut served as the interim chief financial officer following Ms. Stewart’s retirement on August 1, 2017 until Ms. Earhart’s appointment on August 15, 2017.
2William A. Galanko retired from the Corporation effective March 1, 2018.
3Marta R. Stewart retired from the Corporation effective August 1, 2017.
Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 49www.norfolksouthern.com

____________________

Executive Compensation | 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

2Effective November 1, 2013, Marta R. Stewart became Executive Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer. Ms. Stewart previously served as Vice President and Treasurer of the Corporation.

Salary (Column (c))
Represents salary earned during 2012, 20132015, 2016 and 20142017 received on a current or deferred basis.

Stock Awards (Column (e))
The amounts reported for Stock Awards are the full grant date fair values of the awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 Compensation –“Compensation - Stock Compensation.” This column includes Performance Share Units and Restricted Stock Units.

For Performance Share Units, the full grant date fair value is determined consistent with the estimated full accounting cost to be recognized over the three-year performance period, determined as of January 31the end of the month following the grant date under FASB ASC Topic 718. For discussions of the relevant assumptions made in calculating these amounts, see note 12 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.2017. For the grant date fair value of only those awards granted to the Named Executive Officers in 2014,2017, see the Grants“Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table on page 65.Table.”

62
2015 Proxy Statement

     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

The value of the Stock Awards reported in column (e), calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 but assuming the highest level of performance would be achieved is as follows:

    YearC. W. Moorman, IVJ. A. SquiresM. R. StewartD. H. ButlerM. D. Manion
2014$6,694,313$2,231,365$1,249,533$1,249,533$1,696,182
2013$7,401,980$1,745,750$328,201$1,745,750$1,745,750
2012$6,687,460$1,577,940 $1,577,940$1,577,940

Year   J. A. Squires   C. C. Earhart   A. H. Shaw   M. J. Wheeler   T. E. Hurlbut   W. A. Galanko   M. R. Stewart
2017$5,818,538$1,028,580$1,276,016$1,454,721$253,271$460,148$1,683,190
2016$5,709,991$1,093,946$1,093,946$1,142,082$1,522,542
2015$2,267,052$1,041,932$1,450,783

The total for Ms. Stewart in column (e) includes a retention Restricted Stock Unit award of $250,120, which award was forfeited when Ms. Stewart retired effective August 1, 2017.

Option Awards (Column (f))
The amounts reported for Option Awards are the full grant date fair values of the awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation.718. For discussions of the relevant assumptions made in calculating these amounts, see note 12 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.2017.

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (Column (g))
The amounts reported as Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation were paid under the Executive Management Incentive Plan, as more fully described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Amounts reported in this column were earned in the indicated year, and may have been received on a current basis or deferred in accordance with our deferred compensation plans.

Change in Pension ValuesValue and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings (Column (h))
In accordance with SEC rules, any increase or decrease in the present value of the benefits under our Retirement Plan is aggregated with any increase or decrease in the present value of the benefits under our Supplemental Benefit Plan.

All of the Named Executive Officers had an increase in the aggregate present value of the benefits under our Retirement Plan and Supplemental Benefit Plan in 2014.2017. The changes in the values result from increases in each individual’s years of service, final average compensation calculation and age, as well asor from a decreasechanges in marital status which more than offset decreases in value due to an increase in the pension discount rate and revised mortality assumptions. OfFor all the Named Executive Officers other than Mr. Galanko, the amounts shown in this column the following representssolely represent the aggregate increase in the actuarial present value of the Named Executive Officers’ accumulated benefits under the Retirement Plan and the Supplemental Benefits Plan for 2014:2017. For Mr. Moorman, $3,103,088; Mr. Squires, $1,657,155; Ms. Stewart, $1,303,712; Ms. Butler, $2,353,028;Galanko, $231,357 represents the aggregate increase in the actuarial present value of his accumulated benefits under the Retirement Plan and Mr. Manion, $1,688,013.

Thethe Supplemental Benefits Plan for 2017, and the remainder of the amounts shown in this column for 2014 representrepresents the amounts by which 20142017 interest accrued on salary and annual incentives he deferred by them under the Officers’ Deferred Compensation Plan exceeded 120% of the applicable Federal long-term rate provided in Section 1274(d) of the Internal Revenue Code.

All Other Compensation (Column (i))
The amounts reported as All Other Compensation include, for each Named Executive Officer, (i) perquisites as set forth in the table below; (ii) matching contributions to our Thrift and Investment Plan of $9,100 for all Named Executive Officers; (iii) premiums paid on individually owned executive life insurance policies as follows: for Mr. Moorman, $17,678; Mr. Squires, $14,483; Ms. Stewart, $7,693; Ms. Butler, $14,396; and Mr. Manion, $13,457; and (iv) amounts we contributed to charitable organizations on their behalf pursuant to our matching gifts programs as follows: for Mr. Moorman, $39,250; Mr. Squires, $42,260; Ms. Stewart, $28,635; Ms. Butler, $37,500; and Mr. Manion, $10,000. For Mr. Moorman, the amount also includes his proportional cost of NS-owned life insurance policies used to fund the Directors’ Charitable Award Program.

63          Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 50www.norfolksouthern.com
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION 2015 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONExecutive Compensation | 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

All Other Compensation (Column (i))

PerquisitesThe amounts reported as All Other Compensation for our2017 include, for each Named Executive Officers during 2014 consisted of the following:Officer:

     

Use of
Corporate
Aircraft
($)

     

Tax
Preparation
and
Financial
Planning
($)

     

Annual
Physicals
($)

     

Spousal/
Guest
Meals &
Travel
($)

     

Gifts
($)

     

Other
($)

     

Total
($)

     
   C. W. Moorman, IV 26,49603,8001794810 30,956
   J. A. Squires43,42404,80052372939049,866 
   M. R. Stewart0 2,0000 394 461952,635
   D. H. Butler4,4160 5,0003434639010,195
   M. D. Manion003,800523481 04,804

     Perquisites
($)
     401(k)
Matching
Contributions
($)
     Life
Insurance
Premiums
($)
     Other
($)
     Total
($)
J. A. Squires95,4599,45015,9622,090122,961
C. C. Earhart1,1709,45011,483022,103
A. H. Shaw09,4508,011017,461
M. J. Wheeler5859,45012,001022,036
T. E. Hurlbut15,5709,4504,0294,34933,398
W. A. Galanko10,8009,4508,4182,56831,236
M. R. Stewart1,9429,4508,39657,69277,481

All perquisites are valued on the basis of aggregate incremental cost to us. Perquisites included participation infor Mr. Squires during 2017 consisted of $94,289 for use of company aircraft, with the Executive Accident Plan,remainder representing imputed income for which there was no aggregate incremental cost.personal use of a corporate apartment. With regard to personal use of company aircraft, aggregate incremental cost is calculated as the weighted-average cost of fuel, crew hotels and meals, aircraft maintenance, parts and other variable costs.supplies, landing fees, ground services, catering, and crew expenses associated with such use, including those associated with “deadhead” flights related to such use. Use of corporate aircraft includes use by the Named Executive Officers as permitted by resolution of the Board of Directors. The aggregate incremental cost for personal use of company aircraft by our Named Executive Officers is allocated entirely to the highest rankinghighest-ranking Named Executive Officer on the flight. Figures included in “Other” representBecause corporate aircraft are used primarily for business travel, this calculation excludes fixed costs that do not change based on usage. Fixed costs include pilot salaries, the purchase or lease costs of the airplane, and the cost of maintenance not related to such personal travel.

The perquisite amount for Mr. Galanko consisted of a monthly auto allowance that was paid before he was appointed as an Executive Vice President. For Mr. Hurlbut, the perquisite amount consisted of a monthly auto allowance of $14,400, with the remainder representing imputed income for thepersonal use of Corporate Facilities.a corporate apartment. Perquisites for all the Named Executive Officers also included participation in the Executive Accident Plan, for which there was no aggregate incremental cost.

The amounts shown under “Life Insurance Premiums” were premiums the Corporation paid under our Executive Life Insurance Plan. For Mr. Squires, the amount under “Other” includes his proportional cost of NS-owned life insurance policies used to fund the Directors’ Charitable Award Program. For Messrs. Galanko and Hurlbut the amount under “Other” includes a tax-gross up of premiums paid on their behalf for a life insurance policy under our Executive Life Insurance Plan; for Mr. Galanko, this amount was paid in May 2017, before Mr. Galanko was appointed as an Executive Vice President effective October 1, 2017. For Mr. Hurlbut the amount under “Other” also includes annual fees paid for his service as a director of Norfolk and Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad Company. For Ms. Stewart, the amount under “Other” was a payment made upon her retirement for unused vacation.
64Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 51www.norfolksouthern.com
2015 Proxy Statement

 NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  Executive Compensation |

2014 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

Estimated Possible Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards

Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards

   

All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
Shares
of Stock
or
Units
(#)
(i)

   

All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
(j)

   

Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
(k)

   

Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock
and
Option
Awards
($)
(l)

Name
(a)

     

Grant
Date
(b)

   

Committee
Action
Date
1

   

Threshold
($)
(c)

   

Target
($)
(d)

   

Maximum
($)
(e)

   

Threshold
(#)
(f)

   

Target
(#)
(g)

   

Maximum
(#)
(h)

Charles W.
       Moorman, IV
01/20/1401/20/141,5001,507,5002,500,000
01/23/1401/20/147,70938,54577,0903,754,090
01/23/1401/20/1411,9501,125,332
01/23/1401/20/1487,88094.172,624,976
 
James A. Squires01/20/1401/20/14750753,7501,237,500
01/23/1401/20/142,57012,85025,7001,251,526
01/23/1401/20/143,980374,797
01/23/1401/20/1429,29094.17874,892
 
Marta R. Stewart01/20/1401/20/14450452,250725,000
01/23/1401/20/141,4397,19514,390700,757
01/23/1401/20/142,230209,999
01/23/1401/20/1416,40094.17489,868
 
Deborah H. Butler01/20/1401/20/14540542,700870,000
01/23/1401/20/141,4397,19514,390700,757
01/23/1401/20/142,230209,999
01/23/1401/20/1416,40094.17489,868
 
Mark D. Manion01/20/1401/20/14540542,700870,000
 01/23/1401/20/141,9539,76519,530   951,062
01/23/14 01/20/14     3,030   285,335
01/23/1401/20/14    22,260 94.17664,906
     
____________________

1Consistent with past practice 2018 Annual Meeting and the terms of LTIP, the Committee made all equity awards to directors and executive officers effective on the day after a full trading day has elapsed following the release of our fiscal year financial results. Because the meeting at which these awards were made occurred prior to the effective date of the awards, we have provided both dates in accordance with SEC rules. See our Compensation Discussion and Analysis section for further discussion of our equity award grant practices.

65          
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     2015 Proxy Statement

2017 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS
   Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards1
 





Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards

 All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock

or Units
(#)
(i)
All
Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options

(#)
(j)
Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option

Awards
($/Sh)
(k)
Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock
and
Option

Awards
($)
(l)
Name
(a)
Grant
Date
(b)
Committee
Action
Date2
Threshold
($)
(c)
Target
($)
(d)
Maximum
($)
(e)
Threshold
(#)
(f)
Target
(#)
(g)
Maximum
(#)

(h)
James A. Squires1/26/20171/23/2017  101,2501,507,5003,562,500    
1/26/20171/23/20175,63728,18556,3703,249,871
1/26/20171/23/20178,110975,228
1/26/20171/23/201760,300120.252,275,119
Cynthia C. Earhart1/26/20171/23/201736,450542,7001,239,750
1/26/20171/23/20179974,9859,970574,795
1/26/20171/23/20171,430171,958
1/26/20171/23/201710,670120.25402,579
Alan H. Shaw1/26/20171/23/201736,450542,7001,239,750
1/26/20171/23/20171,2366,18012,360712,585
1/26/20171/23/20171,780214,045
1/26/20171/23/201713,220120.25498,791
Michael J. Wheeler1/26/20171/23/201736,450542,7001,239,750
1/26/20171/23/20171,4097,04514,090812,324
1/26/20171/23/20172,030244,108
1/26/20171/23/201715,070120.25568,591
Thomas E. Hurlbut1/26/20171/23/201714,400214,400456,000
1/26/20171/23/20172151,0752,150123,953
1/26/20171/23/201757068,543
1/26/20171/23/20172,190120.2582,629
William A. Galanko1/26/20171/23/201723,288346,725758,813
1/26/20171/23/20173901,9503,900224,845
1/26/20171/23/20171,040125,060
1/26/20171/23/20173,980120.25150,165
10/26/201710/26/20171,4791,4792,958
Marta R. Stewart1/26/20171/23/201736,450542,7001,239,750
1/26/20171/23/20171,3886,94013,880800,217
1/26/20171/23/20174,080490,620
1/26/20171/23/201714,840120.25559,913
1The amounts shown represents the full-year threshold, target and maximum opportunity payable for the annual incentive under the EMIP, as determined at the time that the Compensation Committee made the awards. Because Ms. Stewart retired during the year, she was eligible only for a prorated award. As a result of Ms. Stewart’s retirement effective August 1, 2017, the threshold, target and maximum prorated awards were $21,263, $316,575 and $723,188, respectively. The amount actually paid as an annual incentive under the EMIP is reported in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (column g) of the Summary Compensation Table.
2

Consistent with past practice and the terms of LTIP, the Committee made all January 2017 equity awards to directors and executive officers effective on the day after a full trading day has elapsed following the release of our fiscal year financial results.Because the Committee meetings at which these awards were made occurred prior to the effective date of the awards, we have provided both dates in accordance with SEC rules. In September 2017, the Committee awarded an ATI PSU award to Mr. Galanko in connection with his election as Executive Vice President Law and Administration, and made the award effective on the day after a full trading day had elapsed following the release of our third quarter financial results. See our “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section for further discussion of our equity award grant practices.

Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 52www.norfolksouthern.com


Table of Contents

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONExecutive Compensation | 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (EMIP) (Columns (c), (d) and (e))
These awards were made pursuant to our Executive Management Incentive Plan (“EMIP”) and werehad the potential to be earned upon the achievement of certain performance goals established by the Committee for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.2017. For a discussion of thesethe performance goals established by the Committee, see page 5442 of our Compensation“Compensation Discussion and Analysis section included in this proxy statement.Analysis” section. The Committee targeted a payout of 67% in 20142017 in setting the annual performance goals for EMIP incentive awards, and using an annual incentive opportunity equal to 225% of salary for Mr. Moorman, 150% for Mr. Squires,the Chief Executive Officer and 135% of salary for the Executive Vice Presidents. Consequently, the target amounts in this column (d) assume that the Named Executive Officers earned 67% of the maximum potential EMIP awards that they could have earned using these annual incentive opportunities. The threshold amounts in column (c) assume that the Named Executive Officers earned the minimum EMIP awards based on performance required to trigger any level of payment; if company performance fell below performance goals required to earn the threshold amount, they would not have been entitled to any EMIP awards. The Named Executive Officers earned 80.6%115.7% of these EMIP awards based on our performance during 2014.2017. These annual incentive amounts are also included under “Non-Equity Incentive Compensation” in the Summary Compensation Table.

Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (PSUs) (Columns (f), (g) and (h))
These amounts represent grants of performance share units made pursuant to our Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”). These performance share units will be earned over the performance cycle ending December 31, 2016.2019. For a discussion of the other material terms of these awards, see the narrative discussion which follows this table. LTIP does not provide a performance target for earning performance share units under this feature of the plan; however, the Committee targets a payout of 50% in setting the performance goals for performance share unit awards. Consequently, the target amounts in column (g) assume that the Named Executive Officers will earn 50% of the maximum potential number of performance share units that can be earned under the awards. The threshold amounts in column (f) assume that the Named Executive Officers will earn the minimum number of performance share units based on performance required to trigger any level of payment; if companythe Corporation’s performance fell below performance goals required to earn the threshold amount, they would not receive any performance share units. Our Named Executive Officers actually earned 50.8% of their maximum potentialThe threshold and target amounts in columns (f) and (g) for the accelerated turnaround incentive (ATI) performance share unit awards forunits granted to Mr. Galanko in October 2017 are the performance cycle ended December 31, 2014, based on our performance duringsame because no payment will be made unless at least the three-year period ended December 31, 2014.target level is achieved.

All Other Stock Awards (RSUs) (Column (i))
These amounts represent grants of restricted stock units made under LTIP. The total for Ms. Stewart in column (i) includes a retention Restricted Stock Unit award of 2,080 units, with a grant-date fair value of $250,120, which award was forfeited when Ms. Stewart retired effective August 1, 2017.

For a discussion of the material terms of these restricted stock unit awards, see the narrative discussion which follows this table.

All Other Option Awards (Stock Options) (Columns (j), and (k) and (l))
TheseThe non-qualified stock options (of which the first 1,061 granted to each Named Executive Officer are incentive stock options and the remainder are nonqualified stock options)that were granted as of January 23, 2014, and26, 2017, are exercisable as of January 23, 2018. Dividend equivalent payments are paid in cash to active employees on unvested options for four years in an amount equal to, and commensurate with, regular quarterly dividends paid on our common stock.

26, 2021. The Committee granted these options at an exercise price equal to the higher of the closing market price or the average of the high and low prices of our common stock on the effective date of the grant. The closing price was lower than the average price on the date of grant, so the exercise price shown is the average price on the date of grant. The exercise price may be paid in cash or in shares of our common stock (previously owned by the participant for at least six months preceding the date of exercise) valued on the date of exercise. For a discussion of the other material terms of these option awards, see the narrative discussion which follows this table.

Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards (Column (l))
The amounts reported in Column (l) represent the full grant date fair value of each equity award computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For awards that entitle the Named Executive Officers to dividends or dividend equivalents, those amounts are also computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

No value is assigned to Mr. Galanko’s October 2017 grant of ATI PSUs in the Stock Awards column of the Summary Compensation Table or the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table because of the unlikelihood of achieving the threshold measure as assessed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.
66Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 53www.norfolksouthern.com
2015 Proxy Statement

 NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  Executive Compensation| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

Narrative to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards TableNARRATIVE TO SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE AND GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS TABLE

AwardsAWARDS

Our Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”), as last approved by stockholdersshareholders in 2010,2015, allows for the award of equity-based awards, including incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, restricted stock units and performance share units to non-employee directors, officers and other key employees.employees of the Corporation.

Performance share units entitle a recipient to receive performance-based compensation at the end of a three-year performance cycle based on our performance during that three-year period. For awards made in 2017, the award cycle began on January 1, 2017, and ends December 31, 2019. Under the 2017 performance share unit awards, corporate performance will be measured using two predetermined and equally weighted standards; that is, each of the following performance areas will serve as the basis for earning up to one-half of the total number of performance share units granted (with each one-half portion vesting independent of the other): (1) three-year after-tax return on average invested capital and (2) total return to shareholders measured at the end of the three-year period. Return on average invested capital for this purpose is calculated by dividing Norfolk Southern’s net operating profit after-tax (defined as net income excluding interest expense, and adjusted for the effect of capitalizing Norfolk Southern’s operating lease obligations) by the average invested capital (defined as the average of the current and prior year-end shareholders’ equity and total debt balances, which is then adjusted for the effect of capitalizing Norfolk Southern’s operating lease obligations). Total shareholder return is based on Norfolk Southern’s total shareholder return as compared with the shareholder return of the other publicly-traded North American Class I railroads and a secondary measure based on a comparison of Norfolk Southern’s shareholder return to the S&P 500, with each shareholder return measurement reflecting the return over the entire 3-year period and using a 20-day average to measure performance at the beginning and the end of the period. Additional discussion of these performance criteria can be found beginning on page 44 of our “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section. Performance share units that are earned will be distributed in whole shares of our common stock.

The Compensation Committee established a special performance share unit award in February 2016, called the “Accelerated Turnaround Incentive” or “ATI”. The ATI performance share unit award is based on our performance as determined during a three-year period that began on January 1, 2016 and ends December 31, 2018, and is measured using two predetermined and equally weighted standards; that is, each of the following performance areas will serve as the basis for earning up to one-half of the total number of performance share units granted: (1) operating ratio and (2) diluted earnings per share. In 2017, the Committee granted additional ATI PSUs to Mr. Galanko following his promotion to Executive Vice President Law and Administration, with this prorated award equal to the ATI PSUs granted to the other executive vice presidents in 2016. The other Named Executive Officers did not receive any additional ATI PSUs in 2017. Additional discussion of the ATI performance share units can be found beginning on page 45 of our “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section. Performance share units that are earned will be distributed in whole shares of our common stock.

The Compensation Committee met to approve the 20142017 option grants on January 20, 2014.23, 2017. In order to permit thorough dissemination of our financial results for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013,2016, the Committee made these grants effective January 23, 2014.26, 2017. See our Compensation“Compensation Discussion and AnalysisAnalysis” section for further discussion of our equity award grant practices. These options become exercisable as of January 23, 2018,four years after the grant date, or if the Named Executive Officer retires or dies before that date, the later of one year after the grant date or the participant’s retirement or death. Dividend equivalent payments are paid in cash to active employees on unvested options for four years in an amount equal to, and commensurate with, regular quarterly dividends paid on our common stock. The exercise price may be paid in cash or in shares of our common stock valued at fair market value on the date of exercise. Except for capital adjustments such as stock splits, the exercise price of a stock option granted under LTIP may not be decreased after the option is granted, nor may any outstanding option be modified or replaced through cancellation if the effect would be to reduce the price of the option, unless the repricing, modification or replacement is approved by our stockholders.shareholders.

The restricted stock units awarded in 20142017 are subject to a five-year restriction period and will be settled in shares of our common stock. Dividend equivalent payments are paid in cash on restricted stock units in an amount equal to, and commensurate with, regular quarterly dividends paid on our common stock. During the restriction period, the holder of restricted stock units has no voting or investment power over the underlying common stock.

Performance share In 2017, the Committee also awarded Ms. Stewart restricted stock units entitle a recipient to receive performance-based compensation at the end ofwith a three-year performance cycle based on our performance duringrestriction period provided that three-year period. For awards made in 2014, theshe did not retire before October 1, 2018, but Ms. Stewart forfeited that award cycle began on Januarywhen she retired effective August 1, 2014, and ends December 31, 2016. Under the 2014 performance share unit awards, corporate performance will be measured using two predetermined and equally weighted standards;2017.

Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 54www.norfolksouthern.com

that is, eachTable of the following performance areas will serve as the basis for earning up to one-half of the total number of performance share units granted (with each one-half portion vesting independent of the other): (1) three-year after-tax return on average invested capital and (2) total return to stockholders measured at the end of the three-year period. A more detailed discussion of these performance criteria can be found beginning on page 57 of our Compensation Discussion and Analysis section included in this proxy statement. Performance share units that are earned will be distributed in whole shares of our common stock.Contents

Executive Compensation| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

Receipt of an award under LTIP in 20142017 was made contingent upon the participant’s execution of a non-competition agreement, and all awards are subject to forfeiture in the event the participant “engages in competing employment” within a period of timetwo years following retirement.

For 2014,2017, awards to our Named Executive Officers under the Executive Management Incentive Plan (“EMIP”) were paidpayable based on our performance relative to the following pre-determined criteria:performance measures: operating income, operating ratio, and a composite of three service measures, consisting of adherence to operating plan, connection performance and train performance. The performance standardsmetrics relative to these criteriaperformance measures were established by the Committee in January 2014.2017. A more detailed discussion of these performance criteriameasures can be found on page 5442 of our Compensation“Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this proxy statement.Analysis” section.

The Committee set Mr. Moorman’s 2014Squires’ 2017 incentive opportunity at 250% of his 2014 base salary, Mr. Squires at 165% of his 20142017 base salary and the Executive Vice Presidents at 145% of their 20142017 base salaries. However, in applying the 80.6%115.7% annual incentive earnout, the Committee approved payouts that corresponded to a 225% opportunity for Mr. Moorman, 150% opportunity for Mr. Squires,the Chief Executive Officer and a 135% opportunity for the Executive Vice Presidents, as further described under Annual Incentive in the Compensation“Compensation Discussion and AnalysisAnalysis” section. These amounts are reported as “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” in the Summary Compensation Table.

For further discussion of our plans and how these LTIP and EMIP awards fit into our executive compensation program, see the Compensation“Compensation Discussion and Analysis section beginning on page 45 of this proxy statement.Analysis” section.



67          
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     2015 Proxy Statement



Table of ContentsEMPLOYMENT AND OTHER AGREEMENTS

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Employment and Other Agreements

None of the Corporation’s Named Executive Officers is employed pursuant to an employment agreement.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2014

Option Awards

Stock Awards

Name
(a)

   

Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
(b)

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
(c)

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
(d)

Option
Exercise
Price
($)
(e)

Option
Expiration
Date
(f)

   

Number
of
Shares
or
Units
of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
5
(g)

Market
Value of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
($)
6
(h)

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
7
(i)

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
($)
6
(j)

C. W.
Moorman, IV
123,03050.74001/23/201869,4507,612,41584,4449,255,907
137,50038.70501/28/2019 
112,500 47.76001/28/2020 
83,000162.74501/26/2021 
76,000275.14001/25/2022
102,000369.83001/23/2023
87,880494.17001/22/2024
J. A. Squires37,00038.70501/28/201917,9801,970,78822,2822,442,330
26,50047.76001/28/2020
19,000162.74501/26/2021
18,000275.14001/25/2022
24,000369.83001/23/2023
29,290494.17001/22/2024
M. R.
Stewart
1,97050.74001/23/20186,630726,7147,463818,019
2,58338.70501/28/2019
5,00047.76001/28/2020
4,200162.74501/26/2021
3,700275.14001/25/2022
5,000369.83001/23/2023
16,400494.17001/22/2024
D. H. Butler27,00038.70501/28/201916,2301,778,97018,0861,982,406
26,50047.76001/28/2020
19,000162.74501/26/2021
18,000275.14001/25/2022
24,000369.83001/23/2023
16,400494.17001/22/2024
M. D.
Manion
1,97050.74001/23/201817,0301,866,65819,9932,191,433
37,00038.70501/28/2019
26,50047.76001/28/2020
19,000162.74501/26/2021
18,000275.14001/25/2022
24,000369.83001/23/2023
22,260494.17001/22/2024

68Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 55www.norfolksouthern.com
2015 Proxy Statement

 NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

Executive Compensation| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END 2017

Option AwardsStock Awards
Name     Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
     Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
     Option
Exercise
Price
($)
     Option
Expiration
Date
     Number
of Shares
or Units
of Stock
Have Not
Vested
(#)7
     Market
Value of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
($)8
     
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)9
     Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Shares that
Have Not
Vested
($)8
James A. Squires19,00062.7451/26/202132,4904,707,801121,21617,564,265
18,00075.1401/25/2022
24,00069.8301/23/2023
29,290194.1701/22/2024
28,8302104.2301/26/2025
132,880392.7605/31/2025
105,420470.32061/27/2026
60,3005120.25061/25/2027
Cynthia C. Earhart4,20062.7451/26/20218,4801,228,75226,8233,886,591
3,70075.1401/25/2022
5,00069.8301/23/2023
12,890194.1701/22/2024
13,2602104.2301/26/2025
20,210470.32061/27/2026
10,6705120.25061/25/2027
Alan H. Shaw2,00062.7451/26/20216,270908,52329,0754,212,989
1,90075.1401/25/2022
2,55069.8301/23/2023
2,760194.1701/22/2024
2,7202104.2301/26/2025
20,210470.32061/27/2026
13,2205120.25061/25/2027
Michael J. Wheeler2,760194.1701/22/20247,1801,040,38231,1584,514,840
2,7202104.2301/26/2025
21,080470.32061/27/2026
15,0705120.25061/25/2027
Thomas E. Hurlbut1,33075.1401/25/20224,140599,8867,7971,129,806
1,43269.8301/23/2023
2,760194.1701/22/2024
2,7202104.2301/26/2025
4,140470.32061/27/2026
2,1905120.25061/25/2027
 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  
____________________

1These options vested on January 27, 2015.

2These options vest on January 26, 2016 or, if the Named Executive Officer retires or dies before that date, the later of one year after the grant date or the date of retirement or death.

3These options vest on January 24, 2017 or, if the Named Executive Officer retires or dies before that date, the later of one year after the grant date or the date of retirement or death.

4These options vest on January 23, 2018 or, if the Named Executive Officer retires or dies before that date, the later of one year after the grant date or the date of retirement or death.

5The following table provides information with respect to the vesting of each Named Executive Officer’s restricted stock units:

Name1/29/151/27/1601/26/1701/24/1801/23/19
C. W. Moorman, IV17,50014,000 12,00014,000  11,950
J. A. Squires 4,000 3,000  3,000  4,0003,980
M. R. Stewart 1,250 1,000  950  1,200  2,230 
D. H. Butler4,000 3,000 3,000  4,000 2,230 
M. D. Manion4,0003,000 3,0004,0003,030

6These values are based on the $109.61 closing market price of our common stock on December 31, 2014.

7These amounts represent (i) grants of performance share units made in 2013 pursuant to the Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) that will be earned out over the three-year period ending December 31, 2015, and (ii) grants of performance share units made in 2014 pursuant to LTIP that will be earned out over the three-year period ending December 31, 2016. Because the number of performance share units earned is determined based on a three-year performance period for each cycle, in accordance with the SEC requirements for this table, the number of performance share units disclosed is determined by reporting performance based on achieving threshold performance goals, except that if performance during the last completed fiscal years over which performance is measured has exceeded the threshold, then the disclosure is based on the next highest performance measure (target or maximum) that exceeds the last completed fiscal years over which performance is measured. In accordance with this rule, the number of performance share units shown by each Named Executive Officer for these grants is 60.7% for the grants of performance share units made in 2013, and 37.1% for the grants of performance share units made in 2014, which represents (a) the actual percentage achieved for each completed year in the performance period for the return on average invested capital metric and for the operating ratio metric (for the 2013-2015 performance period), (b) the maximum percentage that can be earned for the pre-tax return on average invested capital metric for the uncompleted year in the 2013-2015 performance period, (c) the target percentage for the after-tax return on average invested capital for each uncompleted year in the 2014-2016 performance period, (d) the maximum percentage that can be earned for the operating ratio metric for the uncompleted year in the 2013-2015 performance period, and (e) the threshold percentage that can be earned for the total shareholder return metric over the three-year performance period. Grants of performance share units will be distributed in whole shares of common stock.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2014Norfolk Southern Corporation

Option Awards                      Stock Awards
Name
(a)
Number of
Shares Acquired
on Exercise
(#)
(b)
         Value Realized
on Exercise
($)1
(c)
   Number of
Shares Acquired
on Vesting
(#)2
(d)
         Value Realized
on Vesting
($)2
(e)
C. W. Moorman, IV       201,970           10,405,921            74,616             7,512,052     
J. A. Squires38,0402,059,08819,1441,909,266
M. R. Stewart4,040198,1373,524348,228
D. H. Butler44,0002,458,58119,1441,909,266
M. D. Manion86,0303,942,31919,1441,909,266

69          Page 56www.norfolksouthern.com
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION 2015 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

Executive Compensation| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

Option AwardsStock Awards
Name     Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
     Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
     Option
Exercise
Price
($)
     Option
Expiration
Date
     Number
of Shares
or Units
of Stock
Have Not
Vested
(#)7
     Market
Value of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
($)8
     
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)9
     Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Shares that
Have Not
Vested
($)8
William A. Galanko4,20062.7451/26/20214,610667,98910,9261,583,107
3,70075.1401/25/2022
5,00069.8301/23/2023
2,760194.1701/22/2024
2,7202104.2301/26/2025
4,140470.32061/27/2026
3,9805120.25061/25/2027
Marta R. Stewart15,33994.1701/22/202411,1401,614,18634,5535,006,762
17,491104.2301/26/2025
25,11070.32061/27/2026
14,8405120.25061/25/2027
1     These options vested on January 23, 2018.
2These options vest on January 27, 2019 or, if the Named Executive Officer retires or dies before that date, the later of one year after the grant date or the date of retirement or death.
3These options vest on June 1, 2019 or, if Mr. Squires retires or dies before that date, the later of one year after the grant date or the date of retirement or death.
4These options vest on January 28, 2020 or, if the Named Executive Officer retires or dies before that date, the later of one year after the grant date or the date of retirement or death.
5These options vest on January 26, 2021 or, if the Named Executive Officer retires or dies before that date, the later of one year after the grant date or the date of retirement or death.
6These options expire on the date listed or, if the Named Executive Officer retires before that date, on the earlier of the date listed or five years after the Named Executive Officer retires.
7The following table provides information with respect to the vesting of each Named Executive Officer’s restricted stock units:

      Name     1/24/18     1/23/19     1/27/20     1/28/21     1/26/22
J. A. Squires4,0003,9803,60012,8008,110
C. C. Earhart1,2001,7501,6502,4501,430
A. H. Shaw6507306602,4501,780
M. J. Wheeler1,2007306602,5602,030
T. E. Hurlbut1,200730660980570
W. A. Galanko1,2007306609801,040
M. R. Stewart1,2002,2302,3003,4102,000
8     These values are based on the$144.90 closing market price of our common stock as of December 31, 2017.
  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONNorfolk Southern CorporationPage 57www.norfolksouthern.com
 

____________________

1Represents the difference between the priceTable of Contents

Executive Compensation| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

9     These amounts represent (i) grants of performance share units made in 2016 pursuant to the Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) that may be earned out over the three-year period ending December 31, 2018, (ii) grants of performance share units made in 2017 pursuant to LTIP that may be earned out over the three-year period ending December 31, 2019, and (iii) grants of accelerated turnaround incentive (ATI) performance share units that may be earned out over the three-year period ending December 31, 2018. Because the number of performance share units earned is determined based on a three-year performance period for each cycle, in accordance with the SEC requirements for this table, the number of performance share units disclosed is determined by reporting performance based on achieving threshold performance goals, except that if performance during the last completed fiscal years over which performance is measured has exceeded the threshold, then the disclosure is based on the next highest performance measure (target or maximum) that exceeds the last completed fiscal years over which performance is measured. In accordance with this rule, the number of performance share units shown by each Named Executive Officer for these grants is 47.15% for the annual grant of performance share units made in 2016, and 94.25% for the annual grant of performance share units made in 2017, which represents (a) the actual percentage for the after-tax return on average invested capital for each completed year in the performance periods, (b) the target percentage for after-tax return on average invested capital for the uncompleted year in the 2016-2018 performance period, (c) the maximum percentage for after-tax return on average invested capital for the uncompleted years in the 2017-2019 performance period, (d) the target percentage for the total shareholder return (TSR) metric for the 2016-2018 performance period based on our TSR as compared with the TSRs of the other publicly-traded North American Class I railroads for the period from the January 1, 2016 start of the performance period to December 31, 2017, and (e) the maximum percentage for the TSR metric for the 2017-2019 performance period based on our TSR as compared with the TSRs of the other publicly-traded North American Class I railroads for the period from the January 1, 2017 start of the performance period to December 31, 2018. In accordance with the SEC requirements for this table, the number of ATI performance share units shown is the threshold level and the value shown is based on our closing stock price on December 31, 2017; the threshold and target levels for the ATI performance share units are the same as no payment of the ATI performance share units will be made unless at least the target level is achieved.

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED IN 2017
Option AwardsStock Awards
NameNumber of
Shares
Acquired
on Exercise
(#)
     Value
Realized
on Exercise
($)1
     Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Vesting
(#)2
     Value
Realized
on
Vesting
($)2
James A. Squires58,8244,552,13612,9001,801,037
Cynthia C. Earhart9,553700,7815,503776,553
Alan H. Shaw001,529208,528
Michael J. Wheeler8,700471,8081,929256,626
Thomas E. Hurlbut11,988759,7311,929256,626
William A. Galanko5,000358,0521,929256,626
Marta R. Stewart17,904943,9327,2881,036,244
1     Represents the difference between the price of the underlying common stock on the day of exercise and the exercise price of the option(s).
2Represents the aggregate number of (1) restricted stock units that vested and were distributed during fiscal 2017, multiplied by the average of the high and low of the market price of the underlying shares on the vesting date, and (2) performance share units that vested during fiscal 2017, which shares were distributed on January 25, 2018, multiplied by the average of the high and low of the market price of the underlying shares on the vesting date of December 31, 2017.
Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 58www.norfolksouthern.com

Table of exercise and the exercise price of the option(s).Contents

Executive Compensation| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

2Represents the aggregate number of (1) restricted stock units that vested and were distributed during fiscal 2014, multiplied by the average of the high and low of the market price of the underlying shares on the vesting date, and (2) performance share units that vested during fiscal 2014, which shares were distributed on January 29, 2015, multiplied by the average of the high and low of the market price of the underlying shares on the vesting date of December 31, 2014, and which shares were distributed on January 29, 2015.

RETIREMENT BENEFITS

2014 Pension Benefits Table2017 PENSION BENEFITS TABLE

The following table shows, as of December 31, 2014,2017, each Named Executive Officer’s years of credited service, present value of accumulated benefit and benefits received, if any, under each of (i) the tax-qualified Retirement Plan of Norfolk Southern Corporation and Participating Subsidiary Companies (the “Retirement Plan”) and (ii) the nonqualified Supplemental Benefit Plan of Norfolk Southern Corporation and Participating Subsidiary Companies (the “SERP”).

Name
(a)
Plan Name
(b)
Number of
Years Credited
Service
(#)
(c)

Present Value of
Accumulated
Benefit
($)
(d)

Payments During
Last Fiscal Year
($)
(e)
              Charles W. Moorman, IV       Retirement Plan40     2,379,976     0
SERP4019,837,2280
James A. SquiresRetirement Plan23889,943 0
SERP23 3,898,205 0
Marta R. StewartRetirement Plan311,285,0470
SERP311,991,0980
Deborah H. ButlerRetirement371,721,6390
SERP377,337,7410
Mark D. ManionRetirement Plan401,896,3040
SERP407,683,5250
Name      Plan Name     Number of Years
Credited Service
(#)
      Present Value
of Accumulated
Benefit
($)
     Payments During
Last Fiscal Year
($)
James A. SquiresRetirement Plan261,204,9800
SERP266,842,3520
Cynthia C. EarhartRetirement Plan321,338,0960
SERP323,578,0040
Alan H. ShawRetirement Plan24898,2720
SERP241,121,0760
Michael J. WheelerRetirement Plan331,372,7160
SERP332,539,6560
Thomas E. HurlbutRetirement Plan26988,2600
SERP26847,8360
William A. GalankoRetirement Plan281,465,4160
SERP281,813,5360
Marta R. StewartRetirement Plan341,672,27254,120
SERP344,528,2603,335

NARRATIVE TO PENSION BENEFITS TABLE

Narrative to Pension Benefits Table

The above table shows the number of years of credited service and the actuarial present value of each Named Executive Officer’s accumulated benefits under our defined benefit plans as of December 31, 2014,2017, which is the pension plan measurement date we use for financial reporting purposes. We assume a retirement age of 60 for purposes of the table for Mr. Squires, Ms. StewartEarhart, Mr. Shaw, Mr. Wheeler and Mr. Squires,Hurlbut, since that is the earliest age at which a participant may retire under the plans without an age-based benefit reduction, and they had not reached that age as of December 31, 2014.2017. For a discussion of the other material assumptions applied in quantifying the present values of the above accrued benefits, see note 11 to our financial statements included with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.2017. The benefits shown are in addition to amounts payable under the U.S. Railroad Retirement Act.

Under the Retirement Plan and the SERP, except as noted above or in the event of a change in control (see below), each Named Executive Officer can expect to receive an annual retirement benefit equal to average annual compensation for the five most highly compensated years out of the last ten years of creditable service multiplied by a percentage equal to 1.5% times total years of creditable service, but not in excess of 40 years of creditable service (which would be equivalent to a maximum of 60% of such average compensation), less an offset for the annual Railroad Retirement Act annuity. Average compensation includes salary, (including any pre-tax contributions the Named Executive Officer makes to our: (i) 401(k) plan; (ii) ChoicePlus Benefits Plan (for medical, dental and similar coverages); and (iii) pre-tax transportation plan), awards under the Executive Management Incentive Plan and unused vacation amounts paid upon severance from



70
2015 Proxy Statement

     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

employment. Under the Retirement Plan and the SERP, annual retirement benefits will be payable to each Named Executive Officer upon retirement (although there may be a six-month delay in payment of benefits that accrued under the SERP after January 1, 2005, if required by Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code) and, upon the Named Executive Officer’s death, to his or her spouse on a joint-and-survivor-annuity basis.

Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 59www.norfolksouthern.com

Table of Contents

Executive Compensation| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

Mr. Moorman,Squires, Ms. ButlerEarhart, and Mr. ManionWheeler are eligible for early retirement under the Retirement Plan and the SERP since each has reached age 55 and have 10 years of creditable service. If Mr. Squires, Ms. Earhart, or Mr. Wheeler chooses to retire prior to age 60, their benefits will be reduced by 1/360th for each month he or she is under age 60 at the time of retirement. Ms. Stewart retired effective August 1, 2017, and her benefit was reduced by 1/360th for each month she was under age 60 at the time of her retirement. Mr. Galanko retired effective March 1, 2018, and he was eligible for full retirement benefits without any benefit reduction due to age. Ms. Stewart is eligible for early retirement since

she has reached age 55 and has 10 years of creditable service. If Ms. Stewart chooses to retire prior to age 60, her benefits will be reduced by 1/360th for each month she is under age 60 at the time of retirement.

We have no policy with regard to granting extra years of credited service. However, our Board has in certain circumstances credited executives with additional years of service. In addition, as described below, our change-in-control agreements provide for additional years of credited service in limited circumstances.




DEFERRED COMPENSATION

Our Named Executive Officers may have deferred the receipt of portions of their compensation under two separate deferred compensation plans: the Officers’ Deferred Compensation Plan (“ODCP”) and the Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan (“EDCP”). The table and narrative below describe the material elements of these plans.

2014 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table

Name
(a)

     

Plan

Executive
Contributions in
Last FY
($)1
(b)

Registrant
Contributions in
Last FY
($)
(c)

Aggregate
Earnings
in Last FY
($)2
(d)

Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
(e)

Aggregate
Balance
at Last FYE
($)3
(f)

Charles W. Moorman, IVODCP0065,7580759,259
EDCP0019,7000348,132
James A. SquiresODCP00000
EDCP75,000060,79801,896,368
Marta R. Stewart ODCP0014,9990229,275
EDCP00000
Deborah H. ButlerODCP0049,4590590,416
EDCP00116,65401,799,612
Mark D. ManionODCP00237,97002,376,832
EDCP0076,14001,875,188
____________________

1Amounts in this column are included in the “Salary” and/or “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column(s) of the Summary Compensation Table.

2Of these amounts, the following amounts are included in the “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column of the Summary Compensation Table and represent the extent to which 2014 interest accrued on salary and annual incentives deferred under the Officers’ Deferred Compensation Plan exceeded 120% of the applicable Federal long-term rate provided in Section 1274(d) of the Internal Revenue Code: Mr. Moorman, $14,000; Mr. Squires, $0; Ms. Stewart $0; Ms. Butler, $9,429; and Mr. Manion, $54,122.2017 NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION TABLE

3Of these amounts, the following amounts have been previously reported as compensation to the Named Executive Officer in our Summary Compensation Tables beginning with the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 and ending with the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013: Mr. Moorman, $362,444; Mr. Squires, $997,607; Ms. Stewart $0; Ms. Butler, $41,063; and Mr. Manion, $1,180,506.

Name     Plan     Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
($)1
     Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
($)
     Aggregate
Earnings
in Last FY
($)2
     Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
     Aggregate
Balance
at Last FYE
($)3
James A. SquiresODCP00000
EDCP100,0080182,70802,808,552
Cynthia C. EarhartODCP0041,4370633,392
EDCP86,9940188,74701,665,918
Alan H. ShawODCP00000
EDCP002,772015,642
Michael J. WheelerODCP00000
EDCP0094,2600826,824
Thomas E. HurlbutODCP00000
EDCP0020,5780130,767
William A. GalankoODCP00150,52601,637,795
EDCP112,949057,96902,352,601
Marta R. StewartODCP0018,3750280,872
EDCP00000
171          

Amounts in this column are included in the “Salary” and/or “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column(s) of the Summary Compensation Table.

NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     2015 Proxy Statement2



Table of Contents

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION     

Of these amounts, $40,077 is included for Mr. Galanko in the “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column of the Summary Compensation Table and represents the extent to which 2017 interest accrued on salary and annual incentives deferred under the Officers’ Deferred Compensation Plan exceeded 120% of the applicable Federal long-term rate provided in Section 1274(d) of the Internal Revenue Code.

3

Of these amounts, $1,507,128 has been previously reported as compensation to Mr. Squires in our Summary Compensation Tables beginning with the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 and ending with the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

NARRATIVE TO NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION TABLE

Narrative to Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table

The 20142017 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table presents amounts deferred under (i) the Officers’ Deferred Compensation Plan and (ii) the Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan. Amounts deferred are credited to a separate memorandum account maintained in the name of each participant. We do not make contributions to participants’ accounts.

Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 60www.norfolksouthern.com

Table of Contents

Executive Compensation| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

Amounts deferred before January 1, 2001, were deferred under the Officers’ Deferred Compensation Plan and earn a fixed rate of interest, which is credited to the account at the beginning of each quarter. In general, the fixed interest rate is determined on the basis of the participant’s age at the time of the deferral. The total amount so credited for amounts deferred before January 1, 2001, (including interest earned thereon) is distributed in five installments beginning in the year following the year in which the participant retires.

Amounts deferred on or after January 1, 2001, have been deferred under the Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan. Participants may defer up to 50% of base salary and 100% of EMIP annual incentive payments and are credited with variable earnings and/or losses based on the performance of hypothetical investment options selected by the participant. The hypothetical investment options include various mutual funds as crediting indices. With respect to each deferral, participants may choose to receive a distribution at the earliest of separation from service, disability, or a date that is at least five years but not more than 15 years after the deferral year has ended.

The total amount credited to a participant will be distributed, in accordance with the participant’s elected distribution option, in one lump sum or a stream of annual cash payments.

Our commitment to accrue and pay interest and/or earnings on amounts deferred is facilitated by the purchase of corporate-owned life insurance with executive officers as insureds under the policies. If the Board of Directors determines at any time that changes in the law affect our ability to recover the cost of providing the benefits payable under the Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan and the Officers’ Deferred Compensation Plan, the Board, in its discretion, may reduce the interest and/or earnings on deferrals. With respect to the Officers’ Deferred Compensation Plan, the adjusted rate of interest may not be less than one-half the rate otherwise provided for in the plan. For the Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan, the adjusted rate may not be less than the lesser of (a) one-half the rate of earnings otherwise provided for in the Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan or (b) 7%.

Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 61www.norfolksouthern.com


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON A CHANGE IN CONTROL OR OTHER TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT

We have entered into certain agreements and maintain certain plans that will require us to provide compensation to our Named Executive Officers in the event of a termination of their employment with our company.



72
2015 Proxy Statement

     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of ContentsPOST EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS*

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

Post Employment Benefits

The benefits to be provided to our Named Executive Officers in the event of a termination due to retirement, involuntary separation, death, disability or a change in control are quantified in the table below. As of December 31, 2014,2017, Mr. Squires wasShaw and Mr. Hurlbut were not eligible to retire under our retirement plans, so figures listed for Mr. SquiresShaw and Mr. Hurlbut under Retirement assume a voluntary separation as of that date. ThisMs. Stewart retired effective August 1, 2017, and Mr. Galanko retired effective March 1, 2018, and this table thus only reflects the amounts payable as a result of their retirements. Except as provided in this paragraph, this analysis assumes that on December 31, 2014,2017,

Forfor a Retirement, the executive retired as of that date;

Forfor an Involuntary Separation, the executive’s employment was terminated as of that date due to the executive’s position being abolished in connection with a downsizing or internal restructuring (and the executive elected to retire if he or she is retirement eligible);

Forfor a Death, the executive dies on that date;

Forfor a Disability, the executive became disabled on that date; and

Forfor a Change in Control, (i) a change in control of our company occurred, as defined in the applicable change in controlchange-in-control agreements, and (ii) each of the above Named Executive Officer’s employment with us was terminated without cause.


RetirementInvoluntary
Separation
DeathDisabilityChange in
Control
     Retirement
$
     Involuntary
Separation
$
     Death
$
     Disability
$
     Change in
Control
$
Charles W. Moorman, IV
Severance Pay$1,538,462$10,500,000
Performance Share Units$9,395,550$10,694,092
Unvested Stock Options$10,567,075
Accelerated Dividends$1,530,883
Restricted Stock Units$7,612,415 
Deferred Compensation Equivalent$213,740
Pension Enhancement $19,784,088
Health and welfare benefits$63,104$22,496$63,104$40,248
Life Insurance Proceeds$3,000,000
Disability Benefits$500,000
Vacation Pay$96,154
Post retirement life insurance
Excise Tax Gross-up on Severance Benefits
TOTAL$27,734,298$29,272,760$30,693,690$28,234,298$42,859,205
James A. Squires
Severance Pay$663,462$5,962,500961,53913,687,500
Performance Share Units $2,540,760$2,953,54010,598,73210,598,73210,598,73210,598,7329,953,275
Unvested Stock Options$2,465,61518,935,38018,935,38018,935,38018,935,380
Accelerated Dividends $435,0011,712,660
Restricted Stock Units$1,970,7884,707,8014,707,8014,707,8014,707,801
Deferred Compensation Equivalent$1,568,3691,953,466
Pension Enhancement$8,339,97615,705,669
Health and welfare benefits$19,212$107,151$217,986$57,636
Health Benefits181,519181,51976,160181,51950,601
Life Insurance Proceeds$2,250,0003,000,000
Disability Benefits$375,000
Vacation Pay$72,11596,15496,15496,154
Post retirement life insurance
Excise Tax Gross-up on Severance Benefits
TOTAL$72,115$754,789$9,406,429$7,642,264$19,389,13734,519,58535,481,12437,318,07234,423,43143,159,325
73          Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 62www.norfolksouthern.com
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION 2015 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

Executive Compensation| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

     Retirement
$
     Involuntary
Separation
$
     Death
$
     Disability
$
     Change in
Control
$
Cynthia C. Earhart
Severance Pay738,4615,519,250
Performance Share Units1,977,5311,977,5311,977,5311,977,5311,858,730
Unvested Stock Options2,963,4712,963,4712,963,4712,963,471
Accelerated Dividends253,296
Restricted Stock Units1,228,7521,228,7521,228,7521,228,752
Deferred Compensation Equivalent1,246,324
Pension Enhancement7,994,865
Health Benefits99,61599,61599,61515,591
Life Insurance Proceeds1,800,000
Vacation Pay57,69257,69257,692
TOTAL6,327,0627,065,5237,969,7556,269,37016,945,748
Alan H. Shaw
Severance Pay530,7692,516,534
Performance Share Units2,130,9472,130,947
Unvested Stock Options2,083,7722,083,772
Restricted Stock Units908,523908,523
Health Benefits17,706408,428559,402
Life Insurance Proceeds1,800,000
TOTAL0548,4757,331,6705,682,6442,516,534
Michael J. Wheeler
Severance Pay738,4612,628,927
Performance Share Units2,300,6292,300,6292,300,6292,300,629
Unvested Stock Options2,194,2592,194,2592,194,2592,194,259
Restricted Stock Units1,040,3821,040,3821,040,3821,040,382
Health Benefits262,436262,436157,077262,436
Life Insurance Proceeds1,800,000
Vacation Pay57,69257,692
TOTAL5,855,3996,593,8607,492,3475,797,7072,628,927
Thomas E. Hurlbut
Severance Pay288,4621,207,422
Performance Share Units425,675425,675
Unvested Stock Options613,382613,382
Restricted Stock Units599,886599,886
Health Benefits17,094159,345287,699
Life Insurance Proceeds900,000
TOTAL0305,5562,698,2871,926,6421,207,422
  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONNorfolk Southern CorporationPage 63www.norfolksouthern.com
 

Table of Contents

Executive Compensation| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

RetirementInvoluntary
Separation
DeathDisabilityChange in
Control
Marta R. Stewart
          Severance Pay$596,154$3,675,000
          Performance Share Units$917,545$917,545$917,545$917,545$1,131,453
          Unvested Stock Options$523,272$523,272$523,272$523,272
          Accelerated Dividends$178,570
          Restricted Stock Units$726,714$726,714$726,714$726,714
          Deferred Compensation Equivalent$60,955
          Pension Enhancement$4,001,033
          Health and welfare benefits$182,420$182,420$94,559$182,420$57,636
          Life Insurance Proceeds$1,500,000
          Disability Benefits$250,000
          Vacation Pay$48,077$48,077$48,077$48,077$48,077
          Post retirement life insurance
          Excise Tax Gross-up on Severance Benefits
TOTAL$2,398,028$2,994,182$3,810,167$2,648,028$9,152,724
Deborah H. Butler
          Severance Pay$853,846$4,410,000
          Performance Share Units$1,987,887$1,987,887$1,987,887$1,987,887$2,238,239
          Unvested Stock Options$2,465,615$2,465,615$2,465,615$2,465,615
          Accelerated Dividends$330,874
          Restricted Stock Units$1,778,970$1,778,970$1,778,970$1,778,970
          Deferred Compensation Equivalent$953,922
          Pension Enhancement$9,418,944
          Health and welfare benefits$91,282$91,282$22,735$91,282$28,656
          Life Insurance Proceeds $1,800,000
          Disability Benefits$300,000
          Vacation Pay$57,692$57,692$57,692$57,692$57,692
          Post retirement life insurance$6,621$6,621 $6,621$6,621
          Excise Tax Gross-up on Severance Benefits
TOTAL$6,388,067$7,241,913$8,112,899$6,688,067$17,444,948
Mark D. Manion
          Severance Pay$923,077$4,410,000
          Performance Share Units$2,239,113$2,239,113$2,239,113$2,239,113$2,563,319
          Unvested Stock Options$2,465,615$2,465,615$2,465,615$2,465,615
          Accelerated Dividends$378,252
          Restricted Stock Units$1,866,658$1,866,658$1,866,658$1,866,658
          Deferred Compensation Equivalent$1,270,969
          Pension Enhancement$8,676,045
          Health and welfare benefits$118,724$118,724$69,954$118,724$26,952
          Life Insurance Proceeds$1,800,000
          Disability Benefits$300,000
          Vacation Pay$57,692$57,692$57,692$57,692$57,692
          Post retirement life insurance$4,984$4,984$4,984$4,984
          Excise Tax Gross-up on Severance Benefits
TOTAL$6,752,786$7,675,863$8,499,032$7,052,786$17,388,213
Retirement
$
Involuntary
Separation
$
Death
$
Disability
$
Change in
Control
$
William A. Galanko
Performance Share Units538,009
Unvested Stock Options657,505
Restricted Stock Units667,989
Health Benefits117,641
Vacation Pay57,692
TOTAL2,038,836
Marta R. Stewart
Performance Share Units2,752,544
Unvested Stock Options365,806
Restricted Stock Units1,614,186
Health Benefits147,484
Vacation Pay57,692
TOTAL4,937,712
*

This table does not include the pension benefits reflected in the Pension Benefits Table, or the deferred compensation amounts disclosed in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table. In addition, this table does not quantify the benefits that would be payable under the Corporation’s long-term disability plan to any of our Named Executive Officers who terminated employment as a result of total disability.

Severance Pay
SEVERANCE PAY

For an Involuntary Separation resulting in the Named Executive Officer’s position being abolished in connection with a downsizing or internal restructuring, these amounts represent two weeks of the executive’s annual base salary for each calendar year of service up to a maximum of 80 weeks, (butbut not in excess of twice the annual amount of the executive’s salary payable in the 12-month period preceding the executive’s severance date).

74
2015 Proxy Statement

     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

date. For a Change-in-Control,description of the severance payable if the Named Executive Officer was involuntarily separated for a reason other than downsizing or internal restructuring, see the section captioned “Termination for Any Other Reason.”

For a Change in Control, these amounts represent three times the sum of each Named Executive Officer’s base salary plus EMIPannual incentive pay.pay times 2.99 for Mr. Shaw, Mr. Wheeler and Mr. Hurlbut, and times three for Mr. Squires and Ms. Earhart. If the Named Executive Officer had elected to defer either a portion of salary or annual incentive under the Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan, then a corresponding portion of this amount would have been deferred and subsequently paid in accordance with the Named Executive Officer’s original deferral election rather than distributed in a lump sum.

PERFORMANCE SHARE UNITS

Performance Share Units
For Retirement, Death or Disability, these amounts represent the estimated dollar value of the annual grants of performance share units to be earned during the performance cycles ending December 31, 2015,2018, and December 31, 2016,2019, assuming an earnout of 55.8%42.15% for the grants of performance share units made in 20132016 and 44.6%44.3% for the grants of performance share units made in 2014,2017, and in each case based onmultiplied by $144.90, the $109.61 closing marketstock price of our common stock on December 31, 2014.29, 2017, the last trading day of the Corporation’s fiscal year. Because the number of performance share units earned is determined based on a three-year performance period for each cycle, these percentages represent (i) the actual percentage achieved for each completed year in the performance cycle for the Return on Average Invested Capital and Operating Ratio metrics, where applicable, and the 50% target percentage achievement for each of these metrics for each uncompleted year in the performance period, and (ii) a 40% achievement for the Total Shareholder Return metric over the entire three-year performance period, reflecting the earnout if Norfolk Southern’s total stockholdershareholder return exceeds the median total stockholdershareholder return of the S&P 500 over the three-year performance cycle. Estimated amounts for the performance cycles ending December 31, 2014,2018, and December 31, 2015,2019, are also included in the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table. However, because the Named Executive Officers would forfeit these awards but for retirement or death benefit provisions under LTIP, we have included these awards here as well. If a participant retires, dies or becomes disabled before the end of the

Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 64www.norfolksouthern.com

Table of Contents

Executive Compensation| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

performance period, the awards are calculated and earned at the end of the performance period as if the participant had not retired or died; however, these awards are subject to forfeiture in the eventcertain situations following retirement or disability including if the participant “engagesengages in competing employment” followingemployment or violates a confidentiality agreement. The payout of accelerated turnaround incentive (ATI) performance share unit awards, if any, would be prorated upon retirement, and beforedeath or disability; no value is assigned to the endATI performance share unit awards in this table because of our assessment of the unlikelihood of achieving the threshold performance measure during the performance period.

For Involuntary Separation, each of the named executive officersNamed Executive Officers other than Mr. SquiresShaw and Mr. Hurlbut was eligible to retire as of December 31, 2014;2017; accordingly, had their employment been terminated by us or them on that date, each would have been entitled to the retirement benefit provisions under LTIP for their performance share units.benefits described above.

For a Change in Control, these amounts represent a cash payment to which the Named Executive OfficerMr. Squires and Ms. Earhart would not otherwise be entitled absent a change in control. Values based on (i) the $109.61$144.90 closing marketstock price of our common stock on December 31, 2014,29, 2017, the last trading day of the Corporation’s fiscal year, and (ii) the average earnout for performance share units for the two most recently completed cycles of 57.7%40.25%, which is the assumed earnout required under the change-in-control agreements. Performance share units are earned over a three-year cycle ending each December 31. The form of award for the accelerated turnaround incentive (ATI) performance share unit awards excludes those grants from any change in control calculation. SEC rules require that we assume a change in control occurred on the last day of our fiscal year. Therefore, our Named Executive Officers were fully vested in their performance share unit awards for the performance cycle ended December 31, 2014,2017, and these awards are excluded from the above amounts.

Unvested Stock OptionsUNVESTED STOCK OPTIONS

For Retirement Death and Disability,Death, these amounts represent the value of the outstanding 2011, 20122014, 2015 and 20132016 unvested stock options for the Named Executive Officer for which vesting is accelerated to the date of his or her retirement death, or disability.death. The value shown equals the difference between the exercise price of each option and the $109.61 closing market price of our common stock on December 31, 2014. Amounts in this column do not includeamounts further represent the value of unexercisedthe outstanding unvested stock options held byfor the Named Executive Officers for which vesting wouldis not be accelerated as a result of hisRetirement, Disability, or herDeath; however, because the Named Executive Officers would forfeit these awards but for the retirement, disability, or death or disability.provisions of LTIP and their LTIP award agreements, we have included the value of these unvested stock options as well. Amounts in these columns do not include the value of vested, unexercised stock options. See the Outstanding“Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End TableTable” for a complete list of each Named Executive Officer’s vested unexercised options. Under the retirement, death and disability benefit provisions contained in the LTIP, each option held by the Named Executive Officers will expire at the end of the term for which the option was granted. But for these provisions, all of their options would expire at the close of business on their last day of employment with us.

For Involuntary Separation, each of the named executive officersNamed Executive Officers other than Mr. SquiresShaw and Mr. Hurlbut was eligible to retire as of December 31, 2014;2017; accordingly, had their employment been terminated by us or them on that date, each would have been entitled to the retirement benefit provisions under LTIP for their unvested stock options.

75          
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     2015 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

For a Change in Control, this table does not report the value of vested options held by each Named Executive Officer as of December 31, 2014.2017. Under each Named Executive Officer’sthe change-in-control agreement,agreements for Mr. Squires and Ms. Earhart, in the event his or her employment with us is terminated in connection with a change in control, we are required to pay him or her the then current spread value of his or her vested options rather than require him or her to exercise them and sell the underlying shares. Based on the $109.61$144.90 closing marketstock price of our common stock on December 31, 2014,29, 2017, the last trading day of the Corporation’s fiscal year, the values of those options were as follows: Mr. Moorman, $23,950,339; Mr. Squires, $4,262,510;$8,838,900; and Ms. Stewart, $608,372; Ms. Butler, $4,262,510; and Mr. Manion, $4,378,484.Earhart, $1,869,210. See the Outstanding“Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End TableTable” for more information regarding these options. Unvested options do not provide for accelerated vesting at the time of a change in control and would be forfeited upon termination ofif their employment.employment is terminated for any reason other than Retirement, Disability, or Death. Accordingly, options which were unvested as of December 31, 2014,2017, are excluded from these amounts.

Restricted Stock Units
RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS

For Retirement, Death and Disability, these amounts represent the dollar value of restricted stock units based on the $109.61$144.90 closing marketstock price of our common stock on December 31, 2014.29, 2017, the last trading day of the Corporation’s fiscal year. These amounts are also included in the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table. However, because the Named Executive Officers would forfeit these awards but for retirement, death or disability benefit provisions of LTIP and their LTIP award agreements, we have included these amounts here as well. If a participant retires, dies or becomes disabled before the end of the restriction period, the awards are delivered at the end of the restriction period as if the participant had not retired, died or become disabled; however, these awards are subject to forfeiture in the event the participant “engages in competing employment” following retirement and before the end of the restriction period.

Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 65www.norfolksouthern.com

Table of Contents

Executive Compensation | 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

For Involuntary Separation, each of the Named Executive Officers other than Mr. SquiresShaw and Mr. Hurlbut was eligible to retire as of December 31, 2014;2017; accordingly, had their employment been terminated by us or them on that date, each would have been entitled to the retirement benefit provisions under LTIP for their restricted stock units.

For a Change in Control, the change-in-control agreements do not provide for the acceleration of any unvested restricted stock units held by Named Executive Officers at the time their employment with us is terminated or upon a change in control. Under the terms of the LTIP, they will forfeit any unvested restricted stock units if their employment is terminated for any reason other than Retirement, Disability or death. The Committee has the authority under LTIP to waive any restrictions restricted stock units.

Deferred Compensation Equivalent
DEFERRED COMPENSATION EQUIVALENT

For a Change in Control, these amounts represent the cash payment that would have been payable when the participantMr. Squires or Ms. Earhart reached age 65, as provided in the change in controltheir change-in-control agreements. This amount does not include the aggregate balance of the Named Executive Officer’s deferred compensation account as of December 31, 2014,2017, in which the Named Executive Officer is currently vested. See column (f) of the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table for this amount. If the change in control was not a change in control as defined in the regulations to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, then any portion of the deferred compensation that was subject to Section 409A would have been payable at the time and in the form provided under the terms of the plan under which the Named Executive Officer earned the benefit, without any acceleration or other alteration in the time and form of payment as a result of the change in control.

PENSION ENHANCEMENT

Pension Enhancement
For a Change in Control, these amounts represent the amount by which the Named Executive Officer’sMr. Squires’ and Ms. Earhart’s pension benefit, as enhanced by the change-in-control agreement, exceeds the actuarial present value of his or her accumulated pension benefits as of December 31, 2014.2017. Amount does not include the actuarial present value of the Named Executive Officer’s accumulated pension benefits as of December 31, 2014.2016. See the Pension“Pension Benefits TableTable” for a description of the pension benefits to which the Named Executive Officers are entitled upon their retirement.

HEALTH BENEFITS

Health and Welfare Benefits
For Retirement, Disability or a Change in Control, these amounts represent estimated medical benefits for the Named Executive Officers and their eligible dependents.

For Involuntary Separation, as each of the Named Executive Officers other than Mr. Squires, wasMs. Earhart, and Mr. Wheeler were eligible to retire as of December 31, 2014; accordingly,2017, each of them other than Mr. Squires could

76
2015 Proxy Statement

     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

elect have elected to retire and receive the same benefits as shown under the “Retirement” column.column plus one year of continued dental and vision coverage for the executive and his eligible dependents to be provided by the Corporation in accordance with the Involuntary Separation Plan. Accordingly, the amounts in this column represent the cost of their post-retirement medical coverage plus the one year cost of continued dental and vision coverage. For involuntary separation for Mr. Squires,Shaw and Mr. Hurlbut, these amounts represent the cost of one year of medical, dental and vision coverage for Mr. Squiresthe executive and his eligible dependents to be paid by the Corporation in accordance with the Involuntary Separation Plan.

For Death, these amounts represent estimated medical benefits for the eligible dependents of the Named Executive Officer. For a Change in Control, these amounts represent medical and dental benefits for a fixed period of time specified in the change in controlchange-in-control agreements.

Life Insurance Proceeds
LIFE INSURANCE PROCEEDS

These amounts represent the life insurance proceeds payable upon the death of the executive officer.officer while employed. In addition to the amounts listed in the table, if a Named Executive Officer died or was totally and permanently disabled for at least 12 months, in either case as a result of an accident that was covered under the insurance policy that provides benefits under the Executive Accident Plan, then the Named Executive Officer (in the case of disability) or his or her beneficiary (in the case of death) would receive a $400,000 lump sum payment from the insurance company.

Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 66www.norfolksouthern.com

Table of Contents

Executive Compensation | 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

POST-RETIREMENT LIFE INSURANCE

Post-Retirement Life Insurance
These amounts represent the remaining premiums required to be paid to fully fund each Named Executive Officer’s Life Insurance policy underUnder our Executive Life Insurance Plan, upon retirement, the remaining premiums on a participant’s life insurance policy must be paid in the minimum number of level annual premiums allowable without causingallowable. No premiums would have been required at the policyend of 2017 to violate Section 7702fully fund any of the Internal Revenue Code.our Named Executive Officer’s life insurance policies as a result of retirement. The life insurance policy amounts are as follows: Mr. Moorman, $565,000;Squires, $345,000; Ms. Stewart, $103,400; Ms. Butler,Earhart, $300,000; Mr. Shaw, $87,000; Mr. Wheeler, $54,100; Mr. Hurlbut, $94,500; and Mr. Manion, $410,000. Galanko, $375,000.

In addition, each Named Executive Officer would be eligible for retiree life insurance coverage under the Corporation’s group life insurance program in the following amounts: Mr. MoormanMessrs. Squires, Shaw, Hurlbut, and Mr. SquiresGalanko, $5,000; and Ms. Earhart, Mr. Wheeler, and Ms. Stewart, Ms. Butler and Mr. Manion, $50,000.

VACATION PAY

The Corporation’s Vacation Pay program, which applies to all nonagreement employees, was revised effective January 1, 2017. An employee who separates from employment on December 31 will not be paid for the following year’s vacation except in the case of retirement. For a ChangeMs. Stewart, the amount represents her unused vacation that was paid upon her retirement in Control, the change-in-control agreements obligate us to pay the premiums on the Named Executive Officers’ life insurance policies as if the Named Executive Officer terminated due to retirement under the Executive Life Insurance Plan.

No Excise Tax Gross-Up
In 2013, Norfolk Southern entered into amendments to its change-in-control agreementsaccordance with the Named Executive Officers to eliminateVacation Pay program; this amount is also included in the tax gross-ups that would have been payable on any Federal excise taxes on excess parachute payments. Each Named Executive Officer appointed since that time has signed an amendment agreeing to2017 total shown for Ms. Stewart in the elimination of this tax gross-up.Summary Compensation Table.

CHANGE-IN-CONTROL AGREEMENTS

77          
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     2015 Proxy Statement



Table of ContentsGENERALLY

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Change-in-Control Agreements

Generally

We have entered into change-in-control agreements with a number of key executives, including our Named Executive Officers. A Named Executive Officer will only receive the benefits provided under these agreements if:

a change in control of Norfolk Southern occurs,and
within two years of the change in control, we terminate the Named Executive Officer’s employment for any reason other than for “cause,” death, total disability or mandatory retirement, or the Named Executive Officer terminates his or her employment with us for “good reason.”

Definition of Change in ControlDEFINITION OF CHANGE IN CONTROL

Generally, under these agreements, a change in control is defined as:

a merger, sale of all or substantially all of our assets or similar fundamental transaction which results in our stockholdersshareholders holding less than 80% of the voting power of the combined company;
a stockholder-approvedshareholder-approved consolidation or dissolution pursuant to a recommendation of our Board of Directors;
a change in the composition of the Board of Directors that results in less than a majority of Board members having either (i) served on the Board for at least two years or (ii) been nominated or elected to be a director by at least two-thirds of directors who had at least two years of service at the time of the director’s nomination or election;
any person or organization acquires more than 20% of our voting stock; or
a determination by the Board that an event similar to those listed above has occurred or is imminent.

As noted below, the Named Executive Officers are entitled to accelerated payouts of amounts deferred under the Officers’ Deferred Compensation Plan and the

Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan (“EDCP”) upon a change in control. For amounts deferred after 2004 under the EDCP, only events described above that also constitute a change in control as defined in the regulations to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code will result in accelerated distribution of those amounts.

Benefits Payable Upon Termination Following a Change in ControlBENEFITS PAYABLE UPON TERMINATION FOLLOWING A CHANGE IN CONTROL

Under our change-in-control agreements, the Named Executive Officers who become entitled to the benefits under those agreementsMr. Squires and Ms. Earhart are generally entitled to receive:receive the following benefits under the change-in-control agreements:

three times their annual base salary plus incentive pay;
accrued but unpaid compensation;

Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 67www.norfolksouthern.com 

Table of Contents

Executive Compensation | 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

a cash payment for unearned performance share units awarded and as to which the performance cycle has not been completed;
completed, but excluding the value of any accelerated turnaround incentive (ATI) performance share units;
all dividend equivalents to which they would have been entitled had their employment not been terminated;
early payout of compensation that was deferred under our nonqualified deferred compensation plans and a cash payment equal to the present value of the deferred compensation that would have been payable if the participant retired at age 65, as provided by the change in controlchange-in-control agreements;
accrued pension benefits, as modified by years of service and average final compensation enhancements provided by the change-in-control agreements;
unused vacation for the year of termination, plus vacation for the following year;
continued payment of premiums on the Named Executive Officer’s life insurance policy under our Executive Life Insurance Plan as if the Named Executive Officer terminated due to retirement under the Executive Life Insurance Plan; and
continued medical and dental benefits, and $50,000 in group-term life insurance coverage, for a specified number of years but subject to termination if the Named Executive Officer receives substantially similar benefits from another employer after the termination of employment.



78
2015 Proxy Statement

     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

Prior to 2013, the Named Executive Officers were generally entitled to receive a payment in an amount sufficient to make them whole for any Federal excise tax on excess parachute payments. InSince January 2013, Norfolk Southern entered into amendments to its change-incontrolchange-in-control agreements with the Named Executive OfficersMr. Squires and Ms. Earhart to eliminate this excise tax gross-up.gross-up payments provided under the agreements.

The Compensation Committee approved a form of change-in-control agreement in 2016 which limits new severance agreements with senior executives to 2.99 times the sum of the executives’ base salary plus bonus and which does not contain a tax gross-up provision. Norfolk Southern entered into the new change-in-control agreement in 2016 with Mr. Shaw, Mr. Wheeler, and Mr. Hurlbut.

If we had terminated the Named Executive Officer’s employment for reasons described below under “Events Triggering Change in ControlChange-in-Control Payments,” these benefits would generally have been payable in a lump sum within ten business days of termination. However, any Severance Pay, Performance Share Unit Equivalent, Accelerated Dividend Equivalent, Vacation Pay and Prorata Incentive Pay would have been payable no earlier than six months after the Named Executive Officer’s termination date if the Named Executive Officer was a “Specified Employee” on his or her termination date and if the change in control was not a change in control as defined in the regulations to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. A “Specified Employee” is one of the 50 most highly compensated employees, as defined within the change in controlchange-in-control agreement. If payment of any amounts were delayed because the Named Executive Officer was a Specified Employee, the delayed payment would have been credited with interest during the period from the termination date until the benefit was distributed at 120% of the short term Applicable Federal Rate determined under section 1274(d) of the Internal Revenue Code that was in effect on the Named Executive Officer’s termination date.

Events Triggering Change in Control PaymentsEVENTS TRIGGERING CHANGE-IN-CONTROL PAYMENTS

If we terminate a Named Executive Officer’s employment with us for “cause,” we will not be required to pay the benefits provided under his or her change-in-control agreement. “Cause” is defined as any of the following if the result of the same is materially harmful to us:

an intentional act of fraud, embezzlement or theft in connection with the executive’s duties or in the course of his or her employment with us;
intentional wrongful damage to our property;
intentional wrongful disclosure of secret processes or of our confidential information; or
intentional violation of The Thoroughbred Code of Ethics or, as applicable, our Code of Ethics.Ethical Conduct for Senior Financial Officers.

Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 68www.norfolksouthern.com

Table of Contents

Executive Compensation | 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

In addition, if a Named Executive Officer terminates employment with us within two years of a change in control for any of the following “good reasons,” we are required to pay the Named Executive Officer the benefits provided under his or her change-in-control agreement:

the Named Executive Officer is not elected or reelected to the office held immediately prior to the change in control, or—ifor-if serving as a director—hedirector-he or she is removed as a director;
the Named Executive Officer’s salary or bonusannual incentive opportunity is materially reduced below the amounts in effect prior to the change in control;
we terminate or materially reduce the value or scope of the Named Executive Officer’s perquisites, benefits and service credit for benefits provided under any employee retirement income or welfare benefit policies, plans, programs or arrangements in which he or she is participating immediately prior to the change in control and which have substantial value;
the Named Executive Officer determines in good faith that following the change in control, he or she has been rendered substantially unable to carry out or has suffered a substantial reduction in any of the substantial authorities, powers, functions, responsibilities or duties attached to the position he or she held immediately prior to the change in control;
the successor to the change in control does not assume all of our duties and obligations under the change-in-control agreement;
we require that the Named Executive Officer relocate his or her principal location of work in excess of 50 miles from his or her employment location immediately prior to the change in control, or that the Named Executive Officer travel away from his or her office significantly more than was required immediately prior to the change in control; or
there is any material breach of the change-in-control agreement by us or our successor.


79          
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     2015 Proxy Statement



Table of ContentsREQUIREMENT NOT TO COMPETE

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Requirement Not to Compete

In exchange for the benefits provided under the change-in-control agreements, and to help encourage management continuity, the Named Executive Officers agreed not to engage in competing employment for a period of three years from the date they originally executed the agreements and,that if they accept benefits payable or provided under the agreements, they may not engage in competing employment for a period of one year from the date they are terminated following the change in control. “Competing employment” for this purpose is the provision of services of any type, kind or nature and in any capacity to any organization or person that is, that controls, that is controlled by, or one of whose significant customers or clients is (i) a Class I railroad operating in the United States, Canada or Mexico, (ii) an interstate trucking company operating in the United States, Canada or Mexico or (iii) a provider or arranger of intermodal services of any kind or nature, any portion of which services is provided or arranged in the United States.

RetirementRETIREMENT

As of December 31, 2014,2017, all Named Executive Officers other than Mr. SquiresMessrs. Shaw and Hurlbut were of retirement age under our retirement plans. See “Termination for Any Other Reason” below for a discussion of the benefits to which Mr. SquiresShaw or Mr. Hurlbut would have been entitled had he retiredthey terminated as of December 31, 2014. Messrs. Moorman2017. Mr. Squires, Ms. Earhart, and Manion and Ms. ButlerMr. Wheeler were eligible to retire as of December 31, 2014, with unreduced pension benefits under our retirement plans. Ms. Stewart waseach eligible to retire and choose to receive either (i) a temporary retirement benefit not to exceed $500 per month until reaching age 60, and thereafter the full amount of the accrued pension benefits disclosed in the Pension Benefits Table, or (ii) a reduced amount of the pension benefits disclosed in the Pension Benefits Table. In addition to these pension benefits, each Named Executive Officer would have been entitled to receive the deferred compensation amounts disclosed in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table. Ms. Stewart retired effective August 1, 2017, and elected a reduced amount of the pension benefits as disclosed in the Pension Benefits Table. Mr. Galanko retired effective March 1, 2018, and was eligible to receive unreduced pension benefits under our retirement plans.

Death or DisabilityDEATH OR DISABILITY

DeathDEATH

If any of the Named Executive Officers had died on December 31, 2014,2017, that Named Executive Officer’s spouse would have been eligible for the pension benefits disclosed in the Pension Benefit Table (reduced on account of the Named Executive Officer’s death) and the Named Executive Officer’s designated beneficiaries

would have been eligible for the deferred compensation benefits disclosed in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table.

Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 69www.norfolksouthern.com

Table of Contents

Executive Compensation | 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

DisabilityDISABILITY

If the Named Executive Officers had become disabled on December 31, 2014,2017, each of them other than Mr. SquiresMessrs. Shaw and Hurlbut could elect to retire and receive the benefits set forth above under “Retirement.” For Mr. SquiresMessrs. Shaw and Hurlbut and any other Named Executive Officer electing not to retire, each would be entitled to disability benefits in an amountunder the Corporation’s long-term disability plan equal to one-half of the Named Executive Officer’s base salary.salary reduced by disability, retirement or sickness benefits paid from the Railroad Retirement Board and further reduced by other qualifying benefits as provided in the long-term disability plan.

Termination for Any Other ReasonTERMINATION FOR ANY OTHER REASON

As noted above, each of the Named Executive Officers other than Mr. SquiresMessrs. Shaw and Hurlbut was eligible to retire as of December 31, 2014;2017; accordingly, had their employment been terminated by us or by them as of that date, each would have been entitled to the benefits set forth above under “Retirement.” BecauseIf Mr. SquiresShaw or Mr. Hurlbut had at least 20 years of serviceterminated employment as of December 31, 2014, had he terminated employment as of that date,2017, he would have been eligible for either (i) the full amount of his accrued pension benefit disclosed in the Pension Benefits Table beginning at age 60, or (ii) the pension benefit disclosed in the Pension Benefits Table reduced by 1/360th for each month he was under age 60 at the time of retirement, with benefits beginning at the earliest upon Mr. Squires reaching age 55.60.

In addition to these pension benefits, each Named Executive Officer would have been entitled to receive the deferred compensation benefits disclosed in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table.

We also have a Severance Pay Plan. Under the Severance Pay Plan, if a Named Executive Officer’s employment had been terminated as of December 31, 2014,2017, due to the executive’s position being abolished in connection with downsizing or internal restructuring, the Named Executive Officer would have been entitled to the following benefits:

two weeks of the executive’s annual base salary for each year of service up to a maximum of 80 weeks (but not in excess of twice the annual amount of the executive’s salary payable in the 12-month period preceding the executive’s severance date);


80
2015 Proxy Statement

     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

continued health care benefits for the executive and the executive’s eligible dependents until the earlier of (a) 12 months from the severance date, or (b) until those health care benefits would otherwise terminate under the continuation of coverage provisions of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1986, as amended (COBRA); and
outplacement assistance for up to 90 days.

If the Named Executive Officer’s employment had been terminated by us for a reason other than as described above, then the Named Executive Officer would have been entitled to one week of the executive’s annual base salary for each year of service up to a maximum of 26 weeks, with the amount capped at two times the executive’s salary paid in the 12-month period preceding the executive’s severance date. The Named Executive Officer would not have been entitled to Severance Pay Plan benefits if terminated for reasons including, without limitation, the following: indictment, conviction of, or entering a plea ofnolo contendere to any felony; commission of theft, fraud, or embezzlement, resulting in gain or personal enrichment; failure or refusal to substantially perform his or her duties for Norfolk Southern; conduct deemed so detrimental to the interests of Norfolk Southern that, in the judgment of the Plan Administrator, it should result in the termination not being deemed a severance; being unable to substantially perform his or her duties because of a physical or mental condition, including a condition that entitles him or her to benefits under any sick pay or disability income policy or program; refusing to transfer to another nonagreement position in the same department; or refusing to transfer to another nonagreement position in a different department assigned to a pay band with the same or higher bonus opportunity.

Directors’ Charitable Award Program BenefitDIRECTORS’ CHARITABLE AWARD PROGRAM BENEFIT

In addition to the benefits described above, Mr. Moorman and Mr. Squires areis entitled to nominate one or more tax-exempt institutions to receive up to $500,000 from Norfolk Southern following theirhis death. We continue to pay the life insurance premiums we use to partly fund this program. See “Narrative to Non-Employee“Non-Employee Director Compensation Table—Directors’Table-Directors’ Charitable Award Program” above for more information regarding this program.

Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 70www.norfolksouthern.com

Table of Contents

Executive Compensation | 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

Non-CompetitionNON-COMPETITION

In addition to restrictions imposed under our change-in-control agreements, awards under LTIP were—beginningwere-beginning in 2006—made2006-made subject to forfeiture in the event the Named Executive Officer “engages in competing employment” for a period of time following termination. For these purposes, “engages in competing employment” means working for or providing services to any of our competitors in North American markets in which we compete.

Future Severance Benefits PolicyFUTURE SEVERANCE BENEFITS POLICY

In 2002, our Board of Directors agreed to abide by a stockholdershareholder approved proposal that future severance agreements with senior executives that exceed 2.99 times the sum of the executive’s base salary plus bonus require stockholdershareholder approval.

COMPENSATION POLICY
RISK ASSESSMENT

The Committee has assessed the risks arising from Norfolk Southern’s compensation policies and practices for all employees to determine whether such policies or practices are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the company.Corporation. As part of this assessment, in 2015,2018, the Committee engaged Pay Governance to conduct a compensation risk analysis and report its findings to the Committee. Based on the observations and findings of Pay Governance’s assessment, as well as its own considerations, the Committee determined that Norfolk Southern’s compensation policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the company.Corporation.

PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE
The ratio of the annual compensation of James A. Squires, our Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman (our “CEO”) to the median annual compensation of our other employees in 2017 is 130 to 1. The determination of the median employee is an estimate, and other companies may use different methodologies and assumptions in determining the median employee. The pay ratio for other companies may not be comparable to the ratio we present due to different methodologies and assumptions, different employee populations, and different compensation structures.

We used the following methodology to identify the estimated median employee, to determine the median employee’s annual compensation, and to determine annual compensation for our CEO:

We determined the gross compensation before pre-tax deductions for each of the 26,531 U.S. employees of Norfolk Southern Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries as recorded in our payroll records as of November 1, 2017, excluding our CEO and our non-U.S. employees. The excluded non-U.S. employees consisted of 9 employees with primary residences or work locations in Canada, 3 employees in Mexico, and 1 employee in Switzerland, and they in aggregate represent less than 0.1% of our total population of 26,544 employees on November 1, 2017.
From these results, we identified the median employee. The terms and conditions of the median employee’s employment, including the rate of the employee’s pay and benefits, were established under a collectively bargaining agreement negotiated between Norfolk Southern Corporation and a labor union. Approximately 80% of our employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements with various labor unions.
We then calculated each element of the median employee’s compensation for 2017 in accordance with the SEC rules for reporting compensation in the Summary Compensation Table of the proxy. Under this calculation, the median of the annual total compensation of all employees of the company, other than our CEO, was $91,791. We included in this calculation the value of the employer-provided health and welfare benefits provided under the Railroad Employees National Health and Welfare Plan, a collectively bargained multiemployer plan.
For the annual total compensation of Mr. Squires, we used the amount reported in the “total” column (column (j)) of our Summary Compensation Table included in our Proxy Statement, but increased that total by $18,280 to include the value of Mr. Squires’ employer-provided health and welfare benefits so as to maintain consistency between the annual total compensation of our CEO and the median employee. This resulted in annual compensation of $11,955,417 for Mr. Squires for purposes of determining the pay ratio. Information about the objectives of our executive compensation program and the process that the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors used to establish Mr. Squires’ compensation for 2017, including the Committee’s engagement of an independent compensation consultant to assist in determining the appropriate level of pay, can be found in our “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section which begins on page 32.

81          Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 71www.norfolksouthern.com
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION 2015 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

Shareholder Proposals| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

ITEM  STOCKHOLDERSHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL DEADLINESREGARDING RIGHT TO ACT BY WRITTEN CONSENT
4

John Chevedden, whose address is 2215 Nelson Avenue, Redondo Beach, California, has notified the Corporation of his intention to present the proposal printed below for shareholder consideration at the Annual Meeting. Mr. Chevedden has furnished evidence of his ownership of 50 shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock, which he has owned for at least one year prior to the date he submitted his proposal.

We have printed verbatim the text of Mr. Chevedden’s proposal and his supporting statement. His proposal will be voted on at the Annual Meeting only if it is properly presented by or on behalf of Mr. Chevedden.

The Board of Directors unanimously opposes the proposal for the reasons set forth in the “Board of Directors’ Statement in Opposition,” which appears directly after Mr. Chevedden’s supporting statement.

Text of Mr. Chevedden’s proposal and supporting statement:

Proposal [4] - Right to Act by Written Consent

Resolved, Shareholders request that our board of directors undertake such steps as may be necessary to permit written consent by shareholders entitled to cast the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize the action at a meeting at which all shareholders entitled to vote thereon were present and voting. This written consent is to be consistent with applicable law and consistent with giving shareholders the fullest power to act by written consent consistent with applicable law. This includes shareholder ability to initiate any topic for written consent consistent with applicable law.

This proposal topic won majority shareholder support at 13 major companies in a single year. This included 67%-support at both Allstate and Sprint. Hundreds of major companies enable shareholder action by written consent.

Taking action by written consent in lieu of a meeting is a means shareholders can use to raise important matters outside the normal annual meeting cycle. A shareholder right to act by written consent and to call a special meeting are 2 complimentary ways to bring an important matter to the attention of both management and shareholders outside the annual meeting cycle. Taking action by written consent saves the expense of holding a special shareholder meeting.

Our company requires 20% of shares to aggregate their holdings to call a special meeting - a higher level than the 10% of shares permitted by many states of incorporation. Dozens of Fortune 500 companies provide for both shareholder rights - to act by written consent and to call a special meeting. Our higher 20% threshold for shareholders to call a special meeting is one more reason that we should have the right to act by written consent.

Please vote to enhance shareholder oversight of management:
Right to Act by Written Consent - Proposal [4]

Board of Directors’ Statement in Opposition

Your Board has carefully considered this proposal on the right to act by written consent and believes it is not in the best interests of shareholders. We recommend that you vote against this proposal for the reasons discussed below.

Our shareholders already have the right to call a special meeting and to submit shareholder proposals for consideration at the annual shareholders meeting.

Norfolk Southern shareholders already have the right “to raise important matters outside the normal annual meeting cycle.” Under our Company’s Bylaws, holders of 20% of the outstanding shares of our common stock can call a special meeting of shareholders. This is a shareholder meeting held in addition to our annual meeting of shareholders. A special meeting allows you, your Board, and management to discuss concerns and allows you to make an informed vote.

Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 72www.norfolksouthern.com
 


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation CommitteeTable of Contents

Shareholder Proposals| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

Notably, and contrary to Mr. Chevedden’s stated belief, Norfolk Southern’s 20% threshold for calling a special meeting is reasonable and, in fact, is lower than the threshold at many S&P 500 companies. A majority of companies that have adopted provisions giving shareholders the ability to call special meetings have adopted the same or higher thresholds.

Mr. Chevedden indicates that “taking action by written consent saves the expense of holding a special shareholder meeting.” This statement is not correct. Shareholder action by written consent still imposes meaningful costs on the Company related to the significant time and attention the Board and management will spend reviewing and responding to the written consent proposal. Further, we believe administrative costs related to holding a special meeting to consider a shareholder proposal are warranted to ensure that all shareholders, and not just those conducting the solicitation, have the ability to express their views on the proposal being considered. We believe that this is an important shareholder protection that shareholders should not give up.

Norfolk Southern shareholders also have the right to submit shareholder proposals in accordance with our BoardBylaws and Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of Directors oversees1934, as amended, for consideration at our compensation program on behalfannual shareholder meetings.

Action by written consent does not ensure all shareholders have the opportunity to express their views.

Unlike at a special (or annual) meeting of shareholders, Mr. Chevedden’s proposal would enable a group of shareholders to take action without their fellow shareholders being protected by processes associated with a shareholder meeting. As proposed, action by written consent could be taken:

without a known place and time for the proposal to be voted on that is publicly announced in advance, giving all shareholders a chance to express their views and cast their votes; and,
without a forum for open discussion and consideration of the proposed stockholder action by written consent.

In other words, action by written consent may be taken without you and all of your fellow shareholders being provided with an opportunity for full discussion of the Board. issues that are the subject of the written consent. This includes action that is significant in nature, such as replacing some (or even all) of your directors or acting on a proposal to sell our company, all without a shareholder meeting to consider the merits or consequences of that action.

In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities,addition, you may not be provided with an opportunity to raise an objection or to vote on the Compensation Committee reviewedproposed action if the group advocating for the proposed action has the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize the action by written consent. In other words, they may not contact you to discuss the proposal because they do not need your support. The group of shareholders acting by written consent could consist of only a small group of Norfolk Southern’s larger shareholders who are under no obligation to consider the rights or interests of their fellow shareholders. Additionally, members of the group acting by written consent only need to own their Norfolk Southern shares on the day they deliver their consent. These members could borrow shares for that day without making a longer-term economic investment in Norfolk Southern.

Your Board has demonstrated a commitment to corporate governance best practices.

Your Board carefully considers the appropriateness of evolving corporate governance practices and discussed with managementhas adopted policies that ensure shareholders have significant rights and protections. Among our best practice governance policies are the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth infollowing:

Annual election of each member of the Board of Directors and a director majority voting policy;
A director resignation policy that requires any director who does not receive a majority of the votes cast for their election to tender his or her resignation;
A clear mechanism that enables shareholders to communicate directly with the Board and an active shareholder outreach and engagement program;
A proxy access bylaw provision;
Ongoing review and refreshment of Board membership;
Robust lead independent director duties;
A special meeting bylaw provision; and
An annual say-on-pay vote.
Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 73www.norfolksouthern.com

Table of Contents

Shareholder Proposals| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

More information about our governance practices is provided on pages 11-23 of this proxy statement.

In reliance onWe firmly believe that our existing corporate governance practices strike the reviewright balance and discussions referredensure shareholders have appropriate means to above, the Compensation Committee recommendedexpress their views to the Board and fellow shareholders.

After careful consideration, we believe this proposal on written consent is not in the best interests of shareholders.

For the reasons stated above, the Board of Directors unanimously recommends that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, and our proxy statement to be filed in connection with our 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, each of which will be filed with the SEC.

2014 Members of the Compensation Committee
Daniel A. Carp,Chair
you vote AGAINST this proposal.
Thomas D. Bell, Jr.,Member
Erskine B. Bowles,Member
Wesley G. Bush,Member
Steven F. Leer,Member

STOCKHOLDERSHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL DEADLINES
StockholdersShareholders are entitled to submit proposals on matters appropriate for stockholdershareholder action consistent with SEC regulations and with our Bylaws. Any such proposal for the 20162019 Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders must comply with applicable regulations and bereceivedby the Corporate Secretary, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Three Commercial Place, 13th Floor, Norfolk, Virginia 23510-9219, as follows:

To be eligible for inclusion in our proxy statement and form of proxy, stockholdershareholder proposals must be received no later than November 26, 2015;21, 2018; or to be eligible to be presented from the floor for vote at the meeting (but not intended for inclusion in our proxy materials), stockholdershareholder proposals must be received during the period that begins December 6, 2015,1, 2018, and ends February 14, 2016.9, 2019.

SHAREHOLDER RECOMMENDATIONS AND NOMINATIONS

The Governance and Nominating Committee will consider director candidates recommended by shareholders. Any such recommendation should include:

By orderbiographical information on the candidate, including all positions held as an employee, officer, partner, director or ten percent owner of all organizations, whether for profit or not-for-profit, and other relevant experience;
a description of any relationship between the candidate and the recommending shareholder;
a statement requesting that the Board consider nominating the individual for election as a director;
written consent of the Boardproposed candidate to being named as a nominee; and
proof of the recommending shareholder’s stock ownership.

Recommendations by shareholders must be in writing and addressed to the Chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee, c/o Corporate Secretary, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Three Commercial Place, 13th Floor, Norfolk, Virginia 23510-9219. To ensure that the Governance and Nominating Committee will have adequate time to consider all candidates,shareholder recommendations must be received no later than November 21, 2018, in order to be considered for nomination for election at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

A shareholder may directly nominate an individual for election as director instead of (or in addition to) recommending a candidate for the Governance and Nominating Committee’s consideration. Unless allowed under our “Proxy Access for Director Nominations” bylaw provision, which was adopted by our Board in 2016, or required by SEC regulations, shareholder nominees will not appear in our proxy statement or on the proxy card for the annual meeting. Our proxy access bylaw provision permits a group of shareholders holding 3% of our outstanding shares for at least 3 years, and who otherwise comply with the Corporation’s Bylaws, to nominate up to 20% of the Board of Directors (with a minimum of 2 nominees), with up to 20 shareholders permitted to aggregate their holdings to reach the 3% threshold.

Shareholders wishing to nominate an individual for election as a director at an annual meeting must comply with our “Nominations of Directors” Bylaw provision. A copy of our Bylaws is available on our website, www.norfolksouthern.com, on the “Invest in NS” page under “Governance Documents.” For such nominations to be eligible for inclusion on the ballot at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the nominations must comply with the “Nomination of Directors” Bylaw provision and must be received during the period that begins December 1, 2018, and ends February 9, 2019.

Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 74www.norfolksouthern.com
  
DENISE W. HUTSON
Corporate Secretary

82
2015 Proxy Statement

     NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION     



Table of Contents

Norfolk Southern Corporation

Our Vision
Be the safest,
most customer-focused and successful
transportation company in the world


2014 Annual Report


2015 Proxy Shareholder Online Voting
(Registered Stockholders)


2015 Proxy Shareholder Online Voting
(Beneficial Stockholders)



Table of Contents

Appendix A

NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN
AS AMENDED SUBJECT TO SHAREHOLDER APPROVAL

Section I. PURPOSE OF THE PLAN

It is the purpose of the Norfolk Southern Corporation Executive Management Incentive Plan (“Plan”) to enhance increased profitability for Norfolk Southern Corporation (“Corporation”) by rewarding certain officers elected by the Board of Directors of Norfolk Southern Corporation and its affiliates with a bonus for collectively striving to attain and surpass financial objectives. The Corporation intends that the Plan comply with the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Code”) and intends that compensation paid under the Plan qualify as performance-based compensation under Code Section 162(m). Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, the Corporation reserves the right to pay compensation under the Plan that does not qualify as performance-based compensation under Code Section 162(m), as circumstances may warrant.

Section II. ADMINISTRATION OF THE PLAN

The Compensation Committee or any other committee of the Board of Directors of Norfolk Southern Corporation which is authorized to determine bonus awards under the Plan (“Committee”) shall administer and interpret this Plan and, from time to time, adopt such rules and regulations and make such recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning Plan changes as are deemed necessary to insure effective implementation of this Plan. It is intended that each member of the Committee qualify as an Outside Directors (as defined in Treasury Regulation § 1.162-27(e)(3)) and as an “independent director” under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange. No executive may simultaneously participate in more than one Norfolk Southern Corporation Incentive Group. An executive must reside in the United States or Canada in order to participate in the Plan.

Section III. ESTABLISHMENT OF PERFORMANCE STANDARDS

Not later than the first 90 days of an incentive year, the Committee shall establish:

A.The Incentive Groups for the incentive year, which Groups shall consist of Board-elected officers at the level of Vice President and above,
B.The bonus level for each Incentive Group for the incentive year, and
C.The performance standard or standards for the Corporation for the incentive year, the outcome of which must be substantially uncertain at the time the standard or standards are established. The performance standards shall be based on one or more, or any combination, of the following business criteria, selected by the Committee, which may be applied on a corporate, department or division level, which may be measured on an absolute or relative basis, or established as a measure of growth: earnings measures (including net income, earnings per share, income from continuing operations, income before income taxes, income from railway operations); return measures (including net income divided by total assets, return on shareholder equity, return on average invested capital); service measures (including connection performance, train performance, plan adherence); cash flow measures (including operating cash flow, free cash flow); productivity measures (including total operating expense per thousand gross ton miles or revenue ton miles, total operating revenue per employee, total operating expense per employee, gross ton miles or revenue ton miles per employee, carloads per employee, revenue ton miles per mile of road operated, total operating expense per carload, revenue ton miles per carload, gross ton miles or revenue ton miles per train hour, percent of loaded-to-total car miles,


Table of Contents

Shareholder Proposals| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

As described in the Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Governance and Nominating Committee considers potential candidates to be nominated for election as directors, whether recommended by a shareholder, director, member of management or consultant retained to identify, evaluate and recommend potential candidates for election to the Board. The Governance and Nominating Committee reviews the current biography of the potential candidate and additional information provided by the individual or group that recommended the candidate for consideration. The Governance and Nominating Committee fully considers the qualifications of all candidates including how the nominee will contribute to the diversity of the Board, and recommends the nomination of individuals who, in the Governance and Nominating Committee’s judgment, will best serve the long-term interests of all shareholders. In the judgment of the Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board, all director nominees recommended by the Governance and Nominating Committee should, at a minimum:

network performance); fair market valuebe of shares of the Corporation's Common Stock; revenue measures; expense measures; operating ratio measures; customer satisfaction measures; working capital measures; cost control measures; economic value added measures;high ethical character and safety measures. If the Committee establishes performance standards using more than one of the aforesaid business criteria, the Committee shall assign a weighting percentage to each business criterion or combination thereof; the sum of the weighting percentages shall equal 100%.have personal and professional reputations consistent with our image and reputation;
have experience as senior executives of public companies or leaders of large organizations, including charitable and governmental organizations, or have other experience at a strategy or policy setting level that would be beneficial to us;
be able to represent all of our shareholders in an objective and impartial manner; and
The Committee may establish performance standards solely with respecthave time available to the Corporation’s performance without regarddevote to the performance of other Corporations or indices, or by comparison of the Corporation’s performance to the performance of a published or special index deemed applicable by the Committee including but not limited to, the Standard & Poor's 500 Stock Index or an index based on a group of comparative companies.board activities.

Section IV. TYPE OF INCENTIVE BONUS

On or before a date which shall not be later thanIt is the date that is six months prior to the last dayintent of the incentive year to whichGovernance and Nominating Committee and the performance standards established pursuant to Section III apply for any incentive bonusBoard that at least one director on the Board will qualify as an “audit committee financial expert,” as that term is performance-based compensation, as defined in Code Section 409A, and which shall not be later than the last dayregulations of the year prior to the incentive year to which the performance standards established pursuant to Section III apply for any incentive bonus that is not performance-based compensation, as defined in Code Section 409A, each participant must elect to receive any incentive bonus which may be awarded to him or her for the incentive year either 100% cash or deferred in whole or in part. If the participant elects to receive 100% cash, the entire amount of the bonus for the incentive year shall be distributed to the participant, or to his or her estate in the event of the participant’s death, on or before March 1 of the year following the incentive year. If deferred in whole or in part, the amount deferred shall be allocated to the Norfolk Southern Corporation Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan (and such deferrals will be governed by the provisions of that plan) on or before March 1 of the year following the incentive year and the remainder, if any, shall be distributed in cash to the participant, or to his or her estate in the event of the participant’s death, on or before March 2 of the year following the incentive year.SEC.

Failure on the part of the participant to elect a deferral by the date specified, either in whole or in part for the incentive year, shall be deemed to constitute an election by such participant to receive the entire incentive bonus for the incentive year as a cash bonus.

Section V. BONUS AWARDSOTHER MATTERS

At the end of the incentive year, the Committee shall certify in writing to what extent the performance standards established pursuant to Section III have been achieved during the incentive year and shall determine the Corporate Performance Factor based on such achievement. In determining the Corporate Performance Factor, special charges and restructuring charges, and unusual or infrequent accounting adjustments which are significant, and restatements or reclassifications, all as determined in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, which would have the effect of reducing the Corporate Performance Factor shall be excluded, and which would have the effect of increasing the Corporate Performance Factor shall be included, unless the Committee shall determine otherwise. The Committee shall further have the discretion, in determining whether the Corporate Performance Factor has been achieved, to include or exclude the any of the following events: (a) litigation, claims, judgments, settlements or loss contingencies, (b) the effect of changes in tax law, accounting principles or other such laws or provisions affecting reported results, or (c) accruals of any amounts for payment under this Plan or any other compensation arrangement maintained by the Corporation.

Each participant shall be eligible to receive a bonus award equal to the product of the Corporate Performance Factor times the participant’s bonus level times the participant’s total salary paid during the incentive year. The Committee may review the performance of any of the Corporation’s Covered Employees, as defined in Code Section 162(m), and may, at its discretion, reduce the bonus award that is paid to any such



Table of Contents

Covered Employee. The Corporation’s chief executive officer may review the performance of any participant who is not a Covered Employee and may, at his discretion, reduce or increase the bonus award that is paid to any such participant, provided that any increase shall not exceed 25 percent of the amount calculated under the first sentence of this paragraph. The bonus award payable to a participant for an incentive year shall not exceed the lesser of: (1) three tenths of one percent (0.3%) of the Corporation’s income from railway operations for the incentive year; or (2) $10,000,000.

If the employment of a participant who is employed by Norfolk Southern Corporation or its affiliates during the incentive year terminates prior to the end of such year by reason of (1) death, or (2) normal retirement, early retirement or total disability under applicable Norfolk Southern Corporation plans and policies, then the phrase "total salary paid during the incentive year" means base salary paid to the participant during that portion of such year of employment prior to his or her termination and through the end of the calendar month or payroll period in which employment terminates but excludes any cash paid with respect to such participant's unused vacation. No incentive bonus for any incentive year shall be awarded or paid to any participant whose employment with Norfolk Southern Corporation and all its affiliates terminates before the end of such incentive year for a reason other than one of those specifically stated in the preceding sentence.

If a participant becomes eligible for the Plan during the year or becomes eligible for a different Incentive Group, then the amount of the award shall be adjusted proportionally to reflect such changes.

Section VI. REIMBURSEMENT OF EXCESS BONUS TO CORPORATION

The Board of Directors may require reimbursementdoes not know of allany other matters to be presented at the 2018 Annual Meeting, other than as noted elsewhere in this proxy statement. If other matters are properly brought for a vote before the 2018 Annual Meeting or at any portion of an excess bonus paid under the Plan if (a) financial results are restated duepostponement or adjournment thereof, your proxy gives authority to the material noncompliance of the Corporation with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, and (b) an excess bonus was distributed within the three-year period prior to the date the applicable restatement was disclosed. For this purpose, “excess bonus” means the positive difference, if any, between (i) the bonus paid to the participant and (ii) the bonus that would have been paid to the participant had the bonus been calculatedpersons named as proxies on the correct Corporate Performance Factor using the restated financial results. The Corporation will not be requiredproxy card or voting instruction form to award an additional bonus to a participant if a restated Corporate Performance Factor would result in a higher bonus payment.

Any bonus to a participant under this Plan is subject to reduction, forfeiture, or recoupment to the extent provided under Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, or as may be provided under any other applicable law.

Section VII. NO GUARANTEE OF CONTINUANCE OF EMPLOYMENT

Nothing contained in this Plan or in any designation of a participant hereunder shall constitute or be deemed to constitute any evidence of an agreement or obligationvote on the part of Norfolk Southern Corporation or its affiliates to continue to employ any such participant for any period whatsoever.

Section VIII. AMENDMENT TO AND TERMINATION OF PLAN

This Plan may be amended by written action of the chief executive officer of the Corporation to effect changes which are, in his or her sole judgment and discretion, ministerial, substantively administrative, or necessary to comply with statutory or other legally mandated requirements, and the implementation of which does not result in a material cost to the Corporation. All other amendments to this Plan shall be made by resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors. This Plan may be amended in any manner or terminated at any time, except that no such amendment or termination shall deprive a participant of any rights hereunder theretofore legally accrued, and no such termination shall be effective for the year in which the Board of Directors adopts a resolution terminating this Plan.



Table of Contents

Section IX. FUNDING SOURCE

All amounts that are payable under this Plan shall be paid for from the general assets of the Corporation. There is no trust or other fund from which amounts under this Plan shall be paid.

Section X. GOVERNING LAW

This Plan shall be construed, administered and enforced according to the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, to the extent not superseded by the Code or other federal law.

Section XI. NON-ASSIGNABILITY OF BENEFITS

A participant’s right to receive a payment hereunder is not subject in any manner to anticipation, allocation, sale, transfer, assignment, pledge, encumbrance or charge, and any attempt to accomplish any of these acts shall be void.



Table of Contents

Appendix B

NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
AS AMENDED SUBJECT TO SHAREHOLDER APPROVAL

Section 1. PURPOSE

The purpose of the Long-Term Incentive Plan (“Plan”), as amended, is to promote the success of Norfolk Southern Corporation (the “Corporation”) and to provide an opportunity for non-employee directors, officers and other employees of the Corporation and its Subsidiary Companies (as hereinafter defined) to acquire or increase a proprietary interest in the Corporation and thereby to provide an additional incentive to devote their maximum efforts and skills to the advancement, betterment, and prosperity of the Corporation and its stockholders. The Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, performance share units, performance shares, restricted shares, and restricted stock units,matters in accordance with their best judgment. The Chairman may refuse to allow the terms and conditions set forth below. The Corporation intends thatpresentation of a proposal or a nomination for the Plan comply withBoard at the requirements of Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) and applicable treasury regulations thereunder and intends that compensation paid under the Plan qualify as performance-based compensation under Code Section 162(m). Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, the Corporation reserves the right to pay compensation under the Plan that doesAnnual Meeting if it is not qualify as performance-based compensation under Code Section 162(m), as circumstances may warrant. The Plan, as amended, is intended, and shall be construed, to comply with the requirements of Code Section 409A.

Section 2. DEFINITIONSproperly submitted.

The terms used herein shall have the following meanings unless otherwise specified or unless a different meaning is clearly required by the context:

AwardAny one or more of the following: Incentive Stock Option; Non-qualified Stock Option; Stock Appreciation Right; Restricted Shares; Restricted Stock Units; Performance Share Units; and Performance Shares.
Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 75www.norfolksouthern.com 

Award Agreement

A written agreement, made in a form approved by the Committee and consistent with the terms of the Plan, that specifies the terms, conditions and limitations of each Award.

 

Award Date

The later of the date on which the Committee or the chief executive officer (to the extent as may be delegated by the Committee) grants an Award or, if granted during a blackout period, the first day of the subsequent trading window during which officers of the Corporation and Subsidiary Companies are permitted to trade in Norfolk Southern Corporation Common Stock under the Corporation’s insider trading policy.

Beneficiary

The person or persons designated in writing by the Participant as his Beneficiary in respect of Awards or, in the absence of such a designation or if the designated person or persons predecease the Participant, the person or persons who shall acquire the Participant’s rights in respect of Awards by bequest or inheritance in accordance with the applicable laws of descent and distribution. In order to be effective, a Participant’s designation of a Beneficiary must be on file with the Corporation before the Participant’s death. Any such designation may be revoked and a new designation substituted for the revoked designation by the Participant at any time before his death without the consent of the previously designated Beneficiary.





Table of Contents

Stock Ownership Information| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATION

Applicable SEC rules require that we furnish you the following information relating to the oversight and management of Norfolk Southern and to certain matters concerning our Board of Directors and officers who are designated by our Board of Directors as executive officers for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Executive Officers”).

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF STOCK
Based solely on our records and our review of the most recent Schedule 13G filings with the SEC, the following tables show information concerning the persons or groups known to Norfolk Southern to be beneficial owners of more than five percent of our common stock, our only class of voting securities:

Title of ClassName and Address of Beneficial OwnerAmount and
DirectorsNature of
Beneficial
Ownership
Percent of
Class
CommonThe Vanguard Group120,863,00017.29%1
Stock100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355
CommonBlackrock, Inc.220,925,02127.3%2
Stock55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055
1The BoardVanguard Group reported in its Schedule 13G filing that it beneficially owned 7.29% of Directorsour common stock as of December 31, 2017, and that as of that date it had sole voting power with respect to 444,192 of these shares, shared voting power with respect to 91,163 of these shares, sole investment power with respect to 20,379,814 of these shares, and shared investment power with respect to 483,186 of these shares.
2Blackrock, Inc. reported in its Schedule 13G filing that it beneficially owned 7.3% of our common stock as of December 31, 2017, and that as of that date, it had sole voting power with respect to 17,708,595 of these shares, shared voting power with respect to none of these shares, and sole investment power with respect to all of these shares.

The following table shows, as of February 1, 2018, the beneficial ownership of our common stock for:

     (1)     each director and each nominee;
     (2)our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer, our interim principal financial officer, our former principal financial officer who retired during the year, and each of the Corporation.other three most highly compensated Executive Officers based on total compensation for 2017 (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”); and
     (3)all directors and Executive Officers as a group.

Unless otherwise indicated by footnote to the table, all such shares are held with sole voting and investment power, and no director or Executive Officer beneficially owns any Norfolk Southern equity securities other than our common stock. Each individual director and each Executive Officer, as well as all the directors and Executive Officers together as a group, beneficially own less than 1% of the shares of our common stock outstanding as of February 1, 2018.

NameShares of
Common Stock
NameShares of
Common Stock
Thomas D. Bell, Jr.21,3911Jennifer F. Scanlon01
Erskine B. Bowles3,4771James A. Squires199,5922
Wesley G. Bush15,8911John R. Thompson9,9421
Daniel A. Carp39,1101Cynthia C. Earhart85,7683
Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr.1,4071Alan H. Shaw15,6264
Marcela E. Donadio1,4341Michael J. Wheeler14,6285
Steven F. Leer73,4961Thomas E. Hurlbut10,5226
Michael D. Lockhart3,7321William A. Galanko32,3667
Amy E. Miles9,7981Marta R. Stewart111,9338
Martin H. Nesbitt9,7981
19 directors and Executive Officers as a group (including the persons named above)659,9109
Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 76www.norfolksouthern.com 

Cash-Settled Stock
Appreciation Rights

Stock Appreciation Rights settled in cash.

 

Code

The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.

Committee

The Compensation Committee or any other committee of the Board of Directors which is authorized to grant Awards under this Plan. It is intended that each member of the Committee shall qualify as (a) a “non-employee director” under Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (b) an “outside director” under Code Section 162(m), and (c) an “independent director” under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange. If it is later determined that one or more members of the Committee do not qualify as a “non-employee director” under Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, actions taken by the Committee prior to such determination shall be valid despite such failure to qualify.

Common Stock

The Common Stock of the Corporation.

Disability

A disability that has enabled the Participant to receive a disability benefit under the Long-Term Disability Plan of the Corporation or a long-term disability plan of a Subsidiary Company (whichever is applicable), as amended from time to time, for a period of at least three months.

For a Participant who is a non-employee director, “Disability” means any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that is expected to result in death or to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months and which prevents a Participant from continuing to serve as a non-employee director.

Dividend Equivalent

An amount equal to the regular quarterly dividend paid in accordance with the Corporation’s normal dividend payment practice as may be determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion, and granted pursuant to Section 13 of the Plan.

Executive Officers

Officers designated by the Board of Directors as “Executive Officers” for purposes of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Exercise Gain Shares

With respect to a Stock Appreciation Right, all of the shares of Common Stock received upon exercise of the Stock Appreciation Right. With respect to an Option, the portion of the shares of Common Stock received upon exercise of the Option equal to the excess of the Fair Market Value, as of the exercise date, over the Option price, multiplied by the number of shares purchased under the Option on the exercise date, divided by such Fair Market Value, and rounded down to the nearest whole number of shares.

Fair Market Value

The value of Common Stock on a particular date as measured by the mean of the high and low prices at which it is traded on such date as reported in the Composite Transactions for such date by Bloomberg L.P., or its successor, on its internet-based service, or, if Common Stock was not traded on such date, on the next preceding day on which Common Stock was traded.

Incentive Stock
Option

An Option that complies with the terms and conditions set forth in Section 422(b) of the Code and is designated by the Committee as an Incentive Stock Option.





Table of Contents

Non-Qualified Stock Ownership Information| 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

Option
1An Option grantedFor directors elected to the Board before January 2015, includes a one-time grant of 3,000 restricted shares to each non-employee director when that director was first elected to the Board. These grants were made pursuant to the Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan; the director may vote these shares, but has no investment power over them until they are distributed. The amounts reported also include restricted stock units which are vested and would be distributable within 60 days of a director leaving the Board: Mr. Bell, 18,391; Mr. Bowles, 0; Mr. Bush, 9,502; Mr. Carp, 35,219; Mr. Daniels, 1,407; Ms. Donadio, 1,407; Mr. Leer, 70,496; Mr. Lockhart, 0; Ms. Miles, 6,798; Mr. Nesbitt, 6,798; Ms. Scanlon, 0; and Mr. Thompson, 6,798. These restricted stock units will be settled in stock. While the directors have neither voting power nor investment power over the shares underlying these restricted stock units, the directors are entitled to receive the shares immediately upon leaving the Board. See “Non-Employee Director Compensation Table - Long-Term Incentive Plan” for more information regarding these restricted stock units. The amounts reported also include the following shares over which the identified director has shared voting and investment power through family trusts or other accounts: Mr. Bush, 3,000 and Ms. Donadio, 27. The amounts reported also include shares credited to certain directors’ accounts in a Dividend Reinvestment Plan. The amounts reported do not include 1,000 restricted stock units awarded pursuant to the Long-Term Incentive Plan to directors who were serving on the Board on January 25, 2018, which will ultimately be settled in shares of common stock upon the satisfaction of applicable vesting requirements but which do not vest within 60 days of February 1, 2018. In addition, the amounts reported do not include restricted stock units awarded under the Long-Term Incentive Plan other than an Incentive Stock Option.for Mr. Bowles and Mr. Lockhart, which units will ultimately be settled in shares of common stock; because Mr. Bowles and Mr. Lockhart have each elected to have those awards distributed in ten annual installments beginning in the January after he ceases to be a director, the stock would not be issuable within 60 days of February 1, 2018 and thus is not considered common stock that is beneficially owned for SEC disclosure purposes.
2Includes 153 shares credited to Mr. Squires’ account in our Thrift and Investment Plan; 90,290 shares subject to stock options granted pursuant to our Long-Term Incentive Plan with respect to which Mr. Squires has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days; and 42,089 shares owned by an immediate family member and attributable to Mr. Squires.
3Includes 25,790 shares subject to stock options granted pursuant to our Long-Term Incentive Plan with respect to which Ms. Earhart has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days; and 322 shares owned by a person whose ownership may be attributable to Ms. Earhart.
4Includes 1,646 shares credited to Mr. Shaw’s account in our Thrift and Investment Plan; and 9,210 shares subject to stock options granted pursuant to our Long-Term Incentive Plan with respect to which Mr. Shaw has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days.
5Includes 29 shares credited to Mr. Wheeler’s account in our Thrift and Investment Plan; and 2,760 shares subject to stock options granted pursuant to our Long-Term Incentive Plan with respect to which Mr. Wheeler has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days.
6Includes 5,522 shares subject to stock options granted pursuant to our Long-Term Incentive Plan with respect to which Mr. Hurlbut has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days.
7Includes 15,660 shares subject to stock options granted pursuant to our Long-Term Incentive Plan with respect to which Mr. Galanko has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days.
8Includes 2,818 shares credited to Ms. Stewart’s account in our Thrift and Investment Plan; 68,780 shares subject to stock options granted pursuant to our Long-Term Incentive Plan with respect to which Ms. Stewart has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days; and 3,566 shares over which Ms. Stewart shares voting and investment power.
9Includes 4,646 shares credited to Executive Officers’ individual accounts under our Thrift and Investment Plan. Also includes: 218,012 shares subject to stock options granted to Executive Officers pursuant to our Long-Term Incentive Plan with respect to which the participant has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days; 42,089 shares owned by a family member whose ownership is attributed to an Executive Officer; 322 shares owned by a person whose ownership may be attributable to an Executive Officer; and 3,566 shares over which an Executive Officer shares voting and investment power. For officers, this amount does not include restricted stock units which will ultimately be settled in shares of common stock upon the satisfaction of applicable vesting requirements but which do not vest within 60 days.

Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 77www.norfolksouthern.com 

Option

Any option to purchase Common Stock granted pursuant to the provisions of Section 6 or Section 7 of the Plan.

 

Optionee

A Participant who is the holder of an Option.

Participant

A person eligible to participate in the Plan who is granted and accepts an Award under the Plan.

Performance Cycle

The period of time, designated by the Committee but not less than one year, over which Performance Shares may be earned.

Performance
Criteria

One or more, or any combination, of the following business criteria, selected by the Committee, which may be applied on a corporate, department or division level, and which may be measured on an absolute or relative basis, or established as a measure of growth: earnings measures (including net income, earnings per share, income from continuing operations, income before income taxes, income from railway operations); return measures (including net income divided by total assets, return on shareholder equity, return on average invested capital); cash flow measures (including operating cash flow and free cash flow); productivity measures (including total operating expense per thousand gross ton miles or revenue ton miles, total operating revenue per employee, total operating expense per employee, gross ton miles or revenue ton miles per employee, carloads per employee, revenue ton miles per mile of road operated, total operating expense per carload, revenue ton miles per carload, gross ton miles or revenue ton miles per train hour, percent of loaded-to-total car miles, network performance); fair market value of shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock; revenue measures; expense measures; operating ratio measures; customer satisfaction measures; working capital measures; cost control measures; total shareholder return measures; economic value added measures; and safety measures.

Performance
Criteria Weighting
Percentage

The percentage weighting accorded to each Performance Criterion (or each combination thereof) selected by the Committee. The total of the Performance Criteria Weighting Percentages for any type of Award shall equal one hundred percent (100%).

Performance Goal

The specific target set by the Committee for each selected Performance Criterion (or each combination thereof) the outcome of which must be substantially uncertain at the time it is established. A Performance Goal may be set solely with respect to the Corporation’s performance, or as compared to the performance of a published or special index deemed applicable by the Committee, including but not limited to the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index or an index based on a group of comparative companies. If a Performance Goal is based on the Corporation’s common stock, then in the event of a recapitalization, stock split, stock dividend, exchange, combination, or reclassification of shares, merger, consolidation, reorganization, or other change in or affecting the capital structure or capital stock of the Corporation (other than a normal cash dividend), the Committee shall make or provide for such adjustments in performance goals as the Committee in its sole discretion may in good faith determine to be equitably required in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the rights of participants.





Table of Contents

Performance SharesStock Ownership Information | 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

ADDITIONAL OWNERSHIP
Our directors hold additional instruments that are not reported in the beneficial ownership table above but that represent additional financial interests in the Corporation that are subject to the same market risk as ownership of our common stock. The following table shows, as of February 1, 2018:

Sharesthe shares of Common Stock granted pursuantcommon stock (and restricted stock units to Section 11be settled in shares of the Plan, which may be made subject to the restrictions and other terms and conditions prescribed in Section 11 of the Plan.

common stock) beneficially owned;

Performance Share
Units

Contingent rights to receive Performance Shares pursuant to Section 11the restricted stock units which will be settled in shares of the Plan.

common stock but which is not considered common stock that is beneficially owned for SEC disclosure purposes; and

Restricted Shares

Sharesthe number of Common Stock granted pursuantNS stock units credited to Section 9those non-employee directors who have made elections under the Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan to defer all or a portion of compensation and have elected to invest such amounts in phantom units of our common stock.

A more detailed discussion of director compensation can be found in “Non-Employee Director Compensation.” A stock unit represents the economic equivalent of a share of our common stock and serves to align the directors’ individual financial interests with the interests of our shareholders because the value of the directors’ holdings fluctuates with the price of our common stock. These stock units ultimately are settled in cash.

Name    Number
of Shares
Beneficially
Owned1
    Number of
RSUs not
counted
towards
Beneficial
Ownership2
    Number
of NS
Stock
Units3
    Total
Thomas D. Bell, Jr.21,3911,000022,391
Erskine B. Bowles3,47712,8868,09124,454
Wesley G. Bush15,8911,0006,17323,064
Daniel A. Carp39,1101,0006,66146,771
Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr.1,4071,00002,407
Marcela E. Donadio1,4341,00002,434
Steven F. Leer73,4961,00038,255112,751
Michael D. Lockhart3,73224,43013,10341,266
Amy E. Miles9,7981,000010,798
Martin H. Nesbitt9,7981,000010,798
Jennifer F. Scanlon01,00001,000
John R. Thompson9,9421,000010,942
1Figures in this column are based on the Plan and subject to the restrictions and other terms and conditions set forth therein.

beneficial ownership that appears on page 76.

Restricted Stock
Unit

2

Contingent rights, granted pursuant to Section 10 of the Plan, to receive

Restricted Stock Unit Shares or cash payment forUnits (RSUs) are bookkeeping units, the Fair Market Valuevalue of shareseach of Common Stock, subjectwhich corresponds to the restrictions and other conditions set forth herein. Each Restricted Stock Unit shall equal the Fair Market Value of one share of Common Stock.

Restricted Stock
Unit Shares

Shares of Common Stock issued as payment for Restricted Stock Units pursuantour common stock. RSUs are granted to Section 10non-employee directors on an annual basis, and dividends paid on our common stock are added to the director’s RSU balance. Upon termination of the Plan, which may be made subject to the restrictions and other terms and conditions prescribed in Section 10 of the Plan.

Restriction Period

A period of time of not less than thirty-six (36) months for officers or employees, or not less than twelve (12) months for non-employee directors, in either case to be determined within those limits by the Committee in its sole discretion, commencing on the Award Date, during which the restrictions imposed by paragraphs (b) and (c) of Section 9 or paragraphs (b) and (c) of Section 10 of the Plan shall apply. At the time that the Restricted Shares or Restricted Stock Units are granted, the Committee shall impose a Restriction Period and determine the length of the Restriction Period. Such Restriction Period, if any, shall be incorporated in the Award Agreement setting forth the grant. Under Sections 9 and 10 of this Plan, the Committee may, in its discretion, specify when the Award is granted that the Restriction Period shall expire upon the earlier achievement of Performance Goals.

Retention
Agreement

An agreement entered into pursuant to Section 12 of the Plan.

Retirement

Retirement from the Corporation and all Subsidiary Companies pursuant to the provisions of the Retirement Plan of the Corporation or a retirement plan of a Subsidiary Company (whichever is applicable), as amended from time to time.

For a Participant who is a non-employee director, “Retirement” means termination ofindividual’s service as a director, the RSUs will be settled in shares of our common stock in a lump sum or ten annual installments, in accordance with the director’s election. For each of the Corporation.

directors, the amount in this column includes the 1,000 RSUs awarded to directors serving on the Board on January 25, 2018, which will ultimately be settled in shares of common stock upon the satisfaction of applicable vesting requirements but which do not vest within 60 days of February 1, 2018. For Mr. Bowles and Mr. Lockhart, the amounts in this column also includes RSUs which will ultimately be settled in shares of common stock but which would not be issuable within 60 days of February 1, 2018, as each has elected to have the awards distributed in ten annual installments beginning in the January after he ceases to be a director.

Stock Appreciation
Right

3

The right, granted pursuant

Represents NS stock units credited to the provisionsaccounts of Section 8 ofnon-employee directors who have elected under the Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan to receive Exercise Gain Sharesdefer all or a portion of compensation and have elected to invest such amounts in “phantom” units whose value is measured by the market value of shares of our common stock, but which ultimately will be settled in cash, payment equal tonot in shares of common stock. NS stock units have been available under the excess, if any, of the Fair Market Value of Common Stock on the exercise date over the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on the Award Date,Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan as specified in Section 8 of the Plan.

a hypothetical investment option since January 1, 2001.
Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 78www.norfolksouthern.com

Stock-Settled Stock
Appreciation Rights

Stock Appreciation Rights paid out in Exercise Gain Shares.

Subsidiary Company

A corporation of which at least fifty percent (50%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote is owned, directly or indirectly, by the Corporation.




Table of Contents

Stock Ownership Information | 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

Section 3. ADMINISTRATIONSECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

The Plan shall be administered by the Committee, which, subject to the limitations set forth herein, shall have the full and complete authority and sole discretion, except as may be delegated to the Corporation’s chief executive officer as provided herein, to construe and interpret the Plan; to select the Participants who shall be granted Awards under the Plan; to determine the type, size, terms, and conditions of the Award or Awards to be granted to each such Participant; to authorize the grant of such Awards pursuant to the Plan; in connection with the merger or consolidation of the Corporation (and subject to any applicable requirements of Code Section 409A), to give a Participant an election to surrender an Award in exchange for the grant of a new Award; to adopt, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to the Plan; and to make all other determinations and take all other actions it may deem necessary or advisable for the implementation and administration of the Plan.

If the Committee makes an Award to non-employee directors in a calendar year, and after such Award is made and in the same year an individual is elected by the Board to be a non-employee director of the Corporation, then the newly appointed director shall automatically be granted an Award under the same terms as was granted to the other non-employee directors earlier that year. The Award granted to the newly appointed director shall be prorated based on the number of days remaining in the calendar year of the individual’s appointment as a director, and effective as of the date the individual became a director or, if the individual became a director during a blackout period, effective on the first day of the subsequent trading window during which officers of the Corporation and Subsidiary Companies are permitted to trade in Norfolk Southern Corporation Common Stock under the Corporation’s insider trading policy.

The Committee in its sole discretion may delegate authority to the Corporation’s chief executive officer to select as Participants the officers and employees who shall be granted Awards under the Plan (provided, however, that only the Committee shall grant Awards to the chief executive officer and Executive Officers); to determine the type, size, terms, and conditions of the Award or Awards to be granted to each such Participant; and to authorize the grant of such Awards pursuant to the Plan.

The Committee, or the chief executive officer to the extent as may be delegated by the Committee (hereinafter, the term “Committee” shall include reference to the chief executive officer to the extent of any such delegation), may authorize the grant of more than one type of Award, and Awards subject to differing terms and conditions, to any eligible Participant. The Committee’s decision to authorize the grant of an Award to a Participant at any time shall not require the Committee to authorize the grant of an Award to that Participant at any other time or to any other Participant at any time; nor shall its determination with respect to the size, type, or terms and conditions of the Award to be granted to a Participant at any time require it to authorize the grant of an Award of the same type or size or with the same terms and conditions to that Participant at any other time or to any other Participant at any time. The Committee shall not be precluded from authorizing the grant of an Award to any eligible Participant solely because the Participant previously may have been granted an Award of any kind under the Plan.

All determinations of the Committee shall be by a majority of its members and shall be final, conclusive and binding. Each member of the Committee, while serving as such, shall be considered to be acting in his capacity as a director of the Corporation, and no member of the Committee shall be liable for any action taken or decision made in good faith with respect to the implementation or administration of the Plan.

Section 4. ELIGIBILITY

To be eligible to be a Participant in the Plan, an individual must on the date on which the Award is made be a full-time nonagreement officer or employee who is a participant in the Norfolk Southern Corporation Executive Management Incentive Plan or Management Incentive Plan, or a full-time nonagreement employee of the Corporation or of a Subsidiary Company who can make an appreciable contribution to the attainment of the Corporation’s overall business objectives as determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, and must reside in the United States or Canada. A non-employee director shall be eligible to participate in the Plan if he or she is a director of the Corporation and is not a full-time salaried employee of the Corporation or a Subsidiary Company.



Table of Contents

Section 5. SHARES AVAILABLE

Since the Plan’s establishment in 1983, up to a maximum of 82,978,604 shares of Common Stock have been authorized for issuance under the Plan. Subject to approval of the Plan, as hereby amended, by the separate vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present or represented and entitled to vote at a meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation, at which a quorum for the proposal is present, an additional 8,000,000 shares of Common Stock are approved for issuance pursuant to the Plan as of May 14, 2015. Awards that are made in a form other than Options or Stock-Settled Stock Appreciation Rights and that are granted under the Plan after May 13, 2010, shall be counted against the share limit set forth in the previous sentence as 1.61 shares for every one share issued in connection with such Award. Such shares shall be provided from shares of Common Stock authorized but not issued. Stock-Settled Stock Appreciation Rights shall be counted in full against the number of shares available for award under the Plan, regardless of the number of Exercise Gain Shares issued upon settlement of the Stock Appreciation Right.

If any shares of Common Stock subject to an Award are forfeited, cancelled, exchanged or surrendered or if an Award otherwise terminates or expires without a distribution of shares to the Participant (including by reason of such Award being settled in cash), the shares with respect to such Award shall, to the extent of any such forfeiture, cancellation, exchange, surrender, termination or expiration, again be available for Awards under the Plan; provided, however, in the case of a stock-based Award that is not an Option or Stock Appreciation Right and that was made after May 13, 2010, 1.61 shares for each share underlying such Award shall again be available for Awards under the Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the following shares of Common Stock may not again be made available for award under the Plan: (i) shares of Common Stock not issued or delivered as a result of the net settlement of an outstanding Stock Appreciation Right or Option; (ii) shares of Common Stock used to pay the exercise price or withholding taxes related to an outstanding award, or (iii) shares of Common Stock repurchased on the open market with proceeds of an Option exercise.

Notwithstanding any other provision to the contrary, no Participant may be awarded a grant in any one year, which, when added to any other grant of Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Shares, Restricted Stock Units and Performance Share Units in the same year, shall exceed 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock. A Stock Appreciation Right granted in connection with an option is treated as a single Award for purpose of the preceding sentence. If an Option is canceled, the canceled Option continues to count against the maximum number of shares for which Options may be granted to a Participant in any year. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the aggregate grant date fair value of shares of Common Stock that may be granted during any year to any non-employee director shall not exceed $500,000.

Section 6. INCENTIVE STOCK OPTIONS

(a)General – The Committee may authorize the grant of Incentive Stock Options subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Section 6. The grant of an Incentive Stock Option shall be evidenced by a written Award Agreement between the Corporation and the Optionee, setting forth the number of shares of Common Stock subject to the Incentive Stock Option evidenced thereby and the terms, conditions, and restrictions applicable thereto. The issuance of shares of Common Stock pursuant to an Incentive Stock Option also shall be subject to the provisions of any Retention Agreement that may be required by the Committee under Section 12 of the Plan.

Except for adjustments pursuant to Section 15 of the Plan, the Option Price for any outstanding Option granted under the Plan may not be decreased after the date the Option is granted, nor may an outstanding Option be modified or replaced if the effect would be to reduce the Option Price, nor may an outstanding Option be cancelled in exchange for cash or another Award, unless such repricing, modification or replacement is approved by the vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present or represented and entitled to vote at a meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation at which a quorum is present.



Table of Contents

(b)Option Price - The Committee shall determine the Option price for each share of Common Stock purchased under an Option, but, subject to the provisions of Section 15 of the Plan, in no event shall the Option price be less than the greater of (i) one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on the Award Date, or (ii) the price at which the Corporation’s Common Stock was last sold in the principal United States market for such Common Stock on the Award Date.

(c)Duration of Options - The Committee shall fix the term or duration of Options, provided that such term shall not exceed ten (10) years from the Award Date, and that such term shall be subject to earlier termination pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (g) of this Section 6.

(d)Non-Transferability of Options - Options may be exercised during the lifetime of the Optionee only by him, and following his death only by his Beneficiary. If a Beneficiary dies after the Optionee, but before the Option is exercised and before such rights expire, such rights shall become assets of such Beneficiary’s estate. Except as provided in this paragraph, Options may not be assigned or alienated, whether voluntarily or involuntarily.

(e)Exercise of Options - The Committee shall determine the time or times at which Options may be exercised; provided that such time or times shall not occur before the latest of:

(i) the first anniversary of the Award Date; and

(ii) the effectiveness of any registration statement required to be filed under the Securities Act of 1933 for the registration of the Common Stock to be issued upon exercise of the Option.

(f)Payment of Option Price - The purchase price of Common Stock upon exercise of an Option shall be paid in full to the Corporation at the time of the exercise of the Option in cash or, at the discretion of the Committee and subject to any limitations or requirements that the Committee may adopt, by the surrender to the Corporation of shares of previously acquired Common Stock, which have been held by the Optionee for at least six (6) months and which shall be valued at Fair Market Value on the date that the Option is exercised, or, at the discretion of the Committee, by a combination of cash and such Common Stock.

(g)Termination of Options - No Option shall be exercisable after it expires. Each Option shall expire upon the earliest of:

(i) the expiration of the term for which the Option was granted;

(ii) (A) Except as otherwise provided by the Committee in the Award Agreement, in the case of an Optionee whose employment with the Corporation or a Subsidiary Company is terminated due to Retirement, Disability or death, the expiration of the term for which the Option was granted, or

(B) in the case of an Optionee whose employment with the Corporation or a Subsidiary Company is terminated for any reason other than Retirement, Disability, or death, at the close of business on the last day of active service by the Optionee with the Corporation or a Subsidiary Company, or

(C) in the case of an Optionee who is granted a leave of absence, if the Optionee’s employment with the Corporation or a Subsidiary Company terminates at any time during or at the end of the leave of absence, at the close of business on the last day of employment with the Corporation or a Subsidiary Company, or

(iii) in connection with a merger or consolidation of the Corporation, with the Optionee’s consent, the grant of a new Award to replace the Option.

(h)Limitation on Exercisability - The aggregate Fair Market Value (determined as of the Award Date) of the Common Stock with respect to which Incentive Stock Options (granted on or after January 1, 1987) are exercisable for the first time by the Optionee during any calendar year shall not exceed $100,000, as adjusted under Code Section 422(d)(1) and corresponding Treasury Regulations.



Table of Contents

Section 7. NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTIONS

The Committee may authorize the grant of Non-Qualified Stock Options subject to the terms and conditions specified in this Section 7. The grant of a Non-Qualified Stock Option shall be evidenced by a written Award Agreement between the Corporation and the Optionee, setting forth the number of shares of Common Stock subject to the Non-Qualified Stock Option evidenced thereby and the terms, conditions, and restrictions applicable thereto. Non-Qualified Stock Options granted pursuant to the provisions of this Section 7 shall be subject to the terms, conditions, and restrictions set forth in paragraphs (a) through (g) of Section 6 of the Plan. The limitations set forth in paragraph (h) of Section 6 of the Plan shall not apply to Non-Qualified Stock Options. The issuance of shares of Common Stock pursuant to a Non-Qualified Stock Option also shall be subject to the provisions of any Retention Agreement that may be required by the Committee under Section 12 of the Plan.

Section 8. STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS

(a)General - The Committee may grant a Stock Appreciation Right to a Participant in connection with an Option, or portion thereof, or on a stand alone basis, as determined by the Committee, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Section 8. If granted in connection with an Option, the Stock Appreciation Right may be granted at the time of grant of the related Option and shall be subject to the same terms and conditions as the related Option, except as this Section 8 may otherwise provide. If granted in connection with an Option, the Stock Appreciation Right shall be evidenced by provisions in the Award Agreement evidencing or identifying the related Option, specifying the number of shares of Common Stock subject thereto and setting forth the terms and conditions applicable to the Stock Appreciation Right. If granted on a stand alone basis, the Stock Appreciation Right shall be evidenced by provisions of a written Award Agreement between the Corporation and the Participant. The Committee may grant Cash-Settled Stock Appreciation Rights or Stock-Settled Stock Appreciation Rights as shall be set forth in an Award Agreement.

Except for adjustments pursuant to Section 15 of the Plan, the terms of an outstanding Stock Appreciation Right may not be amended to reduce the exercise price of the Stock Appreciation Right, nor may an outstanding Stock Appreciation Right be modified or replaced if the effect would be to reduce the exercise price, nor may an outstanding Stock Appreciation Right be cancelled in exchange for cash or another Award, unless such repricing, modification or replacement is approved by the vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present or represented and entitled to vote at a meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation at which a quorum is present.

(b)Exercise Price and Duration - The Committee shall determine the exercise price for any Stock Appreciation Right granted on a stand alone basis but, subject to the provisions of Section 15 of the Plan, in no event shall the exercise price be less than the greater of (i) one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on the Award Date, or (ii) the price at which the Corporation’s Common Stock was last sold in the principal United States market for such Common Stock on the Award Date. The Committee shall fix the term or duration of Stock Appreciation Rights, provided that such term shall not exceed ten (10) years from the Award Date, and that such term shall be subject to earlier termination pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (e) of this Section 8.

(c)Exercise – If granted in connection with an Option, a Stock Appreciation Right shall be exercisable only at such time or times, to such extent, and by such persons, as the Option to which it relates shall be exercisable. If granted on a stand alone basis, a Stock Appreciation Right shall be exercisable only at such time or times, to such extent, and by such persons, as shall be set forth in the Award Agreement.



Table of Contents

Stock Appreciation Rights shall be subject to the following restrictions:

(i) the Stock Appreciation Right may not be exercised before the expiration of one (1) year from the Award Date; provided, however, that this subparagraph (i) shall not apply if the death or Disability of the Optionee occurs within one (1) year after the Award Date; and,

(ii) a Stock Appreciation Right granted in connection with an Incentive Stock Option may not be exercised on any date on which the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock is less than or equal to the Option price per share under the related Incentive Stock Option.

A Stock Appreciation Right shall be exercised by providing the Corporation with a written notice in such form and containing such information (including the number of shares of Common Stock with respect to which the Stock Appreciation Right is being exercised) as the Committee may specify. If the Stock Appreciation Right was granted in connection with an Option, the Participant must surrender the related Option, or the portion thereof pertaining to the shares with respect to which the Stock Appreciation Right is exercised, and the date on which the Corporation receives such notice shall be the date on which the related Option, or portion thereof, shall be deemed surrendered and the Stock Appreciation Right shall be deemed exercised.

(d)Payment - Upon the proper exercise of a Stock-Settled Stock Appreciation Right granted on a stand alone basis, a Participant shall be entitled to receive Exercise Gain Shares equal to the number of shares of Common Stock that have an aggregate Fair Market Value on the exercise date equal to the amount by which the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the exercise date exceeds the exercise price for the Stock Appreciation Right established on the Award Date, multiplied by the number of Stock-Settled Stock Appreciation Rights surrendered in connection with the exercise of the Stock Appreciation Right.

Upon the proper exercise of a Stock-Settled Stock Appreciation Right granted in connection with an Option, an Optionee shall be entitled to receive Exercise Gain Shares equal to the number of shares of Common Stock that have an aggregate Fair Market Value on the exercise date equal to the amount by which the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the exercise date exceeds the Option price per share of the related Option, multiplied by the number of shares covered by the related Option, or portion thereof, surrendered in connection with the exercise of the Stock Appreciation Right. The Exercise Gain Shares shall be subject to the provisions of any Retention Agreement that may be required by the Committee under Section 12 of the Plan.

Upon the proper exercise of a Cash-Settled Stock Appreciation Right granted on a stand alone basis, a Participant shall be entitled to receive cash equal to the value of the number of shares of Common Stock that have an aggregate Fair Market Value on the exercise date equal to the amount by which the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the exercise date exceeds the exercise price for the Stock Appreciation Right established on the Award Date, multiplied by the number of Cash-Settled Stock Appreciation Rights surrendered for settlement.

Upon the proper exercise of a Cash-Settled Stock Appreciation Right granted in connection with an Option, an Optionee shall be entitled to receive cash equal to the value of the number of shares of Common Stock that have an aggregate Fair Market Value on the exercise date equal to the amount by which the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the exercise date exceeds the Option price per share of the related Option, multiplied by the number of shares covered by the related Option, or portion thereof, surrendered in connection with the exercise of the Stock Appreciation Right.

(e)Termination of Right - A Stock Appreciation Right granted in connection with an Option shall expire, unless previously exercised or canceled, upon the expiration of an Option to which it relates, or upon such time as may be set forth in an Award Agreement. A Stock Appreciation Right granted on a stand alone basis shall be subject to the termination provisions set forth in paragraph (g) of Section 6 for Options and shall expire, unless previously exercised or cancelled, at such time as may be set forth in an Award Agreement.

(f)Effect of Exercise - A Stock Appreciation Right shall be canceled when, and to the extent that, it or a related Option is exercised, and an Option shall be canceled when, and to the extent that, the Option is surrendered to the Corporation upon the exercise of a related Stock Appreciation Right.



Table of Contents

Section 9. RESTRICTED SHARES

(a)General - The Committee, in its sole discretion, may from time to time authorize the grant of Restricted Shares to a Participant pursuant to an Award Agreement. A certificate or certificates representing the number of Restricted Shares granted shall be registered in the name of the Participant or held in uncertificated form through a direct registration system or the number of Restricted Shares shall be delivered by electronic delivery to a brokerage account established for the Participant’s benefit at a financial/brokerage firm selected by the Corporation. Until the expiration of the Restriction Period or the lapse of restrictions in the manner provided in paragraph (g) of this Section 9, any certificate or certificates shall be held by the Corporation for the account of the Participant, and any Restricted Shares held through direct registration or in a brokerage account shall be blocked from sale or transfer. Restricted Shares shall be subject to such restrictions as the Committee may establish in the Award Agreement (including, without limitation, any limitation on the right to vote Restricted Shares or the right to receive any dividend or other right), which restrictions may lapse separately or in combination at such time or times, in such installments or otherwise, as the Committee may deem appropriate; provided that dividends on Restricted Shares subject to a specified Performance Goal or Goals shall be payable only to the extent the Performance Goal(s) are achieved with respect to such Restricted Shares.

(b)Performance Goal Requirement – The Committee may determine, in its sole discretion, that a Participant’s entitlement to Restricted Shares shall be subject to achievement of a specified Performance Goal or Goals during the Restriction Period. If so, the Committee shall select the Performance Criterion or each combination thereof, the Performance Goal for each Performance Criterion or each combination thereof, and the Performance Criteria Weighting Percentage for each Performance Criterion or each combination thereof within ninety (90) days of the commencement of the Restriction Period. The Committee may also determine that the Restriction Period shall expire upon achievement of established Performance Goals prior to the established end of the Restriction Period. In determining whether Performance Goals have been achieved, special charges, restructuring charges and unusual or infrequent accounting adjustments which are significant, and restatements or reclassifications, all as determined in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, which would have the effect of reducing the percentage of Performance Goals achieved shall be excluded, and which would have the effect of increasing the percentage of Performance Goals achieved shall be included, unless the Committee, in its discretion, determines otherwise. At such time as the Committee certifies that the Performance Goals have been achieved, the Committee shall authorize delivery of Restricted Shares (or such percentage of the Restricted Shares as equal the Percentage of Performance Goals that have been achieved) for which the Restriction Period has expired. If the Restricted Shares are subject to the achievement of Performance Goals, such Restricted Shares shall be forfeited to the extent Performance Goals are not achieved before the established end of the Restriction Period.

(c)Restrictions – Until the expiration of the Restriction Period or the lapse of restrictions in the manner provided in paragraph (g) of this Section 9, Restricted Shares shall be subject to the following restrictions and any additional restrictions that the Committee, in its sole discretion, may from time to time deem desirable in furtherance of the objectives of the Plan:

(i) the Participant shall not be entitled to receive the certificate or certificates representing the Restricted Shares, or exercise any ownership over any Restricted Shares held through direct registration or in a brokerage account;

(ii) the Restricted Shares may not be sold, transferred, assigned, pledged, conveyed, hypothecated, or otherwise disposed of; and

(iii) the Restricted Shares may be forfeited as provided in paragraphs (b) or (e) of this Section 9, subject to the provisions of paragraph (f) and (g) of this Section 9.

(d)Distribution of Restricted Shares – If a Participant to whom Restricted Shares have been granted remains in the continuous employment of the Corporation or a Subsidiary Company during the entire Restriction Period, or, in the case of a Participant who is a non-employee director, who remains a non-employee



Table of Contents

director during the entire Restriction Period, upon the expiration of the Restriction Period all restrictions applicable to the Restricted Shares shall lapse. When the restrictions applicable to the Restricted Shares lapse, either:

(i) the certificate or certificates representing the shares of Common Stock that were earned pursuant to paragraph (b) of this Section 9 shall be delivered to the Participant or,

(ii) if the shares were delivered by electronic delivery to a brokerage account established for the Participant’s benefit or by direct registration and held in uncertificated form, the restrictions on the sale or transfer of any shares that were earned pursuant to paragraph (b) of this Section 9 shall lapse.

(e)Termination of Employment - If the employment of a Participant is terminated for any reason other than the Retirement, Disability, or death of the Participant in service before the expiration of the Restriction Period, the Restricted Shares shall be forfeited immediately and all rights of the Participant with respect to such shares shall terminate immediately without further obligation on the part of the Corporation or any Subsidiary Company. If the Participant is granted a leave of absence before the expiration of the Restriction Period, the Participant shall not forfeit any rights with respect to any Restricted Shares subject to the Restriction Period, unless the Participant’s employment with the Corporation or a Subsidiary Company terminates at any time during or at the end of the leave of absence for any reason other than Retirement, Disability, or death, at which time the shares shall be forfeited immediately and all rights of the Participant with respect to such shares shall terminate immediately without further obligation on the part of the Corporation or any Subsidiary Company.

(f)Retirement, Disability or Death - If the Participant’s employment is terminated by reason of the Retirement or Disability of the Participant before the expiration of the Restriction Period and no Performance Goals have been imposed, the restrictions on the Restricted Shares shall lapse upon the expiration of the Restriction Period and delivery of the Restricted Shares shall be made to the Participant, as described in paragraph (d) of this Section 9; provided, however, that if the Participant dies after Retirement or Disability and before the expiration of the Restriction Period, the restrictions on the Restricted Shares shall lapse and delivery shall be made to the Participant’s Beneficiary. If the Participant’s employment is terminated by reason of the Participant’s death in service before the expiration of the Restriction Period, the restrictions on the Restricted Shares shall lapse and delivery of the Restricted Shares shall be made to the Participant’s Beneficiary. If the Participant’s employment is terminated by reason of the Retirement, Disability, or death of the Participant before the expiration of the Restriction Period and Performance Goals have been imposed, the restrictions on the Restricted Shares shall lapse upon the expiration of the Restriction Period and to the extent that the Committee certifies that Performance Goals have been achieved and delivery of the Restricted Shares shall be made to the Participant, or the Participant’s Beneficiary in the event of the Participant’s death, in accordance with paragraphs (b) and (d) of this Section 9.

(g)Waiver of Restrictions - The Committee, in its sole discretion, may waive any or all restrictions with respect to Restricted Shares.

Section 10. RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS

(a)General - The Committee, in its sole discretion, may from time to time authorize the grant of Restricted Stock Units (“Units”) to a Participant pursuant to an Award Agreement. Such Units shall be recorded in individual memorandum accounts maintained by the Committee or its agent. The grant of Restricted Stock Units shall entitle the Participant to payment in Restricted Stock Unit Shares or cash, as provided for in the Award Agreement. The Participant shall have no beneficial ownership interest in the Common Stock represented by the Units prior to expiration of the Restriction Period and achievement of any Performance Goals. The Participant shall have no right to vote the Common Stock represented by the Units or to receive dividends (except for any Dividend Equivalents which may be awarded by the Committee in connection with such Units) on the Common Stock represented by the Units. The grant of Units shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement between the Corporation or Subsidiary Company and the Participant, identifying the number of Units awarded, and setting forth the terms and conditions applicable to the Units.



Table of Contents

(b) Performance Goal Requirement – The Committee may determine, in its sole discretion, that a Participant’s entitlement to payment in cash or Restricted Stock Unit Shares for Restricted Stock Units shall be subject to achievement of a specified Performance Goal or Goals over the duration of the Restriction Period. If so, the Award shall specify when it is granted that the Participant’s entitlement to payment is subject to the achievement of the Performance Goal or Goals, and the Committee shall select the Performance Criterion or each combination thereof, the Performance Goals for each Performance Criterion or each combination thereof, and the Performance Criteria Weighting Percentage for each Performance Criterion or each combination thereof within ninety (90) days after the commencement of the Restriction Period.

The Committee may specify, when the Award is granted, that the Restriction Period shall expire upon achievement of the established Performance Goals prior to the established end of the Restriction Period. In determining whether Performance Goals have been achieved, special charges, restructuring charges and unusual or infrequent accounting adjustments which are significant, and restatements or reclassifications, all as determined in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, which would have the effect of reducing the percentage of Performance Goals achieved shall be excluded, and which would have the effect of increasing the percentage of Performance Goals achieved shall be included, unless the Committee, in its discretion, determines otherwise. For Restricted Stock Units subject to the achievement of Performance Goals, the Committee shall certify in writing the extent to which the Performance Goals have been achieved, and shall authorize settlement of Units in cash or Restricted Stock Unit Shares. The Units shall be settled within two and one half months after the end of the year in which the Performance Goals are achieved. Such settlement shall be based on the Fair Market Value on the date all applicable restrictions lapse (or such percentage of the value of the Restricted Stock Units as equal the percentage of Performance Goals that have been achieved) for which the Restriction Period has expired. If the settlement of Restricted Stock Units is subject to the achievement of Performance Goals, such Restricted Stock Units shall be forfeited to the extent Performance Goals are not achieved before the established end of the Restriction Period.

(c) Restrictions - Until the expiration of the Restriction Period and the lapse of any Retention Agreement provided in Section 12, Units shall be subject to the following restrictions and any additional restrictions that the Committee, in its sole discretion, may from time to time deem desirable in furtherance of the objectives of the Plan:

(i) the grant of Units to a Participant shall not entitle a Participant to receive cash payment or Restricted Stock Unit Shares;

(ii) the Units may not be sold, transferred, assigned, pledged, conveyed, hypothecated, or otherwise disposed of; and,

(iii) all or a portion of the Units may be forfeited immediately as provided in paragraph (b) or (e) of this Section 10, subject to the provisions of paragraphs (f) and (g) of this Section 10.

(d) Distribution of Restricted Stock Units - If a Participant to whom Units have been granted remains in the continuous employment of the Corporation or a Subsidiary Company during the entire Restriction Period or, in the case of a Participant who is a non-employee director, who remains a non-employee director during the entire Restriction Period, upon the expiration of the Restriction Period and the further expiration of any Retention Agreement applicable to such Units, all restrictions applicable to the Units shall lapse, and the Units shall be settled in cash or in Restricted Stock Unit Shares, based on Fair Market Value on the later of the date all applicable restrictions lapse or any Retention Agreement lapses. Settlement in cash in a single sum or issuance of Restricted Stock Unit Shares shall be made within thirty (30) days following the later of the expiration of the Restriction Period or any Retention Agreement applicable to such Units. The Participant may not, directly or indirectly, designate the taxable year of the settlement.

(e) Termination of Employment - If the employment of a Participant is terminated for any reason other than the Retirement, Disability, or death of the Participant in service before the expiration of the Restriction Period, the Units shall be forfeited immediately and all rights of the Participant with respect to such Units shall terminate immediately without further obligation on the part of the Corporation or any Subsidiary



Table of Contents

Company. If the Participant is granted a leave of absence before the expiration of the Restriction Period, the Participant shall not forfeit all rights with respect to any Units subject to the Restriction Period, unless the Participant’s employment with the Corporation or a Subsidiary Company terminates at any time during or at the end of the leave of absence for any reason other than Retirement, Disability, or death, at which time all rights of the Participant with respect to such Units shall terminate immediately without further obligation on the part of the Corporation or any Subsidiary Company.

(f) Retirement, Disability or Death - If the Participant’s employment is terminated by reason of the Retirement or Disability of the Participant before the expiration of the Restriction Period and no Performance Goals have been imposed, the restrictions on the Restricted Stock Units shall lapse upon the expiration of the Restriction Period and settlement of Restricted Stock Units shall be made at the end of the Restriction Period to the Participant as described in paragraph (d) of this Section 10; provided, however, if the Participant dies after Retirement or Disability and before the expiration of the Restriction Period, the restrictions on the Restricted Stock Units shall lapse and delivery shall be made to the Participant’s Beneficiary. If the Participant’s employment is terminated by reason of the Participant’s death in service before the expiration of the Restriction Period, the restrictions on the Restricted Stock Units shall lapse and delivery of the Restricted Stock Units shall be made to the Participant’s Beneficiary. Settlement of the Restricted Stock Units shall be made within thirty (30) days following the expiration of the Restriction Period. The Participant or Beneficiary may not, directly or indirectly, designate the taxable year of the settlement.

If the Participant’s employment is terminated by reason of the Retirement, Disability, or death of the Participant before the expiration of the Restriction Period and Performance Goals have been imposed, the restrictions on the Restricted Stock Units shall lapse if the Committee certifies that Performance Goals have been achieved, and settlement of the Restricted Stock Units shall be made to the Participant, or the Participant’s Beneficiary in the event of the Participant’s death, in accordance with paragraphs (b) and (d) of this Section 10.

(g) Waiver of Restrictions - The Committee, in its sole discretion, may waive any or all restrictions with respect to Units. If no Performance Goals have been imposed, settlement of the Units shall be made on the same settlement date that would have applied absent the waiver of restrictions. If Performance Goals have been imposed, settlement of the Units shall be made within two and one half months after the end of the year in which all restrictions are either waived or satisfied.

Section 11. PERFORMANCE SHARES

(a) General - The Committee, in its sole discretion, may from time to time authorize the grant of Performance Share Units to a Participant pursuant to an Award Agreement. Performance Share Units shall entitle the Participant to Performance Shares (or cash in lieu thereof) upon the achievement of Performance Goals. The Committee shall select the Performance Criteria, set the Performance Goals and assign Performance Criteria Weighting Percentages to each Performance Criterion or each combination thereof within ninety (90) days of the commencement of the Performance Cycle. Performance Share Units may not be sold, transferred, assigned, pledged, conveyed, or hypothecated.

After the end of the Performance Cycle, the Committee shall certify in writing to what extent the Performance Goals have been achieved. In determining whether Performance Goals have been achieved, special charges, restructuring charges and unusual or infrequent accounting adjustments which are significant, and restatements or reclassifications, all as determined in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, which would have the effect of reducing the percentage of Performance Goals achieved shall be excluded, and which would have the effect of increasing the percentage of Performance Goals achieved shall be included, unless the Committee, in its discretion, determines otherwise. The Committee shall thereafter authorize the payment of such percentage of the value of the Performance Share Units as equal the percentage of Performance Goals that have been achieved to the Participant, or the Participant’s Beneficiary in the event of the Participant’s death after the end of the Performance Cycle, of (i) cash in lieu of Performance Shares, or (ii) either (1) the issuance of Performance Shares registered in the name of the Participant or (2) the electronic delivery of Performance Shares to a brokerage account established for the Participant’s benefit at a financial/



Table of Contents

brokerage firm selected by the Corporation, subject to the provisions of any Retention Agreement that may be required by the Committee under Section 12 of the Plan, or (iii) both. Settlement in cash or issuance of Performance Shares shall be made within two and one half months after the end of the year in which the Performance Goals are achieved.

(b) Distribution or Forfeiture of Performance Shares - If the Participant’s employment with the Corporation or a Subsidiary Company is terminated before the end of a Performance Cycle for any reason other than Retirement, Disability, or death, the Participant shall forfeit all rights with respect to any Performance Shares that were being earned during the Performance Cycle. If the Participant is granted a leave of absence before the end of a Performance Cycle, the Participant shall not forfeit all rights with respect to any Performance Shares that were being earned during the Performance Cycle, unless the Participant’s employment with the Corporation or a Subsidiary Company terminates at any time during or at the end of the leave of absence, at which time the Participant shall forfeit all rights with respect to any Performance Shares that were being earned during the Performance Cycle. If the Participant’s employment is terminated before the end of a Performance Cycle by reason of Retirement, Disability, or death, the Participant’s rights with respect to any Performance Shares being earned during the Performance Cycle shall, subject to the other provisions of this Section 11, continue as if the Participant’s employment had continued through the end of the Performance Cycle.

Section 12. RETENTION AGREEMENTS

(a) General - The Committee, in its sole discretion, may require as a condition of a grant, exercise, settlement or payment with respect to any Award under the Plan that the Participant and the Corporation enter into a Retention Agreement, which shall provide, (1) with respect to an Award of Restricted Stock Units, that the settlement of the Restricted Stock Units in Restricted Stock Unit Shares or cash shall not occur until the event specified in the Retention Agreement that is part of the Award, or (2) with respect to any portion of any Exercise Gain Shares, Restricted Shares, Restricted Stock Unit Shares, or Performance Shares, that (i) the certificate or certificates representing any such Awards, when issued, shall be held by the Secretary of the Corporation for the benefit of the Participant until such time as the retention period specified by the Retention Agreement has expired or has been waived by the Committee, whichever occurs first, or (ii) that any such Award, when delivered by electronic delivery to a brokerage account established for the Participant’s benefit at a financial/brokerage firm selected by the Corporation or by direct registration and held in uncertificated form, shall not be permitted to be transferred or sold until such time as the retention period specified by the Retention Agreement has expired or has been waived by the Committee, whichever occurs first.

Any dividends payable on shares subject to a Retention Agreement shall be paid to the Participant in cash on the date declared by the Board of Directors. Each Retention Agreement may include some or all of the terms, conditions and restrictions set forth in paragraphs (b) through (e) of this Section 12.

(b) Retention Period - Shares that are subject to the Retention Agreement may not be sold, transferred, assigned, pledged, conveyed, hypothecated or otherwise disposed of within such period of time of not less than twenty-four (24) months following the exercise date (in the case of Exercise Gain Shares) or the date of issuance (in the case of Restricted Shares, Restricted Stock Unit Shares, or Performance Shares), as shall be prescribed by the Committee.

(c) Termination of Employment - If a Participant’s employment with the Corporation or a Subsidiary Company is terminated for any reason other than Retirement, Disability, or death, shares subject to the Retention Agreement shall continue to be held, following the Participant’s termination of employment, until the expiration of the retention period specified by the Retention Agreement. If the Participant’s employment is terminated by reason of Retirement or Disability, shares then held subject to the Retention Agreement shall continue to be held until the expiration of the applicable retention period following termination of employment, but any such retention period shall cease upon the earlier of the Participant’s attainment of age 65 or the expiration of two (2) years after the Participant’s Retirement or Disability, if either of those events occurs before the expiration of the applicable retention period. If the Participant dies while shares are subject to a retention period under the Retention Agreement, such retention period shall expire immediately at the time of death.



Table of Contents

(d) Leave of Absence - If a Participant is granted a leave of absence, shares subject to the Retention Agreement shall continue to be held during the leave of absence, until the expiration of the retention period specified by the Retention Agreement.

(e) Change in Control - Upon a Change in Control, the retention periods specified by all Retention Agreements shall immediately expire; provided, however, that any such waiver shall not accelerate the settlement of any Restricted Stock Units in a manner that would violate the requirements of Code Section 409A.

A Change in Control shall occur if:

(i) any person, other than the Corporation or a Subsidiary Company or any employee benefit plan sponsored by the Corporation or a Subsidiary Company, shall become the beneficial owner of, or obtain voting control over, 20% or more of the Corporation’s outstanding Common Stock;

(ii) (A) any consolidation or merger of the Corporation occurs in which the Corporation is not the continuing or surviving corporation or pursuant to which shares of Common Stock would be converted into cash, securities, or other property, other than a merger of the Corporation in which holders of Common Stock immediately prior to the merger have the same proportionate ownership of common stock of the surviving corporation immediately after the merger as immediately before, or (B) any sale, lease, exchange, or other transfer (in one transaction or a series of related transactions) of all or substantially all the assets of the Corporation occurs; or

(iii) there shall have been a change in the composition of the Board of Directors such that within any period of two (2) consecutive years or less individuals who at the beginning of such period constituted such Board, together with any new directors whose election, or nomination for election by the Corporation’s stockholders, was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the directors then in office who were directors at the beginning of such period, shall for any reason no longer constitute a majority of the directors of the Corporation.

(g) Waiver of Requirements - The Committee, in its sole discretion, may waive any or all retention periods or other restrictions in the Share Retention Agreement, provided that the waiver of restrictions does not accelerate the payment of any Restricted Stock Units in a manner that would violate the requirements of Code Section 409A.

(f) Distribution of Shares and Restricted Stock Units - The Corporation shall cause the shares subject to a Retention Agreement to be distributed to the Participant, or the Participant’s Beneficiary in the event of the Participant’s death, upon expiration of the retention period or other termination or waiver of the restrictions under this Section 12. The Corporation shall cause the Restricted Stock Units subject to a Retention Agreement to be distributed to the Participant upon the expiration of the retention period or to the Participant’s Beneficiary in the event of the Participant’s death.

Section 13. DIVIDEND EQUIVALENT PAYMENTS

The Committee may authorize the immediate payment, in cash or in Common Stock, of Dividend Equivalents on some or all of the shares of Common Stock covered by Options or Stock Appreciation Rights, as specified in the Award Agreement required under Section 6(a), Section 7 or Section 8(a) of the Plan. Dividend Equivalents payable on options may be paid in cash or Common Stock, at the discretion of the Committee.

The Committee may authorize the immediate or deferred payment of Dividend Equivalents on some or all of the shares of Common Stock covered by Restricted Stock Units that are not subject to Performance Goals, as specified in the Award Agreement required under Section 10 of the Plan. Dividend Equivalents payable on Restricted Stock Units may be paid in cash or converted to additional Restricted Stock Units, at the discretion of the Committee and as specified in the Award Agreement.



Table of Contents

The Committee may authorize the deferred payment of Dividend Equivalents on some or all of the shares of Common Stock covered by Restricted Stock Units that are subject to Performance Goals, or by Performance Share Units, as specified in the Award Agreement described in Sections 10 or 11 of the Plan. Deferred Dividend Equivalents shall be paid only to the extent Performance Goals are achieved with respect to such Performance Share Units or Restricted Stock Units, and shall be distributed at the same time as the underlying Performance Shares, Restricted Stock Unit Shares, or cash equivalents thereto. Deferred Dividend Equivalents payable on Performance Share Units or on Restricted Stock Units that are subject to a Performance Goal may be paid in cash, or converted to additional Performance Shares or Restricted Stock Unit Shares (as applicable), at the discretion of the Committee and as specified in the Award Agreement.

Notwithstanding the above, Dividend Equivalents shall not be made or accumulated during a Participant’s leave of absence. If Dividend Equivalents provided under this section are to be paid immediately, the Dividend Equivalents shall be paid in cash on the date declared by the Board of Directors for the payment of dividends on Common Stock. If Dividend Equivalents provided under this section are to be deferred, the deferred Dividend Equivalents shall be paid or forfeited when the underlying Award is paid or forfeited.

Section 14. NON-COMPETE COVENANT

The Committee, in its sole discretion, may require as a condition of a grant of any Award under the Plan that the Participant execute a non-compete, non-solicitation and confidentiality agreement, which agreement shall require that such individual (i) not Engage in Competing Employment (as defined in this Section 14 of the Plan) nor solicit any employee of the Corporation or a Subsidiary Company to Engage in Competing Employment for a specified term following termination of employment (including Retirement), (ii) not solicit customers of the Corporation or a Subsidiary Company for a specified term following termination of employment (including Retirement), and (iii) maintain the Corporation’s and each Subsidiary Company’s confidential information in strict confidence, in accordance with the provisions of the agreement. The Committee, in its sole discretion, may further require as a condition of a grant, exercise, settlement or payment with respect to any Award under the Plan that the Award shall be subject to immediate forfeiture, and all rights of the Participant to such Award shall terminate immediately without further obligation on the part of the Corporation or any Subsidiary Company, if the Participant Engages in Competing Employment for a specified period of time following termination of employment. The terms of such a non-compete covenant shall be as set forth in the agreement or grant providing the terms of an Award and are incorporated herein by reference. A non-compete covenant shall not apply to the settlement or payment of any Option (although it may apply to the grant or exercise of an Option). Settlement or payment of any other Award that is subject to a non-compete covenant shall occur upon the expiration of the Restriction Period, Performance Cycle, Retention Agreement, or other date upon which the Award would be settled and paid if the Participant had not terminated employment.

For purposes of the provision, “Engages in Competing Employment” shall mean to work for or provide services for any Competitor, on the Participant’s own behalf or in the service of or on behalf of others, including, but not limited to, as a consultant, independent contractor, owner, officer, partner, joint venturer, or employee, at any time during the specified period commencing on the date of his or her termination of employment (including Retirement). “Competitor” shall mean any entity in the same line of business as the Corporation in North American markets in which the Corporation competes, including, but not limited to, any North American Class I rail carrier, any other rail carrier competing with the Corporation (including without limitation a holding or other company that controls or operates or is otherwise affiliated with any rail carrier competing with the Corporation), and any other provider of transportation services competing with Corporation, including motor and water carriers.



Table of Contents

Section 15. CAPITAL ADJUSTMENTS

In the event of a recapitalization, stock split, stock dividend, exchange, combination, or reclassification of shares, merger, consolidation, reorganization, or other change in or affecting the capital structure or capital stock of the Corporation, the Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Committee, may make appropriate adjustments in the number of shares of Common Stock authorized for the Plan and in the annual limitation imposed by Section 5 of this Plan; and the Committee may make appropriate adjustments in the number of shares subject to outstanding Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Shares, Restricted Stock Units, or Performance Share Unit grants, and in the Option price of any then outstanding Options, as it deems equitable, in its absolute discretion, to prevent dilution or enlargement of the rights of Participants.

Section 16. REGULATORY APPROVALS

The exercise of each Option and Stock Appreciation Right, and the grant or distribution of Restricted Shares, Restricted Stock Units and Performance Shares, shall be subject to the condition that if at any time the Corporation shall determine in its discretion that the satisfaction of withholding tax or other tax liabilities, or the listing, registration, or qualification of any shares of Common Stock upon any securities exchange or under any Federal or state law, or the consent or approval of any regulatory body, is necessary or desirable as a condition of, or in connection with, such exercise, grant, or distribution, then in any such event such exercise, grant, or distribution shall not be effective unless such liabilities have been satisfied or such listing, registration, qualification, consent, or approval shall have been effected or obtained free of any conditions not acceptable to the Corporation.

Section 17. TERM OF THE PLAN

Awards may be granted from time to time under the terms and conditions of the Plan, but no Incentive Stock Option may be granted after the expiration of ten (10) years from the date of adoption of the Plan, as amended on May 14, 2015, by the Board of Directors; provided, that any future amendment to the Plan that is approved by the stockholders of the Corporation in the manner provided under Section 18 of this Plan shall be regarded as creating a new Plan, and an Incentive Stock Option may be granted under such new Plan until the expiration of ten (10) years from the earlier of the approval by the Board of Directors, or the approval by the stockholders of the Corporation, of such new Plan. Incentive Stock Options theretofore granted may extend beyond the expiration of that ten-year period, and the terms and conditions of the Plan shall continue to apply thereto and to shares of Common Stock acquired upon the subsequent exercise of an Incentive Stock Option or related Stock Appreciation Right.

Section 18. AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION OF THE PLAN

The Corporation may at any time and from time to time alter or amend, in whole or in part, any or all of the provisions of the Plan, or may at any time suspend or terminate the Plan, through resolution of its Board of Directors, provided that no change in any Awards theretofore granted to any Participant may be made which would impair or diminish the rights of the Participant without the Participant’s consent, and provided further, that no alteration or amendment may be made without the approval of the holders of a majority of the Common Stock then outstanding and entitled to vote if (a) such stockholder approval is necessary to comply with the requirements of any rules promulgated under Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors and Executive Officers and any persons beneficially owning more than 10 percent of a class of our stock to file reports of beneficial ownership and changes in beneficial ownership (Forms 3, 4 and 5) with the SEC. Based solely on our review of copies of Forms 3, 4 and 5 available to us, or suchwritten representations that no Forms 5 were required, we believe that all required Forms concerning 2017 beneficial ownership were filed on time by all directors and Executive Officers other Federal or state laws or regulations as may be applicable, (b)than a dividend reinvestment account closure by Mr. Lockhart what was not timely reported due to an administrative error and which was reported promptly on a Form 4 after the amendment materially increases the benefits accruing to Participants under the Plan, (c) materially increases the number of securities that may be issued under the Plan, or (d) materially modifies the requirements for participation in the Plan.

oversight was discovered.
Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 79www.norfolksouthern.com



Table of Contents

Voting and Proxies | 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

Section 19. FORFEITUREVOTING AND RECOUPMENT EVENTSPROXIES

The Committee may specify in an Award Agreement thatThis proxy statement and the Participant’s rights, payments, and benefits with respect to an Award shall be subject to reduction, forfeiture, or recoupment upon the occurrence of certain specified events, in addition to any otherwise applicable vesting or performance conditions of an Award.

Any Award to a Participant under this Plan is subject to reduction, forfeiture, or recoupmentproxy card relate to the extent provided under Section 304Board of Directors’ solicitation of your proxy for use at our Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 10, 2018. The following questions and answers provide guidance on how to vote your shares.

WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU - VOTE TODAY.

Who can vote?
Shareholders who are record owners of our common stock as of the Sarbanes-Oxleyclose of business on March 1, 2018, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the 2018 Annual Meeting.

As of the close of business on the Thursday, March 1, 2018, record date, 303,624,843 shares of our common stock were issued and outstanding. Of those shares, 283,304,066 shares were owned by shareholders entitled to one vote per share. The remaining 20,320,777 shares were held by our wholly owned subsidiaries, which are not entitled to vote those shares under Virginia law.

What will I be voting on?
Shareholders will be voting (i) to elect directors of Norfolk Southern (Item 1); (ii) to ratify the appointment of KPMG as our independent auditors (Item 2); (iii) on an advisory basis, on executive compensation as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and other related tables and disclosures in this proxy statement (Item 3); and (iv) if properly presented at the meeting, a shareholder proposal regarding right to act by written consent (Item 4). Item 3 is being provided as required by Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 2002, Section 9541934.

Our Board of Directors is recommending that shareholders voteFORItems 1, 2, and 3, andAGAINSTon Item 4.

How will these matters be decided at the Annual Meeting?
Voting ItemVoting StandardTreatment of Abstentions and Broker
Non-Votes
Board
Recommendation
1.Election of directorsMajority of votes castNot counted as votes cast and therefore no effect.FOR EACH NOMINEE
2.Ratification of Independent AuditorsMajority of votes castAbstentions are not counted as votes cast andtherefore no effect.
Brokers have discretionary authority to vote without direction from the beneficial owner. If cast, the votes count.
FOR
3.Approval of advisory resolution on executive compensationMajority of votes castNot counted as votes cast and therefore no effect.FOR
4.Shareholder proposal regarding right to act by written consentMajority of votes castNot counted as votes cast and therefore no effect.AGAINST

If you sign and return the proxy card without specifying your vote on a particular voting item, your shares will be voted in accordance with the Board Recommendation unless you revoke your proxy before the shares are voted.

We have a majority voting standard for election of directors.Each director nominee who receives a majority of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reformvotes cast will be elected. Any current director who does not meet this standard must, pursuant to our Bylaws, promptly tender resignation to the Board of Directors for consideration by our Governance and Consumer Protection Act,Nominating Committee.

How many shares are needed at the Annual Meeting to constitute a quorum?
The presence, either in person or as may be provided under any other applicable law.

Section 20. MISCELLANEOUS

(a) Fractional Shares - The Corporation shall not be required to issue or deliver any fractional shareby proxy, of Common Stock upon the exercise of an Option or Stock Appreciation Right, the award of Performance Shares, the paymentholders of a dividend equivalent in Common Stock pursuant to Section 13majority of the Plan or the withholding ofoutstanding shares of Common Stock for payment of taxes requiredour common stock entitled to be withheld, but may pay, in lieu thereof, an amount in cash equal tovote at the Fair Market Value of such fractional share.

(b) Withholding - The Corporation and its Subsidiary Companies shall have the right, to the extent permitted by law, to deduct from any payment of any kind otherwise due to a Participant any Federal, state or local taxes of any kind required by law to be withheld with respect to Awards under the Plan, and to the extent any such withholding requirements are not satisfied, each Participant shall pay to the Corporation any Federal, state or local taxes of any kind required by law to be withheld with respect to Awards under the Plan. The Corporation shall have the right to withhold shares of Common Stock, including fractional shares, from payment as2018 Annual Meeting is necessary to satisfy any withholding obligations, but may only withholdconstitute a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum.

Who is soliciting my proxy?
The Board of Directors is soliciting your proxy to vote your shares at the minimum number2018 Annual Meeting. If you give the Board of Directors your proxy, your shares necessary to do so. If fractional shares are withheld, any remaining fractional shares shallwill be paidvoted in cash to the Participant as provided under paragraph (a) of this Section 20. The Participant or Beneficiary shall remain responsible at all times for paying any Federal, state or local taxes of any kind with respect to Awards under the Plan. In no event shall the Corporation or the Committee be liable for any interest or penalty that a Participant or Beneficiary incurs by failing to make timely payments of tax.

(c) Acceleration of Payments to Avoid Conflicts of Interest - To the extent permitted by Code Section 409A and not prohibited by Section 6(a) of the Plan, the Committee may, in its sole discretion andaccordance with the consent of a Participant or Beneficiary, accelerateselections you indicate on the time or schedule of a payment under the Plan, or make a substitute cash payment upon cancellation of a Participant’s Award, in either case to the extent reasonably necessary for a Participant or Beneficiary to avoid the violation of an applicable Federal, state, local or foreign ethics law or conflicts of interest law (including where such payment is reasonably necessary to permit the Participant or Beneficiary to participate in activities in the normal course of his or her position in which the Participant or Beneficiary would otherwise not be able to participate under an applicable rule). The Corporation’s chief executive officer may exercise the authority granted to the Committee in this paragraph with respect to any Participant or Beneficiary who is neither a current or former director of the Corporation nor a current Executive Officer of the Corporation.proxy card.

(d) Stockholder Rights - No person shall have any rights of a stockholder by virtue of an Option, Stock Appreciation Right, or Performance Share Unit except with respect to shares of Common Stock actually issued to him, and the issuance of shares of Common Stock shall confer no retroactive right to dividends. A Participant’s right to receive Dividend Equivalents shall not, by itself, confer upon the Participant the rights or privileges of a stockholder.

(e) No Contract of Employment - This Plan shall not be deemed to be an employment contract between the Corporation or any Subsidiary Company and any Participant or other employee. Nothing contained herein, or in any agreement, certificate or other document evidencing, providing for, or setting forth the terms and conditions applicable to any Awards shall be deemed to confer upon any Participant or other employee a

Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 80www.norfolksouthern.com



Table of Contents

Voting and Proxies | 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

rightWho is paying for this solicitation?
Norfolk Southern pays the cost of preparing proxy materials and soliciting proxies, including the reimbursement, upon request, of trustees, brokerage firms, banks and other nominee record holders for the reasonable expenses they incur to continueforward proxy materials to beneficial owners. Our officers and other employees may solicit proxies by telephone, facsimile, electronic mail or personal interview; they receive no additional compensation for doing so. We have retained Innisfree M&A Incorporated to assist in the employmentsolicitation of the Corporation or any Subsidiary Company, or to interfere with the rightproxies at an anticipated cost of the Corporation or any Subsidiary Company to terminate the employment of such Participant or employee at any time.$17,500, plus reasonable out-of-pocket expenses.

(f) Unfunded Plan - ExceptWhat is the difference between holding shares as may otherwise be provideda “shareholder of record” and as a “beneficial owner”?
If your shares are registered directly in the Plan, the Plan shall be unfunded. Neither the Corporation nor any Subsidiaryyour name with our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, shall be required to segregate any assets that may be represented by Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Performance Share Units, or Restricted Stock Units, and neither the Corporation nor any Subsidiary Company shall be deemed to beyou are considered a trustee“shareholder of any amounts to be paid under an Option, Stock Appreciation Right, Performance Share Unit, or Restricted Stock Unit. Any liability of the Corporation to pay any Participant or Beneficiaryrecord” with respect to those shares. If your shares are held in a brokerage account or bank, broker or other nominee, you are considered the “beneficial owner” of such shares.

How do I vote if I am a shareholder of record?
If you are the record owner of any shares of our common stock (the shares are registered in your name) and received your materials by mail, you may vote your shares by completing, signing, and dating the proxy card and mailing it to: Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717.

You also may vote by telephone or the Internet in the manner described on the proxy card or the Notice of Internet Availability.

You may also vote in person by ballot by attending the Annual Meeting. To be admitted to the Annual Meeting, you must bring an Option,admission ticket and a valid, government-issued photo identification. Please see "How do I gain admission to the Annual Meeting?" for more information.

How do I vote if I am a beneficial owner of the shares?
If you are the beneficial owner of any shares (the shares are held in street name by a broker, bank or other nominee), which is therefore the record holder of your shares), you may submit your voting instructions to the record holder using the voting instruction card if you requested these materials by mail or in the manner described on the Notice of Internet Availability. The record holder will then vote your shares in accordance with your voting instructions. You can only vote in person at the Annual Meeting if you bring an admission ticket and a valid, government-issued photo identification and a legal proxy from the record holder (the broker, bank or other nominee that holds your shares) assigning its voting authority to you.

Shares held in street name by a broker may be voted on certain matters even if the beneficial owner does not provide the broker with voting instructions; brokers have the authority under New York Stock Appreciation Right, Performance Share Unit,Exchange Listing Standards to vote shares for which their customers - the beneficial owners - do not provide voting instructions on certain “routine” matters. The ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm (Item 2) is considered a routine matter for which brokers may vote shares they hold in street name, even in the absence of voting instructions from the beneficial owner. The election of directors (Item 1), approval of advisory resolution on executive compensation (Item 3), and the shareholder proposal regarding the right to act by written consent (Item 4) are not considered routine matters, and a broker cannot vote shares it holds in street name on these items if it has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares with respect to these items.

How do I vote if I own common stock through an employee plan?
If shares are credited to your account in the Norfolk Southern Corporation Thoroughbred Retirement Investment Plan or Restricted Stock Unit shall be based solely upon any contractual obligations createdthe Thrift and Investment Plan, you will receive a voting instruction form from the trustee of that plan. Your instructions submitted by mail, over the telephone, or by Internet serve as voting instructions for the trustee of the plans, Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company. If your instructions are not received by the trustee by 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time on May 7, 2018, the trustee will vote your shares for each item on the proxy card in the same proportion as the shares that are voted for that item pursuant to the provisions ofvoting instructions received by the Plan; no such obligation shall be deemed to be secured by any pledge or encumbrance on any property oftrustee from the Corporation or a Subsidiary Company.

(g) Applicable Law - The Plan, its validity, interpretation, and administration, and the rights and obligations of all persons having an interest therein, shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, except to the extent that such laws may be preempted by Federal law.

(h) Gender and Number - Wherever usedother participants in the Plan, wordsrespective plan. While employee plan participants may instruct the trustee how to vote their plan shares, employee plan participants can not vote their plan shares in person at the masculine form shall be deemed to refer to females as well as to males, and words in the singular or plural shall be deemed to refer also to the plural or singular, respectively, as the context may require.Annual Meeting.

(i) Code Section 409A - The Plan is intended, and shall be construed, to comply with the requirements of Code Section 409A. The Corporation does not warrant that the Plan will comply with Code Section 409A with respect to any Participant or with respect to any payment, however. In no event shall the Corporation or the Committee be liable for any additional tax, interest, or penalty incurred by a Participant or Beneficiary as a result of the Plan’s failure to satisfy the requirements of Code Section 409A, or as a result of the Plan’s failure to satisfy any other applicable requirements for the deferral of tax.

Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 81www.norfolksouthern.com



Table of Contents

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF

NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION

May 14, 2015

GO GREEN
e-Consent makes it easy to go paperless. With e-Consent, you can quickly access your proxymaterial, statementsVoting and other eligible documents online, while reducing costs, clutterProxies | 2018 Annual Meeting and paper waste. Enroll today via www.amstock.com to enjoy online access.
Proxy Statement

NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIAL:What if I change my mind after I vote?
Any shareholder of record may revoke a previously submitted proxy at any time before the shares are voted by: (a) giving written notice of revocation to our Corporate Secretary; (b) submitting new voting instructions over the telephone or the Internet; (c) delivering a new, validly completed, later-dated proxy card; or (d) attending the 2018 Annual Meeting and voting in person. For shares you hold beneficially in street name, you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee, or, if you have obtained a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee giving you the right to vote your shares, by attending the 2018 Annual Meeting and voting in person. Employee plan participants may change their voting instructions by submitting new voting instructions to Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company prior to 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time on May 7, 2018.

TheHow do I gain admission to the Annual Meeting?
Only shareholders or their legal proxies may attend the Annual Meeting. All shareholders will need an admission ticket and a valid, government-issued photo identification to gain admission. To obtain a ticket, shareholders must access Shareholder Meeting Registration at www.proxyvote.com and following the instructions provided. If you are unable to print your ticket, please call Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. at 800-690-6903 for assistance.

For security purposes, packages, briefcases, and large pocketbooks or bags are not permitted to be brought into the Annual Meeting. Also, use of cellular and digital phones, audio tape recorders, video and still cameras, pagers, laptops, and other portable electronic devices is prohibited in the Annual Meeting.

What if my disability may make it difficult for me to attend?
We are happy to provide reasonable assistance to help you access the meeting space where the Annual Meeting is being held. Please call or write our Corporate Secretary at least two weeks before the meeting to discuss what can be done to assist you.

What is householding?
As permitted by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we may deliver a single copy of the Annual Report and proxy statement, or the Notice of Meeting,Internet Availability, to multiple record shareholders sharing an address. This is known as householding. Upon request, we will promptly deliver a separate copy of the Annual Report or proxy statement to a shareholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the document was delivered. If you would like a separate copy of this proxy card andstatement or the 2017 Annual Report to Stockholders
are available at http://www.astproxyportal.com/ast/17278/


Please sign, date and mail
your proxy cardnow or in the future, or if you are receiving multiple copies and would like to receive only one copy for your household, you may contact: Denise W. Hutson, Corporate Secretary, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Three Commercial Place, 13th Floor, Norfolk, Virginia 23510-9219 (telephone 757-823-5567).

Are votes confidential? Who counts the votes?
envelope provided as soon
We have policies in place to safeguard the confidentiality of proxies and ballots. American Election Services, LLC, Rockville, Maryland, which we have retained to tabulate all proxies and ballots cast at the 2018 Annual Meeting, is bound contractually to maintain the confidentiality of the voting process. In addition, each Inspector of Election will have taken the oath required by Virginia law to execute duties faithfully and impartially.

None of our employees or members of our Board of Directors have access to completed proxies or ballots and, therefore, do not know how individual shareholders vote on any matter. However, when a shareholder writes a question or comment on a proxy or ballot, or when there is a need to determine the validity of a proxy or ballot, our management and/or their representatives may be involved in providing the answer to the question or in determining such validity.

Who can I call with questions?
as possible.
You may contact:

Denise W. Hutson, Corporate Secretary
Please detach along perforated line and mail in the envelope provided.
Norfolk Southern Corporation
Three Commercial Place, 13th Floor
Norfolk, Virginia 23510-9219
Telephone 757-823-5567
Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 82www.norfolksouthern.com 
 

Table of Contents

Voting and Proxies | 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Information included within this Proxy Statement includes non-GAAP financial measures, as defined by SEC Regulation G. On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) was signed into law. For 2017, our financial statements reflect the impact of the Tax Act and are presented in accordance with GAAP. However, for purposes of period-over-period comparability, these financial results are adjusted to exclude the impact of the Tax Act, and are considered to be non-GAAP financial measures. Specifically, the adjustments remove the effects of remeasurements of net deferred tax liabilities related to the reduction of the federal corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent.

While the Corporation believes that these non-GAAP financial measures are useful in evaluating the Corporation’s business, this information should be considered as supplemental in nature and is not meant to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the related financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP. In addition, these non-GAAP financial measures may not be the same as similar measures presented by other companies.

    Year-Ended Dec. 31, 2017
($ in millions except per
share amounts)
Income from railway operations                       $3,586
     Effect of tax reform($151)
Adjusted income from railway operations$3,435
Operating ratio (%)66.0%
    Effect of tax reform (%)1.4%
Adjusted operating ratio (%)67.4%
Net income$5,404
    Effect of tax reform($3,482)
Adjusted net income$1,922
Diluted earnings per share$18.61
    Effect of tax reform($12.00)
Adjusted diluted earnings per share$6.61
Norfolk Southern CorporationPage 83www.norfolksouthern.com

Table of Contents


NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
ATTN: ELIZABETH C. PARKER
THREE COMMERCIAL PLACE
NORFOLK, VA 23510-2191

VOTE BY INTERNET -www.proxyvote.com
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on Wednesday, May 9, 2018. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic proxy card. Then follow the instructions.
VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on Wednesday, May 9, 2018. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
VOTE BY MAIL
Complete, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
SHAREHOLDER MEETING REGISTRATION
To attend the meeting in person, go to the “Register for Meeting” link atwww.proxyvote.com.
ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.




THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS ATO VOTE, “FOR” THE FOLLOWING ITEMS,
AND THIS PROXY CARD WILL BE VOTED ACCORDINGLY IF NO CHOICE IS SPECIFIED.
PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTEBLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK
AS SHOWN HEREFOLLOWS:
E37216-P01630    KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
1.NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATIONELECTION OF THIRTEEN DIRECTORS.
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR items 1-3:
1.     

FOR

Elections of Directors
Nominees:     

AGAINST

For
     

ABSTAIN

Against
Abstain
1.11a.     Thomas D. Bell, Jr.
1.2Erskine B. Bowles
 
1.3Robert A. Bradway
1.41b.Wesley G. Bush
 
1.51c.Daniel A. Carp
 
1.6Karen N. Horn1d.Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr.
 
1.71e.Marcela E. Donadio
1f.Steven F. Leer
 
1.81g.Michael D. Lockhart
 
1.91h.Amy E. Miles
 
1i.Martin H. Nesbitt
 
For address changes and/or comments, please mark this box and write them on the back where indicated.
 
  
 
       
  

To change the address on your account, please check the box at right and indicate your new address in the address space above. Please note that changes to the registered name(s) on the account may not be submitted via this method.

 
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR items 1-3:
     

FOR

For
     

AGAINST

Against
     

ABSTAIN

Abstain
1.10 Charles W. Moorman, IV1j.Jennifer F. Scanlon
 
1.11 Martin H. Nesbitt
1.12 1k.James A. Squires
 
1.13 1l.John R. Thompson
 
2.The ratificationRatification of the appointment of KPMG LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, as Norfolk Southern’sSouthern's independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2015.2018.
3.Approval of advisory resolution on executive compensation, as disclosed in the proxy statement for the 20152018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.Shareholders.
The Board of Directors recommends you vote AGAINST item 4:
4.Approval ofIf properly presented at the amended Executive Management Incentive Plan as disclosed in the proxy statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
5.Approval of the amended Long-Term Incentive Plan as disclosed in the proxy statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

In addition, in their discretion, the Proxies are authorizedmeeting, a shareholder proposal regarding right to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting.


Signature of Stockholder

Date:

Signature of Stockholder

Date:

Note:  

Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this Proxy. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate nameact by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.




Table of Contentswritten consent.

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF

NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION

May 14, 2015

PROXY VOTING INSTRUCTIONS

INTERNET-Access “www.voteproxy.com” and follow the on-screen instructions or scan the QR code with your smartphone. Have your proxy card available when you access the web page.

TELEPHONE-Call toll-free1-800-PROXIES(1-800-776-9437) in the United States or1-718-921-8500from foreign countries from any touch-tone telephone and follow the instructions. Have your proxy card available when you call.

Vote online/phone until 11:59 PM EDT May 13, 2015 the day before the meeting.

MAIL-Sign, date and mail your proxy card in the envelope provided as soon as possible.

IN-PERSON-You may vote your shares in person by attending the Annual Meeting. To be admitted, you must bring photo identification and - if you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name - proof of stock ownership.

GO GREEN-e-Consent makes it easy to go paperless. With e-Consent, you can quickly access your proxy material, statements and other eligible documents online, while reducing costs, clutter and paper waste. Enroll today via www.amstock.com to enjoy online access.


COMPANY NUMBER

ACCOUNT NUMBER



NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIAL:
The Notice of Meeting, proxy statement, proxy card and Annual Report to Stockholders
are available at http://www.astproxyportal.com/ast/17278/

Please detach along perforated line and mail in the envelope providedIF you are not voting via telephone or the Internet.


THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE FOLLOWING ITEMS,
AND THIS PROXY CARD WILL BE VOTED ACCORDINGLY IF NO CHOICE IS SPECIFIED.
PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK
AS SHOWN HERE
1.ELECTION OF THIRTEEN DIRECTORS.

FOR

AGAINST

ABSTAIN

1.1Thomas D. Bell, Jr.
 
1.2Erskine B. Bowles
1.3Robert A. Bradway
1.4Wesley G. Bush
1.5Daniel A. Carp
1.6Karen N. Horn
1.7Steven F. Leer
1.8Michael D. Lockhart
1.9Amy E. Miles

To change the address on your account, please check the box at right and indicate your new address in the address space above. Please note that changes to the registered name(s) on the account may not be submitted via this method.

FOR

AGAINST

ABSTAIN

1.10 Charles W. Moorman, IV
1.11 Martin H. Nesbitt
1.12 James A. Squires
1.13 John R. Thompson
2.The ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, as Norfolk Southern’s independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2015.
3.Approval of executive compensation as disclosed in the proxy statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
4.Approval of the amended Executive Management Incentive Plan as disclosed in the proxy statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
5.Approval of the amended Long-Term Incentive Plan as disclosed in the proxy statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

NOTE:In addition, in their discretion, the Proxiesproxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting.


Signature of Stockholder

Date:

Signature of Stockholder

Date:

     Note:  

Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this Proxy. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign.name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian,other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If the signer is a corporation please sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is aor partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized person.

officer.
 

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]  DateSignature (Joint Owners)                        Date



Table of Contents







Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:
The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.









E37217-P01630

PROXY

NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION

THREE COMMERCIAL PLACE, NORFOLK, VIRGINIA 23510


PROXY FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERSSHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD MAY 14, 201510, 2018
SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The undersigned hereby appoints and authorizes James A. Hixon,John M. Scheib, Denise W. Hutson and Virginia K. Fogg, and each or any of them, proxy for the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to represent and vote all shares of Norfolk Southern Corporation common stock held by the undersigned with the same force and effect as the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders of Norfolk Southern Corporation to be held at the Conference Center, Williamsburg Lodge, South EnglandHilton Norfolk The Main, 100 East Main Street, Williamsburg,Norfolk, Virginia, on Thursday, May 14, 2015,10, 2018, at 8:30 A.M., Eastern Daylight Time, and at any adjournments, postponements or rescheduling thereof, upon the matters more fully set forth in the Proxy Statement,proxy statement dated March 25, 2015,21, 2018, and to transact such other business as properly may come before such meeting(s).

The undersigned acknowledges receipt of the Notice and Proxy Statement dated in each case March 25, 2015.21, 2018. All other proxies heretofore given by the undersigned to vote shares of Norfolk Southern Corporation common stock are expressly revoked hereby.

THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED ON THE OTHER SIDE BY THE UNDERSIGNED STOCKHOLDER.SHAREHOLDER.IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE,THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTEDFOR "FOR" THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS, RATIFICATION OF KPMG AS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS, AND APPROVAL OF THE ADVISORY RESOLUTION ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION, AND "AGAINST" THE AMENDED EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN AND AMENDED LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN.SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING RIGHT TO ACT BY WRITTEN CONSENT. THIS PROXY ALSO DELEGATES DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY TO VOTE WITH RESPECT TO ANY OTHER BUSINESS WHICHTHAT MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENT OR POSTPONEMENT THEREOF.

Address Changes/Comments:  
(If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)

(Continued and to be signed on the reverse side.)